Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€380,000Total of monetary amounts
€200,000Largest single case: Woerd-Tech BV
€130,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Rechtbank Rotterdam; Anklage Openbaar Ministerie €200,000 53 % · 1 case
  2. Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM) €130,000 34 % · 1 case
  3. Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) €50,000 13 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Sanctions and export control €200,000 53 % · 1 case
  2. Consumer protection and online retail €130,000 34 % · 1 case
  3. Data protection €50,000 13 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Woerd-Tech BV €200,000 53 % · 1 case
  2. Leen Bakker €130,000 34 % · 1 case
  3. AS Watson (Health & Beauty Continental Europe) B.V. €50,000 13 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€200,000
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241€130,000
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20251€50,000
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

3 cases

27 May 2025 AS Watson (Health & Beauty Continental Europe) B.V.AP reduces cookie fine against Kruidvat operator AS Watson to 50,000 EUR after objection NetherlandsCookies and tracking €50,000

The company behind the Kruidvat drugstore chain tracked visitors to Kruidvat.nl with tracking cookies without their knowledge or consent, enabling it to build profiles from location, pages visited, shopping basket and purchases. The Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) had imposed 600,000 EUR in 2024, upheld the objection in May 2025 and reduced the fine to 50,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Set tracking cookies in an online shop only after genuine consent – pre-ticked or hidden consent is not sufficient.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a DSGVO (Tracking-Cookies ohne Einwilligung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
12 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 May 2024 Leen BakkerLeen Bakker: 130,000 EUR fine for embellished reference prices NetherlandsMisleading advertising and pricing €130,000

The ACM imposed fines totalling 621,000 EUR on five online retailers because they did not base discounts on the lowest price of the previous 30 days and artificially raised initial prices. The furniture and home furnishings retailer Leen Bakker received a fine of 130,000 EUR and did not acknowledge the infringement.

What organisations can take from it

The reference price for a discount is the lowest price of the previous 30 days – raising prices shortly before a promotion is off-limits.

Relevance to training and awareness

Discount advertising and reference prices

Authority / court
Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Preisangabenregeln zur Preisermäßigung (Umsetzung Omnibus-Richtlinie, seit 1.1.2023)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
11 Jun 2024
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

31 Oct 2023 Woerd-Tech BVWoerd-Tech BV: 200,000 EUR penalty for microchips to Russian defence customers NetherlandsExport control and dual-use goods €200,000

The company of a Russian-Dutch national from Gorssel sold microchips, semiconductors and other electronics to a Russian purchasing organisation with an FSB licence and to customers from the defence industry, and after the tightening of sanctions in 2022 routed shipments ostensibly via the Maldives and other countries. Following charges brought by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (Openbaar Ministerie, OM), the Rotterdam District Court (Rechtbank Rotterdam) imposed a fine of 200,000 EUR on the BV (final after the appeals were withdrawn) and 18 months' imprisonment on the managing director (appeal proceedings pending).

What organisations can take from it

Banks report suspicious Russia payments to the FIU – sham routes via third countries are uncovered in this way and hit both companies and management.

Authority / court
Rechtbank Rotterdam; Anklage Openbaar Ministerie
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Sanctiewet 1977 (EU-Russland-Sanktionen); Urkundenfälschung (valsheid in geschrifte)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Managing director sentenced at first instance to 18 months' imprisonment; in the appeal proceedings, the OM demanded three years and a professional ban.
Published
14 Apr 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial