Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 5 jurisdictions
€204,275Total of monetary amounts (4 cases with an amount)
€43,455Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20243€104,275
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20261€100,000
Q2 20261—
Q3 20260—

5 cases

19 Feb 2026 AZOP: 100,000 EUR against estate agent over ID copies and old files CroatiaData subject rights and transparency €100,000

An estate agency (name not published) kept 11,887 brokerage contracts from 2010 to 2019, together with 914 copies of identity cards, passports and bank cards, without a legal basis, although the managing director stated that no card copies were collected. The Croatian data protection authority (Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka, AZOP) also criticised irregular and inadequate data protection training for employees and imposed 100,000 EUR (date of publication; exact date of the decision not stated).

What organisations can take from it

Make copies of identity documents and cards only with a legal basis, destroy old files on time and train employees regularly.

Relevance to training and awareness

Data minimisation for ID copies, retention periods

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c und e, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 4 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
No damage to data subjects was found.
Published
19 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jun 2026 Deutsche Wohnen SELG Berlin I confirms GDPR infringement by Deutsche Wohnen through tenant archive without deletion function GermanyData breaches and data security Fine

In 2019, the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BlnBDI) had imposed 14.5 million EUR on the housing group because tenant data such as salary statements, bank statements and social security data were held in an archive system with no means of deletion. Following the 2023 CJEU judgment on direct corporate liability, the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin I) confirmed on 9 June 2026 infringements of data minimisation and storage limitation; the press release does not state the amount of the fine set by the court.

What organisations can take from it

Ensure that archive and filing systems can technically implement deletion periods from the outset – ‘privacy by design’ is subject to fines.

Authority / court
Landgericht Berlin I (Bußgeldbehörde: Berliner Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5, Art. 25 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
According to the CJEU (C-807/21), a breach of duty by a person in a management position need not be proven for the corporate fine.
Published
10 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2024 Danske Shoppingcentre P/SDanske Shoppingcentre: 350,000 DKK for camera above urinal in City2 shopping centre DenmarkVideo surveillance €46,909

Because of vandalism, the operator of the City2 shopping centre had installed cameras in toilet areas; one camera in the men’s toilets also captured the area in front of the urinal despite a black masking, and there were no signs. The court followed the Danish Data Protection Agency (Datatilsynet) and the public prosecutor and imposed 350,000 DKK for breach of the data minimisation principle.

What organisations can take from it

Cameras have virtually no place in toilet and changing areas – masking parts of the image is no substitute for checking the location.

Authority / court
Retten i Glostrup (auf Anzeige der Datatilsynet)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c; databeskyttelsesloven § 41; tv-overvågningsloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate

Original amount 350,000 DKK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2024 CNIL: 40,000 EUR against estate agency over constant video surveillance of staff FranceVideo surveillance €40,000

An estate agency (name redacted in the publication) continuously filmed workstations and break areas with image and sound, accessible via a smartphone app, and used the software Time Doctor to record keyboard and mouse activity as well as screenshots of the computers; several people accessed this data via the administrator account of one of them. The French data protection authority (CNIL) found infringements of data minimisation, legal basis, information, security and the obligation to carry out an impact assessment, and imposed 40,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Permanent video and audio recording of workplaces is practically never proportionate – not even in a small business.

Relevance to training and awareness

Permissible employee monitoring and password security

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c, Art. 6, 12, 13, 32, 35 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Dec 2024 Granit Bostad Beritsholm ABGranit Bostad Beritsholm: 200,000 SEK for round-the-clock video surveillance in a block of flats SwedenVideo surveillance €17,366

The landlord monitored a multi-family building in Malmö around the clock with cameras at entrances, lifts, flat doors, in the stairwell, the basement and the refuse room, without any legal basis for doing so; the signs did not name the controller. The Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection (IMY) imposed 200,000 SEK and ordered the landlord to stop the surveillance except in the garage and to supplement the signs.

What organisations can take from it

Video surveillance in residential buildings requires a balancing of interests for each individual area – problems such as vandalism do not justify blanket, permanent surveillance.

Authority / court
Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Published
12 Dec 2024

Original amount 200,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial