Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

14cases from 1 jurisdiction
€638mTotal of monetary amounts
€236.1mLargest single case: Adani Enterprises Limited
€2.91mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241€18.8m
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€244,999
Q1 20251€2.47m
Q2 20251€3.35m
Q3 20253€122m
Q4 20251€9.89m
Q1 20262€213m
Q2 20262€267.3m
Q3 20262€909,971

14 cases

18 May 2026 Adani Enterprises LimitedAdani Enterprises pays 275 million USD over Iranian liquefied petroleum gas USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €236.1m

From November 2023 to June 2025, the Indian conglomerate bought allegedly Omani and Iraqi liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) via a trader in Dubai which in fact originated from Iran; 32 payments totalling around 192 million USD were routed through US banks. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the violations as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; Adani had recklessly ignored numerous warning signs (AIS manipulation by the tankers, implausible loading ports, conspicuous price discounts, irregularities in the certificates of origin).

What organisations can take from it

Companies that source commodities below market price via intermediaries must actively check origin, vessel movements and documents – mere name screening against sanctions lists is not enough.

Relevance to training and awareness

Warning signs in commodity and shipping transactions (origin, AIS gaps, price discounts)

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 560); IEEPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Remedial measures after discovery and cooperation with OFAC
Published
18 May 2026

Original amount 275,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Aug 2026 Container Manufacturing Ltd.Small US machinery supplier exported spare parts for can presses to Russia USAExport control and dual-use goods €857,339

Between March 2023 and March 2025, the Ohio manufacturer of presses for beverage can ends (nine employees) supplied, in ten instances, spare parts for aluminium forming tools worth around 264,700 USD – partly via the UAE and Turkey – without a licence to a Russian customer whose group also supplies defence precursors. In two instances, the company acted with knowledge of the violation; it admitted the allegations, which were brought by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

What organisations can take from it

Even small businesses with few employees must check tariff codes against Russia restrictions and treat deliveries via third countries as a warning sign.

Relevance to training and awareness

HTS-based export restrictions on Russia, diversion via third countries

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations, § 746.8(a)(5) (HTS-Codes Supplement No. 4 to Part 746), §§ 764.2(a), 764.2(e)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Employees
Under 50
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation; compliance programme subsequently expanded with screening, an approval process and additional export control training
Published
24 Aug 2026

Original amount 1,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Rice Lake Weighing Systems, Inc.Scale manufacturer Rice Lake liable for Italian subsidiary's indirect exports to Iran USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €52,632

In eight instances in 2019–2021, the Italian subsidiary Dini Argeo supplied weighing equipment worth around 121,500 USD to a trader in the UAE, although it knew that the goods would be passed on to a former direct Iranian customer. The parent company had passed on the Iran ban only by an English-language e-mail without explanation; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered it a non-egregious, voluntarily self-disclosed case.

What organisations can take from it

Implement sanctions requirements at foreign subsidiaries in an understandable way, in the local language and with training for all relevant employees – indirect supplies via traders are also prohibited.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions training for foreign subsidiaries, indirect supplies via third countries

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, § 560.215 (Auslandstöchter von US-Personen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, immediate internal investigation, low significance for turnover, no prior violations, cooperation; subsequent training of the subsidiary's employees and screening of traders
Published
12 Aug 2026

Original amount 60,764 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jun 2026 Robert Bosch GmbHBosch pays 36 million USD for sensor supplies to Huawei USAExport control and dual-use goods €31.2m

Between September 2020 and September 2024, Bosch exported MEMS sensors and vehicle software worth around 72.4 million USD from outside the US without a licence to Huawei and affiliated companies on the Entity List (Foreign Direct Product Rule). Bosch voluntarily disclosed the violations; around 3.6 million USD of the penalty imposed by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is credited against a disgorgement agreed with the DOJ.

What organisations can take from it

Even products manufactured outside the US can be subject to US export controls via US technology – supplies to Entity List customers need their own review.

Relevance to training and awareness

US export law for foreign-made products (Foreign Direct Product Rule)

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations (Foreign Direct Product Rule, Entity List)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Automotive
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation
Published
17 Jun 2026

Original amount 36,184,680 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

26 Feb 2026 Teledyne FLIR LLCTeledyne FLIR: thermal imaging cameras incorrectly assessed and supplied to Entity List address USAExport control and dual-use goods €846,453

The manufacturer of militarily relevant thermal imaging technology admitted 19 violations to the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS): incorrect de minimis calculations for cameras that went to China via Sweden, pricing arranged with a Chinese drone manufacturer to circumvent the licence requirement, missing records and eight deliveries in 2024 to a Hong Kong address on the Entity List that the screening software did not detect.

What organisations can take from it

Actively incorporate new forms of listing, such as address-only entries, into screening; do not rely solely on the software provider.

Relevance to training and awareness

De minimis calculation, address-based Entity List entries in screening

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations, §§ 734.4 (De minimis), 744.16, 764.2(a), (b), (h), (i)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosures for some of the violations
Published
26 Feb 2026

Original amount 1,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Feb 2026 Applied Materials, Inc. und Applied Materials Korea, Ltd.Applied Materials pays 252 million USD for chip equipment exports to China USAExport control and dual-use goods €212.2m

In 2021 and 2022, Applied Materials and its Korean subsidiary exported ion implanters for semiconductor manufacturing worth around 126 million USD via Korea without a licence to a Chinese company placed on the Entity List in 2020. The penalty imposed by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) corresponds to twice the transaction value and thus the statutory maximum; the compliance staff and executives responsible are no longer with the company.

What organisations can take from it

Routing through foreign subsidiaries does not remove the licence requirement; export control needs audits and clear accountability of management.

Relevance to training and awareness

Entity List screening for deliveries via subsidiaries

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations (Entity List)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Employees
10,000 or more
Liability of senior managers
According to BIS, the responsible compliance staff and senior executives from sales and production are no longer employed.
Published
12 Feb 2026

Original amount 252,500,300 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 Dec 2025 IPI Partners, LLCPrivate equity firm IPI held oligarch's funds for four years after designation USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €9.89m

In 2017/2018, the Chicago fund manager specialising in data centres took in capital from the Russian oligarch Suleiman Kerimov via nested structures and continued to manage this investment for four years after his designation in April 2018. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the case as non-egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

Screen investors through to the beneficial owner and re-check them when new designations occur – nested structures do not protect against liability.

Relevance to training and awareness

Checking beneficial owners of investors and fund structures

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 589); IEEPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
No prior violations in five years; cooperation improved significantly only after initially insufficient engagement (including waiver of attorney-client privilege), hence only limited credit
Published
2 Dec 2025

Original amount 11,485,352 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2025 Fracht FWO Inc.Freight forwarder Fracht FWO chartered blocked Venezuelan airline with Mahan Air jet USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €1.38m

In May 2022, bypassing internal compliance procedures, the Houston freight forwarder engaged a blocked Venezuelan state-owned airline for a shipment from Mexico to Argentina; the aircraft used, which was also blocked, was operated by Iran's Mahan Air. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) classified the case as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed, partly because two vice presidents bypassed the screening under time pressure.

What organisations can take from it

Urgent customer orders never justify skipping sanctions screening of carriers and of the aircraft or vessels used.

Relevance to training and awareness

Business partner screening under time pressure, circumvention of internal approvals

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Venezuela-, Iran-, Proliferations- und Terrorismus-Sanktionsprogramme (OFAC); IEEPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
No prior violations in five years, immediate remediation, substantial cooperation
Liability of senior managers
According to OFAC, the violation was driven primarily by two vice presidents who bypassed internal screening processes.
Published
3 Sep 2025

Original amount 1,610,775 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

28 Jul 2025 Cadence Design Systems Inc.Cadence pleads guilty: chip design software for Chinese military university USAExport control and dual-use goods €120.1m

From 2015 to 2021, the San José provider of chip design software supplied hardware, software and semiconductor IP at least 59 times to the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), a military university on the Entity List, disguised under the alias Central South CAD Center. Cadence pleaded guilty before the US Department of Justice to conspiracy to commit export control violations; criminal penalties of almost 118 million USD and civil penalties of more than 95 million USD imposed by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) result, after crediting, in a net total of more than 140 million USD.

What organisations can take from it

Include cover names and known aliases of listed customers in screening; sales and compliance must escalate indications of military end users.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising aliases and cover names of listed customers

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice; Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations (Entity List); ECRA; Verschwörung zu Exportkontrollverstößen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
28 Jul 2025

Original amount 140,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2025 Key Holding, LLCLogistics company Key Holding: Colombian subsidiary organised 36 shipments to Cuba USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €517,929

After the acquisition of a Colombian logistics company in December 2021, the latter organised 36 freight shipments to Cuba worth around 3.06 million USD up to July 2023. Neither the US parent nor the subsidiary had a sanctions compliance programme for foreign companies; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the case as non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

After an acquisition, roll out the sanctions compliance programme to the new foreign subsidiary immediately – the Cuba embargo applies to US-controlled subsidiaries worldwide.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions compliance after acquisitions

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 515)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, no prior violations, remedial measures after discovery
Published
2 Jul 2025

Original amount 608,825 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jun 2025 Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLCCatalyst manufacturer Unicat supplied Iran and blocked Venezuelan company USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €3.35m

In 2016–2021, the Texas supplier of catalysts for refineries and steelworks supplied products and advice to customers in Iran via its former CEO, employees and agents, and sold goods to a blocked Venezuelan company. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered it an egregious but voluntarily self-disclosed case; there were parallel settlements with the DOJ and BIS, which were taken into account in determining the amount.

What organisations can take from it

When senior management itself steers embargo business, only independent controls and whistleblower channels help – voluntary self-disclosure after discovery reduces the penalty but does not prevent it.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations; Venezuela Sanctions Regulations; IEEPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation and remedial measures after discovery
Liability of senior managers
According to OFAC, the violations were carried out by the former CEO and co-founder as well as former employees.
Published
16 Jun 2025

Original amount 3,882,797 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jun 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jan 2025 Haas Automation, Inc.Haas Automation: CNC parts and unlock codes for blocked Russian defence companies USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €2.47m

From December 2019 to March 2022, the Californian machine tool manufacturer indirectly supplied, via its dealer network, one CNC machine, 13 spare parts orders and seven unlock codes for machines of blocked Russian defence and energy companies. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed 1,044,781 USD (eight of the 21 violations egregious, no voluntary self-disclosure); at the same time, Haas paid 1.5 million USD to the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

What organisations can take from it

Spare parts and software unlock codes for machines already delivered are also services relevant to sanctions – end customers behind dealers must be known.

Relevance to training and awareness

End-customer screening in dealer sales, software unlocks as a service

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC); parallel U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 589; E.O. 13662); Export Administration Regulations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Mitigating circumstances
Substantial remedial measures and extensive cooperation
Published
17 Jan 2025

Original amount 2,544,781 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Dec 2024 C.H. Robinson International, Inc.C.H. Robinson: foreign subsidiaries transported Iranian and Cuban goods USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €244,999

From November 2018 to February 2022, five foreign subsidiaries of the logistics group acquired through takeovers brokered or transported a total of 82 shipments involving Iranian or Cuban goods or an Iranian airline. The main cause was that their booking systems had not yet been integrated into the group's screening processes; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered the case non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

Connect acquired freight forwarders to central screening quickly; until then, interim controls on origin and carrier are needed.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrating acquired companies into sanctions screening

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations; Cuban Assets Control Regulations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, no prior violations, swift remediation
Published
13 Dec 2024

Original amount 257,690 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Apr 2024 SCG Plastics Co., Ltd.SCG Plastics pays 20 million USD for concealed sales of Iranian polyethylene USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €18.8m

In 2017–2018, the Thai plastics company had US banks process 467 payments totalling 291 million USD for HDPE plastic produced in an Iranian joint venture with the state-owned National Petrochemical Company. Shipping and documentation practices concealed the Iranian origin. The penalty was imposed by the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

What organisations can take from it

Invoicing in US dollars brings US sanctions law into the business – holdings in embargoed countries require strict separation of payment flows.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 560)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Culpability
intentional
Published
19 Apr 2024

Original amount 20,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Apr 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial