Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

19cases from 1 jurisdiction
€59.8mTotal of monetary amounts (11 cases with an amount)
€48.4mLargest single case: Wechselstube (anonymisiert)
€697,653Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20241€479,179
Q1 20251€913,388
Q2 20254€56.7m
Q3 20255€838,446
Q4 20251€30,711
Q1 20263€810,115
Q2 20263–
Q3 20261–
Q4 20260–

19 cases

24 Jul 2026 Shelbit General Trading L.L.CVARA sanctions Shelbit again for unlicensed crypto services, missing KYC and promotion United Arab EmiratesCustomer due diligence Fine

Despite a cease-and-desist notice and enforcement action of 2 January 2025, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA, Dubai's virtual assets regulator) found that Shelbit General Trading L.L.C (Shelbit Exchange) continued to provide virtual asset services in and from Dubai without a licence, onboarded users without the mandatory KYC checks and promoted its services without authorisation. VARA again imposed fines of an undisclosed amount and ordered it to cease immediately; according to the regulator, the risk identified also concerned cross-border transactions with possible consequences for the integrity of the UAE financial system.

What organisations can take from it

Disregarding a cease-and-desist order leads to further sanctions – the regulator keeps monitoring the market after the first action.

Relevance to training and awareness

Compliance with cease-and-desist orders and KYC obligations

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Federal Decree-Law No. (10) of 2025 (AML/CFT/PF); Cabinet Resolution No. (111) of 2022; Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets in the Emirate of Dubai; VARA Regulations and Rulebooks
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
24 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jun 2026 MX Global Ltd (MEXC)VARA fines MX Global (MEXC) for unlicensed crypto services and missing KYC United Arab EmiratesCustomer due diligence Fine

According to investigations by the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA, Dubai's virtual assets regulator), MX Global Ltd, which trades under the MEXC brand, provided broker-dealer and/or exchange services to customers in Dubai without a licence from 2022 to April 2026 and onboarded users without the KYC checks required by law. VARA imposed fines of an undisclosed amount and ordered the immediate cessation of all unlicensed activities in or from Dubai; other group companies were expressly not affected.

What organisations can take from it

Serving customers in a market requires a licence there – and local KYC obligations must be met regardless.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing requirement and KYC for cross-border crypto services

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Federal Decree-Law No. (10) of 2025 (AML/CFT/PF); Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets in the Emirate of Dubai; Cabinet Resolution No. 111/2022; VARA Regulations and Rulebooks
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation, compliance with the cease-and-desist orders and a stated intention to apply for a VARA licence.
Published
22 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jun 2026 Peken Global Limited (KuCoin)VARA: fine and cease-and-desist order against unlicensed Peken Global (KuCoin) United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision Fine

Following VARA investigations, Peken Global Limited, trading as KuCoin, provided virtual asset broker-dealer and/or exchange services to customers in Dubai without a licence. VARA imposed fines of an undisclosed amount and ordered the immediate cessation of all unlicensed activities; other group entities were expressly not affected.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone providing crypto services cross-border to customers in Dubai needs a licence there – regardless of where the platform is based.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing requirement for crypto services in the target market

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Legal basis
Federal Decree Law No. (10) of 2025 (AML/CFT/PF); Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets; Cabinet Resolution No. 111/2022; VARA Regulations und Rulebooks
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation and full compliance with the measures; intention to go through the licensing process.
Published
24 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jun 2026 CoinMENA FZEVARA fines CoinMENA over failings in its anti-money laundering programme United Arab EmiratesInternal controls Fine

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA, Dubai's virtual assets regulator) had licensed CoinMENA FZE to provide broker-dealer services on 30 November 2023. In ongoing supervisory inspections covering its entire market operations from the outset up to and including the 2025 financial year, VARA found administrative weaknesses in internal systems and controls that led to compliance failures in the company's anti-money laundering programme. VARA imposed a fine, the amount of which was not published.

What organisations can take from it

Even a licensed provider must keep its anti-money laundering programme aligned with its actual operations – the regulator reviews the entire period of operation.

Relevance to training and awareness

Internal controls in the AML programmes of crypto service providers

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation, acceptance of the findings and a coordinated remediation plan.
Published
22 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Feb 2026 Ark Capital Management (Dubai) LimitedDFSA: allegedly USD 504,000 on Ark Capital Management over market abuse controls United Arab EmiratesMarket abuse and insider dealing €425,676

The investment firm did not review alerts from its surveillance system adequately or promptly, so at least ten suspicious trading instances were not reported or reported late; it also failed to notify an agreed, potentially staged change in control. After a 30% settlement discount the DFSA allegedly imposed USD 504,000 (otherwise USD 720,000).

What organisations can take from it

A surveillance system only helps if its alerts are reviewed promptly – and a staged acquisition of shares must still be notified.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consistently working through trade surveillance alerts

Authority / court
Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Art. 90(2) Regulatory Law 2004 (DIFC); GEN Rules 11.10.12A, 5.3.20(a), 11.8.11(2), 4.2.3, 4.2.10 DFSA Rulebook
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement (30% discount); USD 720,000 without settlement.
Published
6 Feb 2026

Original amount 504,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Feb 2026 Ed Broking (MENA) LimitedDFSA: USD 455,176 on reinsurance broker Ed Broking (MENA) for deceptive conduct United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision €384,439

The reinsurance broker gave cedent insurers and reinsurers different premiums for the same placement, misled reinsurers about deductions and brokerage, and misled a client about the brokerage earned on 121 placements, partly using altered documents. In a settlement the DFSA allegedly imposed USD 455,176: USD 175,343 disgorgement (including interest) and a USD 279,833 penalty (USD 575,104 without settlement). The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Undisclosed brokerage and inconsistent premium figures given to the contracting parties amount to deception – an early self-report reduces the consequences.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transparency on brokerage and premiums in insurance distribution

Authority / court
Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report to the DFSA, internal investigation and restitution to clients; settlement (reduction from USD 575,104).
Published
2 Feb 2026

Original amount 455,176 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jan 2026 Wealthface LimitedADGM: Wealthface gives enforceable undertaking after capital and reporting breaches United Arab EmiratesOrganisational requirements Other

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) accepted an enforceable undertaking from the wealth manager and robo-adviser after its investigation found that between January 2023 and March 2025 the firm held insufficient liquid assets for most of the period and insufficient capital resources at the end of 2023 and 2024, calculated its capital requirement for three quarters of 2024 on an understated expenditure figure, did not prepare its 2023 financial statements under IFRS and filed them late, had no office in ADGM since the end of 2023 and paid supervision fees late. The firm admitted the alleged contraventions and undertook, among other things, to appoint an independent director within 60 days, to close any capital shortfall, to re-establish its head office and registered office in ADGM and to report monthly on its capital and liquid assets for one year. The undertaking contains no financial penalty.

What organisations can take from it

Capital and liquidity requirements must be calculated continuously and on correct input figures, not only at the reporting date.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ongoing monitoring of capital and liquidity

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Section 235 FSMR 2015; PRU Rules 3.2.4(a), 3.7.2, 3.7.4(1); GEN Rules 4.5.1(1), 6.2.2, 6.6.2; FEES Rule 1.2.2
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation with the investigation; some of the contraventions (capital calculation and resources, IFRS accounts, office in ADGM) were already being remediated.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Dec 2025 Payward MENA Holdings LimitedADGM: allegedly 36,000 USD fine for Payward MENA Holdings over five years of late AML returns United Arab EmiratesInternal controls €30,711

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the operator of a multilateral trading facility, which also held a custody permission, allegedly 36,000 USD because it did not file its annual AML returns for 2020 to 2024 until 16 December 2025 despite numerous reminders and did not pay the late filing fees of 2,000 USD in total. The regulator also found inadequate systems and controls; in correspondence the firm pointed to internal issues and to the departure of the user registered for the reporting portal. Without the 20% discount for early settlement the fine would have been 45,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Regulatory returns need clear ownership and portal access that survives staff changes.

Relevance to training and awareness

Timely regulatory returns to the supervisor

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Section 232 Financial Services and Markets Regulations 2015 (FSMR); AML Rule 4.6.1; GEN Rule 2.2.3 (Principle 3); FEES Rule 1.2.7
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation, remediation, no previous non-compliance, limited scale of business with few clients and no customer loss identified (10% reduction); 20% discount for early settlement.

Original amount 36,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Aug 2025 Morpheus Software Technology FZE (Fuze)VARA sanctions crypto provider Fuze over AML failings and activity outside its licence United Arab EmiratesInternal controls Fine

An investigation by the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA, Dubai's virtual assets regulator) that began on 15 April 2025 found failures in the anti-money laundering programme, governance, compliance and internal controls of Morpheus Software Technology FZE (Fuze), licensed since October 2023. The company had also intentionally carried out virtual asset activities in breach of its licence conditions and failed to disclose material facts to the regulator. VARA imposed a fine of an undisclosed amount, issued a cease-and-desist order according to its enforcement list, and ordered the appointment of a Skilled Person to oversee remediation.

What organisations can take from it

Licensed providers must stay within the scope of their licence and disclose material facts to the regulator – otherwise fines and external monitoring follow.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML programme, licence boundaries and disclosure to the regulator

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
The company accepted the findings and proposed a remediation plan.
Published
18 Aug 2025

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

6 Aug 2025 Finanzierungsgesellschaft (anonymisiert)CBUAE fines finance company AED 600,000 for consumer protection breaches United Arab EmiratesConsumer protection and online retail €140,793

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) fined an unnamed finance company AED 600,000 under Article 137 of the central bank law (Decretal Federal Law No. 14 of 2018). Examinations had found that the company had failed to comply with the central bank's Market Conduct and Consumer Protection Regulations and Standards.

What organisations can take from it

Consumer protection rules in the financial sector are examined and sanctioned in their own right, not only anti-money laundering obligations.

Relevance to training and awareness

Market conduct and consumer protection at finance companies

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Art. 137 Decretal Federal Law No. (14) of 2018; CBUAE Market Conduct and Consumer Protection Regulations and Standards
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
6 Aug 2025

Original amount 600,000 AED, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

31 Jul 2025 Gomti ExchangeCBUAE revokes Gomti Exchange's licence over AML and sanctions failings United Arab EmiratesInternal controls Other

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) revoked the licence of the exchange house Gomti Exchange and struck it off the register (Article 137 of Decretal Federal Law No. 14 of 2018). Examinations had found significant failures by the company to comply with the framework for combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and illegal organisations and with the sanctions framework.

What organisations can take from it

For exchange houses, anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance are at the core of licence obligations – significant gaps can lead to the loss of authorisation.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML and sanctions compliance at exchange houses

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 137 Decretal Federal Law No. (14) of 2018 regarding the Central Bank and Organisation of Financial Institutions and Activities
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
31 Jul 2025

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jul 2025 Al Nahdi ExchangeCBUAE revokes Al Nahdi Exchange's licence over AML and sanctions failings United Arab EmiratesInternal controls Other

Central Bank examinations found significant failures by the exchange house to comply with the framework for combating money laundering, terrorist financing and illegal organisations and with sanctions requirements. The CBUAE revoked the licence and struck the exchange house off the register.

What organisations can take from it

Where AML and sanctions compliance is seriously deficient, payment service providers face not just a fine but the end of their licence.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML and sanctions compliance in exchange houses

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 137 Decretal Federal Law No. (14) of 2018 regarding the Central Bank and Organisation of Financial Institutions and Activities
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
30 Jul 2025

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jul 2025 Bank (anonymisiert)CBUAE: AED 3m on a bank for breaching AML requirements United Arab EmiratesInternal controls €697,653

Central Bank examinations found that an unnamed bank had not complied with the CBUAE's instructions implementing the anti-money laundering law. The CBUAE imposed a financial sanction of AED 3,000,000.

What organisations can take from it

Supervisory instructions on AML are binding – examinations uncover implementation gaps and lead to financial sanctions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Implementing supervisory AML instructions in banks

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 14 Federal Decree Law No. (20) of 2018 on AML/CFT; Art. 137 Decretal Federal Law No. (14) of 2018 regarding the Central Bank
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
10 Jul 2025

Original amount 3,000,000 AED, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jun 2025 Sundus ExchangeCBUAE revokes Sundus Exchange's licence and fines it AED 10m over AML breaches United Arab EmiratesInternal controls €2.35m

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) revoked the licence of the exchange house Sundus Exchange, struck it off the register and fined it AED 10 million under Article 14 of the anti-money laundering law (Federal Decree Law No. 20 of 2018). The measures were based on examination findings of failures and breaches of the framework for combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and illegal organisations.

What organisations can take from it

For payment and exchange businesses, anti-money laundering breaches can lead to a fine and loss of licence at the same time.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML obligations of exchange houses

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 14 Federal Decree Law No. (20) of 2018 on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Illegal Organisations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
17 Jun 2025

Original amount 10,000,000 AED, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jun 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

20 May 2025 Wechselstube (anonymisiert)CBUAE fines exchange house AED 200m over serious AML failings United Arab EmiratesInternal controls €48.4m

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) fined an unnamed exchange house AED 200 million under Article 137 of the central bank law (Decretal Federal Law No. 14 of 2018). CBUAE examinations had found significant failures in the company's framework for combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and illegal organisations.

What organisations can take from it

Weaknesses in an anti-money laundering framework can trigger very large fines.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML frameworks at exchange houses

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 137 Decretal Federal Law No. (14) of 2018 Regarding the Central Bank and Organization of Financial Institutions and Activities
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
20 May 2025

Original amount 200,000,000 AED, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Apr 2025 AC Holding Limited (Cayman Islands, Hayvn-Muttergesellschaft)ADGM: 3.6m USD fine for Hayvn parent over payments routed through unregulated accounts United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision €3.24m

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the Cayman Islands parent company of the Hayvn group 3,600,000 USD for being knowingly concerned in unauthorised regulated activities of an unregulated ADGM special purpose vehicle and in breaches of permission by its ADGM subsidiary. Around 3,023 transactions for 241 group clients ran through the bank accounts of that vehicle, with deposits of about 507 million USD and payments of about 558 million USD, although the vehicle held no permission and was not subject to the ADGM anti-money laundering rules. The regulator increased the fine by 20%, partly because the parent did not fully disclose its use of the accounts to the regulator and withheld half of the fees owed to the appointed skilled persons.

What organisations can take from it

A parent company is also liable when it knowingly routes client business through unregulated entities in a financial centre.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing within a group: no processing through unregulated entities

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Legal basis
Sections 16, 17 und 20 i. V. m. Section 220 sowie Section 232 FSMR 2015
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation by the parent company and its audit and risk committee from mid-December 2023; the aggravating factors outweighed this.
Liability of senior managers
According to the Final Notice, the use of the accounts was not approved by the board but directed by the then CEO. Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 3,600,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Apr 2025 AC Limited (Hayvn)ADGM: 3m USD fine and permission cancelled for crypto firm AC Limited (Hayvn) United Arab EmiratesOrganisational requirements €2.7m

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the provider of virtual asset trading and custody 3,000,000 USD and cancelled its Financial Services Permission. Between December 2021 and May 2024 it had dealt in virtual assets that were not accepted and exceeded its asset cap of 1 million USD, let client money run through accounts of an unregulated ADGM special purpose vehicle and of its parent company without formal agreements, maintained seven initially undisclosed client relationships without proper risk assessment and due diligence, and gave the regulator false and misleading information about bank accounts, clients and assets. The regulator considered the contraventions deliberate or at least reckless and increased the fine by 20% because of the false information.

What organisations can take from it

False information to the regulator aggravates any sanction, and client money belongs in dedicated, protected client accounts.

Relevance to training and awareness

Candour towards the regulator and protection of client money

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Sections 17(1), 33, 214(4), 221 und 232 FSMR 2015; GEN Rules 2.2.1, 2.2.3, 2.2.9, 2.2.10, 2.2.11, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.3, 3.3.7, 3.3.34, 8.1.2(6); COBS Rules 2.2.1, 14.2.1, 17.2.1; AML Rules 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 8.3.1(1), 8.4.1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation from mid-December 2023 and voluntary cessation of trading from 11 December 2023 under an enforceable undertaking; no previous non-compliance of a similar nature. The aggravating factors outweighed these.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 3,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Feb 2025 Wechselstube (anonymisiert, Sanktion vom 19.02.2025)CBUAE: AED 3.5m on an exchange house for AML breaches United Arab EmiratesInternal controls €913,388

Following an examination, the Central Bank found that an unnamed exchange house had not complied with its policies and procedures for combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The CBUAE imposed a financial sanction of AED 3.5 million.

What organisations can take from it

Exchange houses are under close AML supervision – gaps between policy and practice are punished with sums in the millions.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML prevention in exchange houses

Authority / court
Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 14 Federal Decree Law No. (20) of 2018 on AML/CFT
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
19 Feb 2025

Original amount 3,500,000 AED, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Feb 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Dec 2024 Aarna Capital LimitedADGM: allegedly 504,000 USD fine for broker Aarna Capital over KYC and monitoring failures United Arab EmiratesCustomer due diligence €479,179

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the broker for professional clients allegedly 504,000 USD for inadequate anti-money laundering controls between June 2017 and January 2023. In a review of 42 client relationships the regulator found that twelve clients should have been rated high risk because of relevant risk factors, so enhanced due diligence and annual reviews did not take place; documentation, risk-based updating of customer data, transaction monitoring and procedures to detect suspicious activity were also inadequate. The regulator identified no specific instances of money laundering; without the 20% discount for early settlement the fine would have been 630,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

A risk rating that is too lenient undermines every downstream control, from enhanced due diligence to periodic review.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer risk rating and ongoing transaction monitoring

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Section 232 FSMR 2015; AML Rules 4.1.1(1), 4.1.1(2)(a) und (d), 4.5.1(b), 4.5.3, 7.1.1, 8.1.2(1), 8.6.1(a), 14.2.1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
No previous breaches of the AML rules (though earlier action over CRS reporting duties), cooperation and remediation including an external gap analysis (10% reduction); 20% discount for early settlement.

Original amount 504,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial