Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America and Asia-Pacific: 1,875 cases from 39 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 1 jurisdiction
€26.5mTotal of monetary amounts
€10.6mLargest single case: Allied Stone Inc.
€6.12mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20252€8.53m
Q2 20250–
Q3 20251€10.6m
Q4 20251€6.12m
Q1 20261€1.28m
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

5 cases

7 Jan 2026 Exyte Management GmbHExyte: 1.5 million USD – Chinese subsidiary arranged US goods for listed chipmaker SMIC USAExport control and dual-use goods €1.28m

The Shanghai company of the Stuttgart-based Exyte group caused around 884 US items (flowmeters, pressure transmitters, controllers) worth around 2.85 million USD to be delivered by Chinese suppliers to SMIC Beijing, which is on the Entity List (the US export control list of restricted parties), on 13 occasions in 2021/22. According to the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS, the export control agency of the US Department of Commerce), the compliance programme did not recognise that in-country transfers within China also require a licence; Exyte voluntarily disclosed the transactions and admitted them.

What organisations can take from it

Screen end customers against the Entity List in foreign subsidiaries too, even for local purchases – US export law also covers transfers of US goods within China.

Relevance to training and awareness

Entity List screening also for domestic deliveries abroad

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
Legal basis
Export Administration Regulations, 15 C.F.R. § 764.2(b), § 744.11
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, own investigation with external lawyers and investment in the compliance programme.
Published
7 Jan 2026

Original amount 1,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

4 Dec 2025 Gracetown, Inc.OFAC: USD 7.14 million penalty on Gracetown over payments for a blocked company and failure to file a blocking report USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €6.12m

OFAC has imposed a penalty of USD 7,139,305 on New York property management company Gracetown, Inc. by way of a Penalty Notice. According to OFAC's findings, between April 2018 and May 2020 Gracetown received 24 payments on behalf of an affiliated company owned by a sanctioned Russian oligarch, although OFAC had previously given it explicit notice of the prohibition. Gracetown also failed to report the blocked property to OFAC for more than 45 months. OFAC regarded the violations as wilful or at least reckless, egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty equalled the statutory maximum of USD 8,906,358. OFAC's publication does not state whether Gracetown has paid the penalty or challenged it in court. Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforcement release "OFAC Imposes $7,139,305 Penalty on Gracetown, Inc. for Violating Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions and Reporting Obligations", 4 December 2025, https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934796/download?inline; summarised in our own words.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 589.201; Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 501.603 (Sperrmeldung); Penalty Notice nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Construction and real estate
Published
4 Dec 2025

Original amount 7,139,305 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Aug 2025 Allied Stone Inc.Allied Stone: 12.4 million USD – Chinese quartz declared as marble or glass USACustoms €10.6m

The Dallas-based supplier of countertops allegedly declared Chinese quartz surface products between 2018 and 2023 as goods subject to lower duties, such as marble or crystallised glass, and evaded anti-dumping and countervailing duties, including by using third parties as importers of record. The settlement of 12.4 million USD (a joint payment with a further settling party) resolves a whistleblower lawsuit.

What organisations can take from it

Do not rely on third parties acting as importer – you remain liable for the correct description of the goods; customs responsibility cannot be outsourced.

Relevance to training and awareness

Description and classification of goods subject to anti-dumping duties

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, und U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Customs
Legal basis
False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff. (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Published
19 Aug 2025

Original amount 12,400,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Mar 2025 Evolutions Flooring Inc.Evolutions Flooring: 8.1 million USD for false manufacturer and origin information on wood flooring USACustoms €7.48m

The Californian importer of multilayered wood flooring allegedly provided false information on the manufacturer and country of origin from 2019 to 2022, thereby evading anti-dumping, countervailing and Section 301 duties on Chinese goods. The settlement of 8.1 million USD is a joint payment by all settling parties and is based on the ability to pay.

What organisations can take from it

State the actual manufacturer and actual country of origin in customs declarations; false information used to evade anti-dumping, countervailing or Section 301 duties can be pursued as customs fraud.

Relevance to training and awareness

Manufacturer and origin information in customs declarations

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, und U.S. Attorney’s Office Central District of California
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Customs
Legal basis
False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff. (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement amount based on the ability to pay of the settling parties.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Published
25 Mar 2025

Original amount 8,100,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jan 2025 Family International Realty LLCOFAC: USD 1.08 million settlement with Family International Realty over concealing properties of sanctioned oligarchs USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €1.05m

Miami real estate company Family International Realty LLC is paying USD 1,076,923 jointly with a further settling party under a settlement with OFAC (joint payment) for 73 apparent violations of the Ukraine-/Russia-related sanctions. According to OFAC's findings, between 2018 and 2023 the company, in a wilful evasion scheme, transferred nominal ownership of three luxury condominiums belonging to two sanctioned Russian oligarchs to non-sanctioned relatives and their shell companies and continued to rent them out; the company earned around USD 182,442 in commissions and reimbursements. OFAC treated the apparent violations as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty equalled the statutory maximum of USD 30,080,709. USD 182,442 is deemed satisfied by a forfeiture payment to the DOJ. Source: OFAC enforcement release of 16 January 2025, https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/933941/download?inline; summarised in our own words.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
E.O. 13685 §§ 2(a), 5(a), 6(a) (73 mutmaßliche Verstöße); Vergleich nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Published
16 Jan 2025

Original amount 1,076,923 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 5 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial