Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€85,276Total of monetary amounts
€50,096Largest single case: a South African mobile operator
€32,753Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. National Consumer Tribunal (auf Antrag der National Consumer Commission) €52,523 62 % · 2 cases
  2. Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) €32,753 38 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic
  1. no topic €52,523 62 % · 2 cases
  2. Misleading advertising and pricing €32,753 38 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Telecoms, IT and software €50,096 59 % · 1 case
  2. Financial services and insurance €32,753 38 % · 1 case
  3. Automotive €2,427 3 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€50,096
20240–
20252€35,180
20260–

3 cases

8 Sep 2025 Kia East Rand (Pty) LtdDefective used car: fine and refund order against Kia East Rand South AfricaConsumer protection and online retail €2,427

On 8 September 2025, on application by the National Consumer Commission (NCC, South Africa's consumer protection authority), the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT, the consumer protection adjudicator) found that car dealer Kia East Rand (Pty) Ltd had breached section 56(3) of the Consumer Protection Act: a used car sold in September 2022 remained defective despite several repair attempts, and the dealer refused the buyer's request to cancel the sale. The Tribunal ordered a refund of the purchase price of 245,075 ZAR within ten days and imposed an administrative fine of 50,000 ZAR.

What organisations can take from it

If a repair fails, the Consumer Protection Act requires the dealer to replace or refund – refusing risks a fine on top of the refund.

Relevance to training and awareness

Warranty obligations in used car sales

Authority / court
National Consumer Tribunal (auf Antrag der National Consumer Commission)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Section 56(3) Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008; Verwaltungsstrafe nach Section 112
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Repeat case
no

Original amount 50,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Apr 2025 African Bank LimitedAfrican Bank: ZAR 700,000 for social-media loan advert presented as an 'investment' South AfricaMisleading advertising and pricing €32,753

A social-media campaign by the bank in December 2023 (#KeFestive), featuring a well-known public figure, presented personal loans as an investment; the authority found this factually incorrect and misleading and also identified weaknesses in the approval process for advertising. Of the 700,000 ZAR penalty, 200,000 ZAR was suspended for two years; the bank has paid 500,000 ZAR. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Advertising for credit products – including with well-known personalities – needs a competent, documented approval that describes the nature of the product correctly.

Relevance to training and awareness

Advert approval and influencer marketing for financial products

Authority / court
Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Sections 6(1), 6(3)(a), 6(3)(b) und 6(9) Conduct Standard 3 of 2020 (Banks)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation during the investigation and prompt remedial action; 200,000 ZAR suspended for two years, provided the bank complies with the Conduct Standard.
Published
22 Apr 2025

Original amount 700,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Oct 2023 a South African mobile operatorFixed-term contracts: consumer tribunal fines South African mobile operator ZAR 1m South AfricaConsumer protection and online retailanonymised €50,096

On 13 October 2023, on application by the National Consumer Commission (NCC, South Africa's consumer protection authority), the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT, the consumer protection adjudicator) found, in proceedings confined to eleven consumer complaints, that a mobile operator had breached the Consumer Protection Act, including by charging unreasonable fees for early cancellation of fixed-term contracts, by requiring all outstanding amounts and the fee to be paid before a cancellation took effect, by implementing cancellations late and by failing to notify a customer that a contract was about to end; a data package that was not available had also been advertised and sold. The Tribunal regarded part of the conduct – such as continuing to bill after cancellation, together with the use of debt collectors and listings with credit bureaus – as unconscionable under section 40 and imposed an administrative fine of 1,000,000 ZAR.

What organisations can take from it

Cancellation fees and processes for fixed-term contracts should be reviewed regularly – consumer authorities pursue even bundled individual complaints through to a fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Cancelling fixed-term contracts and cancellation fees

Authority / court
National Consumer Tribunal (auf Antrag der National Consumer Commission)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008: Section 14(3)(b)(i) i. V. m. Regulation 5(2) und (3), Section 14(2)(b)(i)(bb), Section 14(2)(b) und (3), Section 14(2)(c), Section 40(1)(b) und (d), Section 41(3) (in den Gründen i. V. m. Section 29(b)); Verwaltungsstrafe nach Section 112
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Credits to affected consumers, dropping cancellation fees for SIM-only contracts and cooperation with the National Consumer Commission and the Tribunal.

Original amount 1,000,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Oct 2023.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 13 Oct 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial