Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies 17 cases 25 % · €403.5m
- „Чили Хилс Фудс“ ООД (Chili Hills Foods OOD) 1 case 1 % · €20,022
- Acqua Minerale San Benedetto S.p.A. 1 case 1 % ·
- Alco Harvesting LLC dba Bonipak Produce Inc. und verbundene Unternehmen 1 case 1 % · €5.22m
- Alderson Logistics Limited; Supa Shavings (2022) Limited 1 case 1 % · €214,691
- Amica Chips S.p.A., Pata S.p.A., Preziosi Food S.p.A. 1 case 1 % · €23.3m
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) 1 case 1 % · €33.5m
- Arla Foods Ingredientes Comércio de Produtos Alimentícios Unipessoal Ltda. 1 case 1 % · €5,375
- Aurivo Dairy Ingredients Limited 1 case 1 % · €200,000
- Cervejaria Petrópolis S.A. (em recuperação judicial); Imcopa Importação, Exportação e Indústria de Óleos S.A. 1 case 1 % · €231,813
- 42 more42 cases
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €600,000 |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
30 Oct 2024 Valio OyValio: EUR 600,000 for breaching a merger condition in the Heinon Tukku deal €600,000
The Markkinaoikeus (Market Court, Finland) imposed a penalty payment of 600,000 EUR on the dairy company Valio Oy for breaching the key condition attached to the 2021 clearance of its acquisition of the wholesaler Heinon Tukku: staff responsible for pricing and profitability of Valio products had access to competitors' sensitive purchase prices for about a year. The authority had sought 900,000 EUR; the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Supreme Administrative Court) dismissed its appeal on 16 January 2026.
Behavioural conditions attached to a merger clearance must be implemented technically – confidentiality undertakings do not replace access restrictions.
Implementing behavioural conditions from merger clearances
- Authority / court
- Markkinaoikeus (Marktgericht) auf Antrag des KKV; bestätigt durch Korkein hallinto-oikeus
- Area of law
- Competition law · Merger control
- Legal basis
- Kilpailulaki (948/2011) 25 § und 28 § (Vollzug entgegen einer Freigabeauflage), 13 §
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Temporary, negligent breach; the other conditions were complied with.
- Markkinaoikeus, päätös nro 607/2024, 30.10.2024 (Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto / Valio Oy) Court decision
- Korkein hallinto-oikeus 16.1.2026/97 (ECLI:FI:KHO:2026:T97) Court decision
- KKV: Korkein hallinto-oikeus vahvisti markkinaoikeuden Valiolle määräämän 600 000 euron seuraamusmaksun Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link