Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Brazil Clear all filters
38cases from 1 jurisdiction
€444.4mTotal of monetary amounts (34 cases with an amount)
€2.73mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo 13 cases 34 % · €56.6m
  2. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU) 7 cases 18 % · €216.5m
  3. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) 6 cases 16 % · €96.4m
  4. Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE), Inspeção do Trabalho 4 cases 11 % ·
  5. Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS) 3 cases 8 % · €6.88m
  6. Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) 3 cases 8 % · €41.4m
  7. Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD), Superintendência de Fiscalização 1 case 3 % · €25.6m
  8. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE) 1 case 3 % · €1.04m

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law 14 cases 37 % · €57.7m
  2. Bribery and corruption 13 cases 34 % · €312.9m
  3. Capital markets and financial supervision 4 cases 11 % · €41.9m
  4. Supply chain and human rights 4 cases 11 % ·
  5. Money laundering and terrorist financing 2 cases 5 % · €6.45m
  6. Data protection 1 case 3 % · €25.6m

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance 10 cases 26 % · €150.7m
  2. Food and agriculture 8 cases 21 % · €11m
  3. Energy and utilities 4 cases 11 % · €90.4m
  4. Manufacturing and mechanical engineering 4 cases 11 % · €127.1m
  5. Automotive 2 cases 5 % · €17.6m
  6. Chemicals and pharmaceuticals 2 cases 5 % · €7.92m
  7. Healthcare 2 cases 5 % · €8.12m
  8. Media and online platforms 2 cases 5 % · €25.7m
  9. Telecoms, IT and software 2 cases 5 % · €4.93m
  10. Construction and real estate 1 case 3 % · €1.04m
  11. 1 more1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20243€66.1m
Q1 20254€84.9m
Q2 20256€5.52m
Q3 20253€194.7m
Q4 20255€25.9m
Q1 20263€8.5m
Q2 20265€24.6m
Q3 20269€34.2m
Q4 20260–

38 cases

30 Jul 2025 Seatrium Ltd., Jurong Shipyard Pte. Ltd., Estaleiro Jurong Aracruz Ltda.Seatrium and Jurong: leniency agreement for BRL 728.9m BrazilBribery of public officials €113.2m

Seatrium Ltd., Jurong Shipyard Pte. Ltd. (both Singapore) and Estaleiro Jurong Aracruz Ltda. entered into a leniency agreement with the Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) and the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU, Office of the Attorney General) concerning undue advantages given to public officials or politicials and persons connected to them, and undue advantages obtained in contracts with the public administration. The companies allegedly acknowledged a debt of BRL 728,933,258.58, payable within 60 days; according to the companies, they have also negotiated agreements with the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) and Singapore's Attorney-General's Chambers. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Companies with large public contracts must effectively prevent benefits to public officials, politicians and their associates, as authorities in several countries act in parallel.

Relevance to training and awareness

Benefits to public officials and politically exposed persons

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 I, III und IV d, Art. 16; Lei nº 8.666/1993, Art. 88 II und III; Lei nº 8.429/1992
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Mitigating circumstances
Commitment by the CGU and AGU to avoid double payments in relation to an agreement with the MPF; obligation to improve the integrity programme.

Original amount 728,933,258.58 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Sep 2026 Carioca Christiani-Nielsen Engenharia S.A.Carioca Engenharia pays 6.13 million BRL in CADE settlement on construction tenders BrazilCartels and collusion €1.04m

Carioca Christiani-Nielsen Engenharia S.A. concluded a single settlement (Termo de Compromisso de Cessação) with the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) covering four proceedings concerning alleged collusion in public tenders for infrastructure projects (metro, airports operated by Infraero, the rail company CPTM and the transport authority DNIT). The company admitted its participation, allegedly pays 6,134,676.92 BRL in instalments to the Fund for Diffuse Rights (FDD) and waives court and administrative disputes on these matters. Together with the company’s earlier settlements with CADE, its contributions exceed 90 million BRL.

What organisations can take from it

A settlement covering all pending cartel cases creates legal certainty but requires an admission, payment and full cooperation.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bid rigging in public construction contracts

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência), Termo de Compromisso de Cessação
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Published
22 Sep 2026

Original amount 6,134,676.92 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Sep 2026 Cervejaria Petrópolis S.A. (em recuperação judicial); Imcopa Importação, Exportação e Indústria de Óleos S.A.CADE fines Cervejaria Petrópolis for early closing of Imcopa takeover BrazilMerger control €231,813

The Tribunal of the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) unanimously found that Cervejaria Petrópolis had taken control of the oil producer Imcopa before the legally required notification (gun jumping) and imposed a fine of 1,382,418.22 BRL. According to the investigation, the acquisition was completed on 19 March 2024 but notified only on 9 April 2024; CADE itself cleared the transaction without conditions in April 2024. The argument that the change of control resulted from court decisions in the judicial reorganisation proceedings (recuperação judicial) did not persuade the authority. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Acquisitions in a restructuring or insolvency context, too, may be completed only after notification and clearance.

Relevance to training and awareness

Standstill obligation before clearance in merger control (gun jumping)

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
Art. 88 § 3 Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
8 Sep 2026

Original amount 1,382,418.22 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Aug 2026 ByteDance Brasil Tecnologia Ltda. (TikTok)ANPD fines TikTok operator 153.77 million BRL over data of minors BrazilData protection €25.6m

The Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD, Brazilian data protection authority) imposed three fines totalling 153,769,671.33 BRL on ByteDance Brasil Tecnologia Ltda., which operates TikTok in Brazil (63,176,686.67 BRL each for breaches of Art. 7 and Art. 6 VIII LGPD, and 27,416,297.99 BRL for Art. 6 X LGPD). According to the decision, data of children and adolescents were processed without a valid legal basis both in the feed available without registration and when accounts were created, and effective preventive and accountability measures were lacking. The authority also ordered the deletion of data of registered adolescents aged 13 to 18 whose legal representation is not regularised within 60 working days, backed by a daily penalty of 137,081.49 BRL for each day of delay.

What organisations can take from it

Platforms that reach minors need a sound legal basis and demonstrably effective safeguards – including for services used without registration.

Relevance to training and awareness

Protecting the data of children and adolescents on online platforms

Authority / court
Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD), Superintendência de Fiscalização
Area of law
Data protection
Legal basis
Art. 6 VIII, Art. 6 X und Art. 7 LGPD (Lei nº 13.709/2018); Sanktionen nach Art. 52 LGPD; Resolução CD/ANPD nº 4/2023 (Regulamento de Dosimetria)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
25 Aug 2026

Original amount 153,769,671.33 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Banco Genial S.A.Banco Genial: BRL 21.56m for anti-money laundering failings in FX business BrazilCustomer due diligence €3.62m

The Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador (COPAS, sanctions decision committee) of the Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank) fined Banco Genial S.A. a total of BRL 21,560,000.00: BRL 4,200,000.00 for inadequate anti-money laundering policies, procedures and controls, BRL 8,920,000.00 for failing to verify the credentials of foreign exchange clients and BRL 8,440,000.00 for failing to file suspicious activity reports with the financial intelligence unit Coaf in the proper form and on time. According to the case documents, the reporting charge concerned 1,364 foreign exchange transactions for the acquisition of virtual assets with five clients between November 2020 and October 2021, totalling USD 744,341,982.45.

What organisations can take from it

Foreign exchange transactions for buying crypto-assets require checks on clients' financial capacity and timely suspicious activity reports.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer due diligence and suspicious activity reporting in FX and crypto business

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Lei nº 9.613/1998, Art. 10 III, Art. 11 und 12; Lei nº 13.506/2017; Circular BCB nº 3.978/2020; Resolução CMN nº 3.568/2008
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 21,560,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e InvestimentoLebes Financeira: BRL 2.58m over lending to a related party above the limit BrazilOrganisational requirements €432,774

The BCB (central bank) sanctions committee COPAS imposed a fine of BRL 2,576,000.00 on Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento because from January 2022 to March 2023 it engaged in prohibited credit transactions with a related company: its banking correspondent retained collected loan instalments, and the arrears reached BRL 147m at the end of November 2022, or 207.66% of adjusted equity against a limit of 10%. In addition there was a BRL 20m loan routed through a third company. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

If an affiliated distribution partner retains customer money, this can quickly become a prohibited loan to a related party.

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Lei 13.506/2017, Art. 3 II; Lei 4.595/1964, Art. 34 § 3 V d und § 4 I; Resolução CMN 4.693/2018, Arts. 5, 6 und 7 II
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 2,576,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jul 2026 Arla Foods Ingredientes Comércio de Produtos Alimentícios Unipessoal Ltda.Arla Foods Ingredientes: leniency agreement after self-report for BRL 31,056.36 BrazilBribery and corruption €5,375

Arla Foods Ingredientes Comércio de Produtos Alimentícios Unipessoal Ltda. entered into a leniency agreement with the Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) and the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU, Office of the Attorney General) concerning violations of the Anti-Corruption Law described in an unpublished annex; it had been the first to come forward, in October 2022. The alleged fine of BRL 31,056.36 derives from a preliminary fine of BRL 93,150.45, based on 2021 gross revenue of BRL 6,210,029.68, reduced by 66.66% for self-reporting, degree of cooperation and payment terms.

What organisations can take from it

Self-reporting, full cooperation and the payment terms can together cut a fine under Brazil's Anti-Corruption Law by two thirds in a leniency agreement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Self-reporting and cooperation where corruption is suspected

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 16 und 17; Decreto nº 11.129/2022, Art. 22, 23 und 47; Lei nº 8.429/1992
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Total reduction of 66.66% (22.22% each for self-reporting, degree of cooperation and payment terms); compensation for losses, cooperation and voluntary admission also counted as mitigating factors in the calculation.
Liability of senior managers
As an aggravating factor, the CGU found that management tolerated or was aware of the acts (3% uplift).

Original amount 31,056.36 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jul 2026 RSX Informática Ltda.RSX Informática: BRL 8.8m and three-year debarment for procurement fraud BrazilBribery and corruption €1.49m

The Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) imposed on RSX Informática Ltda. a fine of BRL 8,794,574.67, extraordinary publication of the decision and a three-year ban on tendering for and contracting with the Federal Union, including removal from the supplier register SICAF. The case concerned fraud in a tender (pregão nº 5/2017) of the former Ministry of National Integration and in the resulting contracts; through the price registration agreement, other federal bodies, including the social security institute INSS with a software contract, contracted with the company without holding their own tender.

What organisations can take from it

Price registration agreements carry the effects of a rigged tender into many public bodies, so the award must be clean from the outset.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrity in tenders and framework agreements

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 IV d, Art. 6 I und II; Lei nº 10.520/2002, Art. 7
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
10 Jul 2026

Original amount 8,794,574.67 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2026 IRB-Brasil Resseguros S.A.IRB-Brasil Resseguros: BRL 6.32m settlement over obstructing SUSEP supervision BrazilBribery and corruption €1.07m

IRB-Brasil Resseguros S.A. concluded a Termo de Compromisso (settlement in sanction proceedings) with the CGU and allegedly pays a fine of BRL 6,317,473.41 because the company had hindered the investigative and supervisory activity of the insurance supervisor SUSEP (Art. 5 V Lei 12.846/2013). The fine equals the statutory minimum of 0.1% of gross revenue (BRL 6,509,921.81) less BRL 192,448.40 already paid in SUSEP proceedings over inconsistent reporting. Extraordinary publication was waived, and the proceedings are thereby closed.

What organisations can take from it

Incomplete or inconsistent information given to a supervisory authority can, as obstruction of supervision, trigger an anti-corruption fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Obstructing supervisory authorities through inaccurate information

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 V, Art. 6 I; Decreto 11.129/2022, Art. 25 § 2; Portaria Normativa CGU 155/2024
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Credit was given for a compliance programme (3.6%), the absence of proof of advantage or damage (1%) and settlement-related reductions for cooperation and admission; fines already paid to SUSEP were deducted.
Published
3 Jul 2026

Original amount 6,317,473.41 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 Jul 2026 Datasonic Indústria e Distribuição de Eletrônicos Ltda., D.T.I. Comércio de Artigos de Informática Ltda., Pares Eletrônica Comercial e Industrial Eireli u. a. (10 Unternehmen)CADE: cartel fines on ten electronics suppliers, two later reduced BrazilCartels and collusion €699,960

In cartel proceedings, the CADE Tribunal fined ten suppliers of electronic products, while the signatories of a 2014 leniency agreement (Agilent and Keysight) and one company that had fulfilled a settlement were not sanctioned. The fines on the companies initially totalled 8,362,138.05 BRL; in the virtual deliberation procedure the plenary, deciding on motions for clarification (embargos) on 17 August 2026, reduced of its own motion the fines on Datasonic (from 4,329,605.69 to 856,937.12 BRL) and D.T.I. (from 1,021,750.18 to 265,406.99 BRL), leaving 4,133,126.29 BRL. The session minutes do not identify the market concerned. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

The first party to cooperate with the competition authority can escape sanctions, while the other participants pay.

Relevance to training and awareness

Cartel risks in distribution and the benefits of leniency

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
8 Jul 2026

Original amount 4,133,126.29 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jun 2026 Denso CorporationCADE: 100.79 million BRL against Denso over international wire harness cartel BrazilCartels and collusion €16.8m

The Tribunal of the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) unanimously fined Denso Corporation 100,787,523.05 BRL for taking part in an international cartel in wire harnesses and electrical and electronic automotive components with effects in Brazil. According to the rapporteur’s vote, Denso took part in price fixing, the allocation of projects, geographic market sharing and the exchange of sensitive information roughly between 2000 and 2008. For other participants the proceedings ended through leniency, settlements or for lack of evidence; CADE dismissed Denso’s motion for clarification (embargos) in August 2026. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

International cartels are prosecuted in Brazil even long after they ended if they affected prices there.

Relevance to training and awareness

International cartels in the automotive supply chain

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
10 Jun 2026

Original amount 100,787,523.05 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 May 2026 Frigorífico Cason Ltda., ASM Comércio de Subprodutos de Origem Animal Ltda., ASM Comércio e Coleta de Ossos Ltda.CADE: buyer cartel for animal by-products in Rio Grande do Sul – BRL 6.4m BrazilCartels and collusion €1.09m

The CADE Tribunal convicted three companies of a buyer cartel in the purchase of animal residues in Rio Grande do Sul: according to CADE, rendering plants and haulage companies divided collection points among themselves, exchanged sensitive information and obstructed competitors outside the arrangement. Frigorífico Cason received 5,937,915.73 BRL and the two ASM companies jointly 455,419.65 BRL (6,393,335.38 BRL in total); proceedings against several other parties were closed because settlements had been fulfilled or for lack of evidence. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Buyers, too, must not coordinate the allocation of suppliers or collection areas; buyer cartels are prohibited just like seller cartels.

Relevance to training and awareness

Buyer cartels and allocation of supply or collection areas

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
29 May 2026

Original amount 6,393,335.38 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 May 2026 Comércio de Combustíveis Stang Ltda., Pato Comércio de Combustíveis Ltda. u. a. (3 Unternehmen)CADE: fuel cartel in Coronel Vivida – fines cut to BRL 15.1m on embargos BrazilCartels and collusion €2.63m

The CADE Tribunal convicted three petrol station companies because in 2017 they had divided the lots of municipal fuel tenders in Coronel Vivida (Paraná) among themselves in advance and had also coordinated retail pump prices. The fines on the companies initially totalled 43,953,905.42 BRL (Comércio de Combustíveis Stang 25,801,726.15; a further petrol station company 9,406,784.68; Pato Comércio de Combustíveis 8,745,394.59 BRL). On motions for clarification (embargos) the Tribunal reduced, on 1 July 2026, the fines on Stang to 4,615,849.76 BRL and on Pato to 1,090,682.28 BRL owing to a subsequently arising fact relevant to the calculation, leaving 15,113,316.72 BRL. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Dividing lots in public tenders is a cartel infringement carrying heavy fines, even in small municipal procurement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Division of tender lots between competitors

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011; Art. 38 VI (Handelsverbot für natürliche Personen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Energy and utilities
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
13 May 2026

Original amount 15,113,316.72 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 May 2026 Banco Topázio S.A.Banco Topázio: BRL 16.28m and crypto FX ban over anti-money laundering failings BrazilSuspicious activity reports €2.82m

The sanctions committee COPAS of the Banco Central do Brasil (central bank) imposed fines totalling BRL 16,280,000.00 on Banco Topázio S.A.: BRL 4,560,000.00 because its monitoring system contained no rules for foreign exchange transactions to buy and sell virtual assets, BRL 3,280,000.00 because suspicious transactions were not reported, or reported late, to the financial intelligence unit Coaf (including BRL 3.05bn from one client), and BRL 8,440,000.00 because the bank had not verified the qualification of foreign exchange clients. In addition, for two years it may not carry out over-the-counter foreign exchange transactions for virtual assets in which the client acts as an unauthorised intermediary for third parties. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone processing foreign exchange for crypto intermediaries needs suitable monitoring scenarios and must also know the customers behind the customers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering monitoring of foreign exchange with crypto intermediaries

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Lei 9.613/1998, Art. 10 III, Art. 11 II, Art. 12 II und § 2 II und IV; Circular BCB 3.978/2020, Arts. 38, 39 und 48; Lei 13.506/2017, Art. 3 XVII, Art. 5 II und IV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 16,280,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Apr 2026 Colônia dos Pescadores Z-12 do Médio Rio DoceFishers' colony Z-12: BRL 7.18m CGU fine over fraud involving Renova compensation BrazilBribery and corruption €1.23m

The CGU imposed on the Colônia dos Pescadores Z-12 do Médio Rio Doce a fine of BRL 7,180,921.47 and extraordinary publication of the decision. Acting together with others, the association had falsified its members' applications for entry in the fishing register (RGP) and backdated records and had interfered with the federal fisheries office in Espírito Santo, so that false data found their way into official documents and compensation from the Fundação Renova, together with lawyers' fees, was paid out without entitlement (Art. 5 II, III and V Lei 12.846/2013).

Relevance to training and awareness

Falsified documents submitted to authorities to obtain compensation

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 II, III und V, Art. 6 I und II, Art. 14; Decreto 11.129/2022, Arts. 19, 22 und 23
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
5 May 2026

Original amount 7,180,921.47 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Feb 2026 Liga do Futebol Brasileiro (Libra), Clube de Regatas do Flamengo, Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras u. a. (6 Organisationen)CADE: football league Libra and five clubs pay BRL 559,267.26 for gun jumping BrazilMerger control €90,565

The CADE Tribunal found that the Libra league, as a joint venture of clubs for the joint commercialisation of broadcasting and commercial rights, was notifiable and had been implemented before clearance, and approved a settlement (Acordo em APAC) with Libra and Flamengo, Palmeiras, Santos, São Paulo and Grêmio with an alleged pecuniary contribution of 559,267.26 BRL. The parties must notify the transactions already completed within 60 days and report changes to their commercialisation structures for three years; for the rival league FFU (formerly LFU) no infringement was found because the turnover thresholds were not met. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Clubs and associations that market rights jointly may form a notifiable joint venture and must obtain clearance before launch.

Relevance to training and awareness

Joint commercialisation of rights as a notifiable joint venture

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
Art. 88 § 3 Lei nº 12.529/2011
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
11 Feb 2026

Original amount 559,267.26 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Jan 2026 JBJ Agropecuária Ltda., Prima Foods S.A.JBJ Agropecuária and Prima Foods: BRL 31.16m in fines under leniency agreement BrazilBribery of public officials €4.98m

JBJ Agropecuária Ltda. and Prima Foods S.A. acknowledged, in a leniency agreement with the CGU and the AGU, that they had paid an economic advantage to a public official whose action or omission was in their interest (Art. 5 I Lei 12.846/2013). After a 66.6% reduction they allegedly pay fines totalling BRL 31,156,767.70 in three annual instalments and are jointly and severally liable for them. Payments under an agreement on the same facts with the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) are credited.

What organisations can take from it

Parallel agreements with prosecutors and oversight bodies can be coordinated – double payments are credited, but the liability remains.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payment to a public official to influence official action

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 I, Art. 6 I, Arts. 16 und 17; Decreto 11.129/2022
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
For JBJ, credit was given for restitution or compensation (1%), cooperation (1.5%), voluntary admission (2%) and an applied compliance programme (2.5%); overall a 66.6% reduction on the full fine of BRL 93,283,735.64.
Liability of senior managers
For JBJ, tolerance or knowledge by management (3%) and the concurrence of several offences (3%) were aggravating factors.

Original amount 31,156,767.7 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jan 2026 Linkcon Ltda.Linkcon: BRL 21.5m and debarment over a rigged port authority tender BrazilBribery and corruption €3.43m

The Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) imposed on Linkcon Ltda. a fine of BRL 21,521,878.64, extraordinary publication of the decision and a two-year ban on tendering for and contracting with the Federal Union. According to the final report, an electronic tender of the port company Companhia Docas do Rio de Janeiro (PE 17/2016) and the resulting price registration agreement were steered in the company's favour through simulated price surveys; it also submitted a false document to be classified as a small business (EPP). The CGU rejected the request for reconsideration on 30 July 2026. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Price surveys and proof of company size in public procurement must be genuine; manipulation leads to heavy fines and debarment.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fair competition and truthful evidence in public procurement

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 IV a, Art. 6 I und II; Lei nº 10.520/2002, Art. 7
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
12 Jan 2026

Original amount 21,521,878.64 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Dec 2025 Renuka Vale do Ivaí S.A. (em recuperação judicial)Renuka Vale do Ivaí: sugar mill placed on the ‘Lista Suja’ over slave-like labour BrazilForced and child labour Other

The Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE, Ministry of Labour and Employment) entered the sugar mill Renuka Vale do Ivaí S.A. (in judicial reorganisation) in the register of employers that have subjected workers to conditions analogous to slavery (Cadastro de Empregadores, the ‘Lista Suja’). The entry is based on a 2025 labour inspection at the sugar cane mill in São Pedro do Ivaí (Paraná) involving 57 workers; the final administrative decision was taken on 22 December 2025 and the entry was made in the update of 6 April 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Sugar industry companies must continuously check working conditions at their sites, because an entry on the ‘Lista Suja’ is published by name.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising and preventing slave-like working conditions

Authority / court
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE), Inspeção do Trabalho
Area of law
Supply chain and human rights · Forced and child labour
Legal basis
Portaria Interministerial MTE/MDHC/MIR nº 18/2024 (Cadastro de Empregadores)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
6 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Dec 2025 Elo Sistemas Eletrônicos S.A., FAE Sistemas de Medição S.A., Wasion da Amazônia (ehem. Dowertech da Amazônia)CADE: 73.83 million BRL in fines for electricity meter cartel BrazilCartels and collusion €11.4m

The Tribunal of the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) unanimously convicted the manufacturers Elo Sistemas Eletrônicos, FAE Sistemas de Medição (formerly Fae Ferragens e Aparelhos Elétricos) and Dowertech da Amazônia (now Wasion da Amazônia) of a cartel in electricity meters, in which between 2005 and 2014 prices in public and private tenders were agreed, the market was shared and monitored and cover bids were submitted. The companies received fines of 54,238,824.03 BRL, 15,167,886.53 BRL and 3,196,631.43 BRL. The case was triggered by a leniency application in 2014; in the same session CADE approved four further settlements worth around 15.5 million BRL. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Bid-rigging cartels are often uncovered through leniency applicants; compliance must consistently prevent contacts with competitors before bids are submitted.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bid rigging and market sharing in tenders

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
10 Dec 2025

Original amount 72,603,341.99 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 18 more of 18

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial