Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EU Telecoms, IT and software SIA „Burde B.V.“ Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

€24,199Total of monetary amounts

€24,199Largest single case: SIA „Burde B.V.“

€24,199Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by country

Latvia €24,199 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

Competition law €24,199 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company

When?

per quarter, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
Q3 2023	0	—
Q4 2023	0	—
Q1 2024	0	—
Q2 2024	0	—
Q3 2024	0	—
Q4 2024	0	—
Q1 2025	0	—
Q2 2025	0	—
Q3 2025	0	—
Q4 2025	0	—
Q1 2026	1	€24,199
Q2 2026	0	—
Q3 2026	0	—

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

22 Jan 2026 SIA „Burde B.V.“Latvia: Burde B.V. fined for excessive prices for speed-camera software licences LatviaAbuse of market power €24,199

The Konkurences padome (Latvian Competition Council) found that SIA „Burde B.V.“, the only distributor in Latvia of software licences for Gatso RT4 speed cameras, charged the state-owned company CSDD, which operates the cameras under a state mandate and depended on these licences, excessive prices from September 2022 to July 2023; within six months the price rose by around 260 %. It treated this as an abuse of a dominant position and imposed 24,199.25 EUR. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

An exclusive distributor supplying a locked-in customer must be able to justify price increases objectively.

Authority / court: Konkurences padome (Lettischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law: Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis: Art. 13 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 Konkurences likums (Wettbewerbsgesetz)
Action: Fine
Status of proceedings: under appeal
Sector: Telecoms, IT and software
Published: 4 Feb 2026

Sources

KP lēmums Nr. 5, lieta KL/2.2-5/24/16 (fotoradaru izplatīšana), 22.01.2026 – publiskojamā versija Decision of an authority
Konkurences padomes lēmumi (Nr. 34, Statuss: Tiesvedībā, publicēts 04.02.2026) Enforcement database of an authority

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Ready for training that sticks?