Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Christchurch District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand) 1 case 17 % · €181,678
- Employment Relations Authority (Verfahren des Labour Inspectorate, MBIE) 1 case 17 % · €45,501
- Employment Relations Authority, Wellington (Antrag: Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) 1 case 17 % · €15,350
- Gisborne District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand) 1 case 17 % · €304,230
- Tauranga District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand) 1 case 17 % · €223,678
- Waitakere District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand) 1 case 17 % · €19,586
What for?
by topicWho?
by sectorAll sectors
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €181,678 |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | €223,678 |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 1 | €15,350 |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 1 | €304,230 |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 2 | €65,087 |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
6 cases
3 Sep 2026 SSM Investments LimitedTakeaway operator SSM Investments: 90,000 NZD penalty for worker exploitation €45,501
The restaurant and takeaway business with branches in Auckland and Cromwell did not pay five employees the minimum wage, denied holiday, public holiday and sick pay, made unlawful deductions from wages and kept no accurate wage, time and leave records. After the Employment Relations Authority (ERA, New Zealand's employment tribunal) had already ordered arrears of 147,001 NZD, it imposed a penalty of 90,000 NZD against the company following an investigation by the Labour Inspectorate (labour standards enforcement unit of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment). Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Minimum wage, holiday pay and proper time records are mandatory.
Minimum wage, holiday pay and permissible wage deductions
- Authority / court
- Employment Relations Authority (Verfahren des Labour Inspectorate, MBIE)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Mitigating circumstances
- The company acknowledged its wrongdoing.
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not set out here.
- Published
- 3 Sep 2026
Original amount 90,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Sep 2026.
- Employment New Zealand (MBIE): Restaurant and owner fined $130,000 for exploiting workers (03.09.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Aug 2026 Grace Motors Limited (Grace Construction)Grace Construction: 38,500 NZD for working at height despite a prohibition notice €19,586
At a site for two-storey residential units in Kelston (Auckland), workers were working on the upper floor without adequate fall protection, and the site also had temporary platforms, partially removed scaffolding and unsecured ladders; WorkSafe (New Zealand's workplace health and safety regulator) therefore prohibited work at height on the second floor by a prohibition notice on 30 August 2024. Because work continued there on 2 and 4 September 2024 nonetheless, the Waitakere District Court imposed a fine of 38,500 NZD on 20 August 2026, plus costs of 1,099.10 NZD.
A prohibition notice means an immediate stop to the work – site management must actively enforce it until the risk has demonstrably been remedied.
Fall protection and compliance with regulatory stop-work orders
- Authority / court
- Waitakere District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, s 107(1), (2)(b)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Liability of senior managers
- The prohibition notice had been issued to one of the directors.
- Published
- 4 Sep 2026
Original amount 38,500 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Aug 2026.
- WorkSafe New Zealand: Company falls short after ignoring WorkSafe notice (04.09.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Mar 2026 Double J SmallwoodsDouble J Smallwoods sawmill: 601,250 NZD after two serious injuries €304,230
In June 2024 timber kicked back from an inadequately guarded stack saw at the Gisborne sawmill and seriously injured a worker's arm; seven weeks later another worker was crushed between two forklifts and suffered spinal and pelvic fractures. WorkSafe (New Zealand's workplace health and safety regulator) found systemic failings in machine guarding, risk assessment, traffic management, training and maintenance; the company had not notified the first incident and had not acted on earlier formal directions to fix the risks. On 18 March 2026 the Gisborne District Court imposed a fine of 601,250 NZD and 100,754 NZD in reparation.
Regulatory directions and first incidents call for immediate action – failing to notify incidents and leaving risks unaddressed invites further injuries.
Machine guarding, workplace traffic management and incident notification
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Gisborne District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, ss 36(1)(a), 48(1), 48(2)(c)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Published
- 30 Mar 2026
Original amount 601,250 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Mar 2026.
- WorkSafe New Zealand: Known risks ignored: sawmill penalised after two serious injuries (30.03.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
9 Jul 2025 Well Sushi LimitedWell Sushi (New Zealand): 30,000 NZD penalty for minimum wage and holiday breaches €15,350
On the application of a Labour Inspector, the Employment Relations Authority (New Zealand's employment relations tribunal) ordered Well Sushi Limited to pay a penalty of 30,000 NZD to the Crown. The company had admitted failing to pay an employee on a work visa the minimum wage for all hours worked, miscalculating his annual leave, public holiday and sick leave entitlements and failing to keep complete time and wage records; arrears totalling 53,940.03 NZD had already been paid under a settlement. No penalties were sought against the co-respondent Hutt Food Limited because the time limit had expired.
Incomplete time records are not a mere formality: they lead to incorrect wage and leave calculations – particularly for employees on work visas.
Time recording as the basis for correct wage and leave calculations
- Authority / court
- Employment Relations Authority, Wellington (Antrag: Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
- Legal basis
- Employment Relations Act 2000 (ss. 130, 135), Minimum Wage Act 1983 (s. 6), Holidays Act 2003 (u. a. ss. 16, 24, 25, 28A, 40, 49, 50, 60, 71, 72, 81)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- Settlement without a hearing, full payment of arrears, changed payroll processes and no previous breaches; the Authority therefore reduced the calculated 40,000 NZD to 30,000 NZD.
Original amount 30,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jul 2025.
- A Labour Inspector v Hutt Food Limited, Well Sushi Limited and Anor, [2025] NZERA 404 (Employment Relations Authority, Determination 9 July 2025) Decision of an authority
- ERA Determinations Database – LABOUR INSPECTOR v HUTT FOOD LIMITED and Ors, [2025] NZERA 404 (Main Category: Penalty) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Mar 2025 Ballance Agri-Nutrients LimitedBallance Agri-Nutrients: 420,000 NZD after a fatal conveyor belt accident €223,678
At the Mount Maunganui fertiliser plant in July 2023, a worker cleaning the conveyor system fell onto a moving belt, was dragged under the frame of another conveyor and died. There was no effective, trained and monitored safe system of work for cleaning and maintenance, and no effective guarding or emergency stop devices. On 18 March 2025 the Tauranga District Court imposed a fine of 420,000 NZD (starting point 700,000 NZD, 40% discounts) and made no reparation order because the family had already received 287,202.86 NZD (77,000 NZD directly from the company and 210,202.86 NZD from a group life insurance policy held by the company).
Cleaning and maintenance on conveyors only with the system made safe, with guarding, a reachable emergency stop and a trained, supervised safe system of work.
Safe cleaning and maintenance on conveyor belts
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Tauranga District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, ss 36(1)(a), 48(1), 48(2)(c) ([2025] NZDC 5282)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- Guilty plea, remorse, cooperation and reparation, with discounts totalling 40%; payments to the family totalling 287,202.86 NZD, of which 77,000 NZD was paid directly and 210,202.86 NZD came from the company's group life insurance policy.
Original amount 420,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Mar 2025.
- WorkSafe New Zealand, Court summaries: Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited Enforcement database of an authority
- WorkSafe New Zealand v Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited [2025] NZDC 5282, Reserved decision (18.03.2025) Court decision
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Nov 2024 United Steel LimitedUnited Steel: 330,000 NZD after fatal collapse of a steel storage rack €181,678
In November 2020 a rack loaded with around nine tonnes of steel collapsed at the company's steel store in Wigram (Christchurch), killing a storeman; the racks were neither braced nor fixed to the floor, were not inspected regularly and had been built without engineering input. On 1 November 2024 the Christchurch District Court imposed a fine of 330,000 NZD (starting point 600,000 NZD) and 100,000 NZD in reparation for emotional harm; costs of 17,507.39 NZD were added.
Storage racks need proper design, anchoring, regular inspection and supervised instruction in safe loading.
Safe storage racking and loading rules
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Christchurch District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, ss 36(1)(a), 48(1), 48(2)(c)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Steel and metals
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- Reductions for cooperation (5%), remorse including payments already made to the family (10%), willingness to pay reparation (10%), guilty plea (15%) and no previous convictions in 43 years of trading (5%).
- Published
- 11 Nov 2024
Original amount 330,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Nov 2024.
- WorkSafe New Zealand: Storeman killed in racking collapse (11.11.2024) Press release of an authority
- WorkSafe New Zealand, Court summaries: United Steel Limited Enforcement database of an authority
- WorkSafe New Zealand v United Steel Limited [2024] NZDC 27062, Sentencing notes Court decision
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link