Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 2 jurisdictions
€6,200Total of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€6,200Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20251€6,200
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

2 cases

6 Aug 2025 DSB: fine against news portal that ignored instruction on cookie banner AustriaCookies and tracking €6,200

In 2023, the Austrian data protection authority (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB) had ordered a local news portal (a media GmbH & Co KG, name pseudonymised) by decision to offer, on the first layer of the cookie banner, an equivalent option to close it without consent. Because the company did not implement this from October 2024 until at least March 2025, the DSB imposed 6,200 EUR for failure to comply with an instruction; the penalty decision is final.

What organisations can take from it

Implement orders of the supervisory authority on time – ignoring them risks a separate fine in addition to the original infringement.

Authority / court
Datenschutzbehörde (DSB)
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Legal basis
Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d i. V. m. Art. 83 Abs. 6 DSGVO; Art. 7 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Nov 2024 Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd.BGH: loss of control after Facebook scraping is compensable damage (VI ZR 10/24) GermanyData breaches and data security Other

In April 2021, data on around 533 million Facebook users from 106 countries was made public, which unknown persons had previously linked to telephone numbers and harvested via the contact import function. Germany's Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) ruled that the mere loss of control over data already constitutes non-material damage under Art. 82 GDPR, considered around 100 EUR appropriate and referred the case back to the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (OLG Köln), among other things to examine the default searchability setting in the light of data minimisation.

What organisations can take from it

Data breaches trigger compensation claims even without proven misuse – with millions of data subjects, this adds up to a mass risk.

Authority / court
Bundesgerichtshof (VI. Zivilsenat)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 82 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
18 Nov 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial