Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by countryWhat for?
by topicWho?
by sectorAll sectors
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 | €150,000 |
| 2025 | 0 | – |
| 2026 | 1 | – |
2 cases
25 Jun 2026 TotalEnergiesParis Judicial Court: TotalEnergies must include Scope 3 emissions in vigilance plan Order
In an action brought by Notre Affaire à Tous, Sherpa, ZEA, France Nature Environnement and the City of Paris, the Paris Judicial Court (Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, 34th chamber) ruled that climate risks fall under the French duty of vigilance law and that Scope 3 emissions are part of the oil and gas group's activities. The vigilance plan without Scope 3 is incomplete, the court held; TotalEnergies must supplement it within six months, with provisional enforceability, and implementation will be reviewed by the court in January 2027.
Risk analyses under due diligence laws must also cover the climate impact of the products sold (Scope 3).
- Authority / court
- Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (34. Kammer)
- Area of law
- Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
- Legal basis
- Art. L.225-102-1 und L.225-102-2 Code de commerce (Loi n° 2017-399, devoir de vigilance); Art. 1252 Code civil
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 25 Jun 2026
- Communiqué de presse – Jugement du 25 juin 2026, 34ème chambre Court press release
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
26 Nov 2024 Niederländische Jachtwerft (anonymisiert)OM: €150,000 against Dutch yacht builder over Myanmar teak (EUTR) €150,000
The Openbaar Ministerie (OM, Dutch Public Prosecution Service) settled proceedings against a Dutch yacht builder, not named in the release, with a penalty order of 150,000 EUR because in 2022 it sourced furniture and finishing wood made of Myanmar teak from a Turkish woodworking company and, as the first to place it on the EU market, did not meet the due diligence obligations of the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR); the legal origin of the wood could no longer be established. The yard was not at fault regarding the deck timber of the superyacht, because a German trader had placed that on the market; the information was passed to the German authorities. The OM took into account that the yard admitted the breach and no longer uses Myanmar teak.
Anyone importing timber products directly from non-EU countries becomes an operator with due diligence obligations and must be able to prove legal origin before buying.
Due diligence when importing timber products from non-EU countries
- Authority / court
- Openbaar Ministerie (OM), Functioneel Parket
- Area of law
- Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
- Legal basis
- Europäische Holzhandelsverordnung (EUTR), Sorgfaltspflichten des Marktteilnehmers; Strafbefehl des OM
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Mitigating circumstances
- Admission of the breach; complete abandonment of Myanmar teak.
- Published
- 26 Nov 2024
- OM: OM treft schikking met Nederlandse jachtbouwer voor gebruik van fout hout Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link