Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

39cases from 16 jurisdictions
€171mTotal of monetary amounts (32 cases with an amount)
€233,327Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. EU €126m 74 % · 24 cases
  2. USA €43.6m 25 % · 5 cases
  3. United Kingdom €1.07m 1 % · 6 cases
  4. Canada €338,889 0 % · 2 cases
  5. Switzerland €35,028 0 % · 2 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €85.6m 50 % · 13 cases
  2. Consumer protection and online retail €43m 25 % · 1 case
  3. Bribery and corruption €39.7m 23 % · 2 cases
  4. Health and safety and employment law €1.49m 1 % · 10 cases
  5. Capital markets and financial supervision €729,017 0 % · 2 cases
  6. Environment and sustainability €234,153 0 % · 1 case
  7. Data protection €204,275 0 % · 5 cases
  8. Money laundering and terrorist financing €66,707 0 % · 2 cases
  9. Information security and cyber €1,135 0 % · 1 case
  10. Supply chain and human rights — 0 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. AS Asphaltstraßensanierung GmbH, BITUNOVA GmbH, Kutter Spezialstraßenbau GmbH & Co. KG, Possehl Construction GmbH (inkl. VSI), Liesen…alles für den Bau GmbH, OAT GmbH/Otto Alte-Teigeler GmbH €60.3m 35 % · 1 case
  2. Invitation Homes Inc. €43m 25 % · 1 case
  3. Colas Rail Asia Sdn Bhd (Colas-Gruppe) €29.7m 17 % · 1 case
  4. AS Asphaltstraßensanierung, BITUNOVA, Mainka u. a. (Straßenerhaltungskartell, 7 Unternehmen) €10.5m 6 % · 1 case
  5. Strukton Civiel Projecten B.V. und Strukton International B.V. (Strukton-Gruppe) €10m 6 % · 1 case
  6. ATE, s. r. o.; AŽD Praha s.r.o.; EPLcond a.s.; MONZAS, a.s.; První SaZ Plzeň a.s.; STARMON s.r.o. €6.39m 4 % · 1 case
  7. BeMo Tunnelling, Echterhoff-Holland, Eiffage Infra-West, Fenne, Gehrken, IH Inpako, IHT, Karger, Korte, Mainka Bau, Möllmann, Rostek & Pesch, T&M Baugesellschaft, AKM Verwaltungsgesellschaft €4.8m 3 % · 1 case
  8. Strabag AG (Köln); Kemna Bau Andreae GmbH & Co. KG als Kronzeuge ohne Bußgeld €2.79m 2 % · 1 case
  9. SIA "SILTUMTEHSERVISS", SIA "Apkure IM", SIA "ADAPTERIS", SIA "Alpex", SIA "Infrakom" €513,508 0 % · 1 case
  10. Richard Adam und Zafar Khan (ehem. Finanzvorstände der Carillion plc, in Liquidation) €429,017 0 % · 1 case
  11. 19 more€1.75m

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20234€5.07m
Q1 20241€59,000
Q2 20241—
Q3 20241€43m
Q4 20246€3.23m
Q1 20251€800
Q2 20252€10.5m
Q3 20255€7.24m
Q4 20252€135,907
Q1 20267€40.5m
Q2 20262€1,135
Q3 20267€61.3m

39 cases

24 Sep 2026 M&J GroupCMA: fines against construction firm and two employees for concealing evidence during an inspection United KingdomCartels and collusion €58,149

During an inspection as part of an investigation into bid rigging, the Estimating Director Barry Pirrie instructed the Office Manager Tracey Woods to remove a work mobile phone and documents from the premises, and denied having a work mobile phone. The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) imposed fines of 25,000 GBP on M&J, 20,000 GBP on Pirrie and 5,000 GBP on Woods.

What organisations can take from it

Dawn raid training is mandatory: anyone who removes mobile phones or documents during an inspection is personally liable – even when acting on a superior's instructions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Correct conduct during inspections (dawn raids), no removal of evidence

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Section 40A(1) Competition Act 1998
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Personal fines against Barry Pirrie (20,000 GBP) and Tracey Woods (5,000 GBP)
Published
24 Sep 2026

Original amount 50,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Sep 2026 Hillbeck Homes (Sowerby Bridge) LtdDeveloper pays £300,000 after agency worker falls through unprotected stairwell opening United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €349,895

A 24-year-old labourer working as a temporary worker for a scaffolding company fell, in his second week of work on the developer's housing site, through a stairwell opening that was neither securely covered nor guarded, dropping one storey onto concrete and suffering serious spinal injuries. The court found the company guilty on three counts because it had neither adequately planned nor supervised work at height and had not taken suitable measures to prevent falls. Fine of £300,000 plus costs.

What organisations can take from it

Floor openings on construction sites must be covered with load-bearing covers or guarded at all times – new and temporary workers in particular do not know where the hazards are.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fall protection at openings; induction of new workers

Authority / court
Leeds Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Work at Height Regulations 2005
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Published
21 Sep 2026

Original amount 300,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2026 BDW Trading (Barratt Redrow)Barratt Redrow subsidiary BDW pays 201,500 GBP to environmental projects after silt entered brooks United KingdomEmissions and permits €234,153

At the Ladden Garden Village construction site in Yate, a subcontractor washed silt from the site drainage into two brooks over six days in July 2022. The Environment Agency accepted an Enforcement Undertaking: BDW is paying 201,500 GBP to three environmental and charitable projects, bears the investigation costs and had already invested over 180,000 GBP in remediation, training and improved surface water management.

What organisations can take from it

Developers are liable for environmental damage caused by their subcontractors; clear procedures and training on handling surface water prevent costly proceedings.

Relevance to training and awareness

Protecting watercourses on construction sites and managing subcontractors

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Environment Agency
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Environmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010 (Enforcement Undertaking)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
Acceptance of responsibility, remediation, training of employees and application for a discharge permit.
Published
3 Sep 2026

Original amount 201,500 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Aug 2026 Sioux Erosion Control Inc.DOJ: jury convicts erosion control firm of price fixing in Oklahoma road construction USACartels and collusion —

A jury found Sioux Erosion Control, co-owner BG Dale Biscoe and employee Randall David Shelton guilty of having fixed prices for erosion control services, allocated contracts regionally and rigged bids on publicly funded road construction projects in Oklahoma (more than 100 million USD) from 2017 to 2023. Sentencing was still pending.

What organisations can take from it

Subcontractors in public road construction are also targeted by prosecutors – up to and including jury convictions of individual employees.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price-fixing and territorial agreements for subcontracted services in road construction

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Section 1 Sherman Act
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
Guilty verdict against co-owner BG Dale Biscoe and employee Randall David Shelton
Published
20 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Aug 2026 „О-Рент“ ЕООД (sowie „Инжконсулт“ ЕООД und „Земекоп“ ЕООД)Construction machinery cartel: fine for O-Rent, compliance programme for all participants BulgariaCartels and collusion €2,403

The Комисия за защита на конкуренцията (Bulgarian Commission for the Protection of Competition, KZK) found a cartel in public tenders for mining and construction machinery (price fixing and market sharing, Art. 15 ZZK – Bulgarian Protection of Competition Act, Art. 101 TFEU). Inzhkonsult and Zemekop, as a single undertaking, were exempted from the fine; O-Rent received a sanction of 2,403.07 EUR. All three companies must introduce a competition law compliance programme within 60 days and report on it.

What organisations can take from it

The authority now expressly requires compliance programmes – anyone bidding in tenders should have one before it is ordered.

Relevance to training and awareness

Competition law in tenders; compliance programme

Authority / court
Комисия за защита на конкуренцията (КЗК, Bulgarische Wettbewerbskommission)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 15 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2 ZZK; Art. 101 Abs. 1 lit. a und c AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
Immunity from fines for two participants (leniency programme)
Published
20 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Aug 2026 AS Asphaltstraßensanierung GmbH, BITUNOVA GmbH, Kutter Spezialstraßenbau GmbH & Co. KG, Possehl Construction GmbH (inkl. VSI), Liesen…alles für den Bau GmbH, OAT GmbH/Otto Alte-Teigeler GmbHBundeskartellamt: 60.3 million EUR against DSK road repair cartel GermanyCartels and collusion €60.3m

From around 2010 to September 2019, six suppliers of thin cold-laid asphalt surface layers (Dünne Asphaltdeckschichten in Kaltbauweise, DSK) allocated customers – primarily public contracting authorities – and contracts among themselves nationwide and coordinated prices. Germany's Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) imposed fines of around 60.3 million EUR; all proceedings ended in settlements.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone who "shares out" public contracts regionally risks fines running into millions – calculations and bids must always be prepared independently.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer allocation and bid rigging in public contracts

Authority / court
Bundeskartellamt
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
§ 1 GWB, Art. 101 AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
Leniency bonus for Possehl/VSI, Bitunova, Kutter and AS; settlement
Published
6 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jul 2026 Orchids Builders LLCFlorida roofer: $349,754 for repeatedly missing fall protection USAWorkplace safety and accidents €307,017

On 21.01. and 10 March 2026, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found at two residential construction sites in Rockledge that employees of the roofing contractor were working on roofs without fall protection; training records, eye protection when using nail guns and ladders extending sufficiently above the roof edge were also missing. The company had been inspected seven times since 2023, each time with fall protection violations. Proposed: $349,754 (2 wilful, 4 repeat violations).

What organisations can take from it

Companies that allow the same fall hazards to recur after earlier inspections risk classification as a repeat or wilful violation with substantially higher penalties.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fall protection during roofing work

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
29 CFR 1926 Subpart M (Fall Protection), Subpart X (Ladders)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
yes
Published
23 Jul 2026

Original amount 349,754 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jun 2026 Deutsche Wohnen SELG Berlin I confirms GDPR infringement by Deutsche Wohnen through tenant archive without deletion function GermanyData breaches and data security Fine

In 2019, the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BlnBDI) had imposed 14.5 million EUR on the housing group because tenant data such as salary statements, bank statements and social security data were held in an archive system with no means of deletion. Following the 2023 CJEU judgment on direct corporate liability, the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin I) confirmed on 9 June 2026 infringements of data minimisation and storage limitation; the press release does not state the amount of the fine set by the court.

What organisations can take from it

Ensure that archive and filing systems can technically implement deletion periods from the outset – ‘privacy by design’ is subject to fines.

Authority / court
Landgericht Berlin I (Bußgeldbehörde: Berliner Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5, Art. 25 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
According to the CJEU (C-807/21), a breach of duty by a person in a management position need not be proven for the corporate fine.
Published
10 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Apr 2026 Wspólnota Mieszkaniowa K. (Wohnungseigentümergemeinschaft, im Bescheid pseudonymisiert)Homeowners’ association: 4,852 PLN – misdirected statement not notified PolandIncident reporting obligations €1,135

Acting as processor, the property management company sent an owner’s statement of service charges to an unauthorised person. The association considered notification unnecessary because only ‘ordinary’ data of one member were affected, and maintained this position in the proceedings; the UODO (Poland’s data protection authority) imposed 4,852 PLN.

What organisations can take from it

Small controllers must also assess and notify data breaches by their service providers – ‘only one data subject’ is no ground for exemption.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising misdirected mail as a data breach – including at service providers

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Incident reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 33 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate

Original amount 4,852 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2026 Colas Rail Asia Sdn Bhd (Colas-Gruppe)Colas Rail Asia: CJIP of 29.7 million EUR over bribery in metro contracts in Malaysia FranceBribery of public officials €29.7m

The Malaysian subsidiary of Colas Rail paid large, undocumented sums via intermediaries in connection with public contracts for urban rail lines in Kuala Lumpur (Kelana Jaya extension, MRT2). Following an internal investigation, Colas Rail self-reported the matter in 2017; the CJIP (Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, a French deferred prosecution agreement) provides for a public interest fine of 29,745,974 EUR and a three-year compliance programme monitored by the French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) (costs of up to 1.9 million EUR).

What organisations can take from it

Undocumented payments to intermediaries on foreign projects must be stopped early by the finance and compliance functions – self-reporting after an internal investigation is rewarded.

Relevance to training and awareness

Intermediaries and consultants in public tenders

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report (criminal complaint filed by Colas Rail on 31 May 2017) following an internal forensic investigation.
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
19 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Feb 2026 15 construction workers not registered: criminal fine and administrative fine for managing director GermanyMinimum wage and undeclared work €16,316

A Romanian construction firm, acting as a subcontractor for a Düsseldorf client, deployed 15 workers on a construction site in the district of Emmendingen without registering them for social insurance; the loss amounted to around 85,000 EUR. The managing director received a final penalty order (Strafbefehl) of 15,000 EUR and a fine of 1,316 EUR (date = publication).

What organisations can take from it

Companies that deploy foreign workers must be able to prove social insurance coverage in the country of origin (A1 certificate) – otherwise German contribution law applies.

Authority / court
Amtsgericht Kenzingen / Hauptzollamt Lörrach (Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
§ 266a StGB (Vorenthalten und Veruntreuen von Arbeitsentgelt); SGB IV (Meldepflichten)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Managing director personally convicted by penalty order.
Published
23 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Feb 2026 AZOP: 100,000 EUR against estate agent over ID copies and old files CroatiaData subject rights and transparency €100,000

An estate agency (name not published) kept 11,887 brokerage contracts from 2010 to 2019, together with 914 copies of identity cards, passports and bank cards, without a legal basis, although the managing director stated that no card copies were collected. The Croatian data protection authority (Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka, AZOP) also criticised irregular and inadequate data protection training for employees and imposed 100,000 EUR (date of publication; exact date of the decision not stated).

What organisations can take from it

Make copies of identity documents and cards only with a legal basis, destroy old files on time and train employees regularly.

Relevance to training and awareness

Data minimisation for ID copies, retention periods

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c und e, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 4 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
No damage to data subjects was found.
Published
19 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Feb 2026 Polish construction company: underpayment of rebar benders – 11,000 EUR upheld AustriaMinimum wage and undeclared work €11,000

The managing director of a Polish construction company with twelve employees (anonymised in the decision as ‘P Sp. z o.o.’), which was working as a subcontractor on a motorway bridge construction site in Upper Austria, had paid five rebar benders below the collectively agreed wage in March 2023. The Gmunden district authority (Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmunden) imposed 12,500 EUR, and the Upper Austria Regional Administrative Court (Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich) reduced this to 11,000 EUR; Austria's Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof, VwGH) rejected the appeal on points of law (Ra 2025/11/0196).

What organisations can take from it

When posting workers to Austria, the correct classification of each activity under the collective agreement is decisive – it is subject to full judicial review.

Authority / court
Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Vorinstanzen: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmunden, Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
§ 29 Abs. 1 Lohn- und Sozialdumping-Bekämpfungsgesetz (LSD-BG)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Construction and real estate
Employees
Under 50
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of the fine by the Regional Administrative Court.
Liability of senior managers
The fine is directed against the managing director as the person responsible under administrative criminal law.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Feb 2026 Strukton Civiel Projecten B.V. und Strukton International B.V. (Strukton-Gruppe)Construction group Strukton pays 10 million EUR out-of-court settlement over bribery on the Riyadh Metro NetherlandsBribery of public officials €10m

To secure a share in the Riyadh Metro project, around 31 million USD was paid between 2013 and 2021 to an agent representing a high-ranking member of the Saudi royal family; the agent payments were understated to the export credit insurer Atradius. Strukton accepted a transaction (out-of-court settlement) of 10 million EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Commissions to agents with ties to ruling families carry the highest risk – and false statements to export credit insurers constitute a second offence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Agent commissions and false statements to export credit insurers

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (OM)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Buitenlandse ambtelijke omkoping und valsheid in geschrift (Wetboek van Strafrecht); Transactie nach Art. 74 Sr
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation from mid-2023; compliance programme in place since 2017; the employees involved are no longer with the company.
Liability of senior managers
The Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) is considering prosecuting several natural persons involved (not named).
Published
30 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jan 2026 Bulgarian construction subcontractor: 232,500 EUR for paying below the minimum wage GermanyMinimum wage and undeclared work €232,500

A Bulgarian construction company that worked as a subcontractor for a German firm on a major construction site in the district of Tuttlingen between January and May 2023 paid below the minimum wage, recorded only the duration of working time rather than its start and end, and did not register the posting. The decisions issued in September 2025, final since the end of 2025, amount to 232,500 EUR – of which 215,000 EUR is disgorgement of the economic benefit and 17,500 EUR is imposed on the managing director (date = publication; exact date of the decision not specified).

What organisations can take from it

General contractors should actively check the minimum wage, working time records and posting notifications of their foreign subcontractors – the economic benefit is disgorged in full.

Authority / court
Hauptzollamt Singen (Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Mindestlohngesetz; Arbeitnehmer-Entsendegesetz (Aufzeichnungs- und Meldepflichten)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
Separate fine of 17,500 EUR against the managing director.
Published
9 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Jan 2026 Richard Adam und Zafar Khan (ehem. Finanzvorstände der Carillion plc, in Liquidation)Carillion: former finance directors personally penalised for misleading announcements United KingdomMarket abuse and insider dealing €429,017

The former finance directors Richard Adam and Zafar Khan acted recklessly and were involved in the construction group's breaches of MAR and the Listing Rules: the financial reporting on the UK construction business was inaccurate, and the board was not informed of serious problems. Fines: 232,800 GBP (Adam) and 138,900 GBP (Khan).

What organisations can take from it

Finance directors are personally liable if they fail to escalate known problems to the board and allow embellished figures to be published.

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Art. 15 MAR (Marktmanipulation durch falsche Informationen); Listing Rule 1.3.3R; Listing Principle 1; Premium Listing Principle 2
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
Richard Adam (finance director until 2016): 232,800 GBP; Zafar Khan (finance director 2017): 138,900 GBP

Original amount 371,700 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Jan 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Nov 2025 Manor Windsor Realty Ltd.FINTRAC: estate agent Manor Windsor Realty without AML training programme – 107,250 CAD CanadaInternal controls €65,907

The estate agency in Windsor (Ontario) received a penalty of 107,250 CAD from the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) for four violations: no up-to-date, approved compliance policies, no assessment of the money laundering risk, no written ongoing training programme and no effectiveness review of the compliance programme. The company has appealed to the Federal Court.

What organisations can take from it

For estate agents, a missing written training programme is a separate violation subject to penalties.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML training programme for estate agents

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, Part 1, und zugehörige Verordnungen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Construction and real estate
Published
12 Feb 2026

Original amount 107,250 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Nov 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Oct 2025 SINOP ALFA, s.r.o.SINOP ALFA: 70,000 EUR for refusing to hand over business mobile phone during inspection SlovakiaCompetition law €70,000

During an unannounced inspection in the air-conditioning, refrigeration and heat pump services sector, the company repeatedly refused to produce a mobile phone used for business purposes. The Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) regarded this as obstruction of the inspection and imposed 70,000 EUR, around 1% of the previous year’s turnover (not final).

What organisations can take from it

Business smartphones are part of the documents that may be inspected – a dawn raid guide for employees prevents costly wrong reactions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conduct during inspections (dawn raids), handing over mobile devices

Authority / court
Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
Area of law
Competition law
Legal basis
Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Mitwirkungspflicht bei Nachprüfungen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Published
28 Oct 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

30 Sep 2025 Scaffolder left injured undeclared worker without help – Federal Supreme Court upholds sentence SwitzerlandMinimum wage and undeclared work €35,028

In February 2020, a scaffolder employed without a work permit fell around 4.5 m from scaffolding; the owner and managing director of the scaffolding company (anonymised in the judgment as ‘A.A. GmbH’) did not call the emergency services despite knowing of the accident, and had employed two Kosovars without permits. The Swiss Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgericht) upheld the conviction by the Lucerne Cantonal Court (Kantonsgericht Luzern): a suspended custodial sentence of 9 months and an unconditional monetary penalty of 80 daily rates of 410 CHF (32,800 CHF), plus a fine of 2,000 CHF that also covers traffic offences (6B_163/2024).

What organisations can take from it

After an accident at work, first aid takes priority over everything else – attempting to conceal illegal employment makes the case more serious under criminal law.

Authority / court
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht (Vorinstanz: Kantonsgericht Luzern)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Art. 128 StGB (Unterlassung der Nothilfe); Ausländer- und Integrationsgesetz (Beschäftigung ohne Bewilligung)
Action
Custodial sentence
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Owner and managing director convicted personally.

Original amount 32,800 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Sep 2025 SIA "SILTUMTEHSERVISS", SIA "Apkure IM", SIA "ADAPTERIS", SIA "Alpex", SIA "Infrakom"Bid-rigging cartel in pipeline construction contracts – five construction firms pay 513,508 EUR LatviaCartels and collusion €513,508

From 2021 to 2024, two groups of construction companies coordinated in more than 30 public tenders for the construction and repair of utility pipelines: they exchanged sensitive information, determined winners and submitted sham bids. Prompted by information from the contracting entity Rīgas namu pārvaldnieks, the Konkurences padome (Latvian Competition Council) imposed a total of 513,508.08 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Jointly preparing bids with competitors – even where the work is later carried out jointly – is a cartel; tender teams must know this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Competition law in tenders

Authority / court
Konkurences padome (Lettischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 11 Abs. 1 Konkurences likums
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
All companies except Infrakom concluded a settlement with the Competition Council, acknowledged the facts and waived an appeal; in return, a 10% fine reduction.
Published
10 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Load 19 more of 19

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial