Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€4.65mTotal of monetary amounts
€4.18mLargest single case: TerraCom Limited
€325,508Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Federal Court of Australia (auf Antrag der Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ASIC) €4.18m 90 % · 1 case
  2. NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA NSW) €325,508 7 % · 1 case
  3. NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA NSW) / Land and Environment Court of NSW €147,975 3 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Whistleblower protection €4.18m 90 % · 1 case
  2. Environment and sustainability €473,483 10 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. TerraCom Limited €4.18m 90 % · 1 case
  2. Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd €325,508 7 % · 1 case
  3. Sydney Water Corporation €147,975 3 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20251€4.18m
Q4 20250–
Q1 20261€325,508
Q2 20261€147,975
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

3 cases

20 Feb 2026 Clarence Colliery Pty LtdClarence Colliery: 543,500 AUD after mine water entered the Wollangambe River AustraliaEmissions and permits €325,508

Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Centennial Coal Company, was sentenced by the Land and Environment Court of NSW after pleading guilty to five offences under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, after untreated mine water with elevated nickel and zinc levels from the coal mine near Lithgow entered the Wollangambe River in December 2023 and April 2024. The offences comprised two water pollution offences, a licence breach, non-compliance with a prevention notice and a pollution incident response plan that had not been tested for 269 days. The court imposed fines totalling 543,500 AUD and ordered 86,500 AUD for rehabilitation of Long Swamp; in addition, the EPA's legal and investigation costs of 170,000 AUD and 15,548 AUD are payable.

What organisations can take from it

Pollution incident response plans must be tested regularly; here the failure was penalised separately for the first time.

Relevance to training and awareness

Regularly testing pollution incident response plans

Authority / court
NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA NSW)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) s 120(1) (zwei Fälle), s 64(1), s 97(1), s 153E; Zahlungsanordnung nach s 250(1)(e)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
Early guilty pleas (25% discount).
Published
23 Feb 2026

Original amount 543,500 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

7 May 2026 Sydney Water CorporationSydney Water: AUD 240,000 penalty after sewage overflow in Carramar AustraliaEmissions and permits €147,975

In two incidents in July and August 2022 around 423,000 litres of untreated sewage escaped in Carramar because plant had not been properly maintained, affecting a residential property, a sports field, bushland and Prospect Creek. After a guilty plea, the Land and Environment Court convicted Sydney Water and imposed AUD 225,000 for breaching its environment protection licence and AUD 15,000 for failing without lawful excuse to provide CCTV footage requested by the EPA.

What organisations can take from it

Operators of sewerage networks must ensure their plant is maintained and respond promptly to regulators’ information requests.

Relevance to training and awareness

Maintenance of wastewater plant and cooperation with regulatory information requests

Authority / court
NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA NSW) / Land and Environment Court of NSW
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Bedingungen der Environment Protection Licence; Pflicht zur Vorlage von Informationen und Unterlagen gegenüber der EPA NSW
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
25% discount for an early guilty plea.
Published
7 May 2026

Original amount 240,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Aug 2025 TerraCom LimitedTerraCom: AUD 7.5m penalty for victimising a whistleblower AustraliaRetaliation against whistleblowers €4.18m

In 2020 the ASX-listed coal mining company used two ASX announcements and an open letter to shareholders to present as false the allegations of a former senior employee about coal quality certificates amended without proper justification, although an independent investigation at least partly supported them. On the basis of an admission and a jointly proposed penalty, the Court found a contravention of the prohibition on victimising whistleblowers and allegedly imposed AUD 7.5 million (payable in two instalments); TerraCom also pays AUD 1 million of ASIC’s costs. It is ASIC’s first enforcement outcome for breaches of the whistleblower protection provisions.

What organisations can take from it

Public statements about whistleblower allegations should be legally reviewed beforehand, as even disparaging announcements can amount to prohibited detriment.

Relevance to training and awareness

Protecting whistleblowers from detriment, including through the company’s public statements

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Federal Court of Australia (auf Antrag der Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ASIC)
Area of law
Whistleblower protection · Retaliation against whistleblowers
Legal basis
s 1317AC(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); Strafe nach s 1317G
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Admission of the contravention and jointly proposed penalty following mediation; revised whistleblower policy and training for senior leaders and the board in May 2025; no previous court findings of a similar kind.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
27 Aug 2025

Original amount 7,500,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial