Who was sanctioned, and for what?

According to the KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission, Korea's competition authority), six manufacturers and distributors of printing paper fixed in advance the winning bidder, cover bidders and bid prices in six tenders issued by the publisher Nongmin News Corp. between June 2021 and November 2024; the average winning bid rate was around 96.2%, compared with 87.6% in 2018 to 2020. The KFTC issued corrective orders, imposed fines totalling KRW 3,009 million (Moorim SP KRW 59 million, Moorim Paper KRW 573 million, Moorim P&P KRW 948 million, Hansol Paper KRW 556 million, Hankuk Paper KRW 515 million, Hongwon Paper KRW 358 million).

Authority / court

Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. 40 Abs. 1 Nr. 8 MRFTA (Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

9 Sep 2026

Original amount 3,009,000,000 KRW, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Between March 2023 and March 2025, the Ohio manufacturer of presses for beverage can ends (nine employees) supplied, in ten instances, spare parts for aluminium forming tools worth around 264,700 USD – partly via the UAE and Turkey – without a licence to a Russian customer whose group also supplies defence precursors. In two instances, the company acted with knowledge of the violation; it admitted the allegations, which were brought by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

Authority / court

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods

Legal basis

Export Administration Regulations, § 746.8(a)(5) (HTS-Codes Supplement No. 4 to Part 746), §§ 764.2(a), 764.2(e)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

Under 50

Mitigating circumstances

Full cooperation; compliance programme subsequently expanded with screening, an approval process and additional export control training

Published

24 Aug 2026

Original amount 1,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

In eight instances in 2019–2021, the Italian subsidiary Dini Argeo supplied weighing equipment worth around 121,500 USD to a trader in the UAE, although it knew that the goods would be passed on to a former direct Iranian customer. The parent company had passed on the Iran ban only by an English-language e-mail without explanation; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered it a non-egregious, voluntarily self-disclosed case.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes

Legal basis

Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, § 560.215 (Auslandstöchter von US-Personen)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

negligent

Repeat case

no

Mitigating circumstances

Voluntary self-disclosure, immediate internal investigation, low significance for turnover, no prior violations, cooperation; subsequent training of the subsidiary's employees and screening of traders

Published

12 Aug 2026

Original amount 60,764 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

The Taiwanese LED manufacturer and its Texas subsidiary allegedly transshipped LEDs made in China via Taiwan from 2018 to 2022 and declared them to US customs as being of Taiwanese origin in order to avoid Section 301 tariffs (US punitive tariffs on Chinese goods); in addition, Chinese and Taiwanese chips were not kept separate in production until 2025. The settlement of 5.15 million USD resolves a whistleblower lawsuit brought by a former employee, who receives around 876,000 USD.

Authority / court

U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Maryland (Department of Justice) mit U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Customs

Legal basis

False Claims Act; Tariff Act of 1930 (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)

Action

Other

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

5 Aug 2026

Original amount 5,150,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Over an extended period before November 2022, Airbus Operations Ltd breached the Export Control Order 2008: transfers of controlled technology under three open general export licences (OGEL) were not correctly documented, required registers were missing, and one individual licence was not complied with. The case came to light through voluntary disclosure and was concluded by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) by way of a compound settlement (date of publication).

Authority / court

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) / Export Control Joint Unit

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods

Legal basis

Export Control Order 2008, Art. 29(2) und 29(3) (Auflagen und Register bei OGELs) sowie Auflage einer SIEL; Straftaten nach Art. 38(1)(a) und (b); Compound Settlement durch HMRC

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

10,000 or more

Mitigating circumstances

Voluntary disclosure, full cooperation, remedial measures

Published

30 Jul 2026

Original amount 6,409,388 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

In July 2020 a farmer on a dairy farm in County Limerick was fatally injured by a pneumatically operated milking parlour gate designed and manufactured by Dairymaster. The company pleaded guilty to six counts; the court imposed €200,000 each for breaches of s. 16(3) and s. 16(1)(a) of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 (duties of designers and manufacturers), totalling €400,000, with the remaining counts taken into consideration.

Authority / court

Limerick Circuit Criminal Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Authority)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

s. 16(1)(a), 16(3) i. V. m. s. 77(2)(a), 77(9)(a) Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

28 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

From 2016 to 2022, three distributors of test and measuring equipment coordinated discounts as essential price components and informed each other of customer contacts, usually with a request for "restraint". This was evidenced by more than 400 emails; the proceedings ended in settlements.

Authority / court

Bundeskartellamt

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

§ 1 GWB

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Settlement; cooperation by Elektronik-Kontor Messtechnik taken into account

Published

15 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

During a Christmas lights event at the factory shop in Hanley in November 2024, an unsecured artificial snow machine fell from a window; shards of glass injured a twelve-year-old girl on the head. The ceramics manufacturer had not assessed the risks and, contrary to the manufacturer's instructions, had not secured the machine; fine of 266,666 GBP plus 4,931 GBP in costs. According to its annual accounts (financial year to April 2025), the company had an average of 345 employees.

Authority / court

Birmingham Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Regulation 10(1) Work at Height Regulations 2005; Section 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

250 to 999

Published

7 Jul 2026

Original amount 266,666 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

In cartel proceedings, the CADE Tribunal fined ten suppliers of electronic products, while the signatories of a 2014 leniency agreement (Agilent and Keysight) and one company that had fulfilled a settlement were not sanctioned. The fines on the companies initially totalled 8,362,138.05 BRL; in the virtual deliberation procedure the plenary, deciding on motions for clarification (embargos) on 17 August 2026, reduced of its own motion the fines on Datasonic (from 4,329,605.69 to 856,937.12 BRL) and D.T.I. (from 1,021,750.18 to 265,406.99 BRL), leaving 4,133,126.29 BRL. The session minutes do not identify the market concerned. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

Authority / court

Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Lei nº 12.529/2011

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

reduced

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Liability of senior managers

Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Published

8 Jul 2026

Original amount 4,133,126.29 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

An explosion and fire at a heated mixer machine at Stars Engrg Pte Ltd's Tuas worksite on 24 February 2021 killed three workers and injured seven; the company was fined a total of SGD 500,000 under the Workplace Safety and Health Act. According to investigations by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM, Singapore's labour ministry) and an inquiry committee, the machine had been kept running despite repeated warning signs such as overheating, oil leaks, smoke and a fire shortly beforehand, and there were failures in risk assessment, safe work procedures, maintenance, supervision and training. After the incident, messages significant to the investigation were also deleted.

Authority / court

Ministry of Manpower (MOM); Verurteilung durch ein Singapurer Strafgericht

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Workplace Safety and Health Act 2006 (WSHA); Penal Code (Behinderung der Justiz, gegen Einzelpersonen)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Liability of senior managers

Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Published

25 Jun 2026

Original amount 500,000 SGD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

BaFin imposed fines on the battery manufacturer because it had not disclosed inside information without delay and had not published the half-yearly financial report for the 2024 financial year.

Authority / court

Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)

Area of law

Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations

Legal basis

Art. 17 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 MAR; § 115 Abs. 1 Satz 1 WpHG

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

1 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Økokrim (Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime) issued an industrial company producing silicon carbide with a penalty notice of NOK 18,000,000 for breaches of the Pollution Control Act (forurensningsloven) and for giving incorrect information to Miljødirektoratet (Norwegian Environment Agency). In Økokrim's view, the air emission measurements in 2021 were not representative because, among other things, production was lower during the measurement campaigns; this created a risk that considerably more of the carcinogenic benzo[a]pyrene was emitted than permitted. The company has accepted the penalty notice.

Authority / court

Økokrim

Area of law

Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits

Legal basis

Forurensningsloven (Umweltschutzgesetz); falsche Angaben gegenüber Miljødirektoratet

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Liability of senior managers

According to Økokrim, managers took the decisions on the non-representative measurements knowing that they would not reflect actual emissions.

Published

18 Jun 2026

Original amount 18,000,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Siemens Gamesa was fined £600,000 and ordered to pay £7,980.80 in costs. At the blade factory in Hull on 18 July 2024, a prefabricated component weighing around 800 kg fell onto an employee after support poles had been removed; she has since been paralysed from the waist down. The Health and Safety Executive found inadequate risk assessment, no safe system of work and insufficient training.

Authority / court

Grimsby Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Guilty plea; after the accident the supports were secured with a key-controlled system.

Published

26 May 2026

Original amount 600,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

The Californian manufacturer of PVA brushes for wafer cleaning sold goods worth around 400,000 USD on 18 occasions between 2021 and 2024 via two Chinese distributors to SMIC Beijing and SMIC North, both on the Entity List (the US export control list of restricted parties). The company had no formal export compliance rules; the penalty of 1.7 million USD is suspended for one year owing to limited ability to pay and will be waived if training and an internal audit are completed on time.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods

Legal basis

Export Administration Regulations, 15 C.F.R. § 764.2(a), § 744.11

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

negligent

Mitigating circumstances

Payment suspended owing to demonstrated limited ability to pay; deliveries stopped after notification by BIS (Bureau of Industry and Security).

Published

14 Apr 2026

Original amount 1,700,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

From 13 May 2015 to 20 November 2023, Nexans granted companies of the Sonepar group exclusive rights to import Nexans cables into La Réunion, Mayotte, French Guiana, Martinique and Guadeloupe, which Art. L. 420-2-1 of the Code de commerce (French Commercial Code) prohibits for the overseas territories. In a settlement procedure the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) imposed EUR 3 million on Nexans France (jointly with Nexans SA) and EUR 3.5 million on the Sonepar companies involved, EUR 6.5 million in total. It is the authority’s first decision based on a report by a person with protected whistleblower status.

Authority / court

Autorité de la concurrence

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. L. 420-2-1 Code de commerce; Vergleichsverfahren nach Art. L. 464-2 III Code de commerce

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

under appeal

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Settlement procedure (transaction): the companies did not contest the objections.

Published

2 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

In August 2024 two employees of the Leeds plastics fabricator lost parts of fingers within ten days – one on an unguarded sanding machine, the other on a table saw. The HSE (Health and Safety Executive, Britain's workplace safety regulator) found inadequate guarding, insufficient saw training, no safe systems of work and no suitable risk assessment; fine of 16,000 GBP plus 6,534 GBP in costs for the business, which had 17 employees according to its annual accounts.

Authority / court

Leeds Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974; Regulation 3(1) Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

Under 50

Published

26 Mar 2026

Original amount 16,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

In June 2024 timber kicked back from an inadequately guarded stack saw at the Gisborne sawmill and seriously injured a worker's arm; seven weeks later another worker was crushed between two forklifts and suffered spinal and pelvic fractures. WorkSafe (New Zealand's workplace health and safety regulator) found systemic failings in machine guarding, risk assessment, traffic management, training and maintenance; the company had not notified the first incident and had not acted on earlier formal directions to fix the risks. On 18 March 2026 the Gisborne District Court imposed a fine of 601,250 NZD and 100,754 NZD in reparation.

Authority / court

Gisborne District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, ss 36(1)(a), 48(1), 48(2)(c)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

30 Mar 2026

Original amount 601,250 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Manufacturers and suppliers of copper and aluminium cables coordinated a common calculation of the metal surcharge, which makes up a significant part of the final price; an industry association acted as facilitator. The Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed a total of 97,434,800 EUR, the highest amount in a single proceeding; two leniency applicants were not fined (not final). Addressees: ELKOND HHK, a.s.; VUKI a.s.; Prysmian Kablo s.r.o.; Prysmian Kabely, s.r.o.; Kablo Vrchlabí s.r.o.; NKT s.r.o.; PRECON s.r.o.; Tele–Fonika Kabely CZ s.r.o.; KABELOVNA KABEX a. s.; Asociace výrobců kabelů a vodičů ČR a SR (leniency applicants without a fine: ICS Industrial Cables Slovakia, PRAKAB).

Authority / court

Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Kartellverbot)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Published

11 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

In 2021 and 2022, Applied Materials and its Korean subsidiary exported ion implanters for semiconductor manufacturing worth around 126 million USD via Korea without a licence to a Chinese company placed on the Entity List in 2020. The penalty imposed by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) corresponds to twice the transaction value and thus the statutory maximum; the compliance staff and executives responsible are no longer with the company.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods

Legal basis

Export Administration Regulations (Entity List)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

10,000 or more

Liability of senior managers

According to BIS, the responsible compliance staff and senior executives from sales and production are no longer employed.

Published

12 Feb 2026

Original amount 252,500,300 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

During an improvised relocation of a 4.5-tonne machine without lifting points, using a forklift and skates, the load slid off the forks at the East Kilbride plant in 2023 and struck an employee working underneath it on the head; he suffered permanent damage to his sight, hearing and facial nerves. The lifting operation had not been planned by a competent person; fine of 433,333 GBP. According to its 2024 annual accounts, the company (now Smurfit Westrock Consumer Packaging UK Limited) employed an average of 1,397 people in the United Kingdom.

Authority / court

Hamilton Sheriff Court (Ermittlung: Health and Safety Executive)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Regulation 8(1)(a) und (c) Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

1,000 to 9,999

Published

21 Jan 2026

Original amount 433,333 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

During an on-site inspection in November 2023, a Luxembourg manufacturer of technical equipment (pseudonymised in the decision as “Société A”) did not hand over its record of processing activities but only showed it in an online application; the record exported from the software the following day, with 40 entries, was incomplete and inaccurate, including as regards contact details, categories of data subjects and data, recipients and transfers to third countries. The CNPD (Commission nationale pour la protection des données, the Luxembourg data protection authority) imposed 7,000 EUR, issued a reprimand and ordered the record to be completed within two months.

Authority / court

Commission nationale pour la protection des données (CNPD), formation restreinte

Area of law

Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency

Legal basis

DSGVO Art. 30 Abs. 1 lit. a, c, d, e

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

negligent

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

The Tribunal of the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) unanimously convicted the manufacturers Elo Sistemas Eletrônicos, FAE Sistemas de Medição (formerly Fae Ferragens e Aparelhos Elétricos) and Dowertech da Amazônia (now Wasion da Amazônia) of a cartel in electricity meters, in which between 2005 and 2014 prices in public and private tenders were agreed, the market was shared and monitored and cover bids were submitted. The companies received fines of 54,238,824.03 BRL, 15,167,886.53 BRL and 3,196,631.43 BRL. The case was triggered by a leniency application in 2014; in the same session CADE approved four further settlements worth around 15.5 million BRL. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

Authority / court

Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Liability of senior managers

Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Published

10 Dec 2025

Original amount 72,603,341.99 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

The CADE Tribunal approved a cease-and-desist settlement (TCC) with Rinnai Brasil in proceedings concerning the market for gas water heaters: according to the General Superintendence, the company had abused its dominant position by imposing minimum advertised prices on resellers, which acted as minimum advertised pricing in physical retail and in practice as resale price maintenance online. Rinnai undertook to cease the practices, to take precautions against new infringements and allegedly to pay 11,215,319.31 BRL to the Fund for Diffuse Rights (FDD). The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

Authority / court

Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo

Area of law

Competition law · Abuse of market power

Legal basis

Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Termo de Compromisso de Cessação)

Action

Other

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

11 Dec 2025

Original amount 11,215,319.31 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

UOKiK sanctioned CNH Industrial Polska and seven dealers of the New Holland, Case IH and Steyr brands for dividing the Polish market for agricultural machinery of these brands and coordinating prices. The fines on the undertakings total PLN 338,827,000 (CNH Industrial Polska 241,599,000, Raitech 24,391,000, Perkoz 23,778,000, Adler Agro 15,335,000, Rolserwis 13,356,000, a further dealer company (partnership) 8,249,000, Kisiel Agrotech 6,778,000, Kisiel 5,341,000 PLN). Fines on natural persons are not included in the amount. The decision is not final.

Authority / court

Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 3 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 101 Abs. 1 lit. a und c AEUV

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

under appeal

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Liability of senior managers

Measures against individuals are not reported here.

Original amount 338,827,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

The audio electronics group (brands include Harman Kardon and JBL) allegedly imported heat sinks made of Chinese extruded aluminium from 2011 to 2023 without paying the anti-dumping and countervailing duties owed; after the failure was brought to its attention, the company allegedly did not disclose it. The settlement of 11,809,628 USD resolves a whistleblower lawsuit (share around 2.3 million USD).

Authority / court

U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Michigan (Department of Justice) mit CBP und Department of Commerce

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Customs

Legal basis

False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff. (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)

Action

Other

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

26 Nov 2025

Original amount 11,809,628 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Nov 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) fined Pfanner Schutzbekleidung GmbH, Protos GmbH and their holding company (now Pronocer Holding GmbH) 400,000 EUR because, from 9 March 2016 to 25 November 2021, they fixed their dealers' resale prices for work and protective clothing in Austria. Compliance was monitored systematically, dealers who deviated were contacted, and in 2019 a circular reminded all dealers of the prices. Reductions were granted for the settlement, cooperation and a newly introduced compliance system.

Authority / court

Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

§ 1 Abs. 1 und 4 KartG und Art. 101 AEUV; § 29 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Repeat case

no

Mitigating circumstances

Consensual termination of the proceedings, cooperation with the BWB (Federal Competition Authority), introduction of a compliance system.

Published

18 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

In 2023 an employee was killed by a reversing HGV on the service road of the shared industrial estate in Birmingham. The company had not assessed the risks of workplace transport, had neither avoided reversing nor made it safer with banksmen or signage, and had not controlled HGV access; fine of 240,000 GBP plus 6,917 GBP in costs. According to its 2024 annual accounts, the company employed an average of 37 people.

Authority / court

Birmingham Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Section 2(1) und 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

Under 50

Published

7 Oct 2025

Original amount 240,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a Withhold Release Order: bicycles, bicycle parts and accessories from Giant Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Taiwan) are being detained at all US ports of entry because there are indications of forced labour (ILO indicators including debt bondage, withholding of wages, excessive overtime and abusive working and living conditions). Detained shipments can be destroyed, re-exported or released upon proof of admissibility.

Authority / court

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Area of law

Supply chain and human rights · Forced and child labour

Legal basis

19 U.S.C. § 1307 (Tariff Act of 1930, Section 307)

Action

Order

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

24 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

At the Alloa glassworks, a shovel loader used to clear molten glass waste and hot water had been missing the protective cab door for almost two years, although the damage had been reported and other drivers had already been struck. In 2024 material spilled into the cab and scalded a 32-year-old; fine of 600,000 GBP. According to the HSE (Health and Safety Executive, Britain's workplace safety regulator), around 500 people work at the site; according to its 2024 annual accounts, the company employed an average of 642 people.

Authority / court

Stirling Sheriff Court (Ermittlung: Health and Safety Executive)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Regulation 5(1) Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998; Section 33(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

250 to 999

Published

30 Sep 2025

Original amount 600,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

On 10 September 2025 the High Court in Johannesburg fined Beautiful City (Pty) Ltd, a factory making cotton fibre products in Village Deep (Johannesburg), 300,000 ZAR. A joint inspection by the Department of Employment and Labour (labour ministry), the police and the Department of Home Affairs (home affairs ministry) in November 2019 had found mainly foreign workers without residence rights, including minors, on locked premises; the court noted, among other things, wages below the national minimum wage, failure to register with the Compensation Fund and the UIF, and an unsafe workplace.

Authority / court

High Court Johannesburg (Gauteng) (Ermittlungen u. a. Department of Employment and Labour)

Area of law

Supply chain and human rights · Forced and child labour

Legal basis

Straftatbestände Menschenhandel, Beihilfe zum Menschenhandel, Schuldknechtschaft und Nutznießung aus Menschenhandel; Verstöße gegen Vorschriften zu Unemployment Insurance Fund, Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, National Minimum Wage und Occupational Health and Safety; Beihilfe zum illegalen Aufenthalt (laut Department of Employment and Labour, ohne Paragrafenangaben)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Liability of senior managers

Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Published

10 Sep 2025

Original amount 300,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Seatrium Ltd., Jurong Shipyard Pte. Ltd. (both Singapore) and Estaleiro Jurong Aracruz Ltda. entered into a leniency agreement with the Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) and the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU, Office of the Attorney General) concerning undue advantages given to public officials or politicials and persons connected to them, and undue advantages obtained in contracts with the public administration. The companies allegedly acknowledged a debt of BRL 728,933,258.58, payable within 60 days; according to the companies, they have also negotiated agreements with the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) and Singapore's Attorney-General's Chambers. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

Authority / court

Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 I, III und IV d, Art. 16; Lei nº 8.666/1993, Art. 88 II und III; Lei nº 8.429/1992

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Commitment by the CGU and AGU to avoid double payments in relation to an agreement with the MPF; obligation to improve the integrity programme.

Original amount 728,933,258.58 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

IDEMIA France, formerly Oberthur Technologies, undertook to pay a public interest fine of 15,541,130 EUR in a CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Paris public prosecutor. The investigation opened in 2013, including for bribery of foreign public officials and money laundering, concerned contracts between the Angolan central bank (BNA) and Oberthur Technologies from its former banknote business; validation took place on 27 June 2025.

Authority / court

Parquet de Paris (Procureure de la République); Validierung durch das Tribunal judiciaire de Paris

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (corruption d'agent public étranger, blanchiment)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

27 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Audio electronics group Harman International Industries, Inc. of Connecticut is paying USD 1,454,145 under a settlement with OFAC for eleven apparent violations of the Iran sanctions. According to OFAC's findings, from May 2018 to October 2020 its long-standing distributor in the United Arab Emirates sold Harman products to customers in Iran with the knowledge and support of 13 UK-based employees of its US subsidiary Harman Professional, Inc.; their conduct is attributable to Harman. OFAC treated the apparent violations as egregious but voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty was USD 2,077,350. Harman satisfies USD 400,000 of the settlement amount by investing in additional sanctions controls. OFAC signed the settlement agreement on 25 June 2025 and published it on 8 July 2025. Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforcement release "Harman International Industries, Inc. Settles with OFAC for $1,454,145 Related to Apparent Violations of Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations", 8 July 2025, https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934471/download?inline; summarised in our own words.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes

Legal basis

Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 560.204(a) (elf mutmaßliche Verstöße); Vergleich nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

8 Jul 2025

Original amount 1,454,145 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Jun 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) found that Safran’s acquisition of part of the actuation and flight control business of Collins Aerospace (RTX) would result in a substantial lessening of competition in horizontal stabiliser trim actuators. Clearance was granted only in return for the undertaking to divest Safran’s North American actuation business, including sites in Mexico, California and Canada, to a pre-approved purchaser (Woodward).

Authority / court

Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)

Area of law

Competition law · Merger control

Legal basis

Enterprise Act 2002, s. 73 (Undertakings in lieu of reference)

Action

Order

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

10,000 or more

Published

23 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

In an audit campaign on records of processing activities, the Commission nationale pour la protection des données (Luxembourg data protection authority, CNPD) found that an engineering and design consultancy (pseudonymised as ‘Société A’) had omitted mandatory information such as name and contact details, categories of data subjects and data, and retention periods. It imposed 7,000 EUR.

Authority / court

Commission nationale pour la protection des données (CNPD) – formation restreinte

Area of law

Data protection

Legal basis

DSGVO Art. 30 Abs. 1 lit. a, c, f

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) imposed fines totalling 634,000 EUR for vertical resale price maintenance on Sennheiser-brand consumer electronics audio products (headphones): 534,000 EUR on Sennheiser electronic SE & Co KG for May 2015 to February 2022 and 100,000 EUR on Sonova AG for March to September 2022. Retailers were given end-customer prices whose observance was monitored; both companies cooperated and did not contest the facts.

Authority / court

Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV und § 1 Abs. 1 KartG; § 29 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Repeat case

no

Mitigating circumstances

Full cooperation in clarifying the facts; all essential facts left undisputed (acknowledgement).

Published

16 Dec 2025

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

In May 2023 all rainbow trout died in a toxicity test on the effluent of the pulp mill, which is discharged via a creek into Lake Superior; in the same month the mill also exceeded the limit for total reduced sulphur (TRS) in its air emissions four times. The court convicted the company of two offences under the Environmental Protection Act and fined it CAD 525,000 plus a victim fine surcharge of CAD 131,250.

Authority / court

Gericht in Thunder Bay (Ermittlung und Anklage: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks)

Area of law

Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits

Legal basis

Environmental Protection Act (Ontario), RSO 1990, c E.19 – Abwasserqualität nach der Umweltgenehmigung (Environmental Compliance Approval) und Industriestandard für TRS-Emissionen

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

According to the ministry, the company reported the test result and each TRS exceedance as required, immediately investigated the causes of the exceedances and submitted an abatement plan; weekly follow-up tests of the effluent showed no further failures.

Published

14 Jul 2025

Original amount 525,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Following a referral from the public prosecutor's office in Rennes, the PNF investigated bribery of foreign public officials in the performance of a contract for the supply of ambulances to Algeria. KLUBB France is paying a public interest fine of 558,024 EUR and is undergoing a three-year AFA compliance programme.

Authority / court

Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

50 to 249

Culpability

intentional

Liability of senior managers

The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.

Published

11 Feb 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

In January 2023, in the warehouse of a manufacturer of industrial doors in Didam (anonymised in the judgment), a 792 kg pallet fell from an unstable stack four high onto a new employee, who died; the forklift used, fitted with fork extensions, had no CE marking of its own and was unsuitable for the load, the risk assessment was incomplete and the instruction of the victim, who did not speak Dutch, was inadequate. The Overijssel District Court (Rechtbank Overijssel, economic division) imposed 100,000 EUR (of which 25,000 EUR suspended) for intentional violations of the Dutch Working Conditions Act (Arbowet), plus 17,500 EUR in damages to the mother (ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2025:711).

Authority / court

Rechtbank Overijssel (economische kamer)

Area of law

Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents

Legal basis

Art. 32 Arbeidsomstandighedenwet i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1, 8 Abs. 1 Arbeidsomstandighedenwet; Art. 3.17, 7.2 Abs. 1, 7.18 Abs. 2 Arbeidsomstandighedenbesluit

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Mitigating circumstances

No previous convictions of the company; part of the fine suspended.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

According to the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), from December 2019 to March 2022 the Californian machine tool manufacturer indirectly supplied, via its dealer network, one CNC machine, 13 spare parts orders and seven unlock codes for machines of blocked Russian defence and energy companies. According to OFAC, Haas agreed to a settlement of 1,044,781 USD with OFAC (OFAC treated eight of the 21 apparent violations as egregious; no voluntary self-disclosure); at the same time, Haas reached a separate settlement of 1.5 million USD with the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), which is not included in the amount shown. Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforcement release "Haas Automation, Inc. Settles with OFAC for $1,044,781 for Apparent Violations of the Ukraine-/Russia-related Sanctions Regulations", 17 January 2025, https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/933956/download?inline; summarised in our own words.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC); parallel U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes

Legal basis

Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 589; E.O. 13662); Export Administration Regulations

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Substantial remedial measures and extensive cooperation

Published

17 Jan 2025

Original amount 1,044,781 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Under a consent decree, crane maker Manitowoc and two subsidiaries will pay a civil penalty of 42,600,000 USD because, between 2014 and 2018, they allegedly sold cranes with at least 1,032 diesel engines that were covered neither by a valid EPA certificate of conformity nor by the transition programme for equipment manufacturers; reporting, bonding and labelling requirements were also breached. In addition, the companies will fund the repowering of a locomotive in the Sparrows Point area (Baltimore) with an engine meeting current emission standards. According to the EPA, the court approved the settlement in March 2025.

Authority / court

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin)

Area of law

Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits

Legal basis

Clean Air Act, Sections 203(a) und 213(d) (Mobile-Source-Vorschriften für Offroad-Dieselmotoren)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

19 Dec 2024

Original amount 42,600,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

The Openbaar Ministerie (OM, Dutch Public Prosecution Service) settled proceedings against a Dutch yacht builder, not named in the release, with a penalty order of 150,000 EUR because in 2022 it sourced furniture and finishing wood made of Myanmar teak from a Turkish woodworking company and, as the first to place it on the EU market, did not meet the due diligence obligations of the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR); the legal origin of the wood could no longer be established. The yard was not at fault regarding the deck timber of the superyacht, because a German trader had placed that on the market; the information was passed to the German authorities. The OM took into account that the yard admitted the breach and no longer uses Myanmar teak.

Authority / court

Openbaar Ministerie (OM), Functioneel Parket

Area of law

Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence

Legal basis

Europäische Holzhandelsverordnung (EUTR), Sorgfaltspflichten des Marktteilnehmers; Strafbefehl des OM

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Admission of the breach; complete abandonment of Myanmar teak.

Published

26 Nov 2024

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Between April 2021 and July 2022, the yacht builder imported eleven consignments of timber from the EU, including teak from Myanmar, without being able to demonstrate that the risk of illegal logging was negligible; its due diligence system was not maintained and documents were missing. Following a guilty plea, the Bournemouth Crown Court imposed a fine of 240,000 GBP and a confiscation of 66,950.64 GBP (plus costs of 51,619.96 GBP).

Authority / court

Bournemouth Crown Court (Anklage: Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), Department for Business and Trade)

Area of law

Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence

Legal basis

Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulations 2013, Regulations 4(b), 4(c), 4(d)/4(e); Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Original amount 306,950.64 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Berlin-based Aiotec GmbH, which sources industrial equipment for the energy sector, is paying USD 14,550,000 under a settlement with OFAC for one apparent violation of the Iran sanctions; USD 9,550,000 of this is suspended as long as Aiotec meets its compliance commitments. Under the settlement agreement, up to a further USD 700,000 may be suspended if spent on sanctions compliance; USD 4.3 million is payable in instalments over seven years. According to OFAC's findings, between 2015 and 2019 the company took part in a conspiracy to cause a US company to sell it a decommissioned Australian polypropylene plant for around USD 9.7 million that was in fact destined for a buyer in Iran; payments of around USD 9.46 million ran through a US bank. OFAC treated the apparent violation as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty equalled the statutory maximum of USD 19.4 million. OFAC signed the settlement agreement on 7 November 2024 and published it on 3 December 2024. According to the settlement agreement, the settlement does not constitute an admission by Aiotec of the apparent violation. Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforcement release "Aiotec GmbH Settles with OFAC for $14,550,000 Related to an Apparent Violation of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations", 3 December 2024, https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/933661/download?inline; summarised in our own words.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes

Legal basis

Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 560.203(b) (Verabredung zur Umgehung; ein mutmaßlicher Verstoß); Vergleich nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

3 Dec 2024

Original amount 14,550,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

The Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) sanctioned two vertical price agreements in the distribution of low-voltage electrical equipment: Schneider Electric with the wholesalers Rexel and Sonepar (13 December 2012 to 6 September 2018) and Legrand with Rexel (24 May 2012 to 14 September 2015). Through the system of so-called “dérogations”, i.e. special discounts granted by the manufacturers on the standard purchase price for particular end customers, the distributors’ prices to those customers were in effect fixed. Fines: Schneider Electric 207 million, Rexel 124 million, Sonepar 96 million and Legrand 43 million EUR.

Authority / court

Autorité de la concurrence

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. L. 420-1 Code de commerce; Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

under appeal

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

10,000 or more

Published

30 Oct 2024

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

From 2020 to 2022, employees of the Indian subsidiary of a US aerospace and defence supplier bribed Indian public officials via agents and distributors, among other things to tailor tenders in the group's favour; the payments were booked as business expenses. Payment of 504,926 USD in disgorgement, 78,889 USD in interest and a penalty of 1.1 million USD.

Authority / court

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

FCPA Buchführungs- und interne Kontrollvorschriften (Sections 13(b)(2)(A)/(B) Exchange Act)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Mitigating circumstances

Cooperation (sharing of internal investigation findings) and remediation, including termination of employees and third parties.

Published

11 Oct 2024

Original amount 1,683,815 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Company name anonymised since 11 Oct 2026 · Direct link

From 2017 to 2020, the acquired Thai subsidiary provided public officials, including officials of the Royal Thai Air Force and the Department of Highways, with cash, sham consultancy fees, luxurious "factory visit trips", meals and entertainment, and also engaged in commercial bribery. The group is paying 4,343,401 USD in disgorgement, 1,086,954 USD in interest and a penalty of 4.5 million USD.

Authority / court

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits

Legal basis

FCPA Buchführungs- und interne Kontrollvorschriften (Sections 13(b)(2)(A)/(B) Exchange Act)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

10,000 or more

Culpability

intentional

Published

10 Sep 2024

Original amount 9,930,355 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Sep 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 5 · Company name anonymised since 10 Sep 2026 · Direct link

During the pandemic in 2020 the printing company introduced an access control system with facial recognition and temperature checks for its employees, and kept using facial recognition after the temperature function was discontinued in October 2022. The Commission d'accès à l'information (CAI, Quebec's access to information and privacy commission) found that the company had not shown that collecting the biometric data was necessary for access control and ordered it, within 90 days, to stop collecting and using facial recognition and to destroy the biometric templates created.

Authority / court

Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec (CAI), section de surveillance

Area of law

Data protection · Employee data

Legal basis

Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels dans le secteur privé (RLRQ c. P-39.1), Art. 4 (Notwendigkeit der Erhebung) und Art. 83

Action

Order

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 4 Sep 2026 · Direct link

According to the Competition Commission's investigation, the manufacturer and a competitor had agreed since around 1998 not to compete for each other's traditional customers for packaging paper, coordinated bids and met regularly for that purpose; they also allegedly fixed prices when buying recyclable paper. In a settlement without admission of liability, the manufacturer pays ZAR 21,298,478.38 in three instalments and introduces a compliance programme.

Authority / court

Competition Tribunal of South Africa (auf Antrag der Competition Commission)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Competition Act 89 of 1998, s. 4(1)(b)(i), (ii) und (iii); ss. 49D, 58(1)(a)(iii), 58(1)(b)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Settlement without admission of liability; payment in instalments.

Published

14 Aug 2024

Original amount 21,298,478.38 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Aug 2024.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 14 Aug 2026 · Direct link

The CMA was concerned that the manufacturer, by promoting the ability of its gas boilers to run on a blend of up to 20% hydrogen, gave the impression of an environmental benefit or of future-proofing consumers' heating. The company gave formal undertakings to change or remove such marketing claims, inform its installers and retailers and report to the CMA on compliance; it did not admit any breach of the law.

Authority / court

Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)

Area of law

Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims

Legal basis

Part 8 Enterprise Act 2002 (Undertakings nach section 219); Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008

Action

Other

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

9 Aug 2024

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 9 Aug 2026 · Direct link

The Dutch manufacturer of inverters and chargers allegedly ensured through its distributors, from March 2020 until at least the end of 2022, that online retailers granted no more than 10–15% discount on recommended retail prices, under threat of reduced discounts or cut-off of supply (minimum resale price maintenance). In a settlement without admission of liability, the manufacturer pays ZAR 14,232,581 and must introduce a compliance programme including training on resale price maintenance.

Authority / court

Competition Tribunal of South Africa (auf Antrag der Competition Commission)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Competition Act 89 of 1998, s. 5(2); ss. 49D, 58(1)(a)(iii), 58(1)(b), 59

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Settlement without admission of liability; the manufacturer pointed to the lack of after-sales support with cut-price offers.

Published

17 Sep 2024

Original amount 14,232,581 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Jul 2024.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 26 Jul 2026 · Direct link

In a settlement procedure, the competition authority found that two suppliers of fire protection products (supplier A and supplier B) shared public customers between them in tenders and negotiated procedures for fire protection products from April 2009 to September 2016 by refraining from bidding or submitting cover bids. Supplier B and a further company of its group must pay allegedly 2,207,682 EUR jointly and severally; supplier A, as first leniency applicant, received a fine of 0 EUR and committed to compensating injured customers and to a donation of 50,000 EUR to a charity.

Authority / court

Autorité belge de la Concurrence / Belgische Mededingingsautoriteit (ABC/BMA) – Auditorat (Vergleichsentscheidung)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. IV.1 Code de droit économique (CDE), Art. 101 AEUV; Art. IV.59, IV.60 und IV.79 § 1 CDE

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Settlement; according to the press release supplier B obtained a 50% reduction for its cooperation; supplier A received immunity as first leniency applicant.

Liability of senior managers

Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Published

8 Jul 2024

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Version 2 · Company name anonymised since 8 Jul 2026 · Direct link

The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) imposed a joint fine of EUR 3 million on an Austrian industrial goods manufacturer and its owning entity for a long-running infringement in the distribution of its own products in Austria between 2007 and 2021. Resale prices, a territorial split and non-compete obligations were agreed with authorised dealers, together with concerted practices such as cover bids. The companies acknowledged the infringement and received reductions for cooperation and settlement.

Authority / court

Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

§ 1 KartG und Art. 101 AEUV; § 29 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Repeat case

no

Mitigating circumstances

Acknowledgement of the infringement; reductions for cooperation and settlement.

Published

10 Jan 2025

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 27 Jun 2026 · Direct link

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) reached a settlement of 16,196,120 USD with a Japanese engine manufacturer. Almost 20,000 engines, mainly for transport refrigeration units, were affected: an incompletely reported auxiliary emission control device (AECD), the use of test procedures not applicable to the engine type, and the production of large spark-ignition engines not covered by the CARB certification. According to CARB, the company made modifications to address the incomplete reporting so that it will meet certification requirements in future.

Authority / court

California Air Resources Board (CARB)

Area of law

Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits

Legal basis

CARB Off-Road Compression-Ignition Engines and Equipment Regulation

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

4 Mar 2024

Original amount 16,196,120 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Mar 2024.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 4 Mar 2026 · Direct link

BaFin imposed a fine of 510,000 EUR on the engine manufacturer because it allegedly had not disclosed inside information without delay. Following an objection by the company, the Local Court of Frankfurt am Main (Amtsgericht) discontinued the proceedings on 21 January 2025 pursuant to Section 47 (2) OWiG (German Administrative Offences Act).

Authority / court

Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)

Area of law

Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations

Legal basis

Art. 17 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 MAR

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

overturned

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

20 Mar 2024

Amount in EUR; no ECB reference rate is available for this currency.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 1 Mar 2026 · Direct link

The Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office) fined the Austrian supplier of functional and protective clothing 783,900 EUR because, from early 2016 to the end of November 2021, it had agreed with specialist retailers in Germany that their resale prices – in store and online – should as far as possible match the recommended retail price and that cash discounts should generally not be granted. The case was triggered by a retailer's cooperation request; the authority used requests for information under Section 82b GWB (German Competition Act), and the fining decision is final following a settlement.

Authority / court

Bundeskartellamt

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Prompt, comprehensive and cooperative replies to two requests for information; agreement to a settlement.

Published

13 Mar 2024

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 19 Feb 2026 · Direct link

The intralogistics and forklift truck group had not disclosed inside information. BaFin imposed a fine of 280,000 EUR, which has been final since January 2024.

Authority / court

Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)

Area of law

Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations

Legal basis

Art. 17 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 MAR

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

21 Dec 2023

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 7 Dec 2025 · Direct link

The manufacturer undertook, in a CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Parquet national financier (PNF, French national financial prosecutor), to pay a public interest fine of 13,373,000 EUR; in addition, the group must implement a three-year compliance programme under the supervision of the Agence française anticorruption (AFA, French anti-corruption agency), the costs of which the manufacturer bears up to 500,000 EUR. It was based on an investigation including for bribery of foreign public officials; validated on 4 December 2023.

Authority / court

Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (corruption d'agent public étranger)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

4 Dec 2023

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 4 Dec 2025 · Direct link

CARB reached a settlement with the US subsidiary of a Japanese vehicle and engine manufacturer totalling 7,968,419 USD for breaches of the rules on small off-road engines (SORE) and on evaporative emissions: a civil penalty of 5,694,452 USD and 2,273,967 USD for four environmental projects. The company had obtained a variance for several engine families, mostly generators, whose carbon canisters did not meet capacity requirements, but failed to meet its conditions; after the variance was revoked, all units sold under it counted as non-compliant. It is the third SORE enforcement action against the company within four years. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment. The amount field records only the civil monetary penalty.

Authority / court

California Air Resources Board (CARB)

Area of law

Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits

Legal basis

CARB Small Off-Road Engine (SORE) Regulation; Evaporative Emissions Regulations

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Repeat case

yes

Mitigating circumstances

According to CARB, the company cooperated in resolving the allegations.

Published

13 Sep 2023

Original amount 5,694,452 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Sep 2023.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 13 Sep 2025 · Direct link

A US manufacturer based in Minnesota is paying USD 9,618,477 under a settlement with OFAC for 54 apparent violations of the Iran sanctions. According to OFAC's findings, between 2016 and 2018 its Swiss subsidiary knowingly sold reflective licence plate sheeting via a German reseller to an entity controlled by Iran's Law Enforcement Forces; a US person employed by a foreign subsidiary was closely involved. Such dealings were expressly excluded from the general licence then available to foreign subsidiaries. OFAC treated the apparent violations as egregious but voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty was USD 13,740,682. OFAC signed the settlement agreement on 29 August 2023 and published it on 21 September 2023. Summarised in our own words.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes

Legal basis

Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.204, 560.206, 560.215 (54 mutmaßliche Verstöße); Vergleich nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

21 Sep 2023

Original amount 9,618,477 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 Aug 2023.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 29 Aug 2025 · Direct link

From January 2015 to December 2018, the sales company used price recommendations, price monitoring and the passing-on of retailer complaints to get seven (online) retailers to raise their selling prices for the manufacturer's televisions. The ACM (Autoriteit Consument & Markt, Dutch competition and consumer authority) classified this as prohibited vertical coordination and imposed a fine of 7,943,500 EUR, which the Rechtbank Rotterdam (Rotterdam District Court) upheld on 7 August 2025.

Authority / court

Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. 6 Abs. 1 Mededingingswet, Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

12 Sep 2023

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 11 Jul 2025 · Direct link

On 14 June 2023 the Competition Tribunal (Hong Kong's specialist competition court), on a joint application with the Competition Commission (Hong Kong's competition authority), imposed pecuniary penalties on three suppliers of mail inserters of the same brand that had fixed prices, shared markets and rigged bids between April 2018 and January 2019 (breach of the First Conduct Rule). The brand manufacturer's two Hong Kong companies (which formerly traded under the brand name) pay 1,399,000 HKD together, the second supplier 3,372,000 HKD and the third supplier 808,000 HKD, 5,579,000 HKD in total; in addition each pays 476,101 HKD in investigation costs plus legal costs. It was the first case in which all parties under investigation cooperated with the authority under its cooperation policy already at the investigation stage; in return the Commission refrained from pursuing the employees involved.

Authority / court

Competition Tribunal (Hongkong), auf Antrag der Competition Commission

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619), s. 6 (First Conduct Rule), s. 93 (pecuniary penalty), s. 96 (Ermittlungskosten)

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Cooperation discounts of 25% (brand manufacturer, second supplier) and 28% (third supplier); liability and penalties agreed by consent.

Published

15 Jun 2023

Original amount 5,579,000 HKD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jun 2023.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 14 Jun 2025 · Direct link

The DDTC settled with a US manufacturer of 3D printers for a civil penalty of USD 20 million for unauthorised exports and retransfers of technical data to various countries, including a country proscribed under the ITAR, and for deficient ITAR records. USD 10 million is suspended for approved compliance measures and USD 10 million is payable in three instalments. A few days later the Bureau of Industry and Security imposed a separate penalty for violations of the Export Administration Regulations.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods

Legal basis

Arms Export Control Act § 38 (22 U.S.C. § 2778); ITAR, 22 C.F.R. Parts 120–130, insbesondere Part 127 und § 128.11

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

The allegations are based on facts that the company itself disclosed to the DDTC.

Original amount 20,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Feb 2023.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 24 Feb 2025 · Direct link

The competition authority sanctioned one cable maker as well as a second manufacturer and its parent company because, at least from June 2015 to May 2020, they took turns fixing the winners of tenders by the national transmission grid operator for extra-high-voltage cables, used the loser as subcontractor and settled turnover between them. In the settlement procedure (transação) the authority imposed 1,020,800 EUR on the first manufacturer and 1,035,000 EUR on the second manufacturer and its parent company, 2,055,800 EUR in total.

Authority / court

Autoridade da Concorrência (AdC)

Area of law

Competition law · Cartels and collusion

Legal basis

Art. 9 Lei n.º 19/2012 (Lei da Concorrência); Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Culpability

intentional

Mitigating circumstances

Settlement procedure with admission and waiver of appeal; fines reduced, also in view of the financial situation.

Published

28 Feb 2023

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 10 Feb 2025 · Direct link

A Danish refrigeration and air-conditioning manufacturer is paying USD 4,379,810 under a settlement with the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for 225 apparent violations of the Iran, Syria and Sudan sanctions. According to OFAC's findings, between November 2013 and August 2017 its UAE subsidiary directed customers in those countries to pay, via third-party payers, into its account at the UAE branch of a US financial institution, and also made payments from that account to Iran and Syria; around USD 16.96 million was involved in total. The third-party payers obscured the originators and beneficiaries, so the bank's filters did not stop the payments. OFAC treated the case as non-egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty was USD 21,899,050. Summarised in our own words.

Authority / court

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Area of law

Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes

Legal basis

IEEPA, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1705; Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 560), Syrian Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 542), Sudanese Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 538); Vergleich nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Published

30 Dec 2022

Original amount 4,379,810 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Dec 2022.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 30 Dec 2024 · Direct link

A Singapore-based offshore and shipyard group entered into a leniency agreement with the Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) and the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU, Office of the Attorney General) concerning undue payments to public officials and intermediaries in contractual relationships with the public administration. The agreed global value covering damages, fines and other penalties is BRL 1,223,657,710.19; payments under the earlier agreement between its Brazilian subsidiary and the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) may be credited. This followed a global resolution in December 2017 with authorities in the United States, Singapore and Brazil totalling USD 422,216,980, of which USD 211,108,490 went to the state-controlled oil company and the Federal Union.

Authority / court

Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 16; Lei nº 8.429/1992; Decreto nº 11.129/2022

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Crediting of payments made under the agreement with the MPF; obligation to improve the integrity programme.

Original amount 1,223,657,710.19 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Dec 2022.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 19 Dec 2024 · Direct link

From 2013 employees of an electrical engineering group set up a bribery scheme in which inflated payments to subcontractors were used to channel benefits to public officials in South Africa and win contracts for the construction of a coal-fired power station (bribes of at least CHF 1.3 million, contracts worth at least USD 200 million). By summary penalty order, the Bundesanwaltschaft (BA, Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland) convicted a Swiss services company of the group for failing to take all reasonable organisational measures to prevent this, fined it CHF 4,000,000 (statutory maximum CHF 5 million) and ordered it to pay procedural costs of CHF 50,000. The BA waived a compensatory claim because the group had already paid USD 104 million to South Africa in 2020.

Authority / court

Bundesanwaltschaft (BA)

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Art. 102 Abs. 2 StGB i.V.m. Art. 322septies StGB

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

unknown

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Mitigating circumstances

Cooperation taken into account as mitigating; no compensatory claim because of a USD 104 million settlement payment already made to South Africa in 2020.

Published

2 Dec 2022

Original amount 4,000,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Dec 2022.

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 2 Dec 2024 · Direct link

In a second convention judiciaire d'intérêt public (CJIP, French deferred prosecution agreement), following the one of 2020, the group undertook to pay a public interest fine of 15,856,044 EUR to the Parquet national financier (PNF, French national financial prosecutor). It concerns payments to sales intermediaries in sales campaigns in Libya and Kazakhstan and through a further intermediary, which the prosecutor mostly regards as possible bribery of foreign public officials and, in one helicopter deal in Kazakhstan, as possible bribery of a French elected official; the amount corresponds to the fees paid to the intermediaries in Libya and Kazakhstan. The agreement, concluded on 17 November 2022, was validated by the court on 30 November 2022.

Authority / court

Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris

Area of law

Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials

Legal basis

Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale; Art. 435-3, 433-1 Code pénal

Action

Fine

Status of proceedings

final

Sector

Manufacturing and mechanical engineering

Employees

10,000 or more

Published

30 Nov 2022

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 30 Nov 2024 · Direct link