Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- SURYS SAS (Gruppe Imprimerie Nationale) €18.4m 24 % · 1 case
- Capita plc und Capita Pension Solutions Limited €16.1m 21 % · 1 case
- Ö Aktiengesellschaft (in der Entscheidung abgekürzt; Adressverlag und Direktwerbeunternehmen) €13m 17 % · 1 case
- Società Cooperativa Culture (CoopCulture) €7m 9 % · 1 case
- Caesars Entertainment, Inc. / Desert Palace, LLC (Caesars Palace) €6.77m 9 % · 1 case
- Automobile Association Developments Limited (AA Driving School, BSM Driving School) €4.83m 6 % · 1 case
- Associação Portuguesa das Empresas do Setor Privado de Emprego e de Recursos Humanos (APESPE) €4.52m 6 % · 1 case
- „Техномат-Меркурий“ ЕООД, ТПКИ „Здравоход“ (Rechtsnachfolger ТПКИ „Комфорт“), „Кавалер Юнион 2001“ ЕООД €1.4m 2 % · 1 case
- Sahara Dunes Casino, LP (Lake Elsinore Hotel and Casino) €831,716 1 % · 1 case
- Synot W, a.s.; Ing. Igor Vicel (Unternehmer) €428,500 1 % · 1 case
- 35 more€2.06m
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 1 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | — |
1 case
30 Sep 2024 AS WasaWellness hotel Wasa must suspend video surveillance in treatment area Order
Following a tip-off that at the Wasa Resort Spa filming was also taking place in the treatment area and for monitoring work discipline, and that cameras captured the neighbouring property, the Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate, AKI) ordered the hotel to suspend video surveillance until a sound balancing of interests had been submitted, to stop recording the neighbouring property and to correct the camera information on the website. The hotel had repeatedly let the supervisory authority’s deadlines lapse.
Cameras require a documented balancing of interests for each location – performance monitoring of employees is not a permissible purpose.
Video surveillance of employees and guests
- Authority / court
- Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (AKI)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- § 56 Abs. 1, § 58 Abs. 1 IKS; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d und f, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Ettekirjutus-hoiatus nr 2.1.-1/23/124-377-13 (AS Wasa), 30.09.2024 Decision of an authority
- Andmekaitse Inspektsioon – veröffentlichte Ettekirjutused (Liste) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link