Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

4cases from 1 jurisdiction
€215.6mTotal of monetary amounts
€1.66mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20251€2.47m
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20261€212.2m
Q2 20260—
Q3 20262€909,971

4 cases

24 Aug 2026 Container Manufacturing Ltd.Small US machinery supplier exported spare parts for can presses to Russia USAExport control and dual-use goods €857,339

Between March 2023 and March 2025, the Ohio manufacturer of presses for beverage can ends (nine employees) supplied, in ten instances, spare parts for aluminium forming tools worth around 264,700 USD – partly via the UAE and Turkey – without a licence to a Russian customer whose group also supplies defence precursors. In two instances, the company acted with knowledge of the violation; it admitted the allegations, which were brought by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

What organisations can take from it

Even small businesses with few employees must check tariff codes against Russia restrictions and treat deliveries via third countries as a warning sign.

Relevance to training and awareness

HTS-based export restrictions on Russia, diversion via third countries

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations, § 746.8(a)(5) (HTS-Codes Supplement No. 4 to Part 746), §§ 764.2(a), 764.2(e)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Employees
Under 50
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation; compliance programme subsequently expanded with screening, an approval process and additional export control training
Published
24 Aug 2026

Original amount 1,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Rice Lake Weighing Systems, Inc.Scale manufacturer Rice Lake liable for Italian subsidiary's indirect exports to Iran USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €52,632

In eight instances in 2019–2021, the Italian subsidiary Dini Argeo supplied weighing equipment worth around 121,500 USD to a trader in the UAE, although it knew that the goods would be passed on to a former direct Iranian customer. The parent company had passed on the Iran ban only by an English-language e-mail without explanation; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered it a non-egregious, voluntarily self-disclosed case.

What organisations can take from it

Implement sanctions requirements at foreign subsidiaries in an understandable way, in the local language and with training for all relevant employees – indirect supplies via traders are also prohibited.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions training for foreign subsidiaries, indirect supplies via third countries

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, § 560.215 (Auslandstöchter von US-Personen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, immediate internal investigation, low significance for turnover, no prior violations, cooperation; subsequent training of the subsidiary's employees and screening of traders
Published
12 Aug 2026

Original amount 60,764 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Feb 2026 Applied Materials, Inc. und Applied Materials Korea, Ltd.Applied Materials pays 252 million USD for chip equipment exports to China USAExport control and dual-use goods €212.2m

In 2021 and 2022, Applied Materials and its Korean subsidiary exported ion implanters for semiconductor manufacturing worth around 126 million USD via Korea without a licence to a Chinese company placed on the Entity List in 2020. The penalty imposed by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) corresponds to twice the transaction value and thus the statutory maximum; the compliance staff and executives responsible are no longer with the company.

What organisations can take from it

Routing through foreign subsidiaries does not remove the licence requirement; export control needs audits and clear accountability of management.

Relevance to training and awareness

Entity List screening for deliveries via subsidiaries

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations (Entity List)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Employees
10,000 or more
Liability of senior managers
According to BIS, the responsible compliance staff and senior executives from sales and production are no longer employed.
Published
12 Feb 2026

Original amount 252,500,300 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jan 2025 Haas Automation, Inc.Haas Automation: CNC parts and unlock codes for blocked Russian defence companies USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €2.47m

From December 2019 to March 2022, the Californian machine tool manufacturer indirectly supplied, via its dealer network, one CNC machine, 13 spare parts orders and seven unlock codes for machines of blocked Russian defence and energy companies. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed 1,044,781 USD (eight of the 21 violations egregious, no voluntary self-disclosure); at the same time, Haas paid 1.5 million USD to the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

What organisations can take from it

Spare parts and software unlock codes for machines already delivered are also services relevant to sanctions – end customers behind dealers must be known.

Relevance to training and awareness

End-customer screening in dealer sales, software unlocks as a service

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC); parallel U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 589; E.O. 13662); Export Administration Regulations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Mitigating circumstances
Substantial remedial measures and extensive cooperation
Published
17 Jan 2025

Original amount 2,544,781 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial