Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

7cases from 1 jurisdiction
€6.76mTotal of monetary amounts (4 cases with an amount)
€1.56mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM) €5.95m 88 % · 3 cases
  2. Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) €810,115 12 % · 2 cases
  3. Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai – 0 % · 2 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. no topic €3.63m 54 % · 4 cases
  2. Organisational requirements €2.7m 40 % · 2 cases
  3. Market abuse and insider dealing €425,676 6 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance €6.76m 100 % · 6 cases
  2. Telecoms, IT and software – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20252€5.95m
Q3 20251–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20263€810,115
Q2 20261–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

7 cases

17 Jun 2026 Peken Global Limited (KuCoin)VARA: fine and cease-and-desist order against unlicensed Peken Global (KuCoin) United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision Fine

Following VARA investigations, Peken Global Limited, trading as KuCoin, provided virtual asset broker-dealer and/or exchange services to customers in Dubai without a licence. VARA imposed fines of an undisclosed amount and ordered the immediate cessation of all unlicensed activities; other group entities were expressly not affected.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone providing crypto services cross-border to customers in Dubai needs a licence there – regardless of where the platform is based.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing requirement for crypto services in the target market

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Legal basis
Federal Decree Law No. (10) of 2025 (AML/CFT/PF); Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets; Cabinet Resolution No. 111/2022; VARA Regulations und Rulebooks
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation and full compliance with the measures; intention to go through the licensing process.
Published
24 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Feb 2026 Ark Capital Management (Dubai) LimitedDFSA: allegedly USD 504,000 on Ark Capital Management over market abuse controls United Arab EmiratesMarket abuse and insider dealing €425,676

The investment firm did not review alerts from its surveillance system adequately or promptly, so at least ten suspicious trading instances were not reported or reported late; it also failed to notify an agreed, potentially staged change in control. After a 30% settlement discount the DFSA allegedly imposed USD 504,000 (otherwise USD 720,000).

What organisations can take from it

A surveillance system only helps if its alerts are reviewed promptly – and a staged acquisition of shares must still be notified.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consistently working through trade surveillance alerts

Authority / court
Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Art. 90(2) Regulatory Law 2004 (DIFC); GEN Rules 11.10.12A, 5.3.20(a), 11.8.11(2), 4.2.3, 4.2.10 DFSA Rulebook
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement (30% discount); USD 720,000 without settlement.
Published
6 Feb 2026

Original amount 504,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Feb 2026 Ed Broking (MENA) LimitedDFSA: USD 455,176 on reinsurance broker Ed Broking (MENA) for deceptive conduct United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision €384,439

The reinsurance broker gave cedent insurers and reinsurers different premiums for the same placement, misled reinsurers about deductions and brokerage, and misled a client about the brokerage earned on 121 placements, partly using altered documents. In a settlement the DFSA allegedly imposed USD 455,176: USD 175,343 disgorgement (including interest) and a USD 279,833 penalty (USD 575,104 without settlement). The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Undisclosed brokerage and inconsistent premium figures given to the contracting parties amount to deception – an early self-report reduces the consequences.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transparency on brokerage and premiums in insurance distribution

Authority / court
Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report to the DFSA, internal investigation and restitution to clients; settlement (reduction from USD 575,104).
Published
2 Feb 2026

Original amount 455,176 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jan 2026 Wealthface LimitedADGM: Wealthface gives enforceable undertaking after capital and reporting breaches United Arab EmiratesOrganisational requirements Other

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) accepted an enforceable undertaking from the wealth manager and robo-adviser after its investigation found that between January 2023 and March 2025 the firm held insufficient liquid assets for most of the period and insufficient capital resources at the end of 2023 and 2024, calculated its capital requirement for three quarters of 2024 on an understated expenditure figure, did not prepare its 2023 financial statements under IFRS and filed them late, had no office in ADGM since the end of 2023 and paid supervision fees late. The firm admitted the alleged contraventions and undertook, among other things, to appoint an independent director within 60 days, to close any capital shortfall, to re-establish its head office and registered office in ADGM and to report monthly on its capital and liquid assets for one year. The undertaking contains no financial penalty.

What organisations can take from it

Capital and liquidity requirements must be calculated continuously and on correct input figures, not only at the reporting date.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ongoing monitoring of capital and liquidity

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Section 235 FSMR 2015; PRU Rules 3.2.4(a), 3.7.2, 3.7.4(1); GEN Rules 4.5.1(1), 6.2.2, 6.6.2; FEES Rule 1.2.2
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation with the investigation; some of the contraventions (capital calculation and resources, IFRS accounts, office in ADGM) were already being remediated.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Jul 2025 The Open Network FoundationVARA: fine and cease-and-desist order against The Open Network Foundation (marketing) United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision Fine

According to VARA's enforcement list, The Open Network Foundation breached the VARA Marketing Regulations. The list records a cease-and-desist order, a fine of an undisclosed amount and a public statement as the measures taken.

What organisations can take from it

Foundations in the crypto sector are also subject to Dubai's marketing rules for virtual assets when they promote their offering there.

Relevance to training and awareness

Rules for marketing virtual assets

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Legal basis
VARA Marketing Regulations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Apr 2025 AC Holding Limited (Cayman Islands, Hayvn-Muttergesellschaft)ADGM: 3.6m USD fine for Hayvn parent over payments routed through unregulated accounts United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision €3.24m

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the Cayman Islands parent company of the Hayvn group 3,600,000 USD for being knowingly concerned in unauthorised regulated activities of an unregulated ADGM special purpose vehicle and in breaches of permission by its ADGM subsidiary. Around 3,023 transactions for 241 group clients ran through the bank accounts of that vehicle, with deposits of about 507 million USD and payments of about 558 million USD, although the vehicle held no permission and was not subject to the ADGM anti-money laundering rules. The regulator increased the fine by 20%, partly because the parent did not fully disclose its use of the accounts to the regulator and withheld half of the fees owed to the appointed skilled persons.

What organisations can take from it

A parent company is also liable when it knowingly routes client business through unregulated entities in a financial centre.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing within a group: no processing through unregulated entities

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Legal basis
Sections 16, 17 und 20 i. V. m. Section 220 sowie Section 232 FSMR 2015
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation by the parent company and its audit and risk committee from mid-December 2023; the aggravating factors outweighed this.
Liability of senior managers
According to the Final Notice, the use of the accounts was not approved by the board but directed by the then CEO. Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 3,600,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Apr 2025 AC Limited (Hayvn)ADGM: 3m USD fine and permission cancelled for crypto firm AC Limited (Hayvn) United Arab EmiratesOrganisational requirements €2.7m

The FSRA (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, the financial regulator of Abu Dhabi Global Market, ADGM) fined the provider of virtual asset trading and custody 3,000,000 USD and cancelled its Financial Services Permission. Between December 2021 and May 2024 it had dealt in virtual assets that were not accepted and exceeded its asset cap of 1 million USD, let client money run through accounts of an unregulated ADGM special purpose vehicle and of its parent company without formal agreements, maintained seven initially undisclosed client relationships without proper risk assessment and due diligence, and gave the regulator false and misleading information about bank accounts, clients and assets. The regulator considered the contraventions deliberate or at least reckless and increased the fine by 20% because of the false information.

What organisations can take from it

False information to the regulator aggravates any sanction, and client money belongs in dedicated, protected client accounts.

Relevance to training and awareness

Candour towards the regulator and protection of client money

Authority / court
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (ADGM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Sections 17(1), 33, 214(4), 221 und 232 FSMR 2015; GEN Rules 2.2.1, 2.2.3, 2.2.9, 2.2.10, 2.2.11, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.3, 3.3.7, 3.3.34, 8.1.2(6); COBS Rules 2.2.1, 14.2.1, 17.2.1; AML Rules 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 8.3.1(1), 8.4.1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation from mid-December 2023 and voluntary cessation of trading from 11 December 2023 under an enforceable undertaking; no previous non-compliance of a similar nature. The aggravating factors outweighed these.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 3,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial