Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 1 jurisdiction
€642,643Total of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€511,488Largest single case: ENECHANGE株式会社
€321,322Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁) 2 cases 40 % ·
  2. Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会) 2 cases 40 % · €642,643
  3. Kanto Local Finance Bureau (関東財務局) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会) 1 case 20 % ·

What for?

by topic
  1. Organisational requirements 3 cases 60 % ·
  2. Market abuse and insider dealing 1 case 20 % · €131,155
  3. Disclosure and reporting obligations 1 case 20 % · €511,488

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance 4 cases 80 % · €131,155
  2. Energy and utilities 1 case 20 % · €511,488

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20241€131,155
Q1 20251–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20251–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20261–
Q3 20261€511,488
Q4 20260–

5 cases

16 Sep 2026 ENECHANGE株式会社ENECHANGE: 91.495 million JPY over overstated revenue in quarterly report and prospectus JapanDisclosure and reporting obligations €511,488

Because revenue had been overstated at the company and its consolidated subsidiary or subsidiaries, the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2023 (filed on 10 November 2023) showed a consolidated loss of 1,382,861 thousand JPY instead of 1,662,516 thousand JPY; the registration statement for a share issue relied on this report, and on 26 February 2024 3,784,200 shares were issued for 3,999,899,400 JPY. After the company admitted the facts and the amount, an administrative monetary penalty (kachōkin) of 91,495,000 JPY was imposed: 1,500,000 JPY for the quarterly report and 89,995,000 JPY for the registration statement.

What organisations can take from it

Revenue recognition at subsidiaries should be scrutinised before any capital increase; an error in a quarterly report becomes many times more expensive through the prospectus.

Relevance to training and awareness

Correct revenue recognition before capital market transactions

Authority / court
Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA, 金融商品取引法) Art. 172-4 Abs. 2 a. F., Art. 172-2 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Art. 185-7 Abs. 1 und 14
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Both partial amounts were halved because the company had filed a report for a reduction before the inspection began (Art. 185-7(14) FIEA).
Published
17 Sep 2026

Original amount 91,495,000 JPY, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Jun 2026 moomoo証券株式会社moomoo Securities: three months without new accounts after false NISA information and AML gaps JapanOrganisational requirements Order

From February to May 2025 the online broker wrongly displayed at least 77 US ETFs and ETNs as eligible for NISA (59 clients traded 25 of them in the tax-advantaged account) and repeated this for a further security after discovery, handled affected clients carelessly and unequally, had since 2024 refused all transfers of holdings to other institutions, carried out no suspicious-transaction assessment for at least 1,531 rejected account applicants and managed cyber and system risks inadequately. Soliciting and accepting new accounts was prohibited from 19 June to 18 September 2026, together with a business improvement order.

What organisations can take from it

A firm that grows fast with account-opening bonuses must scale product approval, complaints handling, suspicious-transaction checks and IT security at the same pace.

Relevance to training and awareness

Accurate product information and suspicious-transaction checks also for rejected clients

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Kanto Local Finance Bureau (関東財務局) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA, 金融商品取引法) Art. 52 Abs. 1, Art. 51; Art. 38 Nr. 1, Art. 43, Art. 40 Nr. 2 FIEA i. V. m. Art. 123 Abs. 1 Nr. 14 Cabinet Office Order on Financial Instruments Business; Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds (犯罪収益移転防止法)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
19 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

31 Oct 2025 いわき信用組合 (Iwaki Credit Cooperative)Iwaki Credit Cooperative: lending halt for new clients after payments to anti-social forces JapanOrganisational requirements Order

Among other things, between 2004 and 2011 the credit cooperative had channelled loans taken out in the names of uninvolved people without their knowledge, and via shell companies, to a distressed large borrower group, thereby circumventing large-exposure limits; it had paid large cash sums to anti-social forces (hanshakai-teki seiryoku), carried out no suspicious-transaction assessments and given false reports and false statements to the supervisor. Besides a comprehensive business improvement order, lending to new clients was suspended from 17 November to 16 December 2025, combined with training of all staff away from day-to-day business and the immediate severing of ties with anti-social forces; it was the second order against the cooperative in 2025.

What organisations can take from it

When management and control functions jointly cover up breaches, only a rebuild of governance helps, and every false statement to the supervisor makes the consequences worse.

Relevance to training and awareness

Resisting demands from anti-social forces and truthful information to the supervisor

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperatives (協同組合による金融事業に関する法律) Art. 6 Abs. 1 i. V. m. Banking Act (銀行法) Art. 26 Abs. 1; Art. 10 Nr. 2 und 3 (falsche Berichte und Aussagen); Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds (犯罪収益移転防止法)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
31 Oct 2025

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Mar 2025 Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance, Sompo Japan Insurance, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance u. a. (4 Unternehmen)Four insurers: orders after customer data were passed on via agencies JapanOrganisational requirements Order

Multi-insurer agencies had forwarded policyholder data to competing insurers, and insurance staff seconded to agencies had sent the agencies’ customer data to their employer without the agencies’ consent; from the agency channel alone, Tokio Marine & Nichido reported 1,004,861, Sompo Japan 799,331, Mitsui Sumitomo 319,915 and Aioi Nissay Dowa 221,144 affected records. The business improvement orders under Art. 132(1) of the Insurance Business Act require a compliance organisation for data protection and unfair competition law, customer data management also at the agencies, stricter rules on secondments, a review by external experts and a fundamental overhaul of the improvement plans submitted after the December 2023 order.

What organisations can take from it

Seconded staff and multi-insurer agencies are data protection risks: customer data may only flow between agency and insurer on a lawful basis.

Relevance to training and awareness

Passing on customer data in sales via agencies

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Insurance Business Act (保険業法) Art. 132 Abs. 1; Bezug zum APPI (個人情報保護法) und zum Unfair Competition Prevention Act (不正競争防止法)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Repeat case
yes
Published
24 Mar 2025

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Oct 2024 野村證券株式会社 (Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.)Nomura Securities: 21.76 million JPY for layering in Japanese government bond futures JapanMarket abuse and insider dealing €131,155

A person engaged in the firm’s proprietary trading had, on 9 March 2021, repeatedly placed several layered orders in the order book for the long-term JGB future (March 2021 contract) on the Osaka Exchange to create a false impression of active trading, and then bought lower or sold higher. After administrative proceedings were opened, Nomura admitted the facts and the amount; an administrative monetary penalty (kachōkin) of 21,760,000 JPY was imposed, made up of 6,940,000 JPY for the matched volume and 14,820,000 JPY for the excess purchases.

What organisations can take from it

Trade surveillance must detect layering patterns in proprietary trading, including in bond futures and not only in equities.

Relevance to training and awareness

Spoofing and layering in proprietary trading

Authority / court
Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA, 金融商品取引法) Art. 174-2 Abs. 1 und 8, Art. 159 Abs. 2 Nr. 1; FIEA Enforcement Order Art. 33-13 Nr. 2; Art. 185-7 Abs. 1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
31 Oct 2024

Original amount 21,760,000 JPY, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial