Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€944,000Total of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€472,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 19.11.2024 €588,000 62 % · 1 case
  2. Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 17.12.2024 €356,000 38 % · 1 case
  3. Wirtschafts- und Korruptionsstaatsanwaltschaft (WKStA); Landesgericht Eisenstadt — 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Money laundering and terrorist financing €944,000 100 % · 2 cases
  2. Bribery and corruption — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Commerzialbank Mattersburg — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20262€944,000
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

3 cases

20 Feb 2026 BVwG reduces FMA penalty against private bank over unclarified beneficial owners AustriaCustomer due diligence €356,000

From 2017 to 2020, an Austrian bank specialising in private and investment banking had not adequately examined the ownership and control structure of an offshore holding client despite the lack of evidence on shareholders, trust arrangements and beneficial owners. The Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) confirmed the infringement but reduced the additional penalty imposed by the Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht, FMA) in its penalty decision of 17 December 2024 from 476,000 to 356,000 EUR (total penalty 436,000 EUR less FMA penalties already paid), because the FMA had taken the seriousness of the offence into account twice and the bank had cooperated, admitted its errors and terminated the client relationship; an appeal on points of law has been permitted.

What organisations can take from it

For offshore holdings with trustees, prove the beneficial owner with supporting documents – a self-declaration is not enough.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identifying beneficial owners in holding and trust structures

Authority / court
Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 17.12.2024
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§ 9 Abs. 1 erster Satz i. V. m. § 6 Abs. 1 Z 2 FM-GwG; § 35 Abs. 1 und 3 i. V. m. § 34 Abs. 1 Z 2 und Abs. 2 FM-GwG; § 22 Abs. 9 FMABG (Zusatzstrafe)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction by the court because the wrongfulness of the offence had been counted twice, cooperation, admission of the facts and of guilt, and termination of the client relationship

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Feb 2026 BVwG upholds 588,000 EUR FMA penalty against major bank over incorrect risk classification AustriaCustomer due diligence €588,000

The Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) dismissed the appeal of a listed major Austrian bank and upheld the fine of 588,000 EUR (plus 58,800 EUR in procedural costs) imposed by the Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht, FMA) in its penalty decision of 19 November 2024. From 2017 to 2020, the bank had not adequately risk-classified three business relationships and had disregarded sector risks such as gambling and precious metals trading as well as cash intensity; an appeal on points of law has been permitted.

What organisations can take from it

Customers from gambling or precious metals trading with a high share of cash belong in a higher risk class – otherwise the enhanced obligations are missing.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk classification of cash-intensive high-risk sectors

Authority / court
Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 19.11.2024
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§ 6 Abs. 5 i. V. m. § 34 Abs. 1 Z 2 und § 35 Abs. 1–3 FM-GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Nov 2024 Commerzialbank MattersburgCommerzialbank Mattersburg: indictment over paid-for police Christmas parties, diversions AustriaGifts, hospitality and benefits Other

According to the indictment by Austria's Central Public Prosecutor's Office for Combating Economic Crimes and Corruption (WKStA), the bank, at the instigation of a former member of the management board, paid for the Christmas parties of three police stations over several years in order to influence the way they performed their duties. An indictment (Strafantrag) for granting benefits to exert influence was filed against the former board member; four mostly senior police officers were offered diversion for accepting benefits to exert influence (one probation period, two monetary payments, one further probation period), and the proceedings against two other former board members were discontinued.

What organisations can take from it

Sponsoring celebrations or events for authorities you deal with is not harmless goodwill – it can be punishable as grooming officials (Anfüttern).

Relevance to training and awareness

Invitations and celebrations for authorities and the police

Authority / court
Wirtschafts- und Korruptionsstaatsanwaltschaft (WKStA); Landesgericht Eisenstadt
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
Legal basis
§ 307b StGB (Vorteilszuwendung zur Beeinflussung), § 306 StGB (Vorteilsannahme zur Beeinflussung)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Indictment against a former member of the bank's management board; proceedings against two other former board members discontinued.
Published
25 Nov 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial