Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Norway Clear all filters
16cases from 1 jurisdiction
€438.3mTotal of monetary amounts (13 cases with an amount)
€421.7mLargest single case: three Norwegian grocery chains
€840,774Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241€694,927
Q3 20242€421.7m
Q4 20240—
Q1 20254€7.32m
Q2 20251—
Q3 20252€5.05m
Q4 20250—
Q1 20261€21,331
Q2 20262€3.47m
Q3 20263€27,860

16 cases

21 Aug 2024 three Norwegian grocery chainsThree Norwegian grocery chains: NOK 4.93bn over price-hunter collaboration NorwayCartels and collusionanonymised €421.7m

Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) fined Norway's three largest grocery chains a total of NOK 4,926,981,000: the first chain NOK 2,313,418,000, the second NOK 1,321,024,000, and the third chain and its parent company jointly and severally NOK 1,292,539,000. From January 2011 until at least April 2018, the chains had granted each other's price collectors ('prisjegere') extensive access to their stores, which increased price transparency between the competitors and weakened price competition; the authority also ordered the collaboration to end. The Konkurranseklagenemnda (Competition Appeals Tribunal) upheld the decision on 21 August 2025; according to the courts' official hearing list, Gulating lagmannsrett (Gulating Court of Appeal) will hear an action by the second chain challenging the validity of that ruling from 12 October 2026. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Even seemingly harmless industry arrangements, such as mutual access for price collection, can amount to an anticompetitive exchange of information and trigger fines running into billions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Exchange of information between competitors

Authority / court
Konkurransetilsynet
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
§ 10 konkurranseloven, Art. 53 EWR-Abkommen; §§ 12 und 29 konkurranseloven; § 6 Abs. 1 EØS-konkurranseloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Published
21 Aug 2024

Original amount 4,926,981,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Aug 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 21 Aug 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Aug 2026 Kommunal Landspensjonskasse Gjensidig Forsikringsselskap (KLP)KLP: binding commitments after suspected abuse in municipal pensions NorwayAbuse of market power Order

Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) made commitments offered by KLP binding and thereby closed its investigation into a possible abuse of a dominant position in public occupational pensions for municipalities. The authority was concerned that, from 2019, when a competitor entered the market, KLP had systematically discouraged municipalities from putting their occupational pension schemes out to tender; KLP now undertakes to refrain from such influence and to remedy the effects of its earlier practice. No infringement was conclusively established and no fine was imposed.

What organisations can take from it

Dominant companies must not use close customer relationships to deter customers from running tenders – even a suspicion of this can lead to binding obligations.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conduct of dominant companies towards public purchasers

Authority / court
Konkurransetilsynet
Area of law
Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis
§ 12 Abs. 3 i. V. m. § 11 konkurranseloven; Art. 54 EWR-Abkommen
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
2 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Lab Pharma ASLab Pharma AS: NOK 205,000 for threatening Datatilsynet staff NorwayData subject rights and transparency €18,745

Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined the online dietary supplement retailer Lab Pharma AS NOK 205,000 for breaching its duty to cooperate with the supervisory authority (Art. 31 GDPR): the company had threatened case handlers with police reports and lawsuits in order to end the investigation of a complaint, and submitted requested documents late. The authority also ordered the company to delete the name and images of a former advertising partner (an influencer) from all its websites and to stop using her data for marketing until it can demonstrate a legal basis, as the underlying contract had already expired in March 2017.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone who considers a supervisory order unlawful must use the available appeal routes – threats against case handlers and missed deadlines become a sanctionable breach in their own right.

Relevance to training and awareness

Dealing with supervisory authorities and the duty to cooperate

Authority / court
Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 31, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. f, g und i, Art. 83 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Datatilsynet attributed the intentional conduct of the company's management to the company.
Published
17 Aug 2026

Original amount 205,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Aug 2026 Panzer Norge ASPanzer Norge AS: NOK 100,000 for AML failures at an accounting firm NorwayCustomer due diligence €9,115

Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined the accounting firm Panzer Norge AS, based in Alta, NOK 100,000 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The inspection found shortcomings in the firm-wide risk assessment and in customer due diligence, as well as further breaches in risk and quality management and in engagement agreements; the company, which had five employees, essentially did not dispute the breaches.

What organisations can take from it

Small accounting firms are also subject to anti-money laundering obligations and need a documented risk assessment and demonstrable customer due diligence for every engagement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering obligations for accounting and advisory firms

Authority / court
Finanstilsynet
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§§ 7, 8, 9, 12 Abs. 4, 13 Abs. 1, 3 und 4, 14, 24 und 49 hvitvaskingsloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Employees
Under 50
Culpability
negligent
Published
17 Sep 2026

Original amount 100,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Jun 2026 Siliziumkarbid-Hersteller (anonymisiert)Silicon carbide producer: NOK 18m over unrepresentative emission measurements NorwayEmissions and permits €1.62m

Økokrim (Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime) issued an industrial company producing silicon carbide with a penalty notice of NOK 18,000,000 for breaches of the Pollution Control Act (forurensningsloven) and for giving incorrect information to Miljødirektoratet (Norwegian Environment Agency). In Økokrim's view, the air emission measurements in 2021 were not representative because, among other things, production was lower during the measurement campaigns; this created a risk that considerably more of the carcinogenic benzo[a]pyrene was emitted than permitted. The company has accepted the penalty notice.

What organisations can take from it

Self-monitoring of emissions must reflect normal operations – anyone who embellishes measurements by throttling production risks heavy corporate penalties.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrity of environmental self-monitoring and reports to authorities

Authority / court
Økokrim
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Forurensningsloven (Umweltschutzgesetz); falsche Angaben gegenüber Miljødirektoratet
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
According to Økokrim, managers took the decisions on the non-representative measurements knowing that they would not reflect actual emissions.
Published
18 Jun 2026

Original amount 18,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Jun 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Jun 2026 Elkjøp Nordic AS, Elkjøp Norge ASElkjøp: NOK 20m fine over invalid consent in customer club NorwayMarketing and consent €1.85m

Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined Elkjøp Nordic AS and Elkjøp Norge AS NOK 20,000,000. Following an on-site inspection in June 2022, the authority found that consent for the customer club was neither informed nor specific nor freely given, that club data had been reused without a legal basis for the 'kundematch' (customer match) tool, that the lawfulness of so-called offline conversions had not been assessed and documented, and that rectification requests had not been handled within the deadlines. The decision was adopted under the cooperation mechanism with the supervisory authorities of Sweden, Iceland, Finland and Denmark; more than six million club members across the Nordic countries were affected.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone who ties discounts to club membership must obtain separate, informed and freely given consent in advance for each marketing purpose and must not reuse club data for new purposes such as audience matching without assessment.

Relevance to training and awareness

Valid consent in customer clubs and loyalty programmes

Authority / court
Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Art. 4 Nr. 11, Art. 6 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 2 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 12 Abs. 3 DSGVO; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. i DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Improvements made after the inspection, Datatilsynet's long case-handling time and the lack of evidence that sensitive data were processed; the amount is well below the starting point in the EDPB guidelines (0.4–0.8% of group turnover).
Published
4 Jun 2026

Original amount 20,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jan 2026 Timegrip ASTimegrip AS: NOK 250,000 for denying staff access to time records NorwayData subject rights and transparency €21,331

Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined the time-recording system provider Timegrip AS NOK 250,000 because, after a retail chain went bankrupt, the company refused 80 former employees access to their clock-in data, which they needed to document their wage claims. The authority treated Timegrip as controller, since after the bankruptcy the company alone in fact decided on storage, use and access, and found a breach of the right of access under Art. 15(1) and (3) GDPR. A fine of NOK 750,000 had been notified; the authority took into account, among other things, the confused situation and its own long case-handling time.

What organisations can take from it

Processors should agree in their contracts how data will be released if the controller goes bankrupt – whoever in fact controls the data is liable as controller, including for access requests.

Relevance to training and awareness

Employees' right of access and the allocation of controller and processor roles

Authority / court
Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 15 Abs. 1 und 3, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. i, Art. 83 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
The confused situation after the customer's bankruptcy (given only limited weight) and Datatilsynet's long case-handling time; NOK 750,000 had been notified.
Published
20 Jan 2026

Original amount 250,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2025 Vend Marketplaces ASA (vormals Schibsted ASA)Vend Marketplaces (formerly Schibsted): 10 million NOK for inside information in analyst call NorwayMarket abuse and insider dealing €840,774

Between 25 and 31 March 2025 the listed operator of online marketplaces held one-to-one calls with 19 analysts ahead of its quiet period ("pre-close calls") and, in a recorded call, said that consensus for the first quarter and the full year 2025 was too high, adding expectations for individual business areas; the analyst then cut their EBITDA estimate and the share price fell by 10% on 26 March. The Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) treated this as unlawful disclosure of inside information and imposed 10,000,000 NOK; as an aggravating factor it took into account that Vend had not initially handed over its prepared list of talking points. Vend announced that it would accept the fine and has decided to stop holding analyst calls before quiet periods.

What organisations can take from it

Pre-close calls are not a safe space: views on analyst consensus or the current quarter belong, if anywhere, in a stock exchange announcement to everyone.

Relevance to training and awareness

Handling inside information in investor relations and analyst conversations

Authority / court
Finanstilsynet (Norwegen)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Art. 14 lit. c i. V. m. Art. 10 MAR; verdipapirhandelloven § 3-1 und § 21-1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Culpability
negligent
Published
20 Aug 2025

Original amount 10,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jul 2025 Telenor Norge ASTelenor Norge: 50 million NOK after four disruptions to emergency numbers in autumn 2024 NorwayCritical infrastructure €4.21m

The Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet (Nkom, Norwegian Communications Authority) imposed an administrative penalty (overtredelsesgebyr) of 50,000,000 NOK on Telenor Norge because, on four occasions in autumn 2024 (29 August, 16 September, 17/18 October, 13 November), emergency calls over its network failed entirely or intermittently or were misrouted. The inspection found 22 breaches of ekomloven (Electronic Communications Act), sikkerhetsloven (National Security Act) and several regulations, including inadequate risk assessments, planned work not carried out securely, insufficient redundancy, inadequate auditing of a subcontractor and late notification of the authority. In its final decision Nkom maintained the amount announced in February 2025; the deadline for an administrative appeal ran until 8 September 2025.

What organisations can take from it

Operators that carry emergency call services must safeguard planned network changes with a risk analysis and working redundancy, audit their suppliers and report disruptions on time.

Relevance to training and awareness

Planned work on critical networks: risk analysis, a working fallback and notifying the regulator within 30 minutes

Authority / court
Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet (Nkom)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
Legal basis
ekomloven (lov 4. juli 2003 nr. 83), sikkerhetsloven (lov 1. juni 2018 nr. 24), ekomforskriften, nummerforskriften, klassifiseringsforskriften, virksomhetssikkerhetsforskriften
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Published
3 Jul 2025

Original amount 50,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Jun 2025 EquinorEquinor: Havtil order after health symptoms during work at Hammerfest LNG NorwayWorkplace safety and accidents Order

Havindustritilsynet (Havtil, Norwegian Ocean Industry Authority) ordered Equinor to ensure and document that work in area L201 of the Hammerfest LNG plant is fully prudent before it resumes, including specialist analyses of exposure conditions at the work site. The order followed three incidents between June 2024 and June 2025 in the Snøhvit Future project in which workers developed symptoms – after the first, 17 people went to an emergency clinic; the authority considered Equinor's own criteria for resuming work to be insufficient.

What organisations can take from it

After repeated health incidents, work should only resume once exposure conditions have been analysed by specialists and the findings are also applied by the contractors involved.

Relevance to training and awareness

Workplace exposure and safe resumption of work

Authority / court
Havindustritilsynet (Havtil)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
§ 69 i. V. m. § 10 rammeforskriften; §§ 11, 16 und 18 styringsforskriften
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
20 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Mar 2025 Sparebank 1 ØstlandetSparebank 1 Østlandet: NOK 30m for anti-money laundering failures NorwayInternal controls €2.6m

Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined Sparebank 1 Østlandet NOK 30,000,000 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act after an inspection in September 2022 revealed fundamental shortcomings in risk assessment, procedures, customer risk classification, customer due diligence and ongoing monitoring, as well as a breach of the tipping-off prohibition; the authority classed the breaches as serious and long-standing. It also found that staff training had been inadequate and ordered the bank to complete due diligence measures for one customer. The bank appealed on 8 May 2025. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Risk-based anti-money laundering compliance stands or falls with an up-to-date risk assessment and role-specific training tailored to the firm's own procedures.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk-based anti-money laundering controls and role-specific training

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Finanstilsynet
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
§§ 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 24, 25, 28 und 49 hvitvaskingsloven; § 47 hvitvaskingsloven (Anordnung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
negligent
Published
26 Mar 2025

Original amount 30,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Mar 2025 Telenor ASATelenor ASA: NOK 4m fine over data protection officer set-up and internal control NorwayData protection €342,745

Following an inspection, Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined Telenor ASA NOK 4,000,000 because the group parent had not put in place appropriate organisational measures and policies for the position of its data protection officer (Art. 24(1) and (2) GDPR). The authority also issued a reprimand because for about one year there was no reporting line from the data protection officer to the highest management level, and ordered the company to carry out a documented assessment of whether it must designate a data protection officer and to revise its record of processing activities. According to Datatilsynet, the decision has been appealed and a ruling by the Personvernnemnda (Privacy Appeals Board) is expected in autumn 2026. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

The data protection officer's role must be documented – with a direct reporting line to top management, clear rules on the officer's involvement and an assessment of potential conflicts of interest.

Relevance to training and awareness

Position and independence of the data protection officer

Authority / court
Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection
Legal basis
Art. 24 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 30, Art. 37 Abs. 7, Art. 38 Abs. 2 und 3, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. b, d und i DSGVO; § 26 personopplysningsloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
No specific harm to data subjects was identified; the long case-handling time was taken into account when setting the amount.
Published
14 Mar 2025

Original amount 4,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Feb 2025 Rogaland SparebankRogaland Sparebank: NOK 1.2m fine for failing to freeze an account NorwayBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €102,551

Gulating lagmannsrett (Gulating Court of Appeal) sentenced Rogaland Sparebank (formerly Sandnes Sparebank) to a corporate fine of NOK 1,200,000 because in April and May 2020 the bank failed to freeze an account opened in the name of a person on the UN Al-Qaida sanctions list and booked 13 payments totalling NOK 45,828 to it; the bank must also pay NOK 50,000 in legal costs. Hordaland tingrett (district court) had initially acquitted the bank; on 21 May 2025 the appeals committee of the Høyesterett (Supreme Court) refused leave for the bank's appeal.

What organisations can take from it

Suspicious transaction reporting does not replace sanctions screening: funds of listed persons must be frozen immediately, even if the account was formally opened at the request of a third party.

Relevance to training and awareness

Freezing funds of sanctioned persons

Authority / court
Gulating lagmannsrett
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
§ 2 lov om bindende FN-vedtak i. V. m. § 3 forskrift om sanksjoner mot ISIL (Da'esh) og Al-Qaida; §§ 27 und 28 straffeloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
The bank discovered the matter itself, took measures and reported it to Økokrim and later to Finanstilsynet and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; it gained nothing from the breach.
Liability of senior managers
According to the court of appeal, it is the responsibility of management and the board to staff the bank so that sanctions obligations are complied with.

Original amount 1,200,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Feb 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Jan 2025 Danske Bank A/SDanske Bank: NOK 50m for market manipulation in government bond issue NorwayMarket abuse and insider dealing €4.27m

Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined Danske Bank A/S NOK 50,000,000 for market manipulation. In the syndication of a ten-year Norwegian government bond of NOK 22 billion in February 2023, whose yield was priced off the Norwegian swap rate, the bank, through its Norwegian branch, pushed the reference rate to an artificial level with interest rate swap trades concentrated around the pricing time, in a situation where it benefited from a higher yield. The fact that the bank had itself approached the supervisory authorities was taken into account as a mitigating factor.

What organisations can take from it

Hedging trades around the setting of reference prices need clear controls so that they are not treated as price manipulation.

Relevance to training and awareness

Market manipulation around reference prices and new issues

Authority / court
Finanstilsynet
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Art. 15 i. V. m. Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a MAR; § 3-1, §§ 21-1, 21-9 und 21-14 verdipapirhandelloven; § 46 forvaltningsloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
The bank had itself approached the supervisory authorities.
Published
22 Jan 2025

Original amount 50,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Sep 2024 a Norwegian provider of emptying and flushing servicesEmptying and flushing services: acquisition of a regional competitor prohibited NorwayMerger controlanonymised Order

Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) prohibited the acquisition of a regional competitor by the service provider because the merger would have significantly impeded competition in emptying and flushing services (including emptying septic tanks and separators and cleaning pipes and tanks) in the former county of Hordaland, where the two companies were each other's closest competitors. The Konkurranseklagenemnda (Competition Appeals Tribunal) rejected the provider's appeal on 31 January 2025 and upheld the prohibition.

What organisations can take from it

Acquisitions of regional competitors in niche markets can also be prohibited if they remove the competitive pressure between close rivals.

Authority / court
Konkurransetilsynet
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
§ 16 konkurranseloven
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
24 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 24 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jun 2024 a Norwegian ship management companyNorwegian ship management company: NOK 8m for scrapping two tankers in India NorwayWaste and hazardous substancesanonymised €694,927

Økokrim (Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime) issued a Norwegian ship management company with a penalty notice of NOK 8,000,000 for breaching the Pollution Control Act (forurensningsloven), because two shuttle tankers used in the North Sea left for Asia in 2018 and were broken up on the beach at Alang, India, between 2018 and 2020 ('beaching'). According to Økokrim, the company was familiar with the rules and chose scrapping in India partly for economic reasons. Having initially not accepted the penalty notice, the company accepted it before the main hearing scheduled for January 2025 without admitting guilt; an accepted penalty notice has the effect of a judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone handing over end-of-life vessels for scrapping must ensure recycling at approved yards in line with EU rules; the cost advantages of beaching do not justify circumventing them.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ship recycling and waste exports

Authority / court
Økokrim
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Forurensningsloven (Umweltschutzgesetz)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Published
10 Jun 2024

Original amount 8,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jun 2024.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 10 Jun 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial