Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

7cases from 3 jurisdictions
€1.43bnTotal of monetary amounts (4 cases with an amount)
€890mLargest single case: Google
€265.3mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241€30.5m
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241—
Q1 20252—
Q2 20252€505m
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20261€890m

7 cases

23 Jul 2026 GoogleDMA: 890 million EUR against Google over self-preferencing and Play steering EU levelPlatform obligations €890m

In two decisions, the European Commission found that Google favours its own services in search (460 million EUR) and prevents app developers on Google Play from steering customers to alternative offers (430 million EUR). Google was ordered to bring the infringements to an end.

What organisations can take from it

Platforms' ranking rules and fee models must be demonstrably non-discriminatory and designed in compliance with the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

Authority / court
Europäische Kommission
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · Platform obligations
Legal basis
Verordnung (EU) 2022/1925 (DMA), Selbstbevorzugungsverbot und Anti-Steering-Pflicht
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
23 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Apr 2025 AppleDMA: 500 million EUR against Apple over anti-steering in the App Store EU levelPlatform obligations €500m

In one of the first non-compliance decisions under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the European Commission found that Apple prevents app developers from informing customers free of charge about cheaper offers outside the App Store and steering them there. In addition to a fine of 500 million EUR, the removal of the restrictions within 60 days was ordered, failing which periodic penalty payments may be imposed.

What organisations can take from it

Gatekeepers must allow business users to communicate freely with their customers; technical or commercial hurdles are treated as circumvention.

Authority / court
Europäische Kommission
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · Platform obligations
Legal basis
Verordnung (EU) 2022/1925 (DMA), Anti-Steering-Pflicht
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
23 Apr 2025
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Apr 2025 Luka Inc.Garante: 5 million EUR against Replika operator Luka over lack of legal basis ItalyAI systems €5m

The US operator of the Replika chatbot had not determined a legal basis for the processing, had an inadequate privacy notice and, despite declaring that minors were excluded, had no age verification. Italy's data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) imposed 5 million EUR and opened further proceedings concerning the training of the underlying language model.

What organisations can take from it

A declared exclusion of minors is worthless without effective age verification at registration and during use.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · AI systems
Legal basis
DSGVO (Rechtmäßigkeit, Transparenz, Schutz Minderjähriger)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
19 May 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2025 AppleApple: Commission sets out specific interoperability obligations for iOS by DMA decision EU levelPlatform obligations Order

In two specification decisions under the Digital Markets Act, the European Commission set out which interoperability measures Apple must take: access for manufacturers of connected devices to nine iOS features (such as notifications on smartwatches, peer-to-peer Wi-Fi, NFC, pairing) and a more transparent and faster procedure for developers’ interoperability requests.

What organisations can take from it

Gatekeepers must actively open interfaces – anyone handling third-party requests sluggishly risks detailed regulatory requirements.

Authority / court
Europäische Kommission
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · Platform obligations
Legal basis
Digital Markets Act (Verordnung (EU) 2022/1925): Interoperabilitätspflicht, Spezifizierungsbeschlüsse
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jan 2025 Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.; Beijing DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.Garante blocks DeepSeek: immediate limitation of processing for Italian users ItalyAI systems Order

After the Chinese providers had declared that they did not operate in Italy and were not subject to the GDPR, Italy's data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) ordered, as a matter of urgency and with immediate effect, the limitation of the processing of Italian users' data and opened an investigation.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that offer AI services to European users are subject to the GDPR – regardless of where they are headquartered.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · AI systems
Legal basis
DSGVO, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. f (Beschränkung der Verarbeitung)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
30 Jan 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

2 Nov 2024 OpenAIGarante: 15 million EUR against OpenAI over ChatGPT – later annulled by the court ItalyAI systems overturned

Italy's data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) imposed 15 million EUR because OpenAI trained ChatGPT with user data without an appropriate legal basis, breached transparency obligations, failed to report a data breach from March 2023 and did not provide for age verification; in addition, a six-month information campaign was ordered. The Rome Court (Tribunale di Roma) upheld OpenAI's action in judgment no. 4153/2026 (published on 18 March 2026); the Garante subsequently removed the decision from its website.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that train AI models with personal data need a documented legal basis and age verification in advance.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · AI systems
Legal basis
DSGVO (Rechtsgrundlage, Transparenz, Meldung von Datenpannen, Schutz Minderjähriger)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
overturned
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
20 Dec 2024

Amount in EUR; no ECB reference rate is available for this currency.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 May 2024 Clearview AI Inc.Dutch AP: 30.5 million EUR against Clearview AI over facial database NetherlandsAI systems €30.5m

Clearview processes biometric data of people in the Netherlands without a legal basis for a facial recognition database compiled from the internet, did not inform data subjects, did not respond to access requests and did not designate an EU representative. In addition to a fine of 30.5 million EUR, the Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) imposed four orders subject to penalty payments.

What organisations can take from it

Publicly accessible photos are no licence for biometric analysis – users of such services risk fines of their own.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · AI systems
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, 6 Abs. 1, 9 Abs. 1, 12, 14, 15, 27
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
3 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial