Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 3 jurisdictions
€5.71mTotal of monetary amounts
€200,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. EU €5.71m 100 % · 3 cases

What for?

by action
  1. Fine €5.71m 100 % · 3 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. – Niederlassung Italien (BBVA Italia) €5.51m 96 % · 1 case
  2. CaixaBank, S.A. €200,000 4 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20251€200,000
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261€1,000
Q3 20261€5.51m

3 cases

3 Sep 2026 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. – Niederlassung Italien (BBVA Italia)Garante: 5.5 million EUR against BBVA Italia over advertising despite objection ItalyMarketing and consent €5.51m

For seven months (October 2025 to May 2026), the bank continued to send a customer advertising via its app, although he had objected several times. The Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) also found deficient systems for implementing objections and inaccurate information about the processing, and imposed 5,508,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 613).

What organisations can take from it

An objection to advertising must take effect immediately and reliably across all channels – including app messages.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 12, 21, 24 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
11 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

4 May 2026 Malta: insurer reprimanded again and fined – marketing calls despite objection MaltaMarketing and consent €1,000

Although the Information and Data Protection Commissioner (IDPC) had already ruled in favour of a complainant, an insurance company (name redacted) again had him called for marketing purposes via a third-party company; his number remained on call lists. The IDPC criticised the lack of safeguards and inadequate contracts with processors, ordered remedial action within 20 days and imposed two fines totalling 1,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

An objection to marketing must also reach all call centres engaged – otherwise the next complaint follows.

Relevance to training and awareness

Passing marketing objections on to service providers (suppression lists)

Authority / court
Information and Data Protection Commissioner (IDPC)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 21 Abs. 2, Art. 24 Abs. 1, Art. 28 Abs. 3 i. V. m. Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. b, d, i DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

5 Jun 2025 CaixaBank, S.A.AEPD: 200,000 EUR against CaixaBank over continued storage of a non-customer's data SpainMarketing and consent €200,000

A person who was not (or no longer) a customer received a letter from CaixaBank about an update to its privacy statement, announcing that she would be contacted about her advertising preferences. The Spanish data protection authority (Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, AEPD) considered the continued storage of her data to be an infringement of the principle of storage limitation and imposed 200,000 EUR; the bank's request for reconsideration was dismissed as inadmissible.

What organisations can take from it

Before mass mailings, check whether the recipients' data may still be stored at all – former customers should be deleted, not written to.

Authority / court
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial