Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by country- Germany €58.6m 58 % · 9 cases
- Ireland €21.5m 21 % · 2 cases
- Sweden €13.1m 13 % · 2 cases
- Luxembourg €3.09m 3 % · 3 cases
- Malta €2m 2 % · 8 cases
- Austria €974,000 1 % · 3 cases
- Lithuania €840,000 1 % · 1 case
- Finland €500,000 0 % · 1 case
- Netherlands €406,125 0 % · 1 case
- Hungary €130,215 0 % · 1 case
- 3 more€100,000
What for?
by topicWho?
by sectorAll sectors
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 3 | €1.76m |
| Q1 2024 | 1 | €1.68m |
| Q2 2024 | 2 | €9.21m |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €66,504 |
| Q1 2025 | 2 | €800 |
| Q2 2025 | 5 | €1.86m |
| Q3 2025 | 2 | €3.84m |
| Q4 2025 | 5 | €67.1m |
| Q1 2026 | 6 | €2.26m |
| Q2 2026 | 2 | €12.9m |
| Q3 2026 | 6 | €578,628 |
35 cases
13 Oct 2025 J.P. Morgan SEBaFin: 45 million EUR against J.P. Morgan SE over late suspicious activity reports €45m
By decision of 13 October 2025 (final since 30 October 2025), Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 45 million EUR on J.P. Morgan SE because the institution had culpably breached its duty of supervision in the internal processes for filing money laundering suspicious activity reports; from 4 October 2021 to 30 September 2022, suspicious activity reports were systematically not filed on time. BaFin points out that, in the case of systematic infringements, the amount of the fine can be based on the institution's total turnover.
File suspicious activity reports without delay – systematic backlogs in the reporting process are themselves an infringement, and the fine can then be calculated on the basis of the institution's total turnover.
Filing money laundering suspicious activity reports without delay
- Authority / court
- Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
- Legal basis
- § 130 Abs. 1 OWiG (Aufsichtspflichtverletzung) i. V. m. Pflichten nach dem GwG (Verdachtsmeldungen); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 Abs. 1 GwG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 6 Nov 2025
- Mängel in der Geldwäscheprävention: Bußgeld in Höhe von 45 Millionen Euro gegen J.P. Morgan SE Press release of an authority
- Bekanntmachung zur J.P. Morgan SE (§ 57 GwG) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Sep 2026 Wallester ASFinancial supervisor orders Wallester to remedy governance and AML deficiencies Order
Following an on-site inspection, the Finantsinspektsioon (Estonian Financial Supervision Authority) issued an order requiring the payment institution Wallester to remedy, by 31 December, deficiencies in governance and control functions (separation of the lines of defence, internal rules), in safeguarding customer funds and in the staffing of its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing function. Date = publication of the press release.
Fast-growing payment service providers must let their compliance, AML and internal audit functions grow with them in terms of staffing and organisation.
- Authority / court
- Finantsinspektsioon (Estnische Finanzaufsicht)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
- Legal basis
- Aufsichtsrechtliche Anordnung (ettekirjutus) der Finantsinspektsioon
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 16 Sep 2026
- Finantsinspektsioon tegi Wallester AS-ile ettekirjutuse (16.09.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
31 Aug 2026 EM@NEY P.L.C.Malta: EM@NEY pays 97,622 EUR under settlement for late bank account register reports €97,622
The financial institution did not deliver on time the data due every seven days to the Centralised Bank Account Register (CBAR). The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 162,704 EUR, which was reduced by 40% to 97,622 EUR under a settlement pursuant to its 2026 settlement policy.
Recurring mandatory reports need deadline monitoring with escalation – otherwise individual omissions add up to six-figure sums.
- Authority / court
- Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing
- Legal basis
- Reg. 4(2), 8, 9 CBAR Regulations (S.L. 373.03)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- Settlement with 40% reduction
- Published
- 4 Sep 2026
- Settlement Agreement Publication Notice – EM@NEY P.L.C. Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 Aug 2026 MiFinity Malta LimitedMalta: MiFinity pays 160,099 EUR following anti-money laundering examination €160,099
At the payment institution, the customer risk assessment had only been introduced after business had started, some customers remained unassessed, and customer profiles were based on transaction thresholds rather than on risk. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 266,833 EUR and a follow-up directive; under a settlement, the fine was reduced by 40% to 160,099 EUR.
A customer risk assessment belongs before business starts, not in a later remediation project.
Risk-based customer profiles and source of funds
- Authority / court
- Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Reg. 2(1), 5(5)(a)(ii), 7(1)(c), 7(2)(a), 21, 22 PMLFTR
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- Settlement with 40% reduction; remediation demonstrated
- Published
- 2 Sep 2026
- Settlement Agreement Publication Notice – MiFinity Malta Limited Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Aug 2026 Tax adviser uses firm's account for third-party payments: 30,000 EUR FMA penalty upheld €30,000
From December 2022, an auditor and tax adviser processed payments of another limited company totalling around 1.26 million EUR through the bank account of his tax advisory company, which was held as an own account, without disclosing this to the bank – according to the court, deliberately in order to avoid a compliance review. The Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) upheld the fine of 30,000 EUR imposed on him by the Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht, FMA) in its penalty decision of 27 November 2025, in his capacity as managing director of the account-holding company, which is liable for the penalty; an ordinary appeal on points of law is not admissible.
Customers also have obligations under anti-money laundering law: anyone channelling third-party funds through an own account must disclose this to the bank.
Disclosure obligations as a bank customer for trust and pass-through payments
- Authority / court
- Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 27.11.2025
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- § 6 Abs. 3 FM-GwG (Offenlegung des Handelns auf fremde Rechnung) i. V. m. § 34 Abs. 5 FM-GwG; § 9 Abs. 1 und 7 VStG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- Fine imposed on the managing director personally; liability of the company under Section 9(7) VStG (Austrian Administrative Penal Act)
- BVwG W607 2331234-1 vom 20.08.2026 Court decision
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Jul 2026 Goldwin LtdMalta: 80,907 EUR against online casino Goldwin for missing customer risk assessment €80,907
The 2022 examination revealed that for more than two years the remote gaming operator had had no proper customer risk assessment for almost its entire player base; the assessments submitted had been prepared specifically for the examination. In addition, once players reached the deposit threshold of 2,000 EUR, it did not check in good time whether they were politically exposed persons. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 80,907 EUR; the fine was still open to appeal at the time of publication.
Supervisory authorities see through risk assessments prepared only for the examination – they must be applied in day-to-day business.
Risk-based customer assessment in gambling
- Authority / court
- Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Reg. 5(5)(a)(ii), 11(5), 21 PMLFTR; FIAU Implementing Procedures Part I und II (Remote Gaming)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 16 Jul 2026
- Administrative Measure Publication Notice – Goldwin Ltd Decision of an authority
- Publication of AML/CFT Administrative Penalties and Measures – FIAU Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Jul 2026 Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss eGBaFin: 210,000 EUR against Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss over monitoring and reporting gaps €210,000
Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed fines totalling 210,000 EUR on the cooperative bank: business relationships were not monitored on an ongoing basis or with enhanced scrutiny, additional information was not obtained and suspicious activity reports were not filed or were filed late. The function of the money laundering reporting officer had been outsourced to an external service provider with several clients.
Institutions that outsource the anti-money laundering function remain responsible themselves for ongoing monitoring and timely suspicious activity reports.
Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and suspicious activity reporting
- Authority / court
- Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- § 56 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 20, 36, 38 und 69 GwG; Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 17 Sep 2026
- Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss eG: Bafin setzt Bußgelder fest Press release of an authority
- Bekanntmachung zur Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss eG (§ 57 GwG) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Jun 2026 Banca Popolare Commerciale SpaBanca d'Italia: 40,000 EUR against Banca Popolare Commerciale over AML deficiencies €40,000
Following an on-site inspection from February to April 2025, the Bank of Italy (Banca d'Italia) found deficiencies in customer due diligence, active cooperation (suspicious transaction reporting) and anti-money laundering controls, and imposed an administrative fine of 40,000 EUR. The duration of the deficiencies and the corrective measures initiated were taken into account.
Gaps in customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reporting are consistently sanctioned after on-site inspections, even with smaller amounts – corrective measures reduce the sanction but do not replace it.
Customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reports
- Authority / court
- Banca d'Italia
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Art. 62 d.lgs. 231/2007; Verstöße gegen Art. 7, 16–19, 24, 25, 35, 36 d.lgs. 231/2007
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- Corrective measures initiated
- Banca Popolare Commerciale Spa – Provvedimento n. 190 del 23 giugno 2026 (AML) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Jun 2026 Ikano Bank ABIkano Bank: 140 million SEK over deficiencies in money laundering risk assessment and customer due diligence €12.9m
For the period April 2022 to May 2023, the Swedish financial supervisory authority Finansinspektionen (FI) found that the bank’s general risk assessment did not realistically assess the terrorist financing risks of its corporate products and that no enhanced due diligence measures were taken for high-risk corporate customers. FI issued a remark and imposed 140 million SEK; the bank has brought an action before the administrative court.
The money laundering risk assessment must reflect the actual customers and products – a generic assessment leaves the entire customer due diligence open to challenge.
Enhanced due diligence for high-risk customers
- Authority / court
- Finansinspektionen (FI)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Penningtvättslagen (2017:630)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 17 Jun 2026
Original amount 140,000,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jun 2026.
- FI ger Ikano Bank en anmärkning och en sanktionsavgift (17.06.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Mar 2026 Stanleybet Malta LimitedMalta: 225,730 EUR against betting operator Stanleybet over lack of customer checks in betting shops €225,730
Malta's Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 225,730 EUR, a penalty payment of 2,000 EUR per day and a follow-up directive on the licensed gambling operator, which works through a network of independently operated betting shops in an EU member state. The company was unable to link customers' cumulative deposits across different shops and only checked customers from a single deposit of 2,000 EUR upwards, so the threshold could be circumvented. The company has appealed.
Thresholds must be aggregated per customer across all channels and branches – otherwise the system invites structuring.
Recognising structured deposits below the checking threshold
- Authority / court
- Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Regulation 21 PMLFTR; Verstöße gegen Regulations 5(5)(a)(ii), 7, 9(1) PMLFTR und FIAU Implementing Procedures
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 16 Apr 2026
- Administrative Measure Publication Notice – Stanleybet Malta Limited Decision of an authority
- Administrative Measures – FIAU Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Mar 2026 BNF Bank p.l.c.Malta: 69,000 EUR against BNF Bank over late reporting to the bank account register €69,000
Following the introduction of a new core banking system in April 2025, the bank was unable, until September 2025, to submit the mandatory weekly data deliveries to the Centralised Bank Account Register (CBAR) on time. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 69,000 EUR.
Test regulatory reporting chains in advance of IT migrations – migration problems do not excuse missed deadlines.
- Authority / court
- Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing
- Legal basis
- Reg. 4(2), 8 Centralised Bank Account Register Regulations (S.L. 373.03)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- The bank continuously attempted to upload reports
- Published
- 6 Mar 2026
- Administrative Measure Publication Notice – BNF Bank p.l.c. Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Feb 2026 BVwG reduces FMA penalty against private bank over unclarified beneficial owners €356,000
From 2017 to 2020, an Austrian bank specialising in private and investment banking had not adequately examined the ownership and control structure of an offshore holding client despite the lack of evidence on shareholders, trust arrangements and beneficial owners. The Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) confirmed the infringement but reduced the additional penalty imposed by the Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht, FMA) in its penalty decision of 17 December 2024 from 476,000 to 356,000 EUR (total penalty 436,000 EUR less FMA penalties already paid), because the FMA had taken the seriousness of the offence into account twice and the bank had cooperated, admitted its errors and terminated the client relationship; an appeal on points of law has been permitted.
For offshore holdings with trustees, prove the beneficial owner with supporting documents – a self-declaration is not enough.
Identifying beneficial owners in holding and trust structures
- Authority / court
- Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 17.12.2024
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- § 9 Abs. 1 erster Satz i. V. m. § 6 Abs. 1 Z 2 FM-GwG; § 35 Abs. 1 und 3 i. V. m. § 34 Abs. 1 Z 2 und Abs. 2 FM-GwG; § 22 Abs. 9 FMABG (Zusatzstrafe)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Reduction by the court because the wrongfulness of the offence had been counted twice, cooperation, admission of the facts and of guilt, and termination of the client relationship
- BVwG W204 2306222-1 vom 20.02.2026 Court decision
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Feb 2026 BVwG upholds 588,000 EUR FMA penalty against major bank over incorrect risk classification €588,000
The Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) dismissed the appeal of a listed major Austrian bank and upheld the fine of 588,000 EUR (plus 58,800 EUR in procedural costs) imposed by the Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht, FMA) in its penalty decision of 19 November 2024. From 2017 to 2020, the bank had not adequately risk-classified three business relationships and had disregarded sector risks such as gambling and precious metals trading as well as cash intensity; an appeal on points of law has been permitted.
Customers from gambling or precious metals trading with a high share of cash belong in a higher risk class – otherwise the enhanced obligations are missing.
Risk classification of cash-intensive high-risk sectors
- Authority / court
- Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG); Straferkenntnis der Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) vom 19.11.2024
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- § 6 Abs. 5 i. V. m. § 34 Abs. 1 Z 2 und § 35 Abs. 1–3 FM-GwG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- BVwG W204 2304676-1 vom 17.02.2026 Court decision
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Jan 2026 CCV Group B.V.Netherlands: payment institution CCV without integrity risk analysis – 406,125 EUR fine €406,125
Until March 2018, the payment institution had no systematic integrity risk analysis (SIRA) and therefore no systematic identification and analysis of integrity risks for its gatekeeper function. The Dutch central bank (De Nederlandsche Bank, DNB) imposed the fine in 2020; following objection and appeal proceedings, it was fixed at the reduced amount of 406,125 EUR by the decision of 28 January 2026 and was published in July 2026.
Without a documented integrity risk analysis, any money laundering prevention lacks its foundation – and that alone is subject to fines.
- Authority / court
- De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
- Legal basis
- Art. 3:10 Wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft); Art. 10 Besluit prudentiële regels Wft (Bpr)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- Fine reduced in the objection and appeal proceedings
- Published
- 21 Jul 2026
- Fine for CCV Group B.V. for lack of SIRA Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Jan 2026 Cardif Lux Vie S.A.Cardif Lux Vie: 615,000 EUR over deficiencies in money laundering questionnaires and customer files €615,000
An on-site inspection in 2023 revealed that the life insurer in some cases did not handle the mandatory money laundering risk assessment questionnaires in compliance with the rules, that the employees responsible lacked sufficiently precise instructions and that customer files contained many incorrect answers. The Commissariat aux Assurances (Luxembourg insurance supervisory authority, CAA) imposed 615,000 EUR.
Risk questionnaires are only as good as the guidance given to those who complete them – clear work instructions and training are part of this.
Money laundering risk assessment by employees
- Authority / court
- Commissariat aux Assurances (CAA)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Loi modifiée du 12 novembre 2004 (LBC/FT), Art. 2-1, 8-4, 8-5; Règlement CAA 20/03
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- Close cooperation with the CAA during and after the inspection; remediation plan for all deficiencies submitted promptly.
- Published
- 1 Jul 2026
- CAA – Sanction administrative Cardif Lux Vie S.A. (01.07.2026) Decision of an authority
- CAA – Sanctions et autres mesures administratives Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Dec 2025 Hardeck Möbel GmbH & Co. KGFurniture retailer Hardeck: 379,503 EUR fine for breach of AML due diligence obligations €379,504
The Arnsberg regional government (Bezirksregierung Arnsberg), as anti-money laundering supervisor for the non-financial sector, imposed a fine of 379,503.50 EUR, final since 16 December 2025, on the furniture retailer as a dealer in goods for breach of due diligence obligations under the German Money Laundering Act (Geldwäschegesetz, GwG). Karl-Ernst Hardeck is named as the person responsible for the company.
Furniture retailers, as dealers in goods, are also obliged entities under the GwG – breaches of due diligence obligations can trigger six-figure fines.
Identification for cash payments in the trade in goods
- Authority / court
- Bezirksregierung Arnsberg (Geldwäscheaufsicht Nichtfinanzsektor)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Geldwäschegesetz (Sorgfaltspflichten); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Liability of senior managers
- The announcement names Karl-Ernst Hardeck as the person responsible for the infringement
- Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG – Bezirksregierung Arnsberg Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Nov 2025 Coinbase Europe LimitedIreland: 21.5 million EUR against Coinbase Europe – 30 million transactions unchecked €21.5m
In a settlement of 5 November 2025, the Central Bank of Ireland imposed a reprimand and 21,464,734 EUR (after a 30% discount on 30,663,906 EUR) for breaches of transaction monitoring obligations between April 2021 and March 2025: because of configuration errors in the monitoring system, more than 30 million transactions worth over 176 billion EUR – around 31% of all transactions – were not properly monitored over a period of twelve months. The subsequent review took almost three years and led to 2,708 suspicious transaction reports; the High Court confirmed the sanction on 12 January 2026, and it is the Central Bank's first enforcement action in the crypto sector.
Test monitoring rules regularly for complete coverage – a silent configuration error can go undetected for years.
- Authority / court
- Central Bank of Ireland
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
- Legal basis
- Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Mitigating circumstances
- 30% settlement discount
- Published
- 6 Nov 2025
- Enforcement Action against Coinbase Europe Limited Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Oct 2025 Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Helaba)BaFin: fine against Helaba over inadequate monitoring systems for money laundering prevention €20,000
By decision of 28 October 2025 (final since 7 November 2025), Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 20,000 EUR because, from October 2022 to September 2023, the Landesbank operated data processing systems for money laundering prevention that were only partially adequate. Under the German Banking Act (KWG), the criteria by which monitoring identifies suspicious transactions must be documented, and the systems must be checked regularly by an independent auditor.
Transaction monitoring needs documented indicators and a regular independent quality review – the mere existence of software is not enough.
- Authority / court
- Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
- Legal basis
- § 56 Abs. 2 Nr. 11b KWG (Betrieb angemessener Datenverarbeitungssysteme zur Geldwäscheprävention)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 10 Dec 2025
- Mangelhafte Geldwäscheprävention: BaFin setzt Bußgeld gegen die Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale fest Press release of an authority
- Bekanntmachung zur Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Oct 2025 Zimpler ABZimpler: 3 million SEK over anti-money laundering deficiencies at gambling-related payment service €272,245
Between July 2023 and April 2024, the payment service provider, a substantial part of whose business is linked to the gambling sector, had gaps in its general risk assessment (including a missing assessment of its currency exchange service), in its customer risk assessment and in customer due diligence. The Swedish financial supervisory authority Finansinspektionen (FI) issued a remark and imposed 3 million SEK.
Include every new product – even an ancillary service such as currency exchange – in the money laundering risk assessment before launch.
Money laundering risks in the gambling environment
- Authority / court
- Finansinspektionen (FI)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
- Legal basis
- Penningtvättslagen (2017:630)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 15 Oct 2025
Original amount 3,000,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Oct 2025.
- Zimpler får en anmärkning och sanktionsavgift (15.10.2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Aug 2025 Varengold Bank AGBaFin: 3.3 million EUR fine and penalty payment against Varengold Bank €3.8m
By decision of 22 August 2025, Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 3.3 million EUR because the bank systematically filed suspicious activity reports late from June 2023 to March 2025; in February 2025, a penalty payment of 500,000 EUR had already been imposed for failure to comply with a 2023 order concerning Iran-related transactions (total 3.8 million EUR). In addition, in July 2025 BaFin ordered comprehensive remediation of the deficiencies in money laundering prevention, with an action plan and reporting obligations.
Failing to implement a supervisory order risks penalty payments and a comprehensive package of measures in addition to the fine.
Suspicious activity reports and handling of high-risk transactions
- Authority / court
- Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
- Area of law
- Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
- Legal basis
- Bußgeld: § 56 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 69, Abs. 3 GwG; Anordnung: § 51 Abs. 2 GwG, § 44 Abs. 1 KWG; Zwangsgeld: § 14 VwVG i. V. m. § 17 FinDAG; Bekanntmachung nach § 57 Abs. 1 GwG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 16 Sep 2025
- Varengold Bank AG: BaFin ordnet umfassende Mängelbeseitigung in der Geldwäscheprävention an und setzt Geldbuße fest Press release of an authority
- Bekanntmachungen zur Varengold Bank AG (§ 57 GwG) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link