Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EULithuania Clear all filters
10cases from 1 jurisdiction
€16.2mTotal of monetary amounts
€7.51mLargest single case: MM Grupp OÜ
€620,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€840,000
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20241€2.39m
Q4 20241€9,000
Q1 20251€9,000
Q2 20250—
Q3 20251€400,000
Q4 20253€12.2m
Q1 20261€41,080
Q2 20261€362,000
Q3 20260—

10 cases

30 Oct 2025 MM Grupp OÜCinema chain MM Grupp (Apollo) took over Forum Cinemas without clearance – 7.5 million EUR LithuaniaMerger control €7.51m

In 2021, the Estonian parent company of Apollo cinemas acquired control of Forum Cinemas Lithuania before the notified merger had been cleared and integrated the cinemas in Vilnius and Kaunas into its network, even though the Konkurencijos taryba (Lithuanian Competition Council) had provisionally expressed competition concerns. Fine of 7,507,930 EUR (0.8% of consolidated worldwide turnover) and obligation to end the infringement within six months. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

No implementation before clearance: restructurings and leases can also constitute prohibited early implementation.

Authority / court
Konkurencijos taryba (Litauischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
Konkurencijos įstatymas (Vollzugsverbot bei Zusammenschlüssen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
30 Oct 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jun 2026 „Paysera LT“, UABPaysera: daily fine for missing annual accounts adds up to 362,000 EUR LithuaniaDisclosure and reporting obligations €362,000

Because Paysera did not comply with the order to submit its 2024 annual financial statements by 30 September 2025, the Lietuvos bankas (Bank of Lithuania, financial supervisor) first imposed 20,000 EUR in November 2025 and then a daily fine of 1,000 EUR (rising to 2,000 and 3,000 EUR respectively). As the infringement was only remedied after 6 May 2026, the daily fine added up to 362,000 EUR. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Running daily fines make every delay expensive – supervisory orders need top-management priority.

Authority / court
Lietuvos bankas (Litauische Zentralbank, Finanzaufsicht)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Aufsichtsrechtliche Anordnung und Berichtspflichten nach litauischem E-Geld-Recht
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
30 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Feb 2026 UAB „Manado“, MB „Parts ready“Manado and Parts ready: cartel in Vilnius public transport spare parts tender LithuaniaCartels and collusion €41,080

In two tenders by ‘Vilniaus viešasis transportas’ for vehicle spare parts (May–October 2025), the dealers coordinated bids and prices, wrote the bids for each other and sent them from the same computer. The contracting entity reported the suspicion. Following acknowledgement (minus 15%), fines of 17,950 EUR (Manado) and 23,130 EUR (Parts ready). Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Even jointly prepared bids by small dealers are a cartel – and contracting entities increasingly recognise such patterns.

Relevance to training and awareness

Competition law in tenders

Authority / court
Konkurencijos taryba (Litauischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Konkurencijos įstatymas (verbotene Vereinbarungen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Mitigating circumstances
Acknowledgement of the infringement (15% reduction)
Published
12 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Dec 2025 Snowball.xyz-Gruppe (Snowball.xyz, Šviesa, Tavo mokykla, Ateities pamoka) und AL holdingas-Gruppe (AL holdingas, Ugdymo sprendimai, UNT nuoma)E-register providers shared the market – 3.6 million EUR in cartel fines LithuaniaCartels and collusion €3.63m

In August 2020, the operators of the electronic class registers ‘Tamo’ and ‘Eduka’ agreed to stop competing: one group kept the class register business, the other took over the digital learning content. Following acknowledgement of the infringement, the fines were reduced by 15%: 2,714,940 EUR jointly and severally for the Snowball.xyz group and 913,340 EUR for the AL holdingas group (Art. 101 TFEU). The decision can be appealed. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Agreements between competitors on ‘who does what’ are cartels – even when dressed up as portfolio streamlining.

Relevance to training and awareness

Market sharing among competitors

Authority / court
Konkurencijos taryba (Litauischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Konkurencijos įstatymas; Art. 101 AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Mitigating circumstances
Acknowledgement of the infringement (15% reduction)
Published
18 Dec 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Nov 2025 UAB „Emsi“Emsi took over four filling stations without merger clearance – 1.02 million EUR LithuaniaMerger control €1.02m

In 2024, Emsi acquired control of four filling stations in Kaunas, Vilnius and Maišiagala through leases (via an affiliated company) and purchases without obtaining the required clearances, ignoring previous notices from the Konkurencijos taryba (Lithuanian Competition Council). For two concentrations, fines of 545,160 EUR and 477,010 EUR were imposed, a total of 1,022,170 EUR, together with an obligation to remedy the situation within three months. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Even the long-term lease of individual sites may require notification – if in doubt, ask the authority beforehand.

Relevance to training and awareness

Merger control also for leases of individual sites

Authority / court
Konkurencijos taryba (Litauischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
Konkurencijos įstatymas (Anmelde- und Genehmigungspflicht für Zusammenschlüsse)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
6 Nov 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

5 Sep 2025 „Paysera LT“, UABPaysera took over e-money institution Contis without approval – 400,000 EUR LithuaniaOrganisational requirements €400,000

Paysera acquired 100% of the shares in UAB ‘Finansinės paslaugos „Contis“’ before the assessment period had expired and without a non-objection from the supervisory authority; in April 2025, the Lietuvos bankas (Bank of Lithuania, financial supervisor) objected to the acquisition owing to a lack of documents on reputation, financial soundness and money laundering risks. In addition, the annual financial statements and other reports were not approved and submitted on time. Fine of 400,000 EUR and obligation to remedy by 30 September 2025. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Complete acquisitions of holdings in supervised institutions only after approval – otherwise voting rights are suspended and fines loom.

Authority / court
Lietuvos bankas (Litauische Zentralbank, Finanzaufsicht)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Elektroninių pinigų ir elektroninių pinigų įstaigų įstatymas (Inhaberkontrolle, Berichtspflichten)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
5 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

21 Jan 2025 Užimtumo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerijosEmployment service sends Excel file with data of 29,636 clients – 9,000 EUR LithuaniaData breaches and data security €9,000

An employee accidentally attached an Excel file containing data of 29,636 clients, including health data, to an e-mail sent to 292 clients. The Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (Lithuanian State Data Protection Inspectorate, VDAI) found that measures to prevent data leakage had not been sufficiently tested and that the employee had not been involved in data classification and had been insufficiently instructed; fine of 9,000 EUR. Date = publication; source: archived copy.

What organisations can take from it

One wrong attachment is enough for a mass data breach – DLP tools only help if all employees are trained and involved.

Relevance to training and awareness

Checking e-mail attachments, data classification

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (VDAI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 24 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und d DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
21 Jan 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Oct 2024 Vilniaus rajono savivaldybės administracijaRansomware attack on Vilnius district administration – data protection fine of 9,000 EUR LithuaniaData breaches and data security €9,000

Following a break-in into the district administration’s servers in which data were encrypted, services failed and social benefits were delayed. The Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (Lithuanian State Data Protection Inspectorate, VDAI) found insufficient malware protection, deficient management of rights and passwords, a lack of recovery and insufficient information of data subjects and imposed 9,000 EUR. Date = publication; source: archived copy.

What organisations can take from it

Backups, patch management and password rules are a data protection duty for public authorities too – and data subjects must receive specific advice on protecting themselves.

Relevance to training and awareness

Password security, ransomware preparedness

Authority / court
Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (VDAI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b, c und d, Art. 34 Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
18 Oct 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2024 Vinted, UABVinted pays 2.39 million EUR over ‘shadow banning’ and handling of erasure requests LithuaniaData subject rights and transparency €2.39m

Acting on complaints from France and Poland, the Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (Lithuanian State Data Protection Inspectorate, VDAI) found that the second-hand platform rejected erasure requests when users did not state a ‘specific reason’ under Art. 17 GDPR, throttled users without their knowledge through ‘shadow banning’ and could not demonstrate how it handled access requests. Fine of 2,385,276 EUR. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Covert restrictions on users are non-transparent – and erasure requests must not fail on formalities such as a requirement to give reasons.

Authority / court
Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (VDAI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 12 Abs. 1 und 4 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
3 Jul 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Nov 2023 UAB „Finansinės paslaugos „Contis““Contis: 840,000 EUR for anti-money laundering delegated to partners without oversight LithuaniaCustomer due diligence €840,000

The e-money institution had delegated anti-money laundering tasks to its distribution partners without monitoring them; customer profiles were often not completed, risks (including from crypto-assets) were not assessed, monitoring was insufficient and the second and third lines of defence for ICT risks were missing. Fine of 840,000 EUR, obligation to remedy the deficiencies and restriction on business expansion. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

AML duties can be delegated to distribution partners, responsibility cannot – without oversight of the partners, the institution is liable.

Authority / court
Lietuvos bankas (Litauische Zentralbank, Finanzaufsicht)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Pinigų plovimo ir teroristų finansavimo prevencijos įstatymas; IKT-Risikomanagement-Anforderungen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
The institution submitted a remediation plan and had initiated first steps.
Published
24 Nov 2023

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial