Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€33,978Total of monetary amounts
€23,891Largest single case: an Icelandic event hall operator
€16,989Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Persónuvernd €33,978 100 % · 2 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Video surveillance €23,891 70 % · 1 case
  2. Employee data €10,087 30 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Other €23,891 70 % · 1 case
  2. Food and agriculture €10,087 30 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€23,891
Q1 20241€10,087
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

2 cases

12 Mar 2024 an Icelandic operator of a fast-food restaurant chainIceland: fast-food chain operator fined for using CCTV to monitor staff performance IcelandEmployee dataanonymised €10,087

Persónuvernd (Icelandic Data Protection Authority) fined the operator of a fast-food restaurant chain in Iceland 1,500,000 ISK because the manager of one outlet had used footage from the surveillance cameras to check an employee's work and had produced annotated screenshots for that purpose. The authority found this to be unlawful processing outside the declared purpose of the surveillance and also criticised signs that did not name the controller and inadequate information for employees; it ordered the company to delete the screenshots, put up compliant signs in its outlets, inform employees and keep a record of processing activities.

What organisations can take from it

Footage from security cameras must not be used on the side to monitor staff performance, and anyone with access to it must know what they may use it for.

Relevance to training and awareness

Workplace video surveillance: no performance monitoring without a separate legal basis

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Persónuvernd
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 Bst. a–c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 12 und 13 DSGVO; §§ 8, 9, 14 Abs. 1 und 4 und 17 Gesetz Nr. 90/2018 (isländisches Datenschutzgesetz); Regeln Nr. 837/2006 über elektronische Überwachung; Geldbuße nach § 46 Abs. 3 Gesetz Nr. 90/2018 i.V.m. Art. 83 Abs. 5 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Only one outlet and relatively few people affected, no proven direct damage, only one documented instance of performance monitoring.
Liability of senior managers
The monitoring was carried out by the manager of one outlet; the authority stated that companies must instruct employees who have access to footage. The fine was imposed on the operating company.
Published
20 Mar 2024

Original amount 1,500,000 ISK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Mar 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 12 Mar 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Oct 2023 an Icelandic event hall operatorIceland: event hall operator fined over CCTV surveillance at events IcelandVideo surveillanceanonymised €23,891

Persónuvernd (Icelandic Data Protection Authority) fined the operator of an Icelandic event hall 3,500,000 ISK after finding on 7 February 2023 that video surveillance during events held by third parties took place without a legal basis, without a specified legitimate purpose and without adequate information. Weighing heavily was that the cameras also covered rooms where children and young people stayed overnight as well as Covid-19 mass vaccinations, and that the surveillance had affected a very large number of people since at least 2008.

What organisations can take from it

Video surveillance at event venues needs a clearly defined purpose and a legal basis and must not capture sensitive situations such as children staying overnight or healthcare services.

Relevance to training and awareness

Video surveillance at event venues: purpose, legal basis and sensitive areas

Authority / court
Persónuvernd
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 Bst. a und b, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1 und Art. 13 DSGVO; § 8 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2 und Abs. 2, §§ 9 und 17 Abs. 2 Gesetz Nr. 90/2018 (isländisches Datenschutzgesetz); Geldbuße nach § 46 Abs. 3 Gesetz Nr. 90/2018 i.V.m. Art. 83 Abs. 5 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Mitigating circumstances
There was signage, albeit inadequate; the company cooperated with the authority and partly implemented the earlier orders; no financial damage (given little weight by the authority).
Published
17 Oct 2023

Original amount 3,500,000 ISK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Oct 2023.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 17 Oct 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial