Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EU Clear all filters
924cases from 28 jurisdictions
€21.2bnTotal of monetary amounts (820 cases with an amount)
€2.95bnLargest single case: Google
€632,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by country
  1. Germany 106 cases 11 % · €374.8m
  2. France 88 cases 10 % · €3.92bn
  3. Italy 81 cases 9 % · €1.72bn
  4. Netherlands 60 cases 6 % · €544.5m
  5. Spain 54 cases 6 % · €1.06bn
  6. EU level 42 cases 5 % · €8.31bn
  7. Austria 36 cases 4 % · €190.6m
  8. Poland 36 cases 4 % · €364m
  9. Sweden 34 cases 4 % · €196.7m
  10. Ireland 33 cases 4 % · €3.75bn
  11. 18 more354 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Data protection 285 cases 31 % · €5.02bn
  2. Competition law 222 cases 24 % · €11.3bn
  3. Capital markets and financial supervision 128 cases 14 % · €342m
  4. Money laundering and terrorist financing 88 cases 10 % · €634m
  5. Consumer protection and online retail 88 cases 10 % · €509m
  6. AI and digital regulation 19 cases 2 % · €2.51bn
  7. Health and safety and employment law 18 cases 2 % · €3.51m
  8. Bribery and corruption 17 cases 2 % · €396.7m
  9. Environment and sustainability 17 cases 2 % · €26.9m
  10. Information security and cyber 16 cases 2 % · €90.9m
  11. 4 more26 cases

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance 255 cases 28 % · €1.56bn
  2. Retail and e-commerce 106 cases 11 % · €2.61bn
  3. Media and online platforms 77 cases 8 % · €8.88bn
  4. Telecoms, IT and software 75 cases 8 % · €2.08bn
  5. Energy and utilities 71 cases 8 % · €1.7bn
  6. Other 68 cases 7 % · €76.1m
  7. Transport, logistics and shipping 44 cases 5 % · €979.7m
  8. Construction and real estate 42 cases 5 % · €312.4m
  9. Healthcare 38 cases 4 % · €134m
  10. Public sector 38 cases 4 % · €20.2m
  11. 6 more110 cases

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
202260€1.79bn
2023163€2.87bn
2024209€5.33bn
2025280€8.46bn
2026212€2.71bn

924 cases

24 Sep 2026 Plaček Pet Products s.r.o.Plaček Pet Products: 36.4 million CZK for minimum prices on pet food CzechiaCartels and collusion €1.49m

From January 2013 to March 2022, the distributor of premium pet food and pet supplies imposed minimum resale prices on its retailers and threatened sanctions if they were undercut. In a settlement procedure, the Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Czech Office for the Protection of Competition, ÚOHS) imposed 36.438 million CZK; the company ended the conduct after the inspection and introduced a compliance programme.

What organisations can take from it

Never enforce recommended retail prices with supply stops or sanctions – sales teams need clear rules on this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price requirements imposed on retailers in sales

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (ÚOHS)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Verbot vertikaler Preisbindung (tschechisches Wettbewerbsgesetz, Art. 101 AEUV)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Termination immediately after the inspection, information of customers about free pricing, full cooperation, settlement and newly introduced compliance programme.
Published
24 Sep 2026

Original amount 36,438,000 CZK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Sep 2026 Miljödata i Karlskrona AktiebolagIMY: 1.8 million SEK against HR software provider Miljödata after data leak SwedenData breaches and data security €160,053

The provider of web-based systems for sickness reporting, rehabilitation and occupational safety incidents was hacked in August 2025; the stolen personal data appeared on the dark web shortly afterwards. The Swedish data protection authority (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten, IMY) found that, despite the high need for protection, there were no adequate security measures and no automatic real-time monitoring for attacks, assessed this as negligent and imposed 1,800,000 SEK.

What organisations can take from it

Service providers hosting the health and personnel data of many employers need real-time attack detection, not just perimeter protection.

Authority / court
Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 32 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Culpability
negligent
Published
22 Sep 2026

Original amount 1,800,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Sep 2026 Audax Renovables, S.A. – Sucursal em PortugalPortugal: 22,000 EUR against Audax Renovables over missing gas reserves and hotline PortugalOther €22,000

On a total of 249 days, the Portuguese branch of the energy supplier failed to hold the mandatory natural gas security reserves, did not correctly show network charges on invoices, did not publish, or published late, mandatory information and its quality report, and failed to meet the standards for hotline waiting times. In a settlement procedure, the Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (Portuguese Energy Services Regulatory Authority, ERSE) set a fine of 44,000 EUR and reduced it to 22,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Security of supply and service obligations in the energy sector are sanctioned individually – a compliance calendar for reserves and reports helps.

Authority / court
Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (ERSE)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Regime Sancionatório do Setor Energético (RSSE), Art. 28, 29; Decreto-Lei n.º 62/2020, Art. 96; RRC; RQS
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement (transação) with full admission, remediation of all infringements

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Sep 2026 Lesy České republiky, s.p. (Lesy ČR)Lesy ČR: 17.3 million CZK for export ban on wood chips CzechiaCartels and collusion €710,383

From July 2021 to July 2024, the state forestry company contractually prohibited a customer from actively and passively exporting wood chips and logging residues and secured the ban with a right of termination. The Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Czech Office for the Protection of Competition, ÚOHS) considered this a restriction of competition by object under Czech and EU law and imposed 17.268 million CZK (first instance, not final).

What organisations can take from it

State-owned companies are also subject to competition law – have export and resale bans in framework agreements legally reviewed before signing.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anticompetitive clauses in supply contracts

Authority / court
Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (ÚOHS)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Tschechisches Wettbewerbsgesetz, Art. 101 AEUV (Exportverbot)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary termination immediately after proceedings were opened.
Published
17 Sep 2026

Original amount 17,268,000 CZK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Sep 2026 AIFM Capital ABAIFM Capital: 2 million SEK for inadequate selection and oversight of fund managers SwedenOrganisational requirements €177,187

As a so-called fund hotel, the company had its funds managed by other firms, but examined these delegation agreements only insufficiently, did not take the related decisions properly and did not monitor the funds’ returns in relation to risk closely enough. The Swedish financial supervisory authority Finansinspektionen (FI) issued a remark and imposed 2 million SEK; no damage to investors was established.

What organisations can take from it

Outsourcing tasks does not outsource responsibility: document the selection of service providers, the decisions taken and ongoing oversight.

Authority / court
Finansinspektionen (FI)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Schwedisches Fondsrecht – Regeln zur Delegation der Fondsverwaltung und deren Überwachung
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
No established damage to investors; remedial measures already taken during the investigation.
Published
16 Sep 2026

Original amount 2,000,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Sep 2026 Wallester ASFinancial supervisor orders Wallester to remedy governance and AML deficiencies EstoniaInternal controls Order

Following an on-site inspection, the Finantsinspektsioon (Estonian Financial Supervision Authority) issued an order requiring the payment institution Wallester to remedy, by 31 December, deficiencies in governance and control functions (separation of the lines of defence, internal rules), in safeguarding customer funds and in the staffing of its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing function. Date = publication of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Fast-growing payment service providers must let their compliance, AML and internal audit functions grow with them in terms of staffing and organisation.

Authority / court
Finantsinspektsioon (Estnische Finanzaufsicht)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Aufsichtsrechtliche Anordnung (ettekirjutus) der Finantsinspektsioon
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
16 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

15 Sep 2026 Ministerstvo životního prostředí (Umweltministerium der Tschechischen Republik)Ministry of the Environment: 300,000 CZK over unresolved conflict of interest of an insurance broker CzechiaOther €12,350

In an insurance tender in 2024 worth around 200 million CZK, the ministry had parts of the tender documents drawn up by a broker who could later receive commissions from the winning insurer. As the contracting authority took no measures against the conflict of interest, the Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Czech Office for the Protection of Competition, ÚOHS) imposed a final fine of 300,000 CZK.

What organisations can take from it

External advisers who help draft tender documents must not benefit from the outcome – examine and document conflicts of interest before the tender.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conflicts of interest of external advisers in procurement procedures

Authority / court
Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (ÚOHS)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Gesetz über die Vergabe öffentlicher Aufträge (Pflicht zur Vermeidung von Interessenkonflikten)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector
Culpability
negligent
Published
15 Sep 2026

Original amount 300,000 CZK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2026 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. – Niederlassung Italien (BBVA Italia)Garante: 5.5 million EUR against BBVA Italia over advertising despite objection ItalyMarketing and consent €5.51m

For seven months (October 2025 to May 2026), the bank continued to send a customer advertising via its app, although he had objected several times. The Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) also found deficient systems for implementing objections and inaccurate information about the processing, and imposed 5,508,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 613).

What organisations can take from it

An objection to advertising must take effect immediately and reliably across all channels – including app messages.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 12, 21, 24 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
11 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2026 Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC)Garante: Udine hospital group pays 24,000 EUR for viewing a colleague's patient record ItalyEmployee data €24,000

Hospital staff opened a colleague's electronic health record to organise duty rosters during Covid rather than for treatment purposes. Technical barriers limiting access to treating staff were lacking; the Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) imposed 24,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 616).

What organisations can take from it

Patient records may only be opened for treatment – include this in training and secure it technically through role-based rights and logging.

Relevance to training and awareness

Purpose limitation when accessing patient records

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, b, c, f, Art. 9, 25, 32 DSGVO; Art. 75 Codice privacy; Linee guida dossier sanitario
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Published
11 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2026 ASIS – Azienda Speciale per la gestione degli Impianti Sportivi (Trento)Garante: 8,000 EUR for cameras in swimming pool changing rooms of a Trentino sports operator ItalyVideo surveillance €8,000

Since 2007, the municipal sports facilities operator had had cameras in the changing rooms of a swimming pool that recorded the locker area. The Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) found no sound legal basis, incomplete notices and a 72-hour retention period not justified by a necessity assessment, and imposed 8,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 619); the cameras were removed during the proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Changing rooms and comparably intimate areas are off limits for video surveillance – even when theft prevention is the motive.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. c und e DSGVO; Art. 2-ter Codice privacy
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
11 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

31 Aug 2026 EM@NEY P.L.C.Malta: EM@NEY pays 97,622 EUR under settlement for late bank account register reports MaltaMoney laundering and terrorist financing €97,622

The financial institution did not deliver on time the data due every seven days to the Centralised Bank Account Register (CBAR). The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 162,704 EUR, which was reduced by 40% to 97,622 EUR under a settlement pursuant to its 2026 settlement policy.

What organisations can take from it

Recurring mandatory reports need deadline monitoring with escalation – otherwise individual omissions add up to six-figure sums.

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing
Legal basis
Reg. 4(2), 8, 9 CBAR Regulations (S.L. 373.03)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with 40% reduction
Published
4 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2026 MiFinity Malta LimitedMalta: MiFinity pays 160,099 EUR following anti-money laundering examination MaltaCustomer due diligence €160,099

At the payment institution, the customer risk assessment had only been introduced after business had started, some customers remained unassessed, and customer profiles were based on transaction thresholds rather than on risk. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 266,833 EUR and a follow-up directive; under a settlement, the fine was reduced by 40% to 160,099 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

A customer risk assessment belongs before business starts, not in a later remediation project.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk-based customer profiles and source of funds

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 2(1), 5(5)(a)(ii), 7(1)(c), 7(2)(a), 21, 22 PMLFTR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with 40% reduction; remediation demonstrated
Published
2 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2026 Flower bulb business failed to disclose hours of Polish seasonal workers – fine of around 95,600 EUR NetherlandsMinimum wage and undeclared work €95,588

A lily and tulip grower with an average of around 50 (at peak 75) employees, where Polish migrant workers are employed (anonymised in the judgment), was unable to produce sufficient records of hours worked and wages paid for 18 employees for September 2020 to February 2021. The Dutch Minister of Social Affairs and Employment (Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid) imposed 118,000 EUR in 2024 (112,100 EUR after objection); the North Netherlands District Court (Rechtbank Noord-Nederland) reduced the fine to 95,587.50 EUR, partly because of measures taken and excessively long proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Companies employing seasonal workers must be able to document hours and wage payments for each person without gaps – missing records are fined separately for each employee.

Authority / court
Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid / Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Art. 18b Abs. 2 Wet minimumloon en minimumvakantiebijslag (Wml)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
50 to 249
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of 12.5 % for appropriate measures, 5 % for delay and 2,500 EUR for exceeding the reasonable length of proceedings.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Aug 2026 O2 Czech Republic a.s.; SHERLOG Technology, a.s.O2 Czech Republic and SHERLOG: 280 million CZK for customer allocation in vehicle tracking CzechiaCartels and collusion €11.7m

From December 2012 to June 2022, the two companies allocated customers for vehicle tracking and electronic logbook services between themselves and coordinated bids, including in public tenders. At first instance, the Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Czech Office for the Protection of Competition, ÚOHS) fined O2 262.32 million CZK and SHERLOG 18.357 million CZK and imposed a six-month ban on public contracts; for O2, the fine was increased instead of a procurement ban.

What organisations can take from it

Do not let sales cooperation with competitors turn into customer allocation – e-mail arrangements about individual tenders are the typical evidence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Coordination with cooperation partners on customers and tenders

Authority / court
Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (ÚOHS)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Tschechisches Wettbewerbsgesetz, Art. 101 AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Culpability
intentional
Published
26 Aug 2026

Original amount 280,677,000 CZK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Aug 2026 Wolt DenmarkWolt: Competition Council finds abuse of dominant position vis-à-vis restaurants DenmarkAbuse of market power Order

In 2022–2024, the delivery service used a standard clause to prohibit restaurants from being cheaper on their own channels than on Wolt, while at the same time being able to grant discounts without consultation and to compensate customers up to 400 DKK at the restaurants’ expense. The Konkurrencerådet (Danish Competition Council) ordered the practice to cease, required Wolt to inform all restaurants and intends to enforce a fine through the courts.

What organisations can take from it

Platforms with a high market share should have parity clauses and unilateral cost shifting in standard terms reviewed under competition law.

Authority / court
Konkurrencerådet (Danish Competition Council)
Area of law
Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis
Konkurrenceloven; AEUV Art. 102
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
26 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Aug 2026 Health Service Executive (HSE)Irish health service HSE: 645,000 EUR for neglected paper patient records IrelandData breaches and data security €645,000

In 2023, intruders gained access to two former psychiatric hospitals and posted videos of the patient records stored there online. An inspection of twelve sites found records with mould, water and animal damage in unsuitable rooms, up to and including shipping containers. Ireland's Data Protection Commission (DPC) imposed a fine of 645,000 EUR, issued a reprimand and ordered audits and the relocation of records.

What organisations can take from it

Data protection also applies to paper archives in disused buildings – retention requires an inventory, erasure periods and physical security.

Relevance to training and awareness

Physical security and retention of paper records

Authority / court
Data Protection Commission (DPC)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e und f, 32 Abs. 1, 33 Abs. 1, 34 Abs. 1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
2 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Aug 2026 Elizabeta Promet d.o.o., SolinCroatia: 10,000 EUR against Elizabeta Promet for deliveries without a written contract CroatiaAbuse of market power €10,000

As a buyer with significant bargaining power, the company from Solin purchased agricultural and food products from two suppliers without written contracts. The Agencija za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja (Croatian Competition Agency, AZTN) considered this an unfair trading practice and, taking mitigating circumstances into account, imposed 10,000 EUR (date = publication).

What organisations can take from it

In food purchasing, the mere absence of written supply contracts is an infringement – a simple contract standard prevents this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Written form for supply contracts in food purchasing

Authority / court
Agencija za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja (AZTN)
Area of law
Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis
Zakon o zabrani nepoštenih trgovačkih praksi u lancu opskrbe hranom (ZNTP)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Several mitigating circumstances taken into account
Published
25 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Aug 2026 Wise Europe SAWise Europe: NBB order and public statement over customer due diligence failures BelgiumCustomer due diligence Order

The Banque nationale de Belgique (National Bank of Belgium) found serious anti-money laundering due diligence failures at Wise Europe SA, including in identifying and verifying customers and beneficial owners, ongoing monitoring of business relationships, analysis of atypical transactions and intra-group information sharing. It made public that Wise Europe had not complied with an order of 8 July 2025 to meet these obligations by 31 March 2026, and ordered full compliance by 31 January 2027 at the latest; no fine was published.

What organisations can take from it

Letting a supervisory deadline to remedy KYC failures lapse risks new orders and public naming.

Relevance to training and awareness

KYC and transaction monitoring at payment service providers

Authority / court
Banque nationale de Belgique / Nationale Bank van België (BNB/NBB)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Art. 13 § 1, 23, 26, 27, 35 § 1 und 45 Gesetz vom 18. September 2017 zur Verhinderung von Geldwäsche; Anordnung nach Art. 93 § 1 1°, Veröffentlichung nach Art. 93 § 2 1° und Art. 98/1 i. V. m. 135 § 3
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
25 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Aug 2026 Fitnessstudiokette in Amsterdam (anonymisiert)Labour Authority: €316,875 in fines for Amsterdam gym chain NetherlandsMinimum wage and undeclared work €316,875

The Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie (Netherlands Labour Authority) imposed fines totalling 316,875 EUR on a gym chain in Amsterdam that is not named in the release. For 25 foreign workers the required work permit or combined residence and work permit was missing, and for three people identity had not been established (Wav, Foreign Nationals Employment Act, 234,375 EUR); because of deficient records it could not be verified whether the minimum wage had been paid for all hours worked (WML, Minimum Wage and Minimum Holiday Allowance Act, 60,000 EUR), plus a breach of the Arbeidstijdenwet (Working Hours Act, 22,500 EUR). The company also received two warnings that work may be preventively halted if the same or similar breaches recur.

What organisations can take from it

Before anyone starts work, their right to work and identity must be checked and working hours must be fully recorded.

Relevance to training and awareness

Checking the right to work and recording working hours

Authority / court
Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Wet arbeid vreemdelingen (Wav); Wet minimumloon en minimumvakantiebijslag (WML); Arbeidstijdenwet (ATW)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
24 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Aug 2026 Poliserv JG (PJG) SRLPhishing on admin account – Poliserv JG must pay 3,000 EUR RomaniaData breaches and data security €2,998

Attackers obtained the credentials of a user account with administrator rights through phishing and accessed customer data. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) criticised the lack of technical and organisational measures and of regular effectiveness testing, imposed 15,728 lei (3,000 EUR) and ordered regular employee training, including on recognising phishing e-mails. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.

What organisations can take from it

Admin accounts need MFA, and all employees must be able to recognise phishing – the supervisory authority now expressly orders training.

Relevance to training and awareness

Phishing recognition, protection of privileged accounts

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
19 Aug 2026

Original amount 15,728 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 20 more of 904

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial