Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
€446,000Total of monetary amounts
€446,000Largest single case: Forvis Mazars Accountants N.V.
€446,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20251€446,000
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

1 case

29 Oct 2025 Forvis Mazars Accountants N.V.AFM: €446,000 fine for Forvis Mazars over cheating in internal training tests NetherlandsOrganisational requirements €446,000

On 29 October 2025 the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM, Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets) fined the audit firm Forvis Mazars Accountants N.V. 446,000 EUR because its quality control system and business operations did not prevent almost 100 professionals at all levels from cheating in tests forming part of technical training between 2020 and 2023, for example by sharing answers or completing tests together. There were no specific rules or controls on the integrity of such tests, and no internal report about it was received. The fine was reduced because of the limited role of the internal tests in the quality system, good cooperation and measures taken, and was accepted in the simplified procedure.

What organisations can take from it

Mandatory training tests need their own integrity rules and controls, and the speak-up culture must also cover cheating in professional training.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrity in mandatory training and speak-up culture

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 18 Abs. 1 und Art. 21 Abs. 1 Wet toezicht accountantsorganisaties (Wta)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Mitigating circumstances
Limited role of the internal tests in the quality system, good cooperation, recognition of the importance of culture and behaviour, measures against recurrence; simplified settlement.
Published
31 Oct 2025

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial