Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EUNetherlands Clear all filters
18cases from 1 jurisdiction
€463.6mTotal of monetary amounts (17 cases with an amount)
€290mLargest single case: Uber Technologies Inc. und Uber B.V.
€215,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) 5 cases 28 % · €395m
  2. Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM) 3 cases 17 % · €1.29m
  3. Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens 1 case 6 % · €30.5m
  4. De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) 1 case 6 % · €406,125
  5. Openbaar Ministerie (OM) 1 case 6 % · €10m
  6. Openbaar Ministerie (OM); Ermittlungen FIOD Anti-Corruptie Centrum 1 case 6 % · €25.8m
  7. Openbaar Ministerie (Staatsanwaltschaft der Niederlande) 1 case 6 % · €215,000
  8. Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid) 1 case 6 % · €11,250
  9. Rechtbank Amsterdam 1 case 6 % ·
  10. Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid / Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie) 1 case 6 % · €95,588
  11. 2 more2 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Data protection 5 cases 28 % · €395m
  2. Health and safety and employment law 3 cases 17 % · €206,838
  3. Bribery and corruption 2 cases 11 % · €35.8m
  4. Sanctions and export control 2 cases 11 % · €415,000
  5. Consumer protection and online retail 2 cases 11 % · €1.23m
  6. Money laundering and terrorist financing 1 case 6 % · €406,125
  7. Competition law 1 case 6 % · €59,000
  8. AI and digital regulation 1 case 6 % · €30.5m
  9. Environment and sustainability 1 case 6 % ·

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Retail and e-commerce 3 cases 17 % · €380,000
  2. Transport, logistics and shipping 3 cases 17 % · €390m
  3. Construction and real estate 2 cases 11 % · €10.1m
  4. Food and agriculture 2 cases 11 % · €106,838
  5. Energy and utilities 1 case 6 % · €1.1m
  6. Financial services and insurance 1 case 6 % · €406,125
  7. Manufacturing and mechanical engineering 1 case 6 % · €100,000
  8. Media and online platforms 1 case 6 % · €4.75m
  9. Public sector 1 case 6 % · €175,000
  10. Other 1 case 6 % · €215,000
  11. 2 more2 cases

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€200,000
Q1 20242€59,000
Q2 20243€31.7m
Q3 20242€290.2m
Q4 20241€4.75m
Q1 20251€100,000
Q2 20251€50,000
Q3 20250—
Q4 20252€186,250
Q1 20263€36.2m
Q2 20261€100m
Q3 20261€95,588

18 cases

27 Aug 2026 Flower bulb business failed to disclose hours of Polish seasonal workers – fine of around 95,600 EUR NetherlandsMinimum wage and undeclared work €95,588

A lily and tulip grower with an average of around 50 (at peak 75) employees, where Polish migrant workers are employed (anonymised in the judgment), was unable to produce sufficient records of hours worked and wages paid for 18 employees for September 2020 to February 2021. The Dutch Minister of Social Affairs and Employment (Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid) imposed 118,000 EUR in 2024 (112,100 EUR after objection); the North Netherlands District Court (Rechtbank Noord-Nederland) reduced the fine to 95,587.50 EUR, partly because of measures taken and excessively long proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Companies employing seasonal workers must be able to document hours and wage payments for each person without gaps – missing records are fined separately for each employee.

Authority / court
Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid / Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Art. 18b Abs. 2 Wet minimumloon en minimumvakantiebijslag (Wml)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
50 to 249
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of 12.5 % for appropriate measures, 5 % for delay and 2,500 EUR for exceeding the reasonable length of proceedings.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Apr 2026 MLU B.V. (Rechtsnachfolgerin der Ridetech International B.V., Anbieterin der Yango-App)Yango taxi app: 100 million EUR for transferring data to Russia NetherlandsInternational data transfers €100m

Amsterdam-based Ridetech offered the ride-hailing app Yango in Finland and Norway and transferred data of drivers and customers to the group companies Yandex.Taxi LLC and Yandex LLC in Russia without demonstrating appropriate safeguards. The Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Dutch Data Protection Authority, AP) imposed 100 million EUR on the legal successor and prohibited further transfers to Russia.

What organisations can take from it

Transfers to states without legal protection against access by authorities can hardly be safeguarded – group structures with such locations need data localisation in the EU.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · International data transfers
Legal basis
Art. 44, Art. 46 iVm Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Mar 2026 Fleurette Properties LtdCommodities holding Fleurette: 25.8 million EUR strafbeschikking over bribery in Congo NetherlandsBribery of public officials €25.8m

According to the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM), the top holding company of a mining, oil and gold group, which was based in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2017, participated together with others in bribing public officials of the DR Congo in order to obtain licences for cobalt and copper mines. On 6 March 2026, the OM issued a strafbeschikking (prosecutorial penalty order) imposing a fine of 25.8 million EUR, which Fleurette accepted.

What organisations can take from it

In the commodities sector, licences and concessions are the main target for bribery – holding companies share liability for payments made by their subsidiaries.

Relevance to training and awareness

Award of licences in the commodities sector, payments to public officials

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (OM); Ermittlungen FIOD Anti-Corruptie Centrum
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Buitenlandse ambtelijke omkoping (Wetboek van Strafrecht); OM-strafbeschikking
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Culpability
intentional
Published
10 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Feb 2026 Strukton Civiel Projecten B.V. und Strukton International B.V. (Strukton-Gruppe)Construction group Strukton pays 10 million EUR out-of-court settlement over bribery on the Riyadh Metro NetherlandsBribery of public officials €10m

To secure a share in the Riyadh Metro project, around 31 million USD was paid between 2013 and 2021 to an agent representing a high-ranking member of the Saudi royal family; the agent payments were understated to the export credit insurer Atradius. Strukton accepted a transaction (out-of-court settlement) of 10 million EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Commissions to agents with ties to ruling families carry the highest risk – and false statements to export credit insurers constitute a second offence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Agent commissions and false statements to export credit insurers

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (OM)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Buitenlandse ambtelijke omkoping und valsheid in geschrift (Wetboek van Strafrecht); Transactie nach Art. 74 Sr
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation from mid-2023; compliance programme in place since 2017; the employees involved are no longer with the company.
Liability of senior managers
The Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) is considering prosecuting several natural persons involved (not named).
Published
30 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

28 Jan 2026 CCV Group B.V.Netherlands: payment institution CCV without integrity risk analysis – 406,125 EUR fine NetherlandsInternal controls €406,125

Until March 2018, the payment institution had no systematic integrity risk analysis (SIRA) and therefore no systematic identification and analysis of integrity risks for its gatekeeper function. The Dutch central bank (De Nederlandsche Bank, DNB) imposed the fine in 2020; following objection and appeal proceedings, it was fixed at the reduced amount of 406,125 EUR by the decision of 28 January 2026 and was published in July 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Without a documented integrity risk analysis, any money laundering prevention lacks its foundation – and that alone is subject to fines.

Authority / court
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 3:10 Wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft); Art. 10 Besluit prudentiële regels Wft (Bpr)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Fine reduced in the objection and appeal proceedings
Published
21 Jul 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Dec 2025 Asparagus farm without reliable working time records: Raad van State upholds 11,250 EUR NetherlandsWorking time €11,250

In May/June 2022, the working time records of an asparagus business (anonymised in the judgment) deviated structurally from the hours actually worked; among other things, Sunday work went unrecorded, so compliance with working and rest times could not be checked. The Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Dutch Council of State (Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak) upheld the fine of 11,250 EUR, imposed in 2023 without prior warning, including the increase factor of 1.5.

What organisations can take from it

Working time records that do not reflect actual hours are treated as missing – businesses are then sanctioned without prior warning.

Relevance to training and awareness

Correct recording of working and rest times

Authority / court
Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Working time
Legal basis
Art. 4:3 Abs. 1 Arbeidstijdenwet
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Dec 2025 Stichting Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen (HAN University of Applied Sciences)Netherlands: 175,000 EUR against HAN university over inadequate security after hack NetherlandsData breaches and data security €175,000

In 2021, a hacker gained access via a web form to a web server and a database server of the university, obtained, among other things, names with passwords and citizen service numbers of students and staff, and unsuccessfully demanded a ransom. According to the Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP), security was not aligned with the risks, and the rights of a database account were not restricted.

What organisations can take from it

Give database accounts of web applications minimal rights so that a single vulnerability does not expose the entire data set.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 32
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement without objection; active damage limitation, strengthened resilience and sharing of lessons learned with other organisations.
Published
17 Dec 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 May 2025 AS Watson (Health & Beauty Continental Europe) B.V.AP reduces cookie fine against Kruidvat operator AS Watson to 50,000 EUR after objection NetherlandsCookies and tracking €50,000

The company behind the Kruidvat drugstore chain tracked visitors to Kruidvat.nl with tracking cookies without their knowledge or consent, enabling it to build profiles from location, pages visited, shopping basket and purchases. The Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) had imposed 600,000 EUR in 2024, upheld the objection in May 2025 and reduced the fine to 50,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Set tracking cookies in an online shop only after genuine consent – pre-ticked or hidden consent is not sufficient.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a DSGVO (Tracking-Cookies ohne Einwilligung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
12 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Feb 2025 Fatal pallet fall in warehouse: 100,000 EUR fine for industrial door manufacturer NetherlandsWorkplace safety and accidents €100,000

In January 2023, in the warehouse of a manufacturer of industrial doors in Didam (anonymised in the judgment), a 792 kg pallet fell from an unstable stack four high onto a new employee, who died; the forklift used, fitted with fork extensions, had no CE marking of its own and was unsuitable for the load, the risk assessment was incomplete and the instruction of the victim, who did not speak Dutch, was inadequate. The Overijssel District Court (Rechtbank Overijssel, economic division) imposed 100,000 EUR (of which 25,000 EUR suspended) for intentional violations of the Dutch Working Conditions Act (Arbowet), plus 17,500 EUR in damages to the mother (ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2025:711).

What organisations can take from it

Instruct employees in a language they understand – and draw consequences from earlier reportable accidents.

Relevance to training and awareness

Instruction of employees who speak other languages; safe stacking

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Rechtbank Overijssel (economische kamer)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Art. 32 Arbeidsomstandighedenwet i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1, 8 Abs. 1 Arbeidsomstandighedenwet; Art. 3.17, 7.2 Abs. 1, 7.18 Abs. 2 Arbeidsomstandighedenbesluit
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
No previous convictions of the company; part of the fine suspended.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

26 Nov 2024 Netflix International B.V.AP: 4.75 million EUR against Netflix over insufficient privacy information NetherlandsData subject rights and transparency €4.75m

Between 2018 and 2020, Netflix did not adequately inform customers about what happens to their data, and the information available was partly unclear. The Dutch supervisory authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) imposed 4.75 million EUR; Netflix has since revised its privacy statement.

What organisations can take from it

Privacy notices must be complete and comprehensible – and responses to customer requests must also be specific rather than generic.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a i. V. m. Art. 12 Abs. 1, Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. c, e, f und Abs. 2 lit. a, Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. a, c, d und Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
The privacy statement and the information provided were subsequently improved.
Published
18 Dec 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Sep 2024 Amsterdam company pays settlement: dividend paid out to oligarch's company NetherlandsBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €215,000

At the end of 2021, a company based in Amsterdam paid out a dividend of around 18 million EUR to a Russian shareholder behind which there was a sanctioned person, repaid a loan to a listed Russian company in 2019 and did not freeze shares and voting rights; in addition, a gatekeeper was misinformed. In a settlement (transactie) with the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (Openbaar Ministerie), the company paid 195,000 EUR and the managing director, as de facto manager, 20,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Dividends, loan repayments and voting rights vis-à-vis shareholders with a sanctioned owner in the background are also frozen – gatekeepers must know the full structure.

Relevance to training and awareness

Freezing shares of listed shareholders, beneficial owners

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (Staatsanwaltschaft der Niederlande)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Sanctiewet 1977 i. V. m. EU-Finanzsanktionen gegen Russland (seit 2014)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Liability of senior managers
The managing director paid 20,000 EUR as de facto manager.
Published
23 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Jul 2024 Uber Technologies Inc. und Uber B.V.Uber: 290 million EUR – driver data sent to the USA for two years without a transfer tool NetherlandsInternational data transfers €290m

Uber stored sensitive data of European drivers – including location, payment and identity document data, and in some cases criminal and health data – on servers in the USA and from August 2021 no longer used any transfer tool. Following complaints from more than 170 French drivers, the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Dutch Data Protection Authority, AP) imposed 290 million EUR; it was the AP’s third fine against Uber.

What organisations can take from it

Intra-group transfers to headquarters are third-country transfers – anyone who lets a transfer tool lapse transfers data without a legal basis.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · International data transfers
Legal basis
Art. 44 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Repeat case
yes
Published
26 Aug 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 May 2024 Clearview AI Inc.Dutch AP: 30.5 million EUR against Clearview AI over facial database NetherlandsAI systems €30.5m

Clearview processes biometric data of people in the Netherlands without a legal basis for a facial recognition database compiled from the internet, did not inform data subjects, did not respond to access requests and did not designate an EU representative. In addition to a fine of 30.5 million EUR, the Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) imposed four orders subject to penalty payments.

What organisations can take from it

Publicly accessible photos are no licence for biometric analysis – users of such services risk fines of their own.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · AI systems
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, 6 Abs. 1, 9 Abs. 1, 12, 14, 15, 27
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
3 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 May 2024 Leen BakkerLeen Bakker: 130,000 EUR fine for embellished reference prices NetherlandsMisleading advertising and pricing €130,000

The ACM imposed fines totalling 621,000 EUR on five online retailers because they did not base discounts on the lowest price of the previous 30 days and artificially raised initial prices. The furniture and home furnishings retailer Leen Bakker received a fine of 130,000 EUR and did not acknowledge the infringement.

What organisations can take from it

The reference price for a discount is the lowest price of the previous 30 days – raising prices shortly before a promotion is off-limits.

Relevance to training and awareness

Discount advertising and reference prices

Authority / court
Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Preisangabenregeln zur Preisermäßigung (Umsetzung Omnibus-Richtlinie, seit 1.1.2023)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
11 Jun 2024
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Apr 2024 Allround Hollands Energie B.V. (Hollandse Energie Maatschappij, HEM)HEM: 1.1 million EUR for misleading telemarketing of energy contracts NetherlandsMisleading advertising and pricing €1.1m

Telesales agents of the energy supplier did not identify themselves as HEM, presented the calls as "price protection" or a contract review and put the people they called under pressure; the customers ended up in expensive fixed-price contracts with high cancellation fees. The ACM imposed a fine of 1.1 million EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Sales calls must disclose who is calling and for what purpose – the company is liable for its call centres.

Relevance to training and awareness

Telephone sales and call scripts (including at sales partners)

Authority / court
Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Niederländisches Verbraucherrecht: Verbot irreführender und aggressiver Geschäftspraktiken
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
3 Apr 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Mar 2024 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (KLM)Amsterdam District Court: KLM advertising on sustainable flying misleading NetherlandsMisleading environmental and sustainability claims Other

In a collective action brought by the Fossielvrij foundation, the Amsterdam District Court (Rechtbank Amsterdam) found that 15 KLM advertising claims were misleading and unlawful: they suggested sustainable flying or that offsetting products actually compensate for the climate impact, although biofuels and reforestation reduce it only marginally. KLM bears the costs of the proceedings; further claims were dismissed (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:1512).

What organisations can take from it

Offsetting and SAF offerings must not create the impression of climate-neutral travel; associations can challenge such claims in court.

Relevance to training and awareness

Climate claims and offsetting offers in customer communication

Authority / court
Rechtbank Amsterdam
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
Legal basis
Wet oneerlijke handelspraktijken (Art. 6:193a ff. BW)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
20 Mar 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

28 Feb 2024 Bloem Infra B.V.; Den Ouden Infra B.V. (Kronzeuge, 0 €)Netherlands: 59,000 EUR against construction company over sham bid in school playground tender NetherlandsCartels and collusion €59,000

In the tender for the design of a school playground in Roermond, Bloem Infra passed its bid on in advance to Den Ouden, which then deliberately bid higher (cover pricing). The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) imposed a fine of 59,000 EUR on Bloem Infra; Den Ouden escaped a fine as the first to come forward.

What organisations can take from it

Even a single "helper bid" between construction companies on a small municipal contract is sanctioned – the first to come forward goes unpunished.

Relevance to training and awareness

Passing on one's own bids to co-bidders

Authority / court
Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 Mededingingswet (Kartellverbot)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
Leniency programme (Den Ouden 100 %), fine reduction for Bloem Infra for cooperation and acknowledgement
Published
7 Mar 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

31 Oct 2023 Woerd-Tech BVWoerd-Tech BV: 200,000 EUR penalty for microchips to Russian defence customers NetherlandsExport control and dual-use goods €200,000

The company of a Russian-Dutch national from Gorssel sold microchips, semiconductors and other electronics to a Russian purchasing organisation with an FSB licence and to customers from the defence industry, and after the tightening of sanctions in 2022 routed shipments ostensibly via the Maldives and other countries. Following charges brought by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (Openbaar Ministerie, OM), the Rotterdam District Court (Rechtbank Rotterdam) imposed a fine of 200,000 EUR on the BV (final after the appeals were withdrawn) and 18 months' imprisonment on the managing director (appeal proceedings pending).

What organisations can take from it

Banks report suspicious Russia payments to the FIU – sham routes via third countries are uncovered in this way and hit both companies and management.

Authority / court
Rechtbank Rotterdam; Anklage Openbaar Ministerie
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Sanctiewet 1977 (EU-Russland-Sanktionen); Urkundenfälschung (valsheid in geschrifte)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Managing director sentenced at first instance to 18 months' imprisonment; in the appeal proceedings, the OM demanded three years and a professional ban.
Published
14 Apr 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial