Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

10cases from 1 jurisdiction
€150.7mTotal of monetary amounts
€3.22mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) €82.6m 55 % · 2 cases
  2. Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) €41.4m 27 % · 3 cases
  3. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo €12.7m 8 % · 1 case
  4. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU) €7.15m 5 % · 1 case
  5. Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS) €6.88m 5 % · 3 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Bribery and corruption €89.7m 60 % · 3 cases
  2. Capital markets and financial supervision €41.9m 28 % · 4 cases
  3. Competition law €12.7m 8 % · 1 case
  4. Money laundering and terrorist financing €6.45m 4 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Bulls Holding Investments Company S.A., RS Investimentos S/A €81.5m 54 % · 1 case
  2. Florim Consultoria Ltda. (ehem. Silverado Gestão e Investimentos), Santander Caceis Brasil DTVM S.A., Gradual CCTVM S.A. – Massa Falida u. a. (5 Unternehmen) €41.2m 27 % · 1 case
  3. BofA Securities Inc., Nomura International plc, Standard Chartered Bank u. a. (5 Banken) €12.7m 8 % · 1 case
  4. Qualicorp Consultoria e Corretora de Seguros S.A. €7.15m 5 % · 1 case
  5. Banco Genial S.A. €3.62m 2 % · 1 case
  6. Banco Topázio S.A. €2.82m 2 % · 1 case
  7. IRB-Brasil Resseguros S.A. €1.07m 1 % · 1 case
  8. Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento €432,774 0 % · 1 case
  9. Intra DTVM Ltda. €188,419 0 % · 1 case
  10. Regen Serviços Fiduciários Ltda. €39,713 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20241€41.2m
Q1 20252€7.34m
Q2 20251€39,713
Q3 20251€81.5m
Q4 20251€12.7m
Q1 20260–
Q2 20261€2.82m
Q3 20263€5.12m
Q4 20260–

10 cases

12 Aug 2026 Banco Genial S.A.Banco Genial: BRL 21.56m for anti-money laundering failings in FX business BrazilCustomer due diligence €3.62m

The Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador (COPAS, sanctions decision committee) of the Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank) fined Banco Genial S.A. a total of BRL 21,560,000.00: BRL 4,200,000.00 for inadequate anti-money laundering policies, procedures and controls, BRL 8,920,000.00 for failing to verify the credentials of foreign exchange clients and BRL 8,440,000.00 for failing to file suspicious activity reports with the financial intelligence unit Coaf in the proper form and on time. According to the case documents, the reporting charge concerned 1,364 foreign exchange transactions for the acquisition of virtual assets with five clients between November 2020 and October 2021, totalling USD 744,341,982.45.

What organisations can take from it

Foreign exchange transactions for buying crypto-assets require checks on clients' financial capacity and timely suspicious activity reports.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer due diligence and suspicious activity reporting in FX and crypto business

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Lei nº 9.613/1998, Art. 10 III, Art. 11 und 12; Lei nº 13.506/2017; Circular BCB nº 3.978/2020; Resolução CMN nº 3.568/2008
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 21,560,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e InvestimentoLebes Financeira: BRL 2.58m over lending to a related party above the limit BrazilOrganisational requirements €432,774

The BCB (central bank) sanctions committee COPAS imposed a fine of BRL 2,576,000.00 on Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento because from January 2022 to March 2023 it engaged in prohibited credit transactions with a related company: its banking correspondent retained collected loan instalments, and the arrears reached BRL 147m at the end of November 2022, or 207.66% of adjusted equity against a limit of 10%. In addition there was a BRL 20m loan routed through a third company. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

If an affiliated distribution partner retains customer money, this can quickly become a prohibited loan to a related party.

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Lei 13.506/2017, Art. 3 II; Lei 4.595/1964, Art. 34 § 3 V d und § 4 I; Resolução CMN 4.693/2018, Arts. 5, 6 und 7 II
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 2,576,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2026 IRB-Brasil Resseguros S.A.IRB-Brasil Resseguros: BRL 6.32m settlement over obstructing SUSEP supervision BrazilBribery and corruption €1.07m

IRB-Brasil Resseguros S.A. concluded a Termo de Compromisso (settlement in sanction proceedings) with the CGU and allegedly pays a fine of BRL 6,317,473.41 because the company had hindered the investigative and supervisory activity of the insurance supervisor SUSEP (Art. 5 V Lei 12.846/2013). The fine equals the statutory minimum of 0.1% of gross revenue (BRL 6,509,921.81) less BRL 192,448.40 already paid in SUSEP proceedings over inconsistent reporting. Extraordinary publication was waived, and the proceedings are thereby closed.

What organisations can take from it

Incomplete or inconsistent information given to a supervisory authority can, as obstruction of supervision, trigger an anti-corruption fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Obstructing supervisory authorities through inaccurate information

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 V, Art. 6 I; Decreto 11.129/2022, Art. 25 § 2; Portaria Normativa CGU 155/2024
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Credit was given for a compliance programme (3.6%), the absence of proof of advantage or damage (1%) and settlement-related reductions for cooperation and admission; fines already paid to SUSEP were deducted.
Published
3 Jul 2026

Original amount 6,317,473.41 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 May 2026 Banco Topázio S.A.Banco Topázio: BRL 16.28m and crypto FX ban over anti-money laundering failings BrazilSuspicious activity reports €2.82m

The sanctions committee COPAS of the Banco Central do Brasil (central bank) imposed fines totalling BRL 16,280,000.00 on Banco Topázio S.A.: BRL 4,560,000.00 because its monitoring system contained no rules for foreign exchange transactions to buy and sell virtual assets, BRL 3,280,000.00 because suspicious transactions were not reported, or reported late, to the financial intelligence unit Coaf (including BRL 3.05bn from one client), and BRL 8,440,000.00 because the bank had not verified the qualification of foreign exchange clients. In addition, for two years it may not carry out over-the-counter foreign exchange transactions for virtual assets in which the client acts as an unauthorised intermediary for third parties. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone processing foreign exchange for crypto intermediaries needs suitable monitoring scenarios and must also know the customers behind the customers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering monitoring of foreign exchange with crypto intermediaries

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Lei 9.613/1998, Art. 10 III, Art. 11 II, Art. 12 II und § 2 II und IV; Circular BCB 3.978/2020, Arts. 38, 39 und 48; Lei 13.506/2017, Art. 3 XVII, Art. 5 II und IV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 16,280,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Oct 2025 BofA Securities Inc., Nomura International plc, Standard Chartered Bank u. a. (5 Banken)CADE: settlements with five banks in offshore FX cartel totalling BRL 79m BrazilCartels and collusion €12.7m

On 22 October 2025 the CADE Tribunal approved, in a single block, five cease-and-desist settlements (Termos de Compromisso de Cessação, TCC) with banks and allegedly set the following pecuniary contributions: BofA Securities Inc. 33,010,207.04 BRL, Nomura International plc 32,145,917.76 BRL, Standard Chartered Bank 11,544,947.78 BRL, Credit Suisse AG 1,582,051.57 BRL and MUFG Bank 714,782.33 BRL, together 78,997,906.48 BRL. The session minutes do not state the subject of the proceedings; all five banks are, however, among the parties whose conviction the General Superintendence had recommended in April 2025 in the proceedings on the offshore foreign-exchange cartel (according to CADE, collusion on the prices of FX transactions, exchange of sensitive information and disadvantaging other market participants such as brokers). The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

FX traders must not coordinate prices or customers with competitors; chats between banks are a typical cartel risk.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price-fixing and information exchange in foreign-exchange trading

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Termo de Compromisso de Cessação)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
30 Oct 2025

Original amount 78,997,906.48 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Sep 2025 Bulls Holding Investments Company S.A., RS Investimentos S/ABulls Holding and RS Investimentos: BRL 508.8m for obstructing supervision BrazilBribery and corruption €81.5m

The Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) fined Bulls Holding Investments Company S.A. BRL 387,431,733.02 and RS Investimentos S/A BRL 121,380,000.00 (BRL 508,811,733.02 in total) and ordered extraordinary publication of the decision for each. According to the final report, the companies had submitted to the insurance supervisor SUSEP bids to take over the pension association APLUB, which was under special intervention, backed by inadequate and in part apparently forged documents, thereby interfering with SUSEP's supervisory activity; RS Investimentos was additionally sanctioned for supporting Bulls Holding's acts. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Misleading documents submitted to a supervisory authority count in Brazil as interference with supervision under the Anti-Corruption Law and can trigger very large fines.

Relevance to training and awareness

Truthful submissions to supervisory authorities

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 II und V, Art. 6 I und II, Art. 14
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
2 Oct 2025

Original amount 508,811,733.02 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Apr 2025 Regen Serviços Fiduciários Ltda.Regen Serviços Fiduciários: BRL 255,000 CVM fine over incorrect liquidity data BrazilOrganisational requirements €39,713

The CVM ordered Regen Serviços Fiduciários Ltda. to pay a fine of BRL 255,000.00 because its internal controls failed and it repeatedly submitted incorrect information to the authority on the liquidity of the investment funds it administered (Art. 19 Instrução CVM 558 until 30 June 2021, thereafter Art. 22 Resolução CVM 21). The company had not submitted a defence; an appeal with suspensive effect to the CRSFN was available against the decision.

What organisations can take from it

Regulatory reports on fund liquidity need their own plausibility checks; repeated errors count as an organisational failure.

Authority / court
Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Instrução CVM 558/2015, Art. 19; Resolução CVM 21/2021, Art. 22
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
8 Apr 2025

Original amount 255,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Mar 2025 Qualicorp Consultoria e Corretora de Seguros S.A.Qualicorp: leniency agreement worth BRL 44.5m over payment to a public official BrazilBribery of public officials €7.15m

Qualicorp Consultoria e Corretora de Seguros S.A. acknowledged, in a leniency agreement with the CGU and the AGU, that it had paid an economic advantage to a public official whose action or omission was in the company's interest. It allegedly pays BRL 44,485,434.29 as a fine plus disgorgement: BRL 27,803,396.43 as disgorgement of the advantage obtained and a fine of BRL 16,682,037.86 under Lei 12.846/2013 (40% reduction), both indexed to IPCA up to December 2024. The agreement extends to other companies of the Qualicorp group. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

If management knows of or tolerates payments to officials, the fine rises; without an effective compliance programme there is also no mitigating factor.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payment to a public official to influence official action

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 6 I, Arts. 16 und 17, Art. 19 I; Lei 8.429/1992; Decreto 11.129/2022
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Credit was given for returning the advantage (1%), cooperation (1.5%) and voluntary admission (2%); no compliance programme was taken into account. The fine equals the statutory minimum of the advantage obtained, then reduced by 40%.
Liability of senior managers
Tolerance or knowledge by senior management was applied as an aggravating factor at the maximum rate of 3%.

Original amount 44,485,434.29 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Mar 2025 Intra DTVM Ltda.Intra DTVM: CVM fine of BRL 1.2m for missing fund filings BrazilDisclosure and reporting obligations €188,419

The board of the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM, Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission) fined the fund administrator Intra DTVM Ltda. BRL 1,200,000.00 for filing mandatory periodic information on the investment funds it administered late or not at all (Art. 59 Instrução CVM 555). According to the charges, 121 mandatory documents for 12 of the 19 funds it administered were missing at the end of the 2020 financial year; the company was acquitted of the charge of breaching its duty of diligence on a tied vote, since in that event the view more favourable to the accused prevails. An appeal against the decision is pending before the Conselho de Recursos do Sistema Financeiro Nacional (CRSFN, financial system appeals board). The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Fund administrators need a robust deadline and control system so that mandatory information for every fund reaches the regulator on time.

Relevance to training and awareness

Timely mandatory filings with the regulator

Authority / court
Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Instrução CVM nº 555/2014, Art. 59
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
18 Mar 2025

Original amount 1,200,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

15 Oct 2024 Florim Consultoria Ltda. (ehem. Silverado Gestão e Investimentos), Santander Caceis Brasil DTVM S.A., Gradual CCTVM S.A. – Massa Falida u. a. (5 Unternehmen)CVM fines Florim, Santander Caceis, BNY Mellon and Deutsche Bank in Silverado FIDC case BrazilMarket abuse and insider dealing €41.2m

The Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM, securities regulator) ordered Florim Consultoria Ltda. (formerly Silverado Gestão e Investimentos Ltda.) to pay BRL 244,979,397.58 for fraudulent transactions in managing three receivables funds (FIDC). For deficient controls as administrators or custodians of the funds, Santander Caceis Brasil DTVM S.A. received BRL 2,720,000.00, Gradual CCTVM S.A. – Massa Falida BRL 1,700,000.00, BNY Mellon Serviços Financeiros DTVM S.A. BRL 1,200,000.00 and Deutsche Bank S.A. – Banco Alemão BRL 500,000.00, totalling BRL 251,099,397.58 against companies. BNY Mellon, Gradual, Santander Caceis and Deutsche Bank were acquitted of certain charges.

What organisations can take from it

Administrators and custodians of receivables funds must actively check evidence of receivables and the manager's account access – otherwise they are liable alongside the manager.

Relevance to training and awareness

Control duties of fund administrators and custodians

Authority / court
Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Instrução CVM 08/1979, Ziff. I i. V. m. II c; Instrução CVM 356/2001, Art. 8 § 3 I, Art. 38 III und IV, Art. 39 II und III i. V. m. § 4
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
16 Oct 2024

Original amount 251,099,397.58 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial