Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

8cases from 1 jurisdiction
€2mTotal of monetary amounts
€1.05mLargest single case: OKCoin Europe Limited
€128,861Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) €2m 100 % · 8 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Internal controls €1.05m 53 % · 1 case
  2. Customer due diligence €776,777 39 % · 5 cases
  3. no topic €166,622 8 % · 2 cases

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance €1.62m 81 % · 5 cases
  2. Other €373,141 19 % · 3 cases

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€66,504
Q1 20250—
Q2 20252€1.3m
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20262€294,730
Q2 20260—
Q3 20263€338,628

8 cases

31 Aug 2026 EM@NEY P.L.C.Malta: EM@NEY pays 97,622 EUR under settlement for late bank account register reports MaltaMoney laundering and terrorist financing €97,622

The financial institution did not deliver on time the data due every seven days to the Centralised Bank Account Register (CBAR). The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 162,704 EUR, which was reduced by 40% to 97,622 EUR under a settlement pursuant to its 2026 settlement policy.

What organisations can take from it

Recurring mandatory reports need deadline monitoring with escalation – otherwise individual omissions add up to six-figure sums.

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing
Legal basis
Reg. 4(2), 8, 9 CBAR Regulations (S.L. 373.03)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with 40% reduction
Published
4 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2026 MiFinity Malta LimitedMalta: MiFinity pays 160,099 EUR following anti-money laundering examination MaltaCustomer due diligence €160,099

At the payment institution, the customer risk assessment had only been introduced after business had started, some customers remained unassessed, and customer profiles were based on transaction thresholds rather than on risk. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 266,833 EUR and a follow-up directive; under a settlement, the fine was reduced by 40% to 160,099 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

A customer risk assessment belongs before business starts, not in a later remediation project.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk-based customer profiles and source of funds

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 2(1), 5(5)(a)(ii), 7(1)(c), 7(2)(a), 21, 22 PMLFTR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with 40% reduction; remediation demonstrated
Published
2 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

14 Jul 2026 Goldwin LtdMalta: 80,907 EUR against online casino Goldwin for missing customer risk assessment MaltaCustomer due diligence €80,907

The 2022 examination revealed that for more than two years the remote gaming operator had had no proper customer risk assessment for almost its entire player base; the assessments submitted had been prepared specifically for the examination. In addition, once players reached the deposit threshold of 2,000 EUR, it did not check in good time whether they were politically exposed persons. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 80,907 EUR; the fine was still open to appeal at the time of publication.

What organisations can take from it

Supervisory authorities see through risk assessments prepared only for the examination – they must be applied in day-to-day business.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk-based customer assessment in gambling

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 5(5)(a)(ii), 11(5), 21 PMLFTR; FIAU Implementing Procedures Part I und II (Remote Gaming)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
16 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Mar 2026 Stanleybet Malta LimitedMalta: 225,730 EUR against betting operator Stanleybet over lack of customer checks in betting shops MaltaCustomer due diligence €225,730

Malta's Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 225,730 EUR, a penalty payment of 2,000 EUR per day and a follow-up directive on the licensed gambling operator, which works through a network of independently operated betting shops in an EU member state. The company was unable to link customers' cumulative deposits across different shops and only checked customers from a single deposit of 2,000 EUR upwards, so the threshold could be circumvented. The company has appealed.

What organisations can take from it

Thresholds must be aggregated per customer across all channels and branches – otherwise the system invites structuring.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising structured deposits below the checking threshold

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Regulation 21 PMLFTR; Verstöße gegen Regulations 5(5)(a)(ii), 7, 9(1) PMLFTR und FIAU Implementing Procedures
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Other
Published
16 Apr 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Mar 2026 BNF Bank p.l.c.Malta: 69,000 EUR against BNF Bank over late reporting to the bank account register MaltaMoney laundering and terrorist financing €69,000

Following the introduction of a new core banking system in April 2025, the bank was unable, until September 2025, to submit the mandatory weekly data deliveries to the Centralised Bank Account Register (CBAR) on time. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 69,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Test regulatory reporting chains in advance of IT migrations – migration problems do not excuse missed deadlines.

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing
Legal basis
Reg. 4(2), 8 Centralised Bank Account Register Regulations (S.L. 373.03)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
The bank continuously attempted to upload reports
Published
6 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2025 C2D Payment Solutions LimitedMalta: 243,537 EUR against C2D Payment Solutions for ignoring cash risks MaltaCustomer due diligence €243,537

The financial institution did not take into account its customers’ significant cash exposure in its customer risk assessment, so that almost all customers were rated low risk – even with cash deposits of over 100,000 EUR. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 243,537 EUR and a follow-up directive; the fine was open to appeal at the time of publication.

What organisations can take from it

Cash is an explicit high-risk factor – a risk model that ignores it is worthless.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising cash as a risk factor

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 5(5)(a)(ii), 7(1)(c), 7(1)(d), 7(2)(a), 21 PMLFTR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
23 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Apr 2025 OKCoin Europe LimitedMalta: 1.05 million EUR against crypto exchange OKCoin Europe over anti-money laundering deficiencies MaltaInternal controls €1.05m

During an on-site examination in 2023, the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) found deficiencies at the crypto service provider in its business risk assessment (including product risks), customer risk assessment, customer profiles, ongoing monitoring, suspicious transaction reporting and record-keeping. It imposed 1,054,269 EUR and a follow-up directive; the fine was open to appeal at the time of publication.

What organisations can take from it

Crypto providers are held to the same due diligence standards as banks – the risk assessment must cover their own products.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering for crypto-assets

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Reg. 5(1), 5(4), 5(5), 7, 11, 15(3), 21 PMLFTR; FIAU Implementing Procedures
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
3 Apr 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Nov 2024 Integritas Consulting LtdMalta: 66,504 EUR against corporate services firm Integritas for lack of monitoring MaltaCustomer due diligence €66,504

The corporate services provider did not question why a client company that had been dormant for seven years suddenly received over 4 million EUR and passed almost identical amounts on to its shareholder, and did not keep customer information up to date. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 66,504 EUR; remediation was no longer possible because the firm had surrendered its licence and is being wound up.

What organisations can take from it

Sudden flows of millions through dormant companies are a trigger for updated due diligence and, where appropriate, a suspicious transaction report.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising unusual transactions in dormant companies

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 7(2)(a), 7(2)(b), 11(9), 15(3) PMLFTR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
13 Nov 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial