Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

11cases from 7 jurisdictions
€10.5mTotal of monetary amounts (10 cases with an amount)
€5.47mLargest single case: EOS Matrix d.o.o.
€571,250Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€5.47m
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20241€950,490
Q4 20241€950,000
Q1 20252€120,000
Q2 20250—
Q3 20253€1.9m
Q4 20251€865,000
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261€277,500
Q3 20261€5,002

11 cases

2 Jul 2026 Banca Transilvania S.A.Employee retrieves account statements for a third party – Banca Transilvania pays 5,000 EUR RomaniaData breaches and data security €5,002

At the request of a third party and outside the scope of his duties, a bank employee retrieved account statements of a data subject (name, IBAN, transactions, balances). The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) found insufficient technical and organisational measures and imposed 26,172 lei (5,000 EUR); the bank has paid the fine. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.

What organisations can take from it

Access logs and clear rules against ‘favour queries’ are a duty for every bank.

Relevance to training and awareness

Access to customer data for business purposes only; handling requests from third parties

Authority / court
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 32 Abs. 1, 2 und 4 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
2 Jul 2026

Original amount 26,172 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

8 May 2026 Permanent TSB plcDPC: 277,500 EUR against Permanent TSB after account takeovers via call centre calls IrelandData breaches and data security €277,500

Fraudsters in possession of customer data posed as customers at the bank's ‘Open24’ call centre, had account details changed and obtained further information because security protocols were not followed; those affected had to close accounts, and some suffered losses. Ireland's Data Protection Commission (DPC) imposed 250,000 EUR for inadequate security and 27,500 EUR for late breach notification (decision served in the week before the press release).

What organisations can take from it

Call centre staff must adhere to identity checks without exception – callers with ‘matching’ data are not automatically authorised.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identity verification by telephone (vishing)

Authority / court
Data Protection Commission (DPC)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1, Art. 33 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
8 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Oct 2025 Aktia Pankki OyjAktia: 865,000 EUR – other people’s data visible in OmaKanta and OmaKela via bank login FinlandData breaches and data security €865,000

Following a technical change to the bank’s strong electronic identification service, a disruption lasting around one hour occurred in January 2023 during which customers logging in with Aktia credentials to services such as OmaKanta, OmaKela, unemployment funds, insurers and healthcare providers saw data of other persons; around 350 people were affected. The sanctions board of the Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman) criticised the deficient planning, implementation and testing of the change and imposed 865,000 EUR in addition to a reprimand.

What organisations can take from it

Changes to identification services have effects far beyond one’s own organisation – testing and release processes must reflect this.

Authority / court
Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto – seuraamuskollegio (Datenschutzbeauftragter, Sanktionsgremium)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 25, Art. 32
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
28 Oct 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

8 Sep 2025 S-Pankki OyjS-Pankki: 1.8 million EUR over security flaw in bank identification service FinlandData breaches and data security €1.8m

After a new login function was introduced in the S-mobiili app in April 2022, a vulnerability in the identification service made it possible until August 2022 to access online banking and services requiring strong authentication using other customers’ credentials; misuse caused financial losses. The bank had introduced the function without sufficient risk analysis and testing; the sanctions board of the Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman) imposed 1.8 million EUR in addition to a reprimand, with a previous reprimand acting as an aggravating factor.

What organisations can take from it

Before launch, new functions in authentication services require a risk analysis of all user paths and targeted security testing.

Authority / court
Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto – seuraamuskollegio (Datenschutzbeauftragter, Sanktionsgremium)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 2
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
The fine imposed by the financial supervisory authority (7.67 million EUR) for the same facts was taken into account (fine around one third of the amount that would otherwise have been imposed); according to the bank, it compensated customers for direct losses.
Published
10 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2025 Asociația Casa de Ajutor Reciproc „FLEXICREDIT”Credit association Flexicredit grants 17 loans on forged documents – 3,000 EUR RomaniaData breaches and data security €2,990

A school employee gained access to her school’s official e-mail account and sent forged documents on the basis of which the credit association concluded 17 loans in 2023/2024 without the knowledge of the data subjects. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) criticised the insufficient identity verification for remote applications and imposed 15,141.6 lei (3,000 EUR). Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in June 2025.

What organisations can take from it

Remote contracting requires robust identity verification – an e-mail from an ‘official’ address is no proof.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identity verification and fraud detection in remote applications

Authority / court
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 32 Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
12 Aug 2025

Original amount 15,141.6 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2025 Hrvatski ured za osiguranje (HUO)AZOP: 101,000 EUR against Croatian Insurance Bureau after leak of vehicle owner data CroatiaData breaches and data security €101,000

Following an anonymous tip-off about a USB stick containing data on more than one million vehicle owners (name, OIB, address, registration number, insurance data), the Croatian data protection authority (Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka, AZOP) found that the data originated from the database of the Insurance Bureau, which had not laid down appropriate protective measures or deletion periods. Because of its public tasks, the fine was capped at 101,000 EUR (date of publication; exact date of the decision not stated).

What organisations can take from it

Large registers need access controls, export logging and deletion periods so that bulk data does not end up unnoticed on USB sticks.

Relevance to training and awareness

Access control and deletion periods for register data

Authority / court
Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e, Art. 32 Abs. 2 und 4 DSGVO; Art. 44 kroatisches DSGVO-Durchführungsgesetz
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cap due to public tasks (Art. 44 of the Implementing Act).
Published
2 Jul 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Feb 2025 Trust International Insurance Company (Cyprus) LimitedCyprus: reprimand for Trust International Insurance – accident file given to insurance agent CyprusData breaches and data security Reprimand or warning

An insurance agent who was himself involved in an accident received, on request, the roadside assistance file from the insurer, including data of the other party to the accident, and subsequently contacted that person. The Επίτροπος Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Commissioner for Personal Data Protection) issued a reprimand because there was no legal basis for the disclosure and internal procedures did not cover this case, and ordered a procedure for data requests from agents and employees.

What organisations can take from it

Own agents or employees are also third parties when they request data in their own matters – this must be governed in the disclosure process.

Relevance to training and awareness

Disclosure of customer data to agents and colleagues in their own matters

Authority / court
Επίτροπος Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Commissioner for Personal Data Protection)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und f, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
The company implemented the order

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jan 2025 Εθνική Τράπεζα της Ελλάδος Α.Ε. (National Bank of Greece)Greece: 120,000 EUR against National Bank of Greece after misdirected payment via mobile number GreeceData breaches and data security €120,000

An IRIS transfer made by mobile number via the bank’s app ended up with an uninvolved customer instead of the intended recipient because the number had been assigned incorrectly. By Decision 3/2025, the Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) imposed 100,000 EUR for inaccurate data, insufficient security, lack of data protection by design and failure to notify the data breach, as well as 20,000 EUR for breach of the right of access.

What organisations can take from it

Even a single misdirected payment can be a notifiable data breach – customer complaints must be assessed internally as a possible incident.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising and reporting data breaches

Authority / court
Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. d und f, Art. 15, 25, 32, 33, 34 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Dec 2024 Sambla Group OySambla Group: 950,000 EUR – loan applications accessible via unprotected links FinlandData breaches and data security €950,000

On the loan comparison portals lainaparkki.fi and rahoitu.fi, application data (including income, housing costs, marital status, children) could be accessed by anyone who knew the personal customer link; the links were targeted by phishing and data reached third parties. The sanctions board of the Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman) imposed 950,000 EUR and ordered the data subjects to be notified.

What organisations can take from it

Personal links are not access protection – sensitive customer data requires authentication and regular security testing.

Authority / court
Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto – seuraamuskollegio (Datenschutzbeauftragter, Sanktionsgremium)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 25, Art. 32
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
20 Dec 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Aug 2024 mBank S.A.mBank: 4.05 million PLN for failing to inform customers after misdirected mailing PolandData breaches and data security €950,490

In 2022, an employee of a processor accidentally sent customer documents containing PESEL numbers, identity document, income and credit data to another financial institution; the envelope was returned opened. Despite a notice from the authority, the bank did not notify the data subjects because the recipient was ‘trustworthy’; Poland’s data protection authority (UODO) imposed 4,053,173 PLN and ordered the notification.

What organisations can take from it

Whether data subjects must be informed depends on the risk to them – not on how trustworthy the wrong recipient appears.

Relevance to training and awareness

Misdirected documents and notification of data subjects

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 34 Abs. 1 und 2 DSGVO (DKN.5131.1.2024)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
9 Sep 2024

Original amount 4,053,173 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Aug 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

5 Oct 2023 EOS Matrix d.o.o.Croatia: 5.47 million EUR against debt collection company EOS Matrix after data leak CroatiaData breaches and data security €5.47m

An anonymous tip-off accompanied by a USB stick proved that data of 181,641 debtors had leaked from the debt collection company’s records; there were no systems for detecting unusual data retrievals. In addition, EOS Matrix stored health data up to and including diagnoses, data of non-debtors and call recordings without a legal basis; the Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (Croatian Personal Data Protection Agency, AZOP) imposed 5.47 million EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Employees’ free-text notes can turn into impermissible health data – clear recording rules and monitoring of data retrievals are mandatory.

Relevance to training and awareness

No recording of health data in call notes

Authority / court
Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (AZOP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 12, 13, 32 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
5 Oct 2023

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial