Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Datatilsynet 4 cases 25 % · €2.24m
- Finanstilsynet 3 cases 19 % · €6.88m
- Konkurransetilsynet 3 cases 19 % · €421.7m
- Økokrim 2 cases 13 % · €2.32m
- Finanstilsynet (Norwegen) 1 case 6 % · €840,774
- Gulating lagmannsrett 1 case 6 % · €102,551
- Havindustritilsynet (Havtil) 1 case 6 % ·
- Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet (Nkom) 1 case 6 % · €4.21m
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
- Data protection 4 cases 25 % · €2.24m
- Competition law 3 cases 19 % · €421.7m
- Money laundering and terrorist financing 2 cases 13 % · €2.61m
- Capital markets and financial supervision 2 cases 13 % · €5.11m
- Environment and sustainability 2 cases 13 % · €2.32m
- Health and safety and employment law 1 case 6 % ·
- Information security and cyber 1 case 6 % · €4.21m
- Sanctions and export control 1 case 6 % · €102,551
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
- Financial services and insurance 4 cases 25 % · €6.98m
- Retail and e-commerce 3 cases 19 % · €423.6m
- Telecoms, IT and software 3 cases 19 % · €4.57m
- Other 2 cases 13 % · €9,115
- Energy and utilities 1 case 6 % ·
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering 1 case 6 % · €1.62m
- Media and online platforms 1 case 6 % · €840,774
- Transport, logistics and shipping 1 case 6 % · €694,927
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2024 | 1 | €694,927 |
| Q3 2024 | 2 | €421.7m |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2025 | 4 | €7.32m |
| Q2 2025 | 1 | — |
| Q3 2025 | 2 | €5.05m |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2026 | 1 | €21,331 |
| Q2 2026 | 2 | €3.47m |
| Q3 2026 | 3 | €27,860 |
16 cases
25 Aug 2026 Kommunal Landspensjonskasse Gjensidig Forsikringsselskap (KLP)KLP: binding commitments after suspected abuse in municipal pensions Order
Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) made commitments offered by KLP binding and thereby closed its investigation into a possible abuse of a dominant position in public occupational pensions for municipalities. The authority was concerned that, from 2019, when a competitor entered the market, KLP had systematically discouraged municipalities from putting their occupational pension schemes out to tender; KLP now undertakes to refrain from such influence and to remedy the effects of its earlier practice. No infringement was conclusively established and no fine was imposed.
Dominant companies must not use close customer relationships to deter customers from running tenders – even a suspicion of this can lead to binding obligations.
Conduct of dominant companies towards public purchasers
- Authority / court
- Konkurransetilsynet
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- § 12 Abs. 3 i. V. m. § 11 konkurranseloven; Art. 54 EWR-Abkommen
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 2 Sep 2026
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Aug 2026 Lab Pharma ASLab Pharma AS: NOK 205,000 for threatening Datatilsynet staff €18,745
Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined the online dietary supplement retailer Lab Pharma AS NOK 205,000 for breaching its duty to cooperate with the supervisory authority (Art. 31 GDPR): the company had threatened case handlers with police reports and lawsuits in order to end the investigation of a complaint, and submitted requested documents late. The authority also ordered the company to delete the name and images of a former advertising partner (an influencer) from all its websites and to stop using her data for marketing until it can demonstrate a legal basis, as the underlying contract had already expired in March 2017.
Anyone who considers a supervisory order unlawful must use the available appeal routes – threats against case handlers and missed deadlines become a sanctionable breach in their own right.
Dealing with supervisory authorities and the duty to cooperate
- Authority / court
- Datatilsynet
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 31, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. f, g und i, Art. 83 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- Datatilsynet attributed the intentional conduct of the company's management to the company.
- Published
- 17 Aug 2026
Original amount 205,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.
- Datatilsynet: Overtredelsesgebyr til Lab Pharma AS (17.08.2026) Press release of an authority
- Datatilsynet, Vedtak om overtredelsesgebyr og pålegg om sletting og stans – Lab Pharma AS, 23/00435-62, 12.08.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Aug 2026 Panzer Norge ASPanzer Norge AS: NOK 100,000 for AML failures at an accounting firm €9,115
Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined the accounting firm Panzer Norge AS, based in Alta, NOK 100,000 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The inspection found shortcomings in the firm-wide risk assessment and in customer due diligence, as well as further breaches in risk and quality management and in engagement agreements; the company, which had five employees, essentially did not dispute the breaches.
Small accounting firms are also subject to anti-money laundering obligations and need a documented risk assessment and demonstrable customer due diligence for every engagement.
Anti-money laundering obligations for accounting and advisory firms
- Authority / court
- Finanstilsynet
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- §§ 7, 8, 9, 12 Abs. 4, 13 Abs. 1, 3 und 4, 14, 24 und 49 hvitvaskingsloven
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Employees
- Under 50
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 17 Sep 2026
Original amount 100,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Aug 2026.
- Finanstilsynet: Tilsynsrapport og vedtak – Panzer Norge AS (17.09.2026) Press release of an authority
- Finanstilsynet, Tilsynsrapport med vedtak – Panzer Norge AS, 24/17922, 11.08.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Jun 2026 Siliziumkarbid-Hersteller (anonymisiert)Silicon carbide producer: NOK 18m over unrepresentative emission measurements €1.62m
Økokrim (Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime) issued an industrial company producing silicon carbide with a penalty notice of NOK 18,000,000 for breaches of the Pollution Control Act (forurensningsloven) and for giving incorrect information to Miljødirektoratet (Norwegian Environment Agency). In Økokrim's view, the air emission measurements in 2021 were not representative because, among other things, production was lower during the measurement campaigns; this created a risk that considerably more of the carcinogenic benzo[a]pyrene was emitted than permitted. The company has accepted the penalty notice.
Self-monitoring of emissions must reflect normal operations – anyone who embellishes measurements by throttling production risks heavy corporate penalties.
Integrity of environmental self-monitoring and reports to authorities
- Authority / court
- Økokrim
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Forurensningsloven (Umweltschutzgesetz); falsche Angaben gegenüber Miljødirektoratet
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- According to Økokrim, managers took the decisions on the non-representative measurements knowing that they would not reflect actual emissions.
- Published
- 18 Jun 2026
Original amount 18,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Jun 2026.
- Økokrim, Nachrichten (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Jun 2026 Elkjøp Nordic AS, Elkjøp Norge ASElkjøp: NOK 20m fine over invalid consent in customer club €1.85m
Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined Elkjøp Nordic AS and Elkjøp Norge AS NOK 20,000,000. Following an on-site inspection in June 2022, the authority found that consent for the customer club was neither informed nor specific nor freely given, that club data had been reused without a legal basis for the 'kundematch' (customer match) tool, that the lawfulness of so-called offline conversions had not been assessed and documented, and that rectification requests had not been handled within the deadlines. The decision was adopted under the cooperation mechanism with the supervisory authorities of Sweden, Iceland, Finland and Denmark; more than six million club members across the Nordic countries were affected.
Anyone who ties discounts to club membership must obtain separate, informed and freely given consent in advance for each marketing purpose and must not reuse club data for new purposes such as audience matching without assessment.
Valid consent in customer clubs and loyalty programmes
- Authority / court
- Datatilsynet
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Art. 4 Nr. 11, Art. 6 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 2 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 12 Abs. 3 DSGVO; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. i DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Improvements made after the inspection, Datatilsynet's long case-handling time and the lack of evidence that sensitive data were processed; the amount is well below the starting point in the EDPB guidelines (0.4–0.8% of group turnover).
- Published
- 4 Jun 2026
Original amount 20,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jun 2026.
- Datatilsynet: Overtredelsesgebyr til Elkjøp (04.06.2026) Press release of an authority
- Datatilsynet, Vedtak om overtredelsesgebyr – Kundeklubb og de registrertes rettigheter, 22/00049-13, 01.06.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Jan 2026 Timegrip ASTimegrip AS: NOK 250,000 for denying staff access to time records €21,331
Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined the time-recording system provider Timegrip AS NOK 250,000 because, after a retail chain went bankrupt, the company refused 80 former employees access to their clock-in data, which they needed to document their wage claims. The authority treated Timegrip as controller, since after the bankruptcy the company alone in fact decided on storage, use and access, and found a breach of the right of access under Art. 15(1) and (3) GDPR. A fine of NOK 750,000 had been notified; the authority took into account, among other things, the confused situation and its own long case-handling time.
Processors should agree in their contracts how data will be released if the controller goes bankrupt – whoever in fact controls the data is liable as controller, including for access requests.
Employees' right of access and the allocation of controller and processor roles
- Authority / court
- Datatilsynet
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 15 Abs. 1 und 3, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. i, Art. 83 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- The confused situation after the customer's bankruptcy (given only limited weight) and Datatilsynet's long case-handling time; NOK 750,000 had been notified.
- Published
- 20 Jan 2026
Original amount 250,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jan 2026.
- Datatilsynet: Overtredelsesgebyr for manglende innsyn (20.01.2026) Press release of an authority
- Datatilsynet, Vedtak om ileggelse av overtredelsesgebyr – Timegrip AS, 20/02911-20, 16.01.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Aug 2025 Vend Marketplaces ASA (vormals Schibsted ASA)Vend Marketplaces (formerly Schibsted): 10 million NOK for inside information in analyst call €840,774
Between 25 and 31 March 2025 the listed operator of online marketplaces held one-to-one calls with 19 analysts ahead of its quiet period ("pre-close calls") and, in a recorded call, said that consensus for the first quarter and the full year 2025 was too high, adding expectations for individual business areas; the analyst then cut their EBITDA estimate and the share price fell by 10% on 26 March. The Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) treated this as unlawful disclosure of inside information and imposed 10,000,000 NOK; as an aggravating factor it took into account that Vend had not initially handed over its prepared list of talking points. Vend announced that it would accept the fine and has decided to stop holding analyst calls before quiet periods.
Pre-close calls are not a safe space: views on analyst consensus or the current quarter belong, if anywhere, in a stock exchange announcement to everyone.
Handling inside information in investor relations and analyst conversations
- Authority / court
- Finanstilsynet (Norwegen)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
- Legal basis
- Art. 14 lit. c i. V. m. Art. 10 MAR; verdipapirhandelloven § 3-1 und § 21-1
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 20 Aug 2025
Original amount 10,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2025.
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Jul 2025 Telenor Norge ASTelenor Norge: 50 million NOK after four disruptions to emergency numbers in autumn 2024 €4.21m
The Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet (Nkom, Norwegian Communications Authority) imposed an administrative penalty (overtredelsesgebyr) of 50,000,000 NOK on Telenor Norge because, on four occasions in autumn 2024 (29 August, 16 September, 17/18 October, 13 November), emergency calls over its network failed entirely or intermittently or were misrouted. The inspection found 22 breaches of ekomloven (Electronic Communications Act), sikkerhetsloven (National Security Act) and several regulations, including inadequate risk assessments, planned work not carried out securely, insufficient redundancy, inadequate auditing of a subcontractor and late notification of the authority. In its final decision Nkom maintained the amount announced in February 2025; the deadline for an administrative appeal ran until 8 September 2025.
Operators that carry emergency call services must safeguard planned network changes with a risk analysis and working redundancy, audit their suppliers and report disruptions on time.
Planned work on critical networks: risk analysis, a working fallback and notifying the regulator within 30 minutes
- Authority / court
- Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet (Nkom)
- Area of law
- Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
- Legal basis
- ekomloven (lov 4. juli 2003 nr. 83), sikkerhetsloven (lov 1. juni 2018 nr. 24), ekomforskriften, nummerforskriften, klassifiseringsforskriften, virksomhetssikkerhetsforskriften
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Employees
- 1,000 to 9,999
- Published
- 3 Jul 2025
Original amount 50,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Jul 2025.
- Nkom – Opprettholder millionbot mot Telenor (03.07.2025) Press release of an authority
- Nkom – Tilsynsrapporten mot Telenor er klar: Varsler bot på 50 millioner kroner (27.02.2025) Press release of an authority
- Nkom – Tilsynsrapport Telenor, offentlig sammendrag av sikkerhetsgradert tilsynsrapport (foreløpig), 27.02.2025 Decision of an authority
- Brønnøysundregistrene, Enhetsregisteret – Telenor Norge AS (org.nr. 976967631), antall ansatte Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Jun 2025 EquinorEquinor: Havtil order after health symptoms during work at Hammerfest LNG Order
Havindustritilsynet (Havtil, Norwegian Ocean Industry Authority) ordered Equinor to ensure and document that work in area L201 of the Hammerfest LNG plant is fully prudent before it resumes, including specialist analyses of exposure conditions at the work site. The order followed three incidents between June 2024 and June 2025 in the Snøhvit Future project in which workers developed symptoms – after the first, 17 people went to an emergency clinic; the authority considered Equinor's own criteria for resuming work to be insufficient.
After repeated health incidents, work should only resume once exposure conditions have been analysed by specialists and the findings are also applied by the contractors involved.
Workplace exposure and safe resumption of work
- Authority / court
- Havindustritilsynet (Havtil)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- § 69 i. V. m. § 10 rammeforskriften; §§ 11, 16 und 18 styringsforskriften
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 20 Jun 2025
- Havtil: Pålegg til Equinor – Hammerfest LNG – sikre og dokumentere forsvarlighet før gjenopptakelse av arbeid (20.06.2025) Press release of an authority
- Havtil: Order to Equinor – Hammerfest LNG – ensure and document prudence of activities before resumption of work (25.06.2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Mar 2025 Sparebank 1 ØstlandetSparebank 1 Østlandet: NOK 30m for anti-money laundering failures €2.6m
Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined Sparebank 1 Østlandet NOK 30,000,000 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act after an inspection in September 2022 revealed fundamental shortcomings in risk assessment, procedures, customer risk classification, customer due diligence and ongoing monitoring, as well as a breach of the tipping-off prohibition; the authority classed the breaches as serious and long-standing. It also found that staff training had been inadequate and ordered the bank to complete due diligence measures for one customer. The bank appealed on 8 May 2025. The decision is not final.
Risk-based anti-money laundering compliance stands or falls with an up-to-date risk assessment and role-specific training tailored to the firm's own procedures.
Risk-based anti-money laundering controls and role-specific training
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Finanstilsynet
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
- Legal basis
- §§ 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 24, 25, 28 und 49 hvitvaskingsloven; § 47 hvitvaskingsloven (Anordnung)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 26 Mar 2025
Original amount 30,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Mar 2025.
- Finanstilsynet: Tilsynsrapport og vedtak om overtredelsesgebyr – Sparebank 1 Østlandet (26.03.2025) Press release of an authority
- Finanstilsynet, Tilsynsrapport med vedtak – Sparebank 1 Østlandet, 22/6513, 17.03.2025 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Mar 2025 Telenor ASATelenor ASA: NOK 4m fine over data protection officer set-up and internal control €342,745
Following an inspection, Datatilsynet (Norwegian Data Protection Authority) fined Telenor ASA NOK 4,000,000 because the group parent had not put in place appropriate organisational measures and policies for the position of its data protection officer (Art. 24(1) and (2) GDPR). The authority also issued a reprimand because for about one year there was no reporting line from the data protection officer to the highest management level, and ordered the company to carry out a documented assessment of whether it must designate a data protection officer and to revise its record of processing activities. According to Datatilsynet, the decision has been appealed and a ruling by the Personvernnemnda (Privacy Appeals Board) is expected in autumn 2026. The decision is not final.
The data protection officer's role must be documented – with a direct reporting line to top management, clear rules on the officer's involvement and an assessment of potential conflicts of interest.
Position and independence of the data protection officer
- Authority / court
- Datatilsynet
- Area of law
- Data protection
- Legal basis
- Art. 24 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 30, Art. 37 Abs. 7, Art. 38 Abs. 2 und 3, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. b, d und i DSGVO; § 26 personopplysningsloven
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- No specific harm to data subjects was identified; the long case-handling time was taken into account when setting the amount.
- Published
- 14 Mar 2025
Original amount 4,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Mar 2025.
- Datatilsynet: Telenor ASA er ilagt sanksjoner for mangler ved personvernombudsordning og internkontroll (14.03.2025) Press release of an authority
- Datatilsynet, Vedtak – Personvernombudets rolle i Telenor ASA, 21/03823-45, 10.03.2025 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 Feb 2025 Rogaland SparebankRogaland Sparebank: NOK 1.2m fine for failing to freeze an account €102,551
Gulating lagmannsrett (Gulating Court of Appeal) sentenced Rogaland Sparebank (formerly Sandnes Sparebank) to a corporate fine of NOK 1,200,000 because in April and May 2020 the bank failed to freeze an account opened in the name of a person on the UN Al-Qaida sanctions list and booked 13 payments totalling NOK 45,828 to it; the bank must also pay NOK 50,000 in legal costs. Hordaland tingrett (district court) had initially acquitted the bank; on 21 May 2025 the appeals committee of the Høyesterett (Supreme Court) refused leave for the bank's appeal.
Suspicious transaction reporting does not replace sanctions screening: funds of listed persons must be frozen immediately, even if the account was formally opened at the request of a third party.
Freezing funds of sanctioned persons
- Authority / court
- Gulating lagmannsrett
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- § 2 lov om bindende FN-vedtak i. V. m. § 3 forskrift om sanksjoner mot ISIL (Da'esh) og Al-Qaida; §§ 27 und 28 straffeloven
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- The bank discovered the matter itself, took measures and reported it to Økokrim and later to Finanstilsynet and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; it gained nothing from the breach.
- Liability of senior managers
- According to the court of appeal, it is the responsibility of management and the board to staff the bank so that sanctions obligations are complied with.
Original amount 1,200,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Feb 2025.
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Jan 2025 Danske Bank A/SDanske Bank: NOK 50m for market manipulation in government bond issue €4.27m
Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined Danske Bank A/S NOK 50,000,000 for market manipulation. In the syndication of a ten-year Norwegian government bond of NOK 22 billion in February 2023, whose yield was priced off the Norwegian swap rate, the bank, through its Norwegian branch, pushed the reference rate to an artificial level with interest rate swap trades concentrated around the pricing time, in a situation where it benefited from a higher yield. The fact that the bank had itself approached the supervisory authorities was taken into account as a mitigating factor.
Hedging trades around the setting of reference prices need clear controls so that they are not treated as price manipulation.
Market manipulation around reference prices and new issues
- Authority / court
- Finanstilsynet
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
- Legal basis
- Art. 15 i. V. m. Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a MAR; § 3-1, §§ 21-1, 21-9 und 21-14 verdipapirhandelloven; § 46 forvaltningsloven
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- The bank had itself approached the supervisory authorities.
- Published
- 22 Jan 2025
Original amount 50,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jan 2025.
- Finanstilsynet: Danske Bank A/S får et overtredelsesgebyr på 50 millioner kroner for markedsmanipulasjon (22.01.2025) Press release of an authority
- Finanstilsynet, Vedtak om overtredelsesgebyr – Danske Bank A/S, 23/2053, 15.01.2025 Decision of an authority
- Finanstilsynet: Markedsmanipulasjon: Vedtak om overtredelsesgebyr – Danske Bank A/S Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Sep 2024 a Norwegian provider of emptying and flushing servicesEmptying and flushing services: acquisition of a regional competitor prohibited Order
Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) prohibited the acquisition of a regional competitor by the service provider because the merger would have significantly impeded competition in emptying and flushing services (including emptying septic tanks and separators and cleaning pipes and tanks) in the former county of Hordaland, where the two companies were each other's closest competitors. The Konkurranseklagenemnda (Competition Appeals Tribunal) rejected the provider's appeal on 31 January 2025 and upheld the prohibition.
Acquisitions of regional competitors in niche markets can also be prohibited if they remove the competitive pressure between close rivals.
- Authority / court
- Konkurransetilsynet
- Area of law
- Competition law · Merger control
- Legal basis
- § 16 konkurranseloven
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 24 Sep 2024
- Konkurransetilsynet, Entscheidungen (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2024) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 24 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Aug 2024 three Norwegian grocery chainsThree Norwegian grocery chains: NOK 4.93bn over price-hunter collaboration €421.7m
Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) fined Norway's three largest grocery chains a total of NOK 4,926,981,000: the first chain NOK 2,313,418,000, the second NOK 1,321,024,000, and the third chain and its parent company jointly and severally NOK 1,292,539,000. From January 2011 until at least April 2018, the chains had granted each other's price collectors ('prisjegere') extensive access to their stores, which increased price transparency between the competitors and weakened price competition; the authority also ordered the collaboration to end. The Konkurranseklagenemnda (Competition Appeals Tribunal) upheld the decision on 21 August 2025; according to the courts' official hearing list, Gulating lagmannsrett (Gulating Court of Appeal) will hear an action by the second chain challenging the validity of that ruling from 12 October 2026. The decision is not final.
Even seemingly harmless industry arrangements, such as mutual access for price collection, can amount to an anticompetitive exchange of information and trigger fines running into billions.
Exchange of information between competitors
- Authority / court
- Konkurransetilsynet
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- § 10 konkurranseloven, Art. 53 EWR-Abkommen; §§ 12 und 29 konkurranseloven; § 6 Abs. 1 EØS-konkurranseloven
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 21 Aug 2024
Original amount 4,926,981,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Aug 2024.
- Konkurransetilsynet, Entscheidungen (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2024) Decision of an authority
- Norges domstoler, Terminliste (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2024) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 21 Aug 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Jun 2024 a Norwegian ship management companyNorwegian ship management company: NOK 8m for scrapping two tankers in India €694,927
Økokrim (Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime) issued a Norwegian ship management company with a penalty notice of NOK 8,000,000 for breaching the Pollution Control Act (forurensningsloven), because two shuttle tankers used in the North Sea left for Asia in 2018 and were broken up on the beach at Alang, India, between 2018 and 2020 ('beaching'). According to Økokrim, the company was familiar with the rules and chose scrapping in India partly for economic reasons. Having initially not accepted the penalty notice, the company accepted it before the main hearing scheduled for January 2025 without admitting guilt; an accepted penalty notice has the effect of a judgment.
Anyone handing over end-of-life vessels for scrapping must ensure recycling at approved yards in line with EU rules; the cost advantages of beaching do not justify circumventing them.
Ship recycling and waste exports
- Authority / court
- Økokrim
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
- Legal basis
- Forurensningsloven (Umweltschutzgesetz)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Published
- 10 Jun 2024
Original amount 8,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jun 2024.
- Økokrim, Nachrichten (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2024) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 10 Jun 2026 · Direct link