Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 3 jurisdictions
€102,784Total of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€100,000Largest single case: an alarm system provider in Spain
€51,392Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. EU €102,784 100 % · 3 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Data subject rights and transparency €100,000 97 % · 1 case
  2. no topic €2,784 3 % · 1 case
  3. Video surveillance – 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €100,000 97 % · 1 case
  2. Unternehmen für private Sicherheitsdienste (anonymisiert) €2,784 3 % · 1 case
  3. Securitas Sverige Aktiebolag – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€100,000
20240–
20251€2,784
20261–

3 cases

16 Jun 2026 Securitas Sverige AktiebolagSecuritas Sverige: reprimand over cameras in company vehicles without legal basis SwedenVideo surveillance Reprimand or warning

The security services provider used cameras in vehicles through which personal data was processed without any legal basis for doing so. The Swedish data protection authority (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten, IMY) issued a reprimand under Art. 58 GDPR; no fine was imposed.

What organisations can take from it

Dashcams in company cars also need a verified legal basis and a balancing against the interests of employees and passers-by.

Relevance to training and awareness

Use of cameras in vehicles

Authority / court
Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 6 Abs. 1
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Dec 2025 Unternehmen für private Sicherheitsdienste (anonymisiert)Luxembourg security services firm: EUR 2,784 for incomplete record of processing LuxembourgData protection €2,784

The CNPD (Luxembourg data protection authority) imposed a fine of EUR 2,784, a reprimand and an order on a Luxembourg private security services company with more than 250 employees because its record of processing activities did not fully contain the information required by Art. 30(1) GDPR. Within one month it had to describe the security measures for its whistleblowing report handling, or state expressly that there were none.

What organisations can take from it

The record of processing must contain, for every processing operation – including the handling of whistleblower reports – complete information on purposes, recipients, erasure periods and security measures.

Authority / court
Commission nationale pour la protection des données (CNPD), formation restreinte
Area of law
Data protection
Legal basis
Art. 30(1)(a), (c), (d), (e), (f) und (g) DSGVO; Art. 58(2) und 83 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Defence and security

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 Feb 2023 an alarm system provider in SpainAlarm system provider in Spain: 100,000 EUR because data subject rights could only be exercised via a 902 number SpainData subject rights and transparencyanonymised €100,000

On the video surveillance signs that the alarm system provider supplies to its customers, only a chargeable 902 telephone number was given for access and objection requests. The Spanish data protection authority (Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, AEPD) considered this to obstruct the exercise of rights, imposed 100,000 EUR and ordered the signs to be replaced within twelve months; the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) published the decision in September 2026.

What organisations can take from it

The route for exercising data subject rights must be free of charge and easily accessible, including on signs at customers' premises.

Authority / court
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 12 Abs. 2, Art. 83 Abs. 5 lit. b
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Published
22 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 5 · Company name anonymised since 1 Feb 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial