Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€248.8mTotal of monetary amounts
€240.8mLargest single case: Coupang Corp.
€124.4mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC, 개인정보보호위원회) €248.8m 100 % · 2 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Data breaches and data security €248.8m 100 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Coupang Corp. €240.8m 97 % · 1 case
  2. GS Retail Co., Ltd. €7.95m 3 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20261€240.8m
Q3 20261€7.95m
Q4 20260–

2 cases

26 Aug 2026 GS Retail Co., Ltd.GS Retail: 12.839 billion KRW after credential stuffing on GS SHOP and GS25 South KoreaData breaches and data security €7.95m

Using credentials stolen elsewhere, attackers logged in en masse on the websites of GS SHOP (June 2024 to February 2025) and GS25 (December 2024 to January 2025) and obtained data on 1,581,025 and 79,128 people respectively; GS Retail Co., Ltd. detected neither the bursts of login attempts from the same IP addresses nor the rising number of failed attempts, and after the first discovery at GS25 did not stop the parallel attack on GS SHOP. The authority also found an inadequate data protection organisation and that 1,599 further people were notified more than 72 hours late, imposed a penalty surcharge of 12,836,000,000 KRW and an administrative fine of 3,000,000 KRW (12,839,000,000 KRW in total) and ordered detection measures and a review of the data protection organisation.

What organisations can take from it

Login pages need rate limiting and anomaly detection; after a first credential-stuffing finding, all of a company’s portals must be checked.

Relevance to training and awareness

Credential stuffing and password reuse

Authority / court
Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC, 개인정보보호위원회)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Personal Information Protection Act (개인정보 보호법) Art. 29, Art. 34(1); Sanktion nach Art. 64-2(1) Nr. 9
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of 30% because no benefit was derived and 40% for cooperation, remediation and protective efforts (ISMS-P certification, self-regulation, privacy impact assessment); increase of 50% because the infringement lasted more than two years.
Liability of senior managers
The company was ordered to deploy dedicated data protection staff and to define the powers and responsibility of its chief privacy officer (CPO) clearly.
Published
31 Aug 2026

Original amount 12,839,000,000 KRW, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jun 2026 Coupang Corp.Coupang: 423.6 billion KRW after data leak by a former employee South KoreaData breaches and data security €240.8m

A former employee used authentication signing keys that had been accessible to him in plain text during his employment and were neither renewed nor destroyed after he left to create forged tokens and, from April to November 2025, retrieve data on around 33.22 million customers and delivery data on around 4.33 million other people. For inadequate security measures the authority imposed a penalty surcharge of 423,575,000,000 KRW on Coupang Corp. and, for late notification and failure to delete, an administrative fine of 16,800,000 KRW (423,591,800,000 KRW in total) and criticised the exclusion of the chief privacy officer from the internal investigation. A separate decision on the same day imposed a further 201,106,000,000 KRW for collecting behavioural data on third-party websites and apps without consent.

What organisations can take from it

When employees leave, every key and credential they knew must be renewed immediately – otherwise a single signing key can open the entire customer account system.

Relevance to training and awareness

Offboarding: revoking access and keys

Authority / court
Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC, 개인정보보호위원회)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Personal Information Protection Act (개인정보 보호법) Art. 29, Art. 34(1), Art. 21(1), Art. 31(6), Art. 63(2); Sanktion nach Art. 64-2(1) Nr. 9
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of 30% because no benefit was derived and 50% for remediation, compensation, certification and proportionality; increases of 25% (duration of the infringement), 30% (at least two previous penalties) and 10% (obstruction of the investigation).
Liability of senior managers
The chief privacy officer (CPO) was excluded from the internal investigation and publication; the company was ordered to set up governance that secures the CPO’s independent work and access to information in incidents.
Published
11 Jun 2026

Original amount 423,591,800,000 KRW, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial