Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR) €142.6m 100 % · 10 cases
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz) €21,200 0 % · 5 cases
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakei) €8,000 0 % · 2 cases
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering €97.4m 68 % · 1 case
- Healthcare €22.3m 16 % · 2 cases
- Food and agriculture €21m 15 % · 1 case
- Energy and utilities €1.29m 1 % · 4 cases
- Other €428,500 0 % · 1 case
- Construction and real estate €70,000 0 % · 1 case
- Media and online platforms €57,939 0 % · 1 case
- Public sector €27,200 0 % · 6 cases
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 1 | €57,939 |
| Q1 2024 | 1 | €7,000 |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 1 | €21m |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €2,000 |
| Q1 2025 | 3 | €430,700 |
| Q2 2025 | 4 | €202,200 |
| Q3 2025 | 1 | €6,000 |
| Q4 2025 | 1 | €70,000 |
| Q1 2026 | 3 | €106.3m |
| Q2 2026 | 1 | €14.6m |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | — |
17 cases
17 Apr 2026 Medirex s. r. o.; KLINICKÁ BIOCHÉMIA s.r.o.; Unilabs Slovensko, s. r. o.; synlab slovakia s. r. o.; Asociácia laboratóriíLaboratory cartel: 14.6 million EUR and procurement bans against diagnostic laboratories €14.6m
Four laboratories and their association coordinated negotiations on prices with health insurers, coordinated in tenders, exchanged sensitive information and allocated customers. At first instance, the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed 14,551,800 EUR and three-year procurement bans; Unilabs received a substantially reduced fine as leniency applicant and under a settlement.
Common negotiating positions towards payers via an association are a cartel – association meetings need minutes and a review of the agenda.
Information exchange among competitors and association work
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Kartellverbot)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Unilabs: leniency reduction (50%) and settlement (a further 30%).
- Published
- 12 May 2026
- KARTELY: PMÚ odhalil kartel laboratórií a uložil pokuty takmer 15 miliónov eur Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Feb 2026 ELKOND HHK, VUKI, Prysmian, NKT, KABEX u. a. (Kabelkartell, 9 Unternehmen und ein Verband)Cable cartel: PMÚ imposes record fines of 97.4 million EUR €97.4m
Manufacturers and suppliers of copper and aluminium cables coordinated a common calculation of the metal surcharge, which makes up a significant part of the final price; an industry association acted as facilitator. The Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed a total of 97,434,800 EUR, the highest amount in a single proceeding; two leniency applicants were not fined (not final). Addressees: ELKOND HHK, a.s.; VUKI a.s.; Prysmian Kablo s.r.o.; Prysmian Kabely, s.r.o.; Kablo Vrchlabí s.r.o.; NKT s.r.o.; PRECON s.r.o.; Tele–Fonika Kabely CZ s.r.o.; KABELOVNA KABEX a. s.; Asociace výrobců kabelů a vodičů ČR a SR (leniency applicants without a fine: ICS Industrial Cables Slovakia, PRAKAB).
A coordinated calculation formula for price components is also price fixing – association work needs competition law support.
Price coordination via associations and surcharge formulas
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Kartellverbot)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 11 Mar 2026
- KARTELY: PMÚ odhalil kartel výrobcov a dodávateľov káblov, uložil pokuty takmer 100 miliónov eur Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
29 Jan 2026 RASEMA s.r.o.; M – D – J, spol. s.r.o.; SIMA plus Krompachy, s.r.o.; BarCom spol. s.r.o.Photovoltaic tender: 1.1 million EUR – the contracting entity was also a cartel member €1.1m
In a tender for industrial photovoltaic installations that was to be financed from EU Structural Funds, three bidders coordinated their bids so that a pre-selected bidder would win; the contracting entity BarCom acted as facilitator. The Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed a total of 1,098,200 EUR and three-year procurement bans on all four; the EU funding was refused because of the indications of competition infringements, and the collusion was proven by e-mails secured during the inspection.
A contracting entity that determines the winner of a funded tender in advance is itself liable under competition law and additionally risks losing the funding.
Collusion in funded procurement
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Submissionsabsprache)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 11 Feb 2026
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Jan 2026 PHOENIX Zdravotnícke zásobovanie, a.s.; TRANSMEDIC SLOVAKIA, s.r.o. (in Konkurs)Pharmaceutical cartel uncovered thanks to whistleblower: 7.8 million EUR against PHOENIX and TRANSMEDIC €7.8m
The two companies colluded in tenders of the General Health Insurance Company for the supply of medicines (2017–2020). For the first time, a cartel was uncovered on the basis of information from a whistleblower; the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed 7,595,200 EUR and a one-year procurement ban on PHOENIX and 201,800 EUR and a three-year procurement ban on TRANSMEDIC (first instance).
Whistleblowers receive a reward in Slovakia – internal reporting channels should be faster than the route to the authority.
Bid rigging in public tenders; whistleblowing channels
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Submissionsabsprache)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- PHOENIX: settlement with a 30% fine reduction and a shortened procurement ban.
- Published
- 24 Feb 2026
- KARTELY: PMÚ aj vďaka whistleblowerovi odhalil kartel v dodávkach liekov a uložil pokuty takmer 7,8 milióna eur Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 Oct 2025 SINOP ALFA, s.r.o.SINOP ALFA: 70,000 EUR for refusing to hand over business mobile phone during inspection €70,000
During an unannounced inspection in the air-conditioning, refrigeration and heat pump services sector, the company repeatedly refused to produce a mobile phone used for business purposes. The Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) regarded this as obstruction of the inspection and imposed 70,000 EUR, around 1% of the previous year’s turnover (not final).
Business smartphones are part of the documents that may be inspected – a dawn raid guide for employees prevents costly wrong reactions.
Conduct during inspections (dawn raids), handing over mobile devices
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Mitwirkungspflicht bei Nachprüfungen)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 28 Oct 2025
- KARTELY: PMÚ uložil pokutu za nespoluprácu počas inšpekcie Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jul 2025 Slovenský pozemkový fondSlovak Land Fund: 6,000 EUR for late examination of a whistleblower report €6,000
The state land fund examined a report from September 2022 only after 128 days and, until November 2024, did not sufficiently inform employees about the reporting procedure, protection options and the responsible person. The Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slovak Whistleblower Protection Office) imposed 6,000 EUR.
Whistleblower reports are subject to statutory examination deadlines – anyone who misses them and does not publicise the procedure will be sanctioned.
Deadlines and transparency in the internal reporting system
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakei)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- § 10 Abs. 5 und 8, § 19 Gesetz Nr. 54/2019 über den Schutz von Hinweisgebern (UOO-277/2025)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
- Culpability
- negligent
- Rozhodnutie ÚOO z 24. 7. 2025, UOO-277/2025 (Slovenský pozemkový fond) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2025 Brantner Fatra, s.r.o.Brantner Fatra: 180,200 EUR for excessive landfill prices charged to two towns upheld €180,200
In 2019–2022, the waste management company charged the towns of Martin and Vrútky significantly higher prices for landfilling residual waste than other municipalities without objective justification, although they had no alternative. The Council of the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) upheld the fine of 180,200 EUR; the decision became final on 3 July 2025.
Suppliers without a local alternative must be able to justify and document price differences between customers on objective grounds.
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Missbrauch einer marktbeherrschenden Stellung)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 9 Jul 2025
- Rada PMÚ potvrdila pokutu pre spoločnosť Brantner Fatra za zneužívanie dominantného postavenia Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2025 Slovenská asociácia palivového priemyslu a obchoduFirst labour market cartel: fuel association sanctioned for no-poach rule €10,000
In a ‘code of ethics’, the industry association obliged its members not to poach each other’s employees. In its first decision on labour market cartels, the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed a symbolic fine of 10,000 EUR (first instance) as a warning to business.
No-poach agreements between competitors are cartels – HR departments and associations should review existing codes.
No-poach agreements and HR departments
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Beschluss einer Unternehmensvereinigung)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 2 Jul 2025
- KARTELY: PMÚ uložil prvú pokutu za kartelovú dohodu na trhu práce Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Jun 2025 Ústredie práce, sociálnych vecí a rodinyCentral Office ÚPSVaR: 5,000 EUR – reporting office for children’s homes not operated €5,000
For months, the central authority failed to perform the tasks of the reporting office for three centres for children and families under its authority and did not make the responsible person known to employees. The Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slovak Whistleblower Protection Office) imposed 5,000 EUR; the appeal decision of 12 September 2025 reworded the operative part but left the fine at 5,000 EUR.
Anyone running the reporting office for subordinate units must also make it visible there and handle reports from those units.
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- Zákon č. 54/2019 Z. z. o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti, § 10 Abs. 3 und 5, § 19 Abs. 3
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Public sector
- ÚOO, Rozhodnutie vom 16.06.2025 (UOO-104/2025), ÚPSVaR Decision of an authority
- ÚOO, Berufungsentscheidung vom 12.09.2025 Decision of an authority
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov: Rozhodnutia úradu (Liste der Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
9 Apr 2025 Slovenské národné múzeumSlovak National Museum: 7,000 EUR – employees not informed about reporting system €7,000
The museum published no information on the protection options or on the external reporting channel and could not prove that employees were familiar with the internal reporting rules – there were no signature lists and no proof of intranet access. The Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slovak Whistleblower Protection Office) imposed 7,000 EUR.
Informing employees about the reporting system must be documented – without proof, it is deemed not to have taken place.
Informing employees about internal and external reporting channels
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- Zákon č. 54/2019 Z. z. o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti, § 10 Abs. 5, § 19 Abs. 3
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
- ÚOO, Rozhodnutie vom 09.04.2025 (UOO-195/2025), Slovenské národné múzeum Decision of an authority
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov: Rozhodnutia úradu (Liste der Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Mar 2025 Východoslovenská vodárenská spoločnosť, a.s.East Slovak water company: 2,000 EUR for missing information on external reporting channels €2,000
The Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slovak Whistleblower Protection Office) initially imposed 10,000 EUR because the water utility’s policy named an e-mail address that had been deactivated since October 2022 as a reporting channel available around the clock and because employees were not informed comprehensibly about external reporting channels. On appeal, the head of the authority dropped the e-mail allegation for procedural reasons, set aside the part concerning the failure to acknowledge a report and set the fine at 2,000 EUR solely for the missing information on reporting channels to the competent authorities (September 2023 to September 2024).
Test reporting channels regularly: an undeliverable whistleblower address is as good as none at all.
Functioning internal reporting channels for whistleblowers
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakei)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- § 10 Abs. 5, § 19 Abs. 3 Gesetz Nr. 54/2019 über den Schutz von Hinweisgebern
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- negligent
- Rozhodnutie predsedníčky ÚOO z 21. 3. 2025, UOO-272/2025 (Východoslovenská vodárenská spoločnosť) Decision of an authority
- Rozhodnutie ÚOO z 11. 2. 2025, UOO-19/2025 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Feb 2025 Obec SološnicaMunicipality of Sološnica: 200 EUR – contradictory reporting rules and missing information on protection €200
The municipality did not publish any information on the protection available to whistleblowers and at times had two valid, contradictory sets of rules on the internal reporting procedure online without stating which applied. The Office imposed a fine of 200 EUR.
Reporting rules must be unambiguous and up to date – remove outdated versions from the internet.
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- Zákon č. 54/2019 Z. z. o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti, § 10 Abs. 5, § 19 Abs. 2
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
- ÚOO, Rozhodnutie vom 14.02.2025 (UOO-178/2025), Obec Sološnica Decision of an authority
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov: Rozhodnutia úradu (Liste der Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Feb 2025 Synot W, a.s.; Ing. Igor Vicel (Unternehmer)Gambling takeover without notification: 428,500 EUR for gun-jumping €428,500
In 2020, Synot and a sole trader jointly acquired control of the gambling operator SLOV-MATIC, transferred shares and replaced corporate bodies before notifying the concentration. Under a settlement, the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed 400,000 EUR on Synot and 28,500 EUR on the entrepreneur; final since 7 March 2025.
Before closing, neither replace corporate bodies nor steer finances – M&A teams need a gun-jumping checklist.
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Merger control
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Anmeldepflicht und Vollzugsverbot)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary subsequent notification, admission and settlement (50% reduction).
- Published
- 10 Mar 2025
- KONCENTRÁCIE: PMÚ uložil pokutu viac ako 428-tisíc eur za „gun-jumping“ v oblasti hazardu Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Nov 2024 Správa účelových zariadeníState body SÚZ: 2,000 EUR – no reporting office of its own, channels not published €2,000
Instead of designating its own responsible person, the body subordinate to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with at least 50 employees, had named the ministry’s secretary general and had not published the reporting channels in a way accessible to all employees. The Office imposed 2,000 EUR.
Every obliged organisation needs its own reporting office that is known internally – the responsibility of the parent body is not sufficient.
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- Zákon č. 54/2019 Z. z. o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti, § 10 Abs. 1 und 5, § 19 Abs. 2
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
- ÚOO, Rozhodnutie vom 11.11.2024 (UOO-404/2024), Správa účelových zariadení Decision of an authority
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov: Rozhodnutia úradu (Liste der Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Sep 2024 AGROFERT, a.s.AGROFERT: 21 million EUR for concealed takeover of two large bakeries upheld €21m
In 2013, AGROFERT acquired control of the bakeries PRVÁ BRATISLAVSKÁ PEKÁRENSKÁ and PEZA, but had the Žilina bakery held covertly by a third party for two years in order to circumvent the notification threshold – the authority had rejected an earlier takeover in 2011. The Council of the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) upheld the fine of 21 million EUR; final since 27 September 2024.
Staggered acquisitions or acquisitions concealed via third parties are aggregated – circumvention structures increase the fine.
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Merger control
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Nichtanmeldung und Vollzug eines Zusammenschlusses)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 8 Oct 2024
- Rada PMÚ potvrdila 21-miliónovú pokutu za neoznámenie koncentrácie a jej predčasnú implementáciu Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Jan 2024 Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republikySlovak Ministry of the Environment: 7,000 EUR – reporting office existed only on paper €7,000
From February 2021 to July 2023, the ministry had designated as the office responsible for reports an ‘anti-corruption unit’ that did not even exist in the organisational structure. A report from April 2022 had still not been examined at the time of the inspection in May 2023; the ministry’s appeal was unsuccessful on 22 April 2024.
A reporting office must actually be staffed – responsibility on paper does not fulfil the statutory obligation.
- Authority / court
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz)
- Area of law
- Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
- Legal basis
- Zákon č. 54/2019 Z. z. o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti, § 10 Abs. 1, 4, 5 und 7, § 19 Abs. 1
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Public sector
- ÚOO, Rozhodnutie vom 12.01.2024 (UOO-87/2024), Ministerstvo životného prostredia SR Decision of an authority
- ÚOO, Berufungsentscheidung vom 22.04.2024 (UOO-221/2024) Decision of an authority
- Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov: Rozhodnutia úradu (Liste der Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Oct 2023 LITA, autorská spoločnosťLITA: fine for excessive licence fees for hotel TV upheld €57,939
In 2015–2019, the collecting society charged hotels and guesthouses unreasonably high licence fees for the performance of works via television and radio sets in guest rooms. The Council of the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) upheld the fine of 57,939 EUR; final since 27 October 2023.
Collecting societies with a statutory monopoly must also set reasonable tariffs.
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz, Art. 102 AEUV
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Published
- 31 Oct 2023
- Rada PMÚ potvrdila prvostupňové rozhodnutie PMÚ o uložení pokuty organizácii LITA za zneužívanie dominantného postavenia Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link