Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EUSlovenia Clear all filters
9cases from 1 jurisdiction
€860,474Total of monetary amounts (5 cases with an amount)
€71,474Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK) €693,000 81 % · 3 cases
  2. Banka Slovenije €90,000 10 % · 3 cases
  3. Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP) €77,474 9 % · 2 cases
  4. Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (bekanntgemacht durch den Informacijski pooblaščenec) — 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €693,000 81 % · 3 cases
  2. Capital markets and financial supervision €90,000 10 % · 1 case
  3. Data protection €77,474 9 % · 3 cases
  4. Money laundering and terrorist financing — 0 % · 1 case
  5. Information security and cyber — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Automotive €650,000 76 % · 1 case
  2. Financial services and insurance €90,000 10 % · 3 cases
  3. Other €71,474 8 % · 1 case
  4. Healthcare €43,000 5 % · 1 case
  5. Energy and utilities €6,000 1 % · 2 cases
  6. Transport, logistics and shipping — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€43,000
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20241€650,000
Q4 20241€90,000
Q1 20251—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20251—
Q4 20251—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20262€77,474
Q3 20261—

9 cases

24 Sep 2024 GA ADRIATIC, trženje in prodaja avtomobilov, d.o.o. (vormals Renault Nissan Slovenija)GA Adriatic (Renault): 650,000 EUR settlement for collusion on workshop contracts SloveniaCartels and collusion €650,000

In 2021, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) had found that the Renault importer and four car dealerships had infringed the cartel prohibition in the repair and maintenance of Renault vehicles for public contracting authorities. In a settlement procedure under the new competition act, GA Adriatic withdrew its action and received an administrative sanction of 650,000 EUR, payable in three instalments.

What organisations can take from it

Authorised dealer networks must not coordinate on public contracts – even where contracting authorities require brand workshops.

Relevance to training and awareness

Collusion between manufacturer and dealer network in tenders

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 ZPOmK-1 bzw. Art. 5 ZPOmK-2, Art. 101 AEUV; Vergleich nach Art. 95 ZPOmK-2 (3062-5/2024)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Automotive
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with a reduction of up to 20%; termination after the inspection, cooperation.
Published
30 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Jul 2026 Unternehmen mit drei Dienstfahrzeugen (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Administrative Court upholds ban on continuous GPS tracking of three company vehicles SloveniaEmployee data Order

The data protection authority had prohibited a company from tracking its three company vehicles continuously by GPS and ordered the data to be erased; narrow purposes such as theft protection while parked remained permitted. The Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia) upheld this and clarified that employee consent bundled with other declarations is invalid.

What organisations can take from it

Employee consent rarely supports monitoring – and never when it is bundled with other declarations in the form.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proportionality in employee monitoring

Authority / court
Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (bekanntgemacht durch den Informacijski pooblaščenec)
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 7 Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Published
7 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Apr 2026 Öffentliches Kommunalunternehmen (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Municipal company: 6,000 EUR for permanent GPS tracking of company vehicles SloveniaEmployee data €6,000

A provider of public utility services used GPS transmitters in company vehicles to record employees’ location data permanently and without cause, without defining a purpose, carrying out a balancing of interests or providing sufficient information. The Informacijski pooblaščenec (Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia, IP) imposed 6,000 EUR on the company and 600 EUR on the responsible person.

What organisations can take from it

GPS data are not suitable for performance monitoring – consider less intrusive means before introduction and inform employees in advance.

Relevance to training and awareness

GPS tracking and employee data protection

Authority / court
Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP)
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 und Art. 6 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Liability of senior managers
Additional fine of 600 EUR on the responsible person.
Published
15 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

9 Apr 2026 Arbeitgeber (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Slovenia: 71,474 EUR for covert monitoring of employees using spyware SloveniaEmployee data €71,474

An employer installed the software Spyrix Employee Monitoring on the work computers of individual employees, which for months recorded screen content, audio and even private e-mails and conversations without informing the employees. The supervisory authority, the Informacijski pooblaščenec (Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia, IP), imposed 71,474 EUR on the company and 4,000 EUR on the responsible person.

What organisations can take from it

Covert employee monitoring by software is practically never permissible – IT and managers must know this before tools are installed.

Relevance to training and awareness

Permissible monitoring of employees and IT use

Authority / court
Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP)
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 und Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Additional fine of 4,000 EUR on the responsible person.
Published
9 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Dec 2025 SUROVINA d.o.o.; SALOMON d.o.o.; RECIKEL d.o.o.; DINOS d.o.o.Packaging waste: AVK finds market sharing by four waste management companies SloveniaCartels and collusion Order

In the reopened proceedings, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) found that the companies had shared the market for take-back schemes for packaging waste and agreed to stop providing their services to a competitor (now Interzero). The authority ordered immediate termination; the decision is not final, and an earlier decision from 2019 in the same matter is partly final.

What organisations can take from it

An agreement to stop supplying a common competitor is a cartel – even in regulated waste management markets.

Relevance to training and awareness

Boycott and market-sharing agreements

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 ZPOmK-1, Art. 101 AEUV (3062-5/2017)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
16 Apr 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Sep 2025 Nova Ljubljanska banka d. d.NLB: reprimand because PSD2 interface exposed 57 account numbers SloveniaSecurity measures and risk management Reprimand or warning

After an update of the PSD2 interface for third-party providers in July 2023, the confidentiality of 57 IBAN accounts of bank customers was not ensured. The banking supervisor, Banka Slovenije (Bank of Slovenia), issued a reprimand to the bank and to the responsible IT development director for breaching the obligation to protect confidential data (final).

What organisations can take from it

Every change to customer interfaces requires testing for data leakage before go-live – responsibility also lies with the manager in charge.

Relevance to training and awareness

Security testing for software releases of interfaces

Authority / court
Banka Slovenije
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Security measures and risk management
Legal basis
Art. 146, Art. 396 Abs. 1 Nr. 18 ZBan-3 (slowenisches Bankengesetz)
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Reprimand also issued to the responsible Director of IT Development (Dejan Pust).

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

4 Mar 2025 MAKI podjetje za turizem, trgovino in storitve d.o.o. KoperBureau de change MAKI: transaction limit of 1,000 EUR over unresolved anti-money laundering deficiencies SloveniaInternal controls Order

During a follow-up inspection, Banka Slovenije (Bank of Slovenia) found that the company had not remedied the anti-money laundering deficiencies it had been ordered to address in 2023; some infringements are considered serious. It limited transactions to 1,000 EUR per customer per day, ordered monthly reports and set a deadline of 30 June 2025.

What organisations can take from it

Supervisory orders that are not implemented lead to business restrictions – working through them requires responsible persons and deadline control.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering in small financial service providers

Authority / court
Banka Slovenije
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 164 ZPPDFT-2, Art. 280 ZBan-3, Art. 42.a ZBS-1
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Nov 2024 Deželna banka Slovenije d. d.Deželna banka Slovenije: 90,000 EUR for deficient credit risk provisioning SloveniaOrganisational requirements €90,000

From 2018 to mid-2023, the bank had no adequate policies for impairments and provisions under IFRS 9 and the EBA guidelines on credit risk. Banka Slovenije (Bank of Slovenia) imposed 90,000 EUR on the bank and 2,500 EUR each on the chair of the management board and a board member.

What organisations can take from it

In Slovenia, governance deficiencies in risk management are also sanctioned personally against board members.

Authority / court
Banka Slovenije
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 171, Art. 396 Abs. 1 Nr. 19 ZBan-3
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Fines of 2,500 EUR each on the chair of the management board, Marko Rozman, and the board member Barbara Cerovšek Zupančič.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Dec 2023 Veterinarska zbornica SlovenijeVeterinary chamber: 43,000 EUR for ban on discounts and advertising SloveniaCartels and collusion €43,000

Since 2015, the chamber’s professional code had prohibited its members from offering services below list price, at a discount or free of charge and from advertising prices and promotions – including online. As the first decision under the new act and in the first settlement procedure, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) imposed 43,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Professional codes of chambers are decisions of associations of undertakings – price and advertising bans in them infringe competition law.

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 5 ZPOmK-2, Art. 101 AEUV (3062-13/2019)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with acknowledgement of responsibility.
Published
22 Jan 2024
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial