Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

8cases from 1 jurisdiction
€102.3mTotal of monetary amounts
€53.5mLargest single case: AAR Corp.
€1.44mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20243€97m
Q1 20250—
Q2 20251€266,631
Q3 20253€3.63m
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20261€1.5m

8 cases

28 Aug 2026 MSC Shipmanagement Limited; Hong Kong Spirit Shipping and Trading LimitedMSC Shipmanagement: 1.75 million USD fine for secretly discharging oily bilge water USAWaste and hazardous substances €1.5m

On board the MSC Samira III, senior engineering officers had oily bilge water pumped overboard via the sewage tank, bypassing the oily water separator, in 2024/2025, manipulated the oil content monitoring and falsified the oil record book, which was presented to the Coast Guard in Philadelphia. The operator and the owner each pleaded guilty to two counts under the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS) and are paying a combined 1.75 million USD; in addition, there are four years of probation.

What organisations can take from it

Shipping companies must actively monitor practice on board and the oil record book, because instructions given by individual officers are attributed to the company under criminal law.

Relevance to training and awareness

MARPOL obligations on board, oil record book and reporting channels for crews

Authority / court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Anklage: DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS), 33 U.S.C. § 1908
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Second Engineer Mikhail Tsurikov also pleaded guilty; sentencing scheduled for 10 September 2026.
Published
28 Aug 2026

Original amount 1,750,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2025 Fracht FWO Inc.Freight forwarder Fracht FWO chartered blocked Venezuelan airline with Mahan Air jet USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €1.38m

In May 2022, bypassing internal compliance procedures, the Houston freight forwarder engaged a blocked Venezuelan state-owned airline for a shipment from Mexico to Argentina; the aircraft used, which was also blocked, was operated by Iran's Mahan Air. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) classified the case as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed, partly because two vice presidents bypassed the screening under time pressure.

What organisations can take from it

Urgent customer orders never justify skipping sanctions screening of carriers and of the aircraft or vessels used.

Relevance to training and awareness

Business partner screening under time pressure, circumvention of internal approvals

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Venezuela-, Iran-, Proliferations- und Terrorismus-Sanktionsprogramme (OFAC); IEEPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
No prior violations in five years, immediate remediation, substantial cooperation
Liability of senior managers
According to OFAC, the violation was driven primarily by two vice presidents who bypassed internal screening processes.
Published
3 Sep 2025

Original amount 1,610,775 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2025 V.Ships Norway A.S.V.Ships Norway: 2 million USD fine for oil pollution and falsified oil record books USAWaste and hazardous substances €1.73m

On board the tanker M/T Swift Winchester, a hose connected the incinerator's waste oil tank to the sewage tank from February to August 2022, so that oily waste bypassed the pollution prevention equipment and went into the sea; in August 2022, an oily water separator filter was also hosed down with degreaser on deck and the oily mixture ran overboard. The vessel called at Baton Rouge and Port Arthur with a knowingly falsified oil record book. The ship management company pleaded guilty and is paying a fine of 2 million USD.

What organisations can take from it

When a crew member reports misconduct to management, the company must intervene immediately; otherwise it is liable for the continued pollution.

Relevance to training and awareness

Handling oil residues on board and honest documentation

Authority / court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Anklage: DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
intentional
Published
27 Aug 2025

Original amount 2,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2025 Key Holding, LLCLogistics company Key Holding: Colombian subsidiary organised 36 shipments to Cuba USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €517,929

After the acquisition of a Colombian logistics company in December 2021, the latter organised 36 freight shipments to Cuba worth around 3.06 million USD up to July 2023. Neither the US parent nor the subsidiary had a sanctions compliance programme for foreign companies; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the case as non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

After an acquisition, roll out the sanctions compliance programme to the new foreign subsidiary immediately – the Cuba embargo applies to US-controlled subsidiaries worldwide.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions compliance after acquisitions

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 515)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, no prior violations, remedial measures after discovery
Published
2 Jul 2025

Original amount 608,825 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

14 May 2025 Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyNorfolk Southern: EPA fine for locomotives without valid emissions certification USAEmissions and permits €266,631

In the view of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the freight railway operated locomotives without a certificate of conformity, did not comply with the conditions of a testing exemption for several locomotives and operated locomotives in breach of the applicable emission standards. Under the settlement (Consent Agreement and Final Order), the company is paying a civil penalty of 299,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Converted vehicles or vehicles exempted for testing are also subject to certification and restoration obligations, which must be tracked in fleet management.

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 3
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act §§ 203(a), 213(d) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7522(a), 7547(d)); 40 C.F.R. § 1068.101
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more

Original amount 299,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2024 AAR Corp.Aviation services provider AAR pays 55.6 million USD for bribery in Nepal and South Africa USABribery of public officials €53.5m

Through an agent and a joint venture partner, AAR paid sham commissions to public officials in order to secure the sale of two Airbus A330s to Nepal Airlines and maintenance services for South African Airways Technical. SEC: 23,451,100 USD in disgorgement and 5,785,524 USD in interest; DOJ criminal penalty of 26,363,029 USD under a Non-Prosecution Agreement.

What organisations can take from it

State-owned airlines are public contracting entities – scrutinise commissions to intermediaries in aircraft transactions rigorously.

Relevance to training and awareness

Agents and joint venture partners in transactions with state-owned airlines

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA (Anti-Bestechung, Buchführung, interne Kontrollen); Non-Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Disclosure following press reports, cooperation (forensics, translations, witnesses) and remedial measures.
Liability of senior managers
A former senior employee of an AAR subsidiary, Deepak Sharma (named in the SEC order), was involved.
Published
19 Dec 2024

Original amount 55,599,653 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Dec 2024 C.H. Robinson International, Inc.C.H. Robinson: foreign subsidiaries transported Iranian and Cuban goods USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €244,999

From November 2018 to February 2022, five foreign subsidiaries of the logistics group acquired through takeovers brokered or transported a total of 82 shipments involving Iranian or Cuban goods or an Iranian airline. The main cause was that their booking systems had not yet been integrated into the group's screening processes; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered the case non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

Connect acquired freight forwarders to central screening quickly; until then, interim controls on origin and carrier are needed.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrating acquired companies into sanctions screening

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations; Cuban Assets Control Regulations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, no prior violations, swift remediation
Published
13 Dec 2024

Original amount 257,690 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Nov 2024 United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS)UPS: goodwill of UPS Freight division incorrectly valued – 45 million USD USADisclosure and reporting obligations €43.2m

UPS based the valuation of UPS Freight on a consultant's appraisal of around 2 billion USD, although its own analyses had arrived at only about 650 million USD, and did not record a required goodwill impairment. UPS is paying 45 million USD and must introduce training for certain executives, board members and employees and engage an independent compliance consultant.

What organisations can take from it

Valuation reports are only as good as the information given to the valuers – internal findings must feed into impairment tests.

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Section 17(a)(2),(3) Securities Act; Reporting-, Buchführungs-, interne Kontroll- und Disclosure-Controls-Vorschriften des Exchange Act
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping

Original amount 45,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial