Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies €1.22bn 44 % · 79 cases
- GVA Capital Ltd. €186.3m 7 % · 1 case
- The Toronto-Dominion Bank €113m 4 % · 1 case
- UBS Financial Services Inc. €108.4m 4 % · 1 case
- Xeltox Enterprises Ltd. (Cryptomus) €108.1m 4 % · 1 case
- Two Sigma Investments LP und Two Sigma Advisers LP €87.6m 3 % · 1 case
- FleetCor Technologies Inc. (heute Corpay Inc.) €87.1m 3 % · 1 case
- Canaccord Genuity LLC €69.2m 2 % · 1 case
- J.P. Morgan SE €57.2m 2 % · 2 cases
- Nationwide Building Society €50.4m 2 % · 1 case
- 206 more€697.4m
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2025 | 1 | €15.5m |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | — |
1 case
16 Dec 2025 Svea Bank ABSvea Bank: SEK 170m for failings in AML risk assessment and customer due diligence €15.5m
Finansinspektionen (FI, Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) issued Svea Bank a remark (anmärkning) and an administrative fine of 170,000,000 SEK. In the review period from 30 April 2022 to 1 May 2023 (business with legal entities), the general risk assessments were incomplete, customers were not risk-assessed as required, beneficial owners were not sufficiently identified, and enhanced due diligence on high-risk customers was omitted, insufficient or late in a large proportion of the cases reviewed. An earlier FI sanction of June 2022 for credit assessment failings was treated as only a minor aggravating factor because it concerned different obligations.
The general money laundering risk assessment must cover every product and feed into customer risk assessment, otherwise all downstream due diligence measures are ineffective.
Risk-based customer due diligence, identification of beneficial owners and enhanced due diligence for high-risk customers
- Authority / court
- Finansinspektionen (FI)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Lag (2017:630) om åtgärder mot penningtvätt och finansiering av terrorism, u. a. 2 kap. 1–3 §§, 3 kap. 12 och 16 §§; 15 kap. 1 och 7 §§ lagen (2004:297) om bank- och finansieringsrörelse
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Repeat case
- yes
- Mitigating circumstances
- The bank pointed to its cooperation and remediation; FI did not treat this as mitigating. No damage was known to FI; in an overall assessment FI did not classify the breaches as serious and therefore refrained from a warning or licence revocation.
- Published
- 17 Dec 2025
Original amount 170,000,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Dec 2025.
- FI: Svea Bank får en anmärkning och en sanktionsavgift (17.12.2025) Press release of an authority
- FI-Beschluss FI dnr 23-13249 vom 16.12.2025 – Svea Bank AB Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link