Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
€44,179Total of monetary amounts
€44,179Largest single case: FWS Group Ltd
€44,179Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM) €44,179 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Money laundering and terrorist financing €44,179 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. FWS Group Ltd €44,179 60 % · 1 case
  2. UHY James Chartered Accountants €17,502 24 % · 1 case
  3. MBK Auditing L.L.C €12,380 17 % · 1 case
  4. Emirates Advocates LLP – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20251€44,179
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

1 case

24 Nov 2025 FWS Group LtdADGM: allegedly 51,000 USD fine for business centre operator FWS Group over missing customer checks United Arab EmiratesCustomer due diligence €44,179

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the operator of a business centre, registered as a company service provider, allegedly 51,000 USD for anti-money laundering failings between December 2022 and December 2023. The firm had not carried out a business risk assessment and could not show a risk assessment for any of its 104 customers (tenants), nor had it verified any of them, because its outsourced compliance provider treated only the external operator of the centre as a customer; in addition, after the money laundering reporting officer (MLRO) had been absent for a long period, a replacement was only appointed after about ten months and the regulator was not promptly informed. Without the 20% discount for early settlement the fine would have been 63,750 USD.

What organisations can take from it

A firm that outsources operations and compliance remains itself responsible for due diligence on all of its own customers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Who the customer is: due diligence duties when operations and compliance are outsourced

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Section 232 FSMR 2015; AML Rules 4.1.1(1), 4.1.1(2)(a) und (d), 6.1.1, 7.1.1(1)(a) und (b), 7.1.2(1)(a), 8.3.1(1)(d), 8.3.2, 8.4.1(c), 12.1.1(1), 15.6.1(d)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
No previous non-compliance, cooperation and a remediation programme; 20% discount for early settlement.

Original amount 51,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Nov 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial