Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Healthcare NeoGenomics Laboratories Inc. Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

€8.59mTotal of monetary amounts

€8.59mLargest single case: NeoGenomics Laboratories Inc.

€8.59mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

USA €8.59m 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

Bribery and corruption €8.59m 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company

When?

per year, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
2026	1	€8.59m

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

20 Jul 2026 NeoGenomics Laboratories Inc.NeoGenomics: 9.8 million USD after self-disclosure – discounted consulting for referring physicians USACommercial bribery €8.59m

The Florida laboratory provided referring physicians with consulting services below market value and paid independent consultants referral-based remuneration for recruiting physicians. Following a self-disclosure, NeoGenomics paid 9,813,260 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Free or discounted services are also benefits – like cash payments, they belong in the anti-corruption review.

Relevance to training and awareness

Services with monetary value provided to customers below market value

Authority / court: U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law: Bribery and corruption · Commercial bribery
Legal basis: Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)); False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff.)
Action: Other
Status of proceedings: final
Sector: Healthcare
Mitigating circumstances: Self-disclosure of the remuneration arrangements.

Original amount 9,813,260 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Jul 2026.

Sources

HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: Florida Laboratory Agrees to Pay $9.8M … Self-Disclosure of Compensation Arrangements (20.07.2026) Enforcement database of an authority

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Ready for training that actually lands?