Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, District of Columbia) €1.53bn 38 % · 1 case
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Ermittlungen: EPA Criminal Investigation Division, FBI) €1.48bn 36 % · 1 case
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice €1.03bn 25 % · 2 cases
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) €34.1m 1 % · 2 cases
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas) €2.62m 0 % · 1 case
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Anklage: DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division) €1.73m 0 % · 1 case
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Anklage: DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division) €1.5m 0 % · 1 case
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 3 €266,631 0 % · 1 case
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) €222,537 0 % · 1 case
What for?
by topicWho?
by sectorAll sectors
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 1 | €17.9m |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 1 | €1.53bn |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 3 | €11.9m |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €16.2m |
| Q1 2025 | 2 | €2.49bn |
| Q2 2025 | 1 | €266,631 |
| Q3 2025 | 1 | €1.73m |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2026 | 1 | €1.5m |
11 cases
28 Aug 2026 MSC Shipmanagement Limited; Hong Kong Spirit Shipping and Trading LimitedMSC Shipmanagement: 1.75 million USD fine for secretly discharging oily bilge water €1.5m
On board the MSC Samira III, senior engineering officers had oily bilge water pumped overboard via the sewage tank, bypassing the oily water separator, in 2024/2025, manipulated the oil content monitoring and falsified the oil record book, which was presented to the Coast Guard in Philadelphia. The operator and the owner each pleaded guilty to two counts under the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS) and are paying a combined 1.75 million USD; in addition, there are four years of probation.
Shipping companies must actively monitor practice on board and the oil record book, because instructions given by individual officers are attributed to the company under criminal law.
MARPOL obligations on board, oil record book and reporting channels for crews
- Authority / court
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Anklage: DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
- Legal basis
- Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS), 33 U.S.C. § 1908
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- Second Engineer Mikhail Tsurikov also pleaded guilty; sentencing scheduled for 10 September 2026.
- Published
- 28 Aug 2026
Original amount 1,750,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Aug 2026.
- International Shipping Companies Sentenced to Pay $1.75 Million Fine for Concealing Discharges of Oily Waste into Ocean Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 Aug 2025 V.Ships Norway A.S.V.Ships Norway: 2 million USD fine for oil pollution and falsified oil record books €1.73m
On board the tanker M/T Swift Winchester, a hose connected the incinerator's waste oil tank to the sewage tank from February to August 2022, so that oily waste bypassed the pollution prevention equipment and went into the sea; in August 2022, an oily water separator filter was also hosed down with degreaser on deck and the oily mixture ran overboard. The vessel called at Baton Rouge and Port Arthur with a knowingly falsified oil record book. The ship management company pleaded guilty and is paying a fine of 2 million USD.
When a crew member reports misconduct to management, the company must intervene immediately; otherwise it is liable for the continued pollution.
Handling oil residues on board and honest documentation
- Authority / court
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Anklage: DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
- Legal basis
- Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 27 Aug 2025
Original amount 2,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Aug 2025.
- Shipping Company Fined $2M for Maritime Pollution Offense Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 May 2025 Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyNorfolk Southern: EPA fine for locomotives without valid emissions certification €266,631
In the view of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the freight railway operated locomotives without a certificate of conformity, did not comply with the conditions of a testing exemption for several locomotives and operated locomotives in breach of the applicable emission standards. Under the settlement (Consent Agreement and Final Order), the company is paying a civil penalty of 299,000 USD.
Converted vehicles or vehicles exempted for testing are also subject to certification and restoration obligations, which must be tracked in fleet management.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 3
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act §§ 203(a), 213(d) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7522(a), 7547(d)); 40 C.F.R. § 1068.101
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
Original amount 299,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 May 2025.
- In the Matter of Norfolk Southern Railway Company, EPA Docket No. CAA-03-2025-0062, Consent Agreement and Final Order Decision of an authority
- 2025 Clean Air Act Vehicle and Engine Enforcement Case Resolutions Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Mar 2025 Hino Motors, Ltd.Hino Motors: over 1.6 billion USD in fines and forfeiture for emissions fraud €1.48bn
Between 2010 and 2019, the Toyota subsidiary submitted false certification applications, altered emissions data and fabricated test results; more than 105,000 non-compliant diesel engines were imported into the USA. The court imposed a fine of 521.76 million USD and forfeiture of 1.087 billion USD, plus five years of probation with an import ban on Hino diesel engines.
Manipulated test data in approval procedures lead to penalties that threaten a company's existence and to market bans; testing processes need independent controls.
Data integrity in testing and approval procedures
- Authority / court
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Ermittlungen: EPA Criminal Investigation Division, FBI)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act; Verschwörung zum Betrug der Vereinigten Staaten und Schmuggel (Schuldbekenntnis)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Automotive
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 19 Mar 2025
Original amount 1,608,760,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Mar 2025.
- Court Sentences Hino Motors Ltd., a Toyota Subsidiary, and Imposes Over $1.6B in Penalties for Emissions Fraud Scheme Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Jan 2025 Hino Motors, Ltd.; Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc.; Hino Motors Sales U.S.A., Inc.Hino Motors: over 1 billion USD in penalties for falsified emissions test data €1.02bn
From 2010 to 2019, the Toyota subsidiary altered test data, carried out tests improperly or fabricated them entirely for more than 50 engine families (around 105,000 on-road and 5,700 off-road diesel engines). The resolution with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice comprises a civil penalty of 525 million USD and a criminal fine of 521.76 million USD (together 1.047 billion USD), five years of probation and an import ban on diesel engines; including the recall and mitigation measures, the overall resolution totals more than 1.6 billion USD.
Certification data is evidence – companies that embellish test results risk their existence, loss of market access and criminal prosecution.
Integrity of test and certification data
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Automotive
- Culpability
- intentional
Original amount 1,046,760,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jan 2025.
- Hino Motors Clean Air Act Settlement Summary Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Nov 2024 Invesco Advisers, Inc.Invesco Advisers: 17.5 million USD for inflated ESG integration percentages €16.2m
From 2020 to 2022, Invesco told clients that 70 to 94 per cent of the parent company's assets under management were ‘ESG integrated’, but counted passive ETFs that did not take ESG into account and had no written definition of ESG integration. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) imposed 17.5 million USD, a censure and a cease-and-desist order.
Sustainability metrics used in sales need a written definition and a traceable calculation.
Verifiable metrics in ESG marketing
- Authority / court
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
- Legal basis
- Investment Advisers Act of 1940
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 8 Nov 2024
Original amount 17,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Nov 2024.
- SEC Charges Invesco Advisers for Making Misleading Statements About Supposed Investment Considerations Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Sep 2024 COBB Tuning Products, LLCCOBB Tuning: 2.914 million USD for over 81,000 tuners that disable emission controls €2.62m
Since 2015, the Austin-based manufacturer has sold more than 81,000 tuners that deactivate emission controls, as well as 8,400 exhaust pipes with fewer or weaker catalytic converters. The proposed settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (subject to court approval) provides for a civil penalty of 2,914,000 USD in four instalments, as well as a ban on defeat devices, removal of the ‘delete’ functions, information for dealers and customers, buy-back and destruction of such devices held by employees, and Clean Air Act training for the workforce.
Tuning products that circumvent emission controls are prohibited even as ‘racing parts’ – product approvals require an emissions review.
Emissions law for aftermarket products
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act § 203(a)(3)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Automotive
- Mitigating circumstances
- Amount of the penalty based on demonstrated limited ability to pay; payment in instalments.
Original amount 2,914,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2024.
- COBB Tuning Products, LLC Clean Air Act Settlement Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Sep 2024 Rudy's Performance Parts, Inc.Rudy's Performance Parts: 10 million USD in criminal and civil penalties for defeat devices €9.07m
From 2014 to 2019, the North Carolina company and its CEO Aaron Rudolf manufactured, sold or installed over 250,000 parts for Ford, GM and Dodge diesel pickups in order to remove emission controls – according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), producing as much in emissions as more than 11 million additional vehicles. A total of 10 million USD: a civil penalty of 7 million USD in instalments (settlement subject to court approval), a criminal fine of 2.4 million USD against the company together with three years' probation, and a fine of 600,000 USD against the CEO.
Those who run emissions tampering as a business model are liable under civil and criminal law – all the way up to management.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act § 203(a)(3)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Automotive
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Payment in instalments because of demonstrated limited ability to pay.
- Liability of senior managers
- CEO Aaron Rudolf: three years' probation and a fine of 600,000 USD in the criminal proceedings; personally a party to the civil settlement.
Original amount 10,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Sep 2024.
- Rudy's Performance Parts, Inc. and Aaron Rudolf Clean Air Act Settlement Information Sheet Press release of an authority
- EPA: North Carolina auto parts seller and its owner to pay $10M for making, selling and installing defeat devices Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 Aug 2024 Cleveland Cliffs Burns Harbor LLCCleveland-Cliffs Burns Harbor: EPA settlement over pollutant emissions at steelworks €222,537
The steelworks on Lake Michigan allegedly emitted excessive particulate matter and hazardous air pollutants when charging the basic oxygen furnaces and during overflows of molten material. Under the settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the company is paying 248,396 USD and must charge more slowly, improve extraction and monitoring, and introduce video recording and reporting to the EPA.
Emission peaks often result from operating procedures; binding work instructions and documentation are part of permit compliance.
Operating procedures for reducing emissions in production
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Steel and metals
- Published
- 27 Aug 2024
Original amount 248,396 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Aug 2024.
- EPA Reaches Settlement with Cleveland Cliffs Burns Harbor for Alleged Clean Air Act Violations Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Jan 2024 Cummins Inc.Cummins: 1.675 billion USD civil penalty for defeat devices in Ram pickups €1.53bn
The engine manufacturer programmed the engine software so that emission controls were reduced or switched off during normal driving (around 630,000 Ram 2500/3500 vehicles from model years 2013–2019) and failed to disclose auxiliary emission control devices in a further approximately 330,000 vehicles. Civil penalty of 1.675 billion USD – the highest ever under the Clean Air Act – plus recall and mitigation measures, totalling around 2 billion USD.
Software functions that affect emissions behaviour must be fully disclosed in the type approval process.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, District of Columbia)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Automotive
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
Original amount 1,675,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jan 2024.
- 2024 Cummins Inc. Vehicle Emission Control Violations Settlement Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Sep 2023 DWS Investment Management Americas Inc.DWS Investment Management Americas: 19 million USD for misleading ESG statements €17.9m
From 2018 until the end of 2021, the Deutsche Bank subsidiary presented ESG as part of its ‘DNA’ but did not implement the ESG integration policies it had promised. It is paying 19 million USD for the ESG misstatements; in separate proceedings over deficiencies in its anti-money laundering programme, a further 6 million USD was added.
ESG marketing statements must be backed by processes that are actually practised and documented; otherwise they become a regulatory risk.
Truthful sustainability communication in sales and marketing
- Authority / court
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
- Legal basis
- Sections 206(2), 206(4) Investment Advisers Act; Rules 206(4)-7 und 206(4)-8
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 25 Sep 2023
Original amount 19,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Sep 2023.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link