Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 2 jurisdictions
€45mTotal of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€45mLargest single case: Vodafone GmbH
€45mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by country
  1. Germany €45m 100 % · 2 cases
  2. Switzerland — 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by action
  1. Fine €45m 100 % · 1 case
  2. Other — 0 % · 1 case
  3. Reprimand or warning — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Telecoms, IT and software €45m 100 % · 2 cases
  2. Transport, logistics and shipping — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20251€45m
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261—
Q3 20260—

3 cases

4 May 2026 Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) AöRBlnBDI reprimands BVG: deletion at service provider not checked, data breach reported too late GermanyData processors Reprimand or warning

A processor of Berlin's public transport operator BVG, which had sent customer letters in early 2025, was hacked; around 180,000 customer records were affected, although they should long since have been deleted after the end of the contract. BVG had never checked the deletion, had not agreed any procedure for data breaches in the data processing agreement and reported the incident only after the 72-hour deadline had expired; the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BlnBDI) issued a reprimand.

What organisations can take from it

Have service providers prove deletion after the end of the contract, and have an internal procedure that immediately turns indications of a breach into a 72-hour notification.

Relevance to training and awareness

Reporting process for data breaches and management of service providers

Authority / court
Berliner Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit (BlnBDI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 2 i. V. m. Abs. 1 lit. c, e, f, Art. 28 Abs. 3 S. 2 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1, Art. 33 DSGVO
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Mitigating circumstances
BVG has announced measures against similar incidents.
Published
4 May 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jun 2025 Vodafone GmbHBfDI: 45 million EUR against Vodafone over fraud in partner agencies and authentication gaps GermanyData processors €45m

Malicious employees in partner agencies that broker contracts for Vodafone had created fictitious contracts and contract changes to the detriment of customers. The German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI) imposed 15 million EUR for inadequate vetting and monitoring of the partner agencies (Art. 28) and 30 million EUR for authentication deficiencies in ‘MeinVodafone’ in combination with the hotline, through which unauthorised persons were able, among other things, to retrieve eSIM profiles; in addition, a reprimand was issued under Art. 32.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that outsource sales to partner agencies must audit how those agencies handle customer data and make misuse technically harder.

Relevance to training and awareness

Insider threats and oversight of sales partners

Authority / court
Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit (BfDI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 28 Abs. 1 S. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation including self-incrimination, modernisation of systems, separation from fraudulent partners; fines accepted and paid, plus donations amounting to millions.
Published
3 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 May 2024 Xplain AG; Bundesamt für Polizei (fedpol); Bundesamt für Zoll und Grenzsicherheit (BAZG)FDPIC: data protection infringements at Xplain, fedpol and FOCBS after ransomware attack SwitzerlandData processors Other

Following the hacker attack on the IT service provider Xplain, the Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (Eidgenössischer Datenschutz- und Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragter, EDÖB) found that personal data of the Federal Office of Police (fedpol) and the Federal Office for Customs and Border Security (BAZG) had reached Xplain via support processes without the necessary data protection safeguards. Xplain subsequently retained the data in breach of data protection law and partly in breach of contract.

What organisations can take from it

Real data does not belong in service providers' support and test environments – clients must control disclosure and deletion.

Relevance to training and awareness

Passing real data to service providers for support

Authority / court
Eidgenössischer Datenschutz- und Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragter (EDÖB)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Datenschutzgesetz (DSG)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
1 May 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial