Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

4cases from 2 jurisdictions
€11mTotal of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€5.5mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20241€6m
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20251€5m
Q4 20251–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20261–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

4 cases

22 Jun 2026 OzCar Pty LtdUsed car dealer OzCar: reprimand and licence conditions over unfair sales practices AustraliaMisleading advertising and pricing Fine

NSW Fair Trading (the consumer protection regulator of New South Wales) reprimanded used car dealer OzCar Pty Ltd on 22 June 2026 and imposed conditions on its dealer licence. The regulator refers to the maximum available in disciplinary proceedings and does not state the amount imposed on the company. The investigation found a pattern of dishonest conduct between 2023 and 2025; among other things, customers reported being pressured into signing or misled about the purpose of contracts, that contracts were not properly explained – including to particularly vulnerable buyers – and that vehicles of unacceptable quality were sold. Among other things, the company must introduce a compliance programme with training for sales staff, may no longer allow waivers of the statutory cooling-off right to be pre-filled, and must fix defects affecting safety or reliability before sale.

What organisations can take from it

Waivers of a cooling-off right must never be pre-selected, and contracts must be demonstrably explained to customers – especially vulnerable buyers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fair sales conversations, cooling-off rights and dealing with vulnerable customers

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
NSW Fair Trading
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 (NSW), s 45(1)(a), (b), (d) und (d1)(ii)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
24 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Nov 2025 Atom Motorss Pty LtdNSW: car dealer Atom Motorss loses licence over false security interest information AustraliaMisleading advertising and pricing Other

NSW Fair Trading (the consumer protection regulator of New South Wales) cancelled the motor dealer licence of Atom Motorss Pty Ltd on 17 November 2025 and disqualified the company for five years. Measures against individuals are not set out here. According to the release, the company had traded as a motor dealer without a licence and, when selling vehicles to consumers, had given false information from the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR, the register of security interests in personal property) in the prescribed dealer forms.

What organisations can take from it

Information on encumbrances on a vehicle must come from a current register search; false statements in dealer forms can cost the business its licence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Accurate information on encumbrances and security interests when selling used cars

Authority / court
NSW Fair Trading
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 (NSW), s 45(1)(f) und (g); zugrunde liegende Verstöße gegen den Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 und das Australian Consumer Law
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
12 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Sep 2025 ALD Automotive Italia S.r.l.AGCM fines ALD Automotive Italia €5m over damage charges in long-term car rental ItalyInformation duties in online retail €5m

According to the AGCM, ALD Automotive Italia gave long-term rental customers insufficient information about the optional liability-limitation service and about the criteria for assessing damage on return, and charged damage as unreported even where it was not visible to the naked eye for an average consumer or did not result from an incident. The authority imposed a fine of 5,000,000 EUR and prohibited continuation.

What organisations can take from it

Return inspection reports and damage criteria must be transparent in advance, and customers must not be blamed for failing to report damage that is invisible.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transparent damage assessment and add-on services in rental and leasing contracts

Authority / court
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Information duties in online retail
Legal basis
Art. 20, 21, 22, 24, 25 Codice del consumo (D.lgs. 206/2005)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Mitigating circumstances
The basic amount of 7,000,000 EUR was reduced to 5,000,000 EUR because ALD had remedied the information deficiencies through its own measures and mitigated their effects.
Published
9 Oct 2025

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Jun 2024 an Italian car manufacturer and its service and spare parts companyAGCM fines car manufacturer €6m over origin claims and spare parts failings ItalyMisleading advertising and pricinganonymised €6m

The manufacturer presented Italy in its advertising as the place of production of its vehicles of two brands, although they are built by Chinese manufacturers and only undergo finishing work in Italy (vehicles of the core brand were assembled in Italy only until 2010); in addition, the manufacturer and its service and spare parts company did not make sufficient spare parts available and failed to provide adequate after-sales service. The AGCM imposed 3,000,000 EUR on the manufacturer and a further 3,000,000 EUR jointly and severally on the manufacturer and the service and spare parts company, a total of 6,000,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Origin claims in advertising must match the actual place of production, and anyone selling vehicles must actually organise spare parts and after-sales service.

Relevance to training and awareness

Origin claims ("Made in Italy") and after-sales service obligations

Authority / court
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Art. 20, 21, 22 (Praxis A) sowie Art. 20, 24, 25 (Praxis B) Codice del consumo (D.lgs. 206/2005)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Employees
Under 50
Published
20 Jun 2024

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 11 Jun 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial