Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

22cases from 6 jurisdictions
€1.01bnTotal of monetary amounts (20 cases with an amount)
€338.4mLargest single case: RTX Corporation (Raytheon Company)
€15mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20231€24.8m
Q4 20230—
Q1 20241€90.5m
Q2 20241€143,988
Q3 20241€138.9m
Q4 20243€393.5m
Q1 20252€143.9m
Q2 20250—
Q3 20253€22.4m
Q4 20251€102.1m
Q1 20266€68.9m
Q2 20261€11.6m
Q3 20262€8.91m

22 cases

23 Sep 2026 BGH upholds conviction of a procurement head of unit at the OLG Jena for accepting benefits GermanyBribery of public officials Custodial sentence

A head of unit at the Higher Regional Court of Jena (OLG Jena) responsible for budget, procurement and personnel of the Thuringian judiciary obtained fourteen loans (375 to 10,000 EUR) from two co-defendants between 2013 and 2019, coupled with the tacit expectation that he would take them into account when awarding contracts; he also concluded service contracts in breach of public procurement law (damage exceeding 450,000 EUR). The Regional Court of Gera (LG Gera) imposed an aggregate suspended prison sentence of two years and confiscation. Germany's Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) upheld the conviction for accepting benefits (Vorteilsannahme, not Bestechlichkeit, i.e. taking bribes) in 13 cases, discontinued one time-barred case and set aside the aggregate sentence and the amount of the daily fine rate; the defendant's appeal on points of law will be decided separately.

What organisations can take from it

Private loans from suppliers to procurement officers are a criminal offence even without a specific quid pro quo – contracting authorities need clear rules and staff rotation.

Relevance to training and awareness

Loans and benefits from contractors to procurement officers

Authority / court
Bundesgerichtshof (2. Strafsenat); Vorinstanz Landgericht Gera
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
§ 331 StGB (Vorteilsannahme), § 266 StGB (Untreue); BGH 2 StR 554/25
Action
Custodial sentence
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Public sector
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The former head of unit (a management function in the judicial administration) was convicted; two lenders were co-defendants.
Published
23 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jul 2026 The Scoular CompanyAgricultural trader Scoular pays 10 million USD over bribes to Mexican border officials USABribery of public officials €8.91m

From 2013 to 2019, Scoular had customs brokers pay around 400,000 USD to Mexican border and inspection officials so that trains carrying contaminated maize and grain would pass inspections; some of the money went to individuals close to cartels. Three-year DPA with a criminal penalty of 9,769,521 USD and forfeiture of 414,351 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Customs agents and freight forwarders are high-risk third parties: question conspicuous flat fees per shipment, even if they appear to be customary charges.

Relevance to training and awareness

Facilitation payments via customs agents and logistics service providers

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice (Criminal Division, Fraud Section; USAO Western District of Texas)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA (Verschwörung zur Verletzung der Anti-Bestechungsvorschriften); Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation and remediation (including an overhaul of compliance, third-party management, financial controls and anti-corruption training); 25 % reduction off the low end of the sentencing guidelines range.
Liability of senior managers
The customs broker Carlos Leopoldo Alvelais has pleaded guilty.
Published
17 Jul 2026

Original amount 10,183,872 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 May 2026 Ultra Electronics Holdings Limited (vormals plc)Ultra Electronics: DPA of around 10.1 million GBP over bribery in Algeria and Oman United KingdomBribery of public officials €11.6m

The British defence supplier failed to prevent bribery by agents in connection with three public contracts in Oman and Algeria (including a contract with the Omani Ministry of Transport worth up to 200 million GBP). The DPA approved by Southwark Crown Court provides for a penalty of 10,083,150 GBP; in addition, the company is bearing around 4.8 million GBP of the SFO's investigation costs and must report on its compliance programme for three years.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that use agents for government contracts must be able to demonstrate adequate procedures – otherwise the company is liable under Section 7 Bribery Act even without any intent to bribe on its own part.

Relevance to training and awareness

Use of sales agents in public contracts

Authority / court
Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Section 7 Bribery Act 2010 (Failure to prevent bribery); Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report of the Algerian matters in 2018; restructuring of ownership and leadership; 45 % discount on the penalty.
Published
1 May 2026

Original amount 10,083,150 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2026 Colas Rail Asia Sdn Bhd (Colas-Gruppe)Colas Rail Asia: CJIP of 29.7 million EUR over bribery in metro contracts in Malaysia FranceBribery of public officials €29.7m

The Malaysian subsidiary of Colas Rail paid large, undocumented sums via intermediaries in connection with public contracts for urban rail lines in Kuala Lumpur (Kelana Jaya extension, MRT2). Following an internal investigation, Colas Rail self-reported the matter in 2017; the CJIP (Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, a French deferred prosecution agreement) provides for a public interest fine of 29,745,974 EUR and a three-year compliance programme monitored by the French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) (costs of up to 1.9 million EUR).

What organisations can take from it

Undocumented payments to intermediaries on foreign projects must be stopped early by the finance and compliance functions – self-reporting after an internal investigation is rewarded.

Relevance to training and awareness

Intermediaries and consultants in public tenders

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report (criminal complaint filed by Colas Rail on 31 May 2017) following an internal forensic investigation.
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
19 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2026 Balt USA LLC (Balt-Gruppe)Balt USA: CJIP in France over payments to a hospital physician FranceBribery of public officials €1.77m

In parallel with the US declination, the PNF concluded a CJIP with the US subsidiary of the French medical technology manufacturer for 1,765,493 EUR (after crediting the US disgorgement) and a three-year AFA compliance programme. The case arose from Balt SAS's voluntary self-disclosure of 22 May 2023 concerning offences committed by a former manager of the acquired company Blockade Medical.

What organisations can take from it

Acquisitions require anti-corruption due diligence on the target company – otherwise legacy misconduct by its management becomes a group risk.

Relevance to training and awareness

Benefits to hospital physicians, integration of acquired companies

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); aktive und passive Bestechung von Amtsträgern
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Healthcare
Employees
250 to 999
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure to the PNF and the DOJ; coordinated resolution with crediting.
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
19 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Mar 2026 Balt SAS / Balt USA LLCMedical technology: DOJ declination for Balt SAS after bribery of a hospital physician USABribery of public officials €1.05m

Through sham consultancy agreements, fictitious invoices and purported bonus payments, around 602,000 USD in bribes flowed from 2017 to 2023 via a Belgian consultant to a physician in a senior position at a French public hospital, so that the hospital would purchase embolisation coils from Balt. The DOJ declined to prosecute on account of voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation and remediation (declination of 17 March 2026); Balt is disgorging 1,214,797 USD in profits.

What organisations can take from it

Physicians at public hospitals are public officials – consultancy agreements with them require documented services and approval by the compliance function.

Relevance to training and awareness

Benefits to physicians in the public healthcare sector, sham consultancy agreements

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice (Criminal Division, Fraud Section)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA; Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (Declination)
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Healthcare
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure (including to the French national financial prosecutor's office, PNF), full cooperation, timely remediation, disciplinary measures, parallel resolution in France.
Liability of senior managers
A former manager of the US subsidiary (David Ferrera) and a consultant (Marc Tilman) were charged with FCPA violations and money laundering.
Published
19 Mar 2026

Original amount 1,214,797 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Mar 2026 Fleurette Properties LtdCommodities holding Fleurette: 25.8 million EUR strafbeschikking over bribery in Congo NetherlandsBribery of public officials €25.8m

According to the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM), the top holding company of a mining, oil and gold group, which was based in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2017, participated together with others in bribing public officials of the DR Congo in order to obtain licences for cobalt and copper mines. On 6 March 2026, the OM issued a strafbeschikking (prosecutorial penalty order) imposing a fine of 25.8 million EUR, which Fleurette accepted.

What organisations can take from it

In the commodities sector, licences and concessions are the main target for bribery – holding companies share liability for payments made by their subsidiaries.

Relevance to training and awareness

Award of licences in the commodities sector, payments to public officials

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (OM); Ermittlungen FIOD Anti-Corruptie Centrum
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Buitenlandse ambtelijke omkoping (Wetboek van Strafrecht); OM-strafbeschikking
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Culpability
intentional
Published
10 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Feb 2026 Périphériques et Matériels de Contrôle SAS (Groupe Carrus)Betting terminal manufacturer PMC: CJIP over payments to the head of state-owned PMU Mali FranceBribery of public officials €499,150

From 2008 to 2011, the Paris-based supplier of betting and gaming terminals made unjustified payments of 78,972 EUR to the head of the majority state-owned Pari Mutuel Urbain Mali, with which it had a supply contract awarded without a tender. The case was triggered by a report from TRACFIN (the French financial intelligence unit). Public interest fine of 499,150 EUR (including 335,000 EUR already seized) and a three-year AFA compliance programme.

What organisations can take from it

Managers of state-controlled companies are also public officials – even small private payments to them create a risk of criminal liability for medium-sized companies.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments to heads of state-owned companies abroad

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger und Geldwäsche
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
50 to 249
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
18 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Feb 2026 Strukton Civiel Projecten B.V. und Strukton International B.V. (Strukton-Gruppe)Construction group Strukton pays 10 million EUR out-of-court settlement over bribery on the Riyadh Metro NetherlandsBribery of public officials €10m

To secure a share in the Riyadh Metro project, around 31 million USD was paid between 2013 and 2021 to an agent representing a high-ranking member of the Saudi royal family; the agent payments were understated to the export credit insurer Atradius. Strukton accepted a transaction (out-of-court settlement) of 10 million EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Commissions to agents with ties to ruling families carry the highest risk – and false statements to export credit insurers constitute a second offence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Agent commissions and false statements to export credit insurers

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (OM)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Buitenlandse ambtelijke omkoping und valsheid in geschrift (Wetboek van Strafrecht); Transactie nach Art. 74 Sr
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation from mid-2023; compliance programme in place since 2017; the employees involved are no longer with the company.
Liability of senior managers
The Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) is considering prosecuting several natural persons involved (not named).
Published
30 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Nov 2025 Comunicaciones Celulares S.A. (TIGO Guatemala)TIGO Guatemala pays more than 118 million USD for bribing members of Congress USABribery of public officials €102.1m

From 2012 to 2018, the Guatemalan mobile network operator made monthly cash payments to members of Congress or their security staff in order to obtain legislative support; part of the funds came from laundered drug money. Two-year Deferred Prosecution Agreement with a criminal penalty of 60 million USD and administrative forfeiture of 58,198,343 USD.

What organisations can take from it

In joint ventures with local partners, the parent company needs genuine control over cash flows and contacts with public officials – an early voluntary self-disclosure is no substitute for a full investigation.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bribery of public officials, cash payments, integrity of co-shareholders

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice (Criminal Division, Fraud Section; USAO Southern District of Florida)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-3 (Verschwörung, 18 U.S.C. § 371); Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure by the parent company Millicom in 2015; subsequently extensive cooperation and remediation (including dismissals of staff and an 800 % increase in compliance personnel).
Liability of senior managers
According to the DOJ, the scheme was directed by the then Guatemalan shareholder and other senior individuals; four individuals had already been charged (not named).
Published
12 Dec 2025

Original amount 118,198,343 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Nov 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2025 SURYS SAS (Gruppe Imprimerie Nationale)Hologram manufacturer SURYS: CJIP of 18.4 million EUR in the Ukrainian passport case FranceBribery of public officials €18.4m

From 2013, SURYS supplied security holograms for Ukrainian passports to the state-owned company Polygraph via an interposed Estonian company; the investigation (following a request for mutual legal assistance from Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau, NABU) concerned misappropriation of public funds, bribery of foreign public officials and money laundering. Public interest fine of 18,363,007 EUR, plus 3,770,000 EUR in damages to the Ukrainian state and a three-year AFA compliance programme.

What organisations can take from it

If a state customer insists on an interposed trader without any discernible added value, treat this as a red flag for misappropriation and bribery.

Relevance to training and awareness

Interposed trading companies and sales agents

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger, Geldwäsche
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Employees
250 to 999
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
3 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Aug 2025 Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyLiberty Mutual: declination against 4.7 million USD after bribery of Indian state bank employees USABribery of public officials €4.04m

From 2017 to 2022, the Indian subsidiary Liberty General Insurance paid around 1.47 million USD to employees of six state-owned banks so that they would refer bank customers to its insurance products; the payments were booked as marketing expenses and routed through third parties. The DOJ declined to prosecute; Liberty Mutual is disgorging 4,699,088 USD in profits.

What organisations can take from it

Employees of state-owned banks are public officials – sales commissions paid to them are bribes, even if they are booked as marketing.

Relevance to training and awareness

Distribution partnerships with state-owned banks, payments disguised as marketing

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice (Fraud Section; USAO District of Massachusetts)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2; Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (Declination)
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure (March 2024), full cooperation, root cause analysis, termination of those involved, improved controls including rules on messaging apps.
Published
7 Aug 2025

Original amount 4,699,088 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Aug 2025 LG Neuruppin/BGH: 3.5 years' imprisonment for bribing the head of a state-owned waste management company GermanyBribery of public officials Custodial sentence

From 2015 to 2019, the managing director of a supplier of landfill technology granted the managing director of a waste management company controlled by two German federal states benefits of around 696,325 EUR and in return received preferential contracts. Because the waste management company is state-controlled, its head was deemed a public official. The prison sentence of 3 years and 6 months is final; the confiscation of 1,982,658.63 EUR must be decided afresh.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone supplying municipal or state-owned companies is, in legal terms, bribing public officials – the stricter Sections 331 et seq. StGB (German Criminal Code) apply there, not merely Section 299 StGB.

Relevance to training and awareness

Managing directors of public companies as public officials

Authority / court
Bundesgerichtshof (6. Strafsenat); Vorinstanz Landgericht Neuruppin
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
§ 334 StGB (Bestechung) i. V. m. § 11 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 c StGB; BGH 6 StR 315/24; LG Neuruppin 13 KLs 26/23
Action
Custodial sentence
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The supplier's managing director was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months' imprisonment.
Published
5 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Feb 2025 KLUBB France SASVehicle body builder KLUBB France: CJIP over an ambulance contract in Algeria FranceBribery of public officials €558,024

Following a referral from the public prosecutor's office in Rennes, the PNF investigated bribery of foreign public officials in the performance of a contract for the supply of ambulances to Algeria. KLUBB France is paying a public interest fine of 558,024 EUR and is undergoing a three-year AFA compliance programme.

What organisations can take from it

Medium-sized exporters are also in the spotlight: companies supplying foreign authorities need a robust anti-corruption programme under Sapin II (the French anti-corruption law).

Relevance to training and awareness

Export contracts with state bodies

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Employees
50 to 249
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
11 Feb 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

31 Jan 2025 Trafigura Beheer B.V.Swiss Federal Criminal Court (Bundesstrafgericht) convicts Trafigura of bribery in Angola SwitzerlandBribery of public officials €143.3m

Between 2009 and 2011, more than 4 million EUR and more than 600,000 USD were paid to a senior employee of the Angolan state oil distributor in order to promote ship chartering and bunkering business of the Trafigura group. The court convicted the then parent company for lacking rules on the supervision of intermediaries, imposing a fine of 3 million CHF and a compensatory claim (Ersatzforderung) of 145,634,268 USD (amount converted at the ECB rate of 31 January 2025: 148,933,982 USD in total); three individuals received prison sentences. It was the first judgment of the Federal Criminal Court on corporate criminal liability for foreign bribery; it is not final.

What organisations can take from it

In Switzerland, companies are liable if their organisation fails to prevent bribery – and the compensatory claim can exceed the fine many times over.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments via intermediaries to employees of state-owned oil companies

Authority / court
Bundesstrafgericht (Strafkammer); Anklage durch die Bundesanwaltschaft
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 102 StGB i. V. m. Art. 322septies StGB (Bestechung fremder Amtsträger); SK.2023.49
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
A former senior manager of the group received a prison sentence of 32 months (12 of them unsuspended), the intermediary 24 months suspended, and the Angolan public official 36 months (names anonymised).
Published
31 Jan 2025

Original amount 148,933,982 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 31 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2024 AAR Corp.Aviation services provider AAR pays 55.6 million USD for bribery in Nepal and South Africa USABribery of public officials €53.5m

Through an agent and a joint venture partner, AAR paid sham commissions to public officials in order to secure the sale of two Airbus A330s to Nepal Airlines and maintenance services for South African Airways Technical. SEC: 23,451,100 USD in disgorgement and 5,785,524 USD in interest; DOJ criminal penalty of 26,363,029 USD under a Non-Prosecution Agreement.

What organisations can take from it

State-owned airlines are public contracting entities – scrutinise commissions to intermediaries in aircraft transactions rigorously.

Relevance to training and awareness

Agents and joint venture partners in transactions with state-owned airlines

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA (Anti-Bestechung, Buchführung, interne Kontrollen); Non-Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Disclosure following press reports, cooperation (forensics, translations, witnesses) and remedial measures.
Liability of senior managers
A former senior employee of an AAR subsidiary, Deepak Sharma (named in the SEC order), was involved.
Published
19 Dec 2024

Original amount 55,599,653 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Oct 2024 RTX Corporation (Raytheon Company)RTX (Raytheon) pays around 391 million USD for bribing a Qatari military official USABribery of public officials €338.4m

From 2011 to 2017, Raytheon paid almost 2 million USD via sham subcontracts to Qatari military and other public officials and more than 30 million USD to an agent from the ruling family. SEC order: disgorgement of 37,400,090 USD, interest of 11,786,208 USD and a penalty of 75 million USD (of which 22.5 million USD was credited against the DOJ payment); under the DPA with the DOJ, 267,096,068 USD (230.4 million penalty, 36,696,068 forfeiture) is attributable to the FCPA part, combined with an Arms Export Control Act violation and a three-year monitorship. Total without double counting: 368,782,366 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Subcontracts without verifiable services are a classic vehicle for bribes – defence exporters must also disclose payment flows to export control authorities.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sham subcontracts and agents in defence transactions

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA (Anti-Bestechung, Buchführung, interne Kontrollen, Sections 30A, 13(b)(2)(A)/(B) Exchange Act); Arms Export Control Act; DPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
16 Oct 2024

Original amount 368,782,366 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

11 Oct 2024 Moog Inc.Moog: SEC order over bribery of Indian public officials by a subsidiary USABribery of public officials €1.54m

From 2020 to 2022, employees of the Indian subsidiary of the aerospace and defence supplier bribed Indian public officials via agents and distributors, among other things to tailor tenders in Moog's favour; the payments were booked as business expenses. Payment of 504,926 USD in disgorgement, 78,889 USD in interest and a penalty of 1.1 million USD.

What organisations can take from it

Even small foreign subsidiaries need effective controls over payments to distributors and agents – otherwise the listed parent company is liable under the books-and-records provisions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Influencing tender conditions via distributors

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA Buchführungs- und interne Kontrollvorschriften (Sections 13(b)(2)(A)/(B) Exchange Act)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation (sharing of internal investigation findings) and remediation, including termination of employees and third parties.
Published
11 Oct 2024

Original amount 1,683,815 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

5 Aug 2024 Glencore International AGOffice of the Attorney General of Switzerland: summary penalty order against Glencore over bribery in Congo SwitzerlandBribery of public officials €138.9m

Glencore failed to take all reasonable organisational precautions to prevent the bribery of foreign public officials by a business partner in connection with the acquisition of minority stakes in two mining companies in the DR Congo in 2011. The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (Bundesanwaltschaft, BA) issued a summary penalty order (Strafbefehl) imposing a fine of 2 million CHF and a compensatory claim of 150 million USD (amount converted at the ECB rate of 5 August 2024: 152,357,266 USD in total); further matters from 2007–2017 were discontinued.

What organisations can take from it

Companies are also liable for bribery by business partners if they have not taken adequate due diligence and control measures.

Relevance to training and awareness

Corruption risks posed by business partners in acquisitions of stakes

Authority / court
Bundesanwaltschaft (BA)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 102 Abs. 2 StGB (Unternehmensverantwortlichkeit) i. V. m. Bestechung fremder Amtsträger; Strafbefehl
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
5 Aug 2024

Original amount 152,357,266 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Aug 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Apr 2024 Former MoD official jailed for 30 months – bribes from consultants United KingdomBribery of public officials €143,988

A British Ministry of Defence official seconded to a defence contractor accepted more than 70,000 GBP (44,000 GBP in cash and two cars) in return for commissioning work from offshore consultants. He was convicted of misconduct in public office and sentenced to 30 months' imprisonment, with a confiscation order of 123,000 GBP; the associated company GPT had already pleaded guilty in 2021.

What organisations can take from it

Kickbacks for consultancy contracts expose public servants and suppliers alike – contract awards require a four-eyes principle and conflict-of-interest declarations.

Relevance to training and awareness

Kickbacks in the engagement of consultants

Authority / court
Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Misconduct in public office (Common Law); Proceeds of Crime Act (Confiscation)
Action
Custodial sentence
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Defence and security
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The former MoD official Jeffrey Cook was personally sentenced to imprisonment.
Published
12 Apr 2024

Original amount 123,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Apr 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Mar 2024 Gunvor SAGunvor convicted: around 86.7 million CHF over corruption in Ecuador's oil business SwitzerlandBribery of public officials €90.5m

The Geneva-based commodities trading house failed to take all reasonable organisational precautions to prevent foreign public officials from being bribed on its behalf in connection with the Ecuadorian oil industry from 2013 to 2017. The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (BA) – in coordination with US authorities – ordered Gunvor to pay around 86.7 million CHF, of which 4.3 million CHF is a fine.

What organisations can take from it

Commodities traders must scrutinise payments to intermediaries in government business without gaps – the confiscation of profits far exceeds the fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments via intermediaries to state-owned oil companies

Authority / court
Bundesanwaltschaft (BA)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 102 StGB (Unternehmensverantwortlichkeit) i. V. m. Bestechung fremder Amtsträger
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Culpability
intentional
Published
1 Mar 2024

Original amount 86,700,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Mar 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

28 Sep 2023 Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc.Clear Channel Outdoor: 26.1 million USD – gifts and hospitality for Chinese officials USABribery of public officials €24.8m

From at least 2012 to 2017, the Chinese majority-owned subsidiary Clear Media bribed officials with expensive gifts and hospitality and used sham intermediaries and false invoices to fund concealed consultants in order to obtain advertising space, for example at bus stops; the payments were booked as entertainment, cleaning and customer development expenses. Despite repeated warnings from internal audit, adequate controls were lacking until 2019; Clear Channel paid 16,355,567 USD in disgorgement, 3,760,920 USD in interest and a civil penalty of 6 million USD (a total of 26,116,487 USD).

What organisations can take from it

Internal audit findings on entertainment and consultancy costs in high-risk markets must lead to immediate controls.

Relevance to training and awareness

Gifts and hospitality for public officials; correct booking

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Anti-Bribery, Books and Records, Internal Accounting Controls)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms

Original amount 26,116,487 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Sep 2023.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial