Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

9cases from 1 jurisdiction
€58.6mTotal of monetary amounts
€45mLargest single case: J.P. Morgan SE
€210,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) €58.2m 99 % · 5 cases
  2. Bezirksregierung Arnsberg (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor) €392,370 1 % · 2 cases
  3. Landesdirektion Sachsen (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor) €7,800 0 % · 2 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Suspicious activity reports €58m 99 % · 3 cases
  2. Customer due diligence €603,170 1 % · 4 cases
  3. Internal controls €27,000 0 % · 2 cases

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance €58.2m 99 % · 5 cases
  2. Retail and e-commerce €386,504 1 % · 2 cases
  3. Automotive €12,866 0 % · 1 case
  4. Construction and real estate €800 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20242€9.21m
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20251€800
Q2 20251€7,000
Q3 20251€3.8m
Q4 20253€45.4m
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20261€210,000

9 cases

10 Jul 2026 Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss eGBaFin: 210,000 EUR against Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss over monitoring and reporting gaps GermanyCustomer due diligence €210,000

Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed fines totalling 210,000 EUR on the cooperative bank: business relationships were not monitored on an ongoing basis or with enhanced scrutiny, additional information was not obtained and suspicious activity reports were not filed or were filed late. The function of the money laundering reporting officer had been outsourced to an external service provider with several clients.

What organisations can take from it

Institutions that outsource the anti-money laundering function remain responsible themselves for ongoing monitoring and timely suspicious activity reports.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and suspicious activity reporting

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 20, 36, 38 und 69 GwG; Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
17 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Dec 2025 Hardeck Möbel GmbH & Co. KGFurniture retailer Hardeck: 379,503 EUR fine for breach of AML due diligence obligations GermanyCustomer due diligence €379,504

The Arnsberg regional government (Bezirksregierung Arnsberg), as anti-money laundering supervisor for the non-financial sector, imposed a fine of 379,503.50 EUR, final since 16 December 2025, on the furniture retailer as a dealer in goods for breach of due diligence obligations under the German Money Laundering Act (Geldwäschegesetz, GwG). Karl-Ernst Hardeck is named as the person responsible for the company.

What organisations can take from it

Furniture retailers, as dealers in goods, are also obliged entities under the GwG – breaches of due diligence obligations can trigger six-figure fines.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identification for cash payments in the trade in goods

Authority / court
Bezirksregierung Arnsberg (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Geldwäschegesetz (Sorgfaltspflichten); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Liability of senior managers
The announcement names Karl-Ernst Hardeck as the person responsible for the infringement

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

28 Oct 2025 Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Helaba)BaFin: fine against Helaba over inadequate monitoring systems for money laundering prevention GermanyInternal controls €20,000

By decision of 28 October 2025 (final since 7 November 2025), Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 20,000 EUR because, from October 2022 to September 2023, the Landesbank operated data processing systems for money laundering prevention that were only partially adequate. Under the German Banking Act (KWG), the criteria by which monitoring identifies suspicious transactions must be documented, and the systems must be checked regularly by an independent auditor.

What organisations can take from it

Transaction monitoring needs documented indicators and a regular independent quality review – the mere existence of software is not enough.

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 2 Nr. 11b KWG (Betrieb angemessener Datenverarbeitungssysteme zur Geldwäscheprävention)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
10 Dec 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Oct 2025 J.P. Morgan SEBaFin: 45 million EUR against J.P. Morgan SE over late suspicious activity reports GermanySuspicious activity reports €45m

By decision of 13 October 2025 (final since 30 October 2025), Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 45 million EUR on J.P. Morgan SE because the institution had culpably breached its duty of supervision in the internal processes for filing money laundering suspicious activity reports; from 4 October 2021 to 30 September 2022, suspicious activity reports were systematically not filed on time. BaFin points out that, in the case of systematic infringements, the amount of the fine can be based on the institution's total turnover.

What organisations can take from it

File suspicious activity reports without delay – systematic backlogs in the reporting process are themselves an infringement, and the fine can then be calculated on the basis of the institution's total turnover.

Relevance to training and awareness

Filing money laundering suspicious activity reports without delay

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
§ 130 Abs. 1 OWiG (Aufsichtspflichtverletzung) i. V. m. Pflichten nach dem GwG (Verdachtsmeldungen); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 Abs. 1 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
6 Nov 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Aug 2025 Varengold Bank AGBaFin: 3.3 million EUR fine and penalty payment against Varengold Bank GermanySuspicious activity reports €3.8m

By decision of 22 August 2025, Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 3.3 million EUR because the bank systematically filed suspicious activity reports late from June 2023 to March 2025; in February 2025, a penalty payment of 500,000 EUR had already been imposed for failure to comply with a 2023 order concerning Iran-related transactions (total 3.8 million EUR). In addition, in July 2025 BaFin ordered comprehensive remediation of the deficiencies in money laundering prevention, with an action plan and reporting obligations.

What organisations can take from it

Failing to implement a supervisory order risks penalty payments and a comprehensive package of measures in addition to the fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Suspicious activity reports and handling of high-risk transactions

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Bußgeld: § 56 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 69, Abs. 3 GwG; Anordnung: § 51 Abs. 2 GwG, § 44 Abs. 1 KWG; Zwangsgeld: § 14 VwVG i. V. m. § 17 FinDAG; Bekanntmachung nach § 57 Abs. 1 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
16 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Jun 2025 Saxony: 7,000 EUR fine against art dealer over due diligence obligations and risk management GermanyInternal controls €7,000

The Saxony State Directorate (Landesdirektion Sachsen), as anti-money laundering supervisor for the non-financial sector, imposed a fine of 7,000 EUR on an art dealer, announced in anonymised form, for breaches of the due diligence obligations and risk management requirements under the German Money Laundering Act (GwG). The authority had previously issued several orders on risk management in the art trade, backed by the threat of penalty payments.

What organisations can take from it

Art dealers need a written risk analysis and must identify buyers for transactions of 10,000 EUR or more.

Relevance to training and awareness

AML obligations in the art trade

Authority / court
Landesdirektion Sachsen (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Geldwäschegesetz (Sorgfaltspflichten, Risikomanagement); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Jan 2025 Saxony: fine against estate agent for breach of AML due diligence obligations GermanyCustomer due diligence €800

The Saxony State Directorate (Landesdirektion Sachsen), as anti-money laundering supervisor for the non-financial sector, imposed a fine of 800 EUR on an estate agent, announced in anonymised form, for breach of the due diligence obligations under the German Money Laundering Act (GwG). The list of announcements shows numerous further fines and reprimands against agents ranging from 50 to 5,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Estate agents must identify both contracting parties in good time – even small offices are subject to active anti-money laundering supervision.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identification of contracting parties in property brokerage

Authority / court
Landesdirektion Sachsen (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Geldwäschegesetz (Sorgfaltspflichten); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

5 Jun 2024 CarXclusive GmbHCar dealer CarXclusive: 12,866 EUR fine for breach of AML due diligence obligations GermanyCustomer due diligence €12,866

A fine of 12,866 EUR, final since 5 June 2024, was imposed on the motor vehicle dealer by the Arnsberg regional government (Bezirksregierung Arnsberg), as anti-money laundering supervisor for the non-financial sector, for breach of the due diligence obligations of the German Money Laundering Act (Geldwäschegesetz, GwG), and the company was publicly named.

What organisations can take from it

Car dealerships must identify and document buyers for cash payments of 10,000 EUR or more – sales staff must know the threshold.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer identification when selling vehicles for cash

Authority / court
Bezirksregierung Arnsberg (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Geldwäschegesetz (Sorgfaltspflichten); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Automotive

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Apr 2024 N26 Bank AGBaFin: 9.2 million EUR against N26 over systematically late suspicious activity reports GermanySuspicious activity reports €9.2m

By final decision of 24 April 2024, Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 9.2 million EUR on the neobank because it had systematically filed money laundering suspicious activity reports late in 2022.

What organisations can take from it

Send suspicious activity reports to the FIU without delay – systematically late reporting risks fines running into millions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Suspicious activity reports without delay

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 1 Nr. 69, Abs. 3 GwG (verspätete Verdachtsmeldungen, § 43 Abs. 1 GwG); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
21 May 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial