Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

NorwayOther Clear all filters
2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€9,115Total of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€9,115Largest single case: Panzer Norge AS
€9,115Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Finanstilsynet 1 case 50 % · €9,115
  2. Konkurransetilsynet 1 case 50 % ·

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Money laundering and terrorist financing 1 case 50 % · €9,115
  2. Competition law 1 case 50 % ·

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies 1 case 50 % ·
  2. Panzer Norge AS 1 case 50 % · €9,115

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20241—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20261€9,115

2 cases

11 Aug 2026 Panzer Norge ASPanzer Norge AS: NOK 100,000 for AML failures at an accounting firm NorwayCustomer due diligence €9,115

Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined the accounting firm Panzer Norge AS, based in Alta, NOK 100,000 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The inspection found shortcomings in the firm-wide risk assessment and in customer due diligence, as well as further breaches in risk and quality management and in engagement agreements; the company, which had five employees, essentially did not dispute the breaches.

What organisations can take from it

Small accounting firms are also subject to anti-money laundering obligations and need a documented risk assessment and demonstrable customer due diligence for every engagement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering obligations for accounting and advisory firms

Authority / court
Finanstilsynet
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§§ 7, 8, 9, 12 Abs. 4, 13 Abs. 1, 3 und 4, 14, 24 und 49 hvitvaskingsloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Employees
Under 50
Culpability
negligent
Published
17 Sep 2026

Original amount 100,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Sep 2024 a Norwegian provider of emptying and flushing servicesEmptying and flushing services: acquisition of a regional competitor prohibited NorwayMerger controlanonymised Order

Konkurransetilsynet (Norwegian Competition Authority) prohibited the acquisition of a regional competitor by the service provider because the merger would have significantly impeded competition in emptying and flushing services (including emptying septic tanks and separators and cleaning pipes and tanks) in the former county of Hordaland, where the two companies were each other's closest competitors. The Konkurranseklagenemnda (Competition Appeals Tribunal) rejected the provider's appeal on 31 January 2025 and upheld the prohibition.

What organisations can take from it

Acquisitions of regional competitors in niche markets can also be prohibited if they remove the competitive pressure between close rivals.

Authority / court
Konkurransetilsynet
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
§ 16 konkurranseloven
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
24 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 24 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial