Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

9cases from 1 jurisdiction
€115.2mTotal of monetary amounts (8 cases with an amount)
€50.4mLargest single case: Nationwide Building Society
€9.24mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20231€7.48m
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€15.6m
Q1 20252€11.3m
Q2 20250—
Q3 20251€24.5m
Q4 20251€50.4m
Q1 20261€389,760
Q2 20261—
Q3 20261€5.54m

9 cases

11 Dec 2025 Nationwide Building SocietyFCA: £44 million against Nationwide over financial crime controls United KingdomCustomer due diligence €50.4m

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed £44,078,500 (after a 30% discount) because, from October 2016 to July 2021, the building society had no effective systems to keep due diligence and risk assessments for personal customers up to date, and did not identify personal accounts used for business purposes. As a result, one customer received 24 fraudulent Covid furlough payments totalling £27.3 million.

What organisations can take from it

Keep customer profiles continuously up to date – anyone who postpones known weaknesses for years ends up paying for the abuse.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identifying personal accounts used for business purposes

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
FCA Principle 3; SYSC 6.1.1R und 6.3.1R
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
30% settlement discount
Published
12 Dec 2025

Original amount 44,078,500 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Dec 2025.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Aug 2026 Citibank, N.A., London BranchOFSI imposes 4.7 million GBP on Citibank London over Russia payments United KingdomBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €5.54m

Mainly between February and November 2022, the London branch processed 970 payments totalling around 19.7 million GBP that breached Russia and anti-corruption sanctions. The causes were overloaded alert handling after the wave of designations, delayed escalation and human error; the bank voluntarily disclosed most of the breaches and received a 20% reduction from HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI).

What organisations can take from it

During waves of designations, alert handling needs additional trained capacity – backlogs and wrong decisions in screening are themselves sanctions breaches.

Relevance to training and awareness

Handling sanctions alerts, escalation and freezing

Authority / court
HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019; Global Anti-Corruption Sanctions Regulations 2021; s. 146 Policing and Crime Act 2017
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Predominantly voluntary disclosure and cooperation (20% reduction); exceptional burden caused by the 2022 sanctions packages taken into account
Published
2 Sep 2026

Original amount 4,732,830.58 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Jun 2026 CACEIS Bank (UK Branch)FCA: public censure for CACEIS UK over deficient checks on a custody client United KingdomCustomer due diligence Reprimand or warning

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a public censure because the London branch opened and operated accounts for the wealth manager WealthTek, although its own register searches showed that it lacked permissions to hold client assets, and overlooked a restriction noted in the register; 16 monitoring alerts were not worked through over two years, and more than £314 million flowed through the accounts. In view of cooperation and a voluntary payment of £31.7 million to WealthTek clients, the FCA refrained from imposing a fine (otherwise £23.1 million after discount).

What organisations can take from it

Anyone who notices a discrepancy in the register must clarify and document it before accounts are activated.

Relevance to training and awareness

Register checks and follow-up on identified KYC gaps

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Section 205 FSMA (Public Censure) wegen Verstoßes gegen FCA Principle 2; Maßstab u. a. SYSC 6.1.1R, 6.3.1R, 6.3.3R und Regulations 18, 27, 28 MLR 2017
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation, acknowledgement of the deficiencies and a voluntary payment of £31,714,068 to those harmed
Published
25 Jun 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Mar 2026 Dinosaur Merchant Bank LimitedDinosaur Merchant Bank: 338,000 GBP – CFD trading without market abuse surveillance United KingdomOrganisational requirements €389,760

After a new order management system was introduced in June 2024, CFD transactions with an underlying value of around 3.05 billion USD were not captured by automated trade surveillance. The bank identified the error in October 2024 but only remedied it in May 2025; the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed 338,000 GBP after a 30% cooperation discount.

What organisations can take from it

With every system migration, check whether surveillance systems actually capture the new data flows.

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 16 Abs. 2 UK MAR; SYSC 6.1.1R; FCA Principle 3
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation (30% discount); CFD business discontinued in May 2025.

Original amount 338,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Jul 2025 Monzo Bank LimitedFCA: £21 million against Monzo over lax account opening for high-risk customers United KingdomCustomer due diligence €24.5m

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed £21,091,300 (after a 30% discount) because, from 2018 to 2020, Monzo onboarded customers on the basis of sparse and sometimes obviously implausible information – such as well-known London landmarks given as addresses. Despite a requirement not to take on any more high-risk customers, the bank opened more than 34,000 such accounts up to 2022.

What organisations can take from it

Automated onboarding needs plausibility checks – and supervisory requirements must be implemented in a technically effective way.

Relevance to training and awareness

Plausibility checks in customer onboarding

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
FCA Principle 3 (PRIN 3); s. 55L FSMA (Verstoß gegen Auflage)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
30% settlement discount
Published
8 Jul 2025

Original amount 21,091,300 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Jul 2025.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Mar 2025 The London Metal Exchange (LME)London Metal Exchange: 9.2 million GBP – controls and escalation failed in nickel turmoil United KingdomCritical infrastructure €11m

When the nickel price rose to over 100,000 USD within just over an hour on 8 March 2022, only junior staff were on duty during Asian trading hours, and they had not been trained to recognise a disorderly market; they did not escalate and even switched off price bands. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed a fine on the recognised investment exchange for the first time: 9.2 million GBP after a 30% discount.

What organisations can take from it

Critical infrastructure needs trained staff around the clock and clear escalation paths – including at night and at off-peak times.

Relevance to training and awareness

Escalation of unusual market conditions; training of shift staff

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
Legal basis
FCA REC 2.5.1 (Recognition Requirements); Art. 18 RTS 7 (MiFID II)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Early settlement (30% discount); improvements since March 2022.

Original amount 9,200,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jan 2025 Arian Financial LLPFCA: small broker Arian Financial fined over cum-ex money laundering risks United KingdomInternal controls €344,791

From January to September 2015, the broker had no effective systems against financial crime and was therefore exposed to the risk of facilitating fraudulent trading and money laundering in connection with cum-ex trades. Following proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) set the fine at £288,962.53 instead of the £744,745 originally intended.

What organisations can take from it

Even small brokers must question unusually lucrative, circular trading patterns before executing them.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising warning signs in unusual trading structures

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
FCA Principles 2 und 3 (PRIN 2, PRIN 3)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction by the Upper Tribunal
Published
10 Jan 2025

Original amount 288,962.53 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jan 2025.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

26 Nov 2024 Macquarie Bank Limited, London BranchMacquarie Bank London: 13 million GBP – trader concealed over 400 fictitious trades United KingdomOrganisational requirements €15.6m

From June 2020 to February 2022, a trader on the metals and commodities desk was able to book over 400 fictitious trades and circumvent three key internal controls in order to conceal losses; the bank was partly aware of the weaknesses but did not remedy them in time. Unwinding the positions cost around 57.8 million USD; the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed 13 million GBP on the bank and banned the trader Travis Klein.

What organisations can take from it

Close known control weaknesses in trading with a deadline and a responsible person – otherwise a lone perpetrator becomes an organisational failure.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising and reporting circumvention of controls in trading

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
FCA Principles for Businesses, Principle 3 (Systeme und Kontrollen); s. 206 Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Liability of senior managers
Prohibition order imposed on the trader; no fine imposed on him on grounds of serious financial hardship.

Original amount 13,031,400 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

29 Sep 2023 ADM Investor Services International LimitedFCA: £6.47 million against ADM Investor Services over outdated AML controls United KingdomInternal controls €7.48m

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed £6,470,600 (after a 30% discount) because, between September 2014 and October 2016, the derivatives broker had only a rudimentary customer risk assessment, no firm-wide money laundering risk assessment and no adequate ongoing monitoring; its policies referred to outdated legislation. The FCA had already raised concerns in 2014.

What organisations can take from it

Policies that refer to repealed legislation are a sure sign of a dead AML programme.

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
FCA Principle 3; SYSC
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
30% settlement discount
Published
2 Oct 2023

Original amount 6,470,600 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 Sep 2023.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial