Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK) €281.3m 77 % · 9 cases
- Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK) €34.2m 9 % · 4 cases
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF) €29.7m 8 % · 6 cases
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO) €10.8m 3 % · 15 cases
- Präsident des Amts für Wettbewerbs- und Verbraucherschutz (UOKiK) €6.66m 2 % · 1 case
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK), Delegatura w Poznaniu €1.44m 0 % · 1 case
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
- Retail and e-commerce €126m 35 % · 10 cases
- Automotive €92.4m 25 % · 1 case
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering €80.1m 22 % · 1 case
- Financial services and insurance €27.6m 8 % · 10 cases
- Telecoms, IT and software €13.4m 4 % · 2 cases
- Media and online platforms €8.07m 2 % · 3 cases
- Construction and real estate €7.9m 2 % · 2 cases
- Food and agriculture €4.06m 1 % · 2 cases
- Transport, logistics and shipping €2.95m 1 % · 2 cases
- Energy and utilities €1.44m 0 % · 1 case
- 2 more€7,607
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | €45.4m |
| 2023 | 3 | €27.7m |
| 2024 | 8 | €102.2m |
| 2025 | 8 | €131.5m |
| 2026 | 15 | €57.3m |
36 cases
5 Aug 2026 Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. (PKO BP)PKO BP: PLN 47.5m for failings in structured deposits €11m
The KNF imposed five fines totalling PLN 47,500,000 on PKO BP in connection with structured deposits: PLN 26m for failing to inform clients of existing conflicts of interest, PLN 8m each for not analysing costs and charges and for an imprecise definition of the risk category and target market, PLN 4m for selling without checking target-market suitability and PLN 1.5m for misleading sales material on two products. The decision is not final.
Firms selling structured products must disclose conflicts of interest, test costs against client benefit and define the target market precisely.
Conflicts of interest and product governance for retail investment products
- Authority / court
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
- Legal basis
- Art. 88c Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 88m Abs. 5 und 9 Prawo bankowe i. V. m. Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 21.01.2019 über Dienstleistungen der Banken bei strukturierten Einlagen
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
Original amount 47,500,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Aug 2026.
- KNF: Nałożenie kar pieniężnych na PKO BP SA Press release of an authority
- KNF: Wykaz kar nałożonych przez Komisję Nadzoru Finansowego w 2026 roku (Lp. 41) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
26 Jun 2026 Neonet S.A.Neonet: 3 million PLN over false delivery and availability information on Allegro €709,854
On its Allegro account, the electronics retailer promised dispatch within 24 hours even for goods not in stock and did not inform customers in good time of delays or unavailability. UOKiK imposed a fine of 3,043,000 PLN; the decision is not final.
Link delivery and availability information to stock levels; in the event of delays, inform customers immediately.
Availability and delivery information on marketplaces
- Authority / court
- Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Information duties in online retail
- Legal basis
- Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Published
- 26 Jun 2026
Original amount 3,043,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Jun 2026.
- Empty promises from Neonet – decision by the President of UOKiK Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
29 May 2026 mBank S.A.mBank: PLN 14.9m for failings in treasury business and compliance €3.52m
The KNF imposed four fines totalling PLN 14,900,000 on mBank: PLN 0.4m and 6m because staff negotiated client transactions with unauthorised third parties and passed client information to them, PLN 5m for not treating currency hedging transactions as financial instruments and PLN 3.5m for ineffective internal control and compliance functions. Following a request for reconsideration, the KNF upheld the decision on 28 August 2026; it is not final.
Staff may negotiate client transactions only with persons whose authority has been verified, and the compliance function must monitor this.
Verifying authority and confidentiality in client dealings
- Authority / court
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
- Legal basis
- § 8 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 26 Nr. 1 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 24.09.2012; Art. 83b Abs. 3 und 6, Art. 83c Abs. 1 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi; Art. 9c Abs. 1 Nr. 4 Prawo bankowe; Art. 21 und 22 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/565
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
Original amount 14,900,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 May 2026.
- KNF: Nałożenie kar pieniężnych na mBank SA Press release of an authority
- KNF: Ostateczna decyzja ws. mBanku SA Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 May 2026 Decora S.A., Bel-Pol sp. z o.o.Decora and Bel-Pol: PLN 33.6m for price and territory agreements on flooring accessories €7.9m
The manufacturer Decora and the wholesaler Bel-Pol had coordinated prices for vinyl panels, underlays, skirting boards and floor profiles from Decora's range and divided the wholesale market for these products. UOKiK imposed fines of PLN 28,344,000 on Decora and PLN 5,290,000 on Bel-Pol, PLN 33,634,000 in total. The decision is not final.
Vertical agreements on prices and territories in wholesale are hardcore restrictions.
Price and territory agreements between manufacturer and wholesaler
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 3 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 101 Abs. 1 lit. a und c AEUV; Art. 106 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2, Art. 113c und Art. 89a ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Mitigating circumstances
- As a leniency applicant, Bel-Pol received a 50% reduction of its fine and a further 10% for voluntarily accepting the fine (settlement).
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Original amount 33,634,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 May 2026.
- UOKiK-Entscheidungsdatenbank: Decyzja DOK-2/2026 (Decora S.A., Bel-Pol sp. z o.o.) Enforcement database of an authority
- Decyzja nr DOK-2/2026 vom 04.05.2026 (öffentliche Fassung) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 Apr 2026 Compensa Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń S.A. Vienna Insurance GroupCompensa: PLN 8.5m for inadequate motor third-party liability premiums €2m
The KNF fined the insurer Compensa PLN 8,500,000 because, in motor third-party liability insurance (class 10) in 2022 to 2024, it set premiums that were insufficient to cover all obligations under the contracts and the costs of its insurance business. The decision is not final.
Insurers must price premiums so that they cover at least all contractual obligations and operating costs, and review this regularly.
Adequate premium pricing in insurance
- Authority / court
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
- Legal basis
- Art. 33 Abs. 2 ustawa z dnia 11 września 2015 r. o działalności ubezpieczeniowej i reasekuracyjnej
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
Original amount 8,500,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Apr 2026.
- KNF: Nałożenie kary pieniężnej na Compensa TU SA Vienna Insurance Group Press release of an authority
- KNF: Wykaz kar nałożonych przez Komisję Nadzoru Finansowego w 2026 roku (Lp. 14) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 Apr 2026 Wspólnota Mieszkaniowa K. (Wohnungseigentümergemeinschaft, im Bescheid pseudonymisiert)Homeowners’ association: 4,852 PLN – misdirected statement not notified €1,135
Acting as processor, the property management company sent an owner’s statement of service charges to an unauthorised person. The association considered notification unnecessary because only ‘ordinary’ data of one member were affected, and maintained this position in the proceedings; the UODO (Poland’s data protection authority) imposed 4,852 PLN.
Small controllers must also assess and notify data breaches by their service providers – ‘only one data subject’ is no ground for exemption.
Recognising misdirected mail as a data breach – including at service providers
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Information security and cyber · Incident reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 33 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
Original amount 4,852 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Apr 2026.
- UODO, Decyzja DKN.5131.16.2025 vom 07.04.2026 (rechtskräftig) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Apr 2026 LPP S.A.LPP: PLN 15m for flawed consolidated accounts after the outbreak of war in Ukraine €3.5m
The KNF imposed a fine of PLN 15,000,000 on the listed issuer LPP for breaches of disclosure obligations in its consolidated financial statements for 2021/2022 and 2022/2023. LPP had wrongly recognised impairments of PLN 608m on fixed assets and inventories resulting from the Russian attack on Ukraine of 24 February 2022 as an adjusting event in the 2021/2022 statements and did not correct the comparative figures in the following year, although the authority had repeatedly recommended this and the auditor had issued qualifications. The decision is not final.
Issuers should promptly act on supervisory recommendations and auditor qualifications on accounting treatment rather than carrying errors forward.
Correct accounting for events after the reporting period
- Authority / court
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 56 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 lit. a ustawa o ofercie publicznej i. V. m. § 3 Abs. 1 und 3 sowie § 71 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 lit. b Verordnung des Finanzministers über laufende und periodische Informationen; IAS 2, 8, 10 und 36
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
Original amount 15,000,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Apr 2026.
- KNF: Nałożenie kary pieniężnej na LPP SA Press release of an authority
- KNF: Wykaz kar nałożonych przez Komisję Nadzoru Finansowego w 2026 roku (Lp. 10) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Mar 2026 XTB S.A.XTB: PLN 20m for deficient appropriateness checks in CFD sales €4.66m
The KNF fined the brokerage XTB PLN 20,000,000 because, between January 2022 and September 2023, it did not properly assess clients' knowledge and experience, did not adequately define the target market for complex instruments such as CFDs, failed to identify possible conflicts of interest arising from the „lista HOT“ distributed to clients and gave clients unreliable information on CFD risks. At XTB's request the KNF reconsidered the case and upheld the decision on 28 August 2026.
Experience with simple products is not enough to classify complex leveraged products such as CFDs as appropriate for a client.
Appropriateness assessment and product governance for leveraged products
- Authority / court
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
- Legal basis
- Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. a, Art. 48 und Art. 56 Abs. 1 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/565; § 37 Abs. 5 Nr. 6 i. V. m. § 31 Abs. 7 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 30.05.2018; Art. 83c Abs. 2 und Abs. 4 Nr. 2 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
Original amount 20,000,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Mar 2026.
- KNF: Nałożenie kary pieniężnej na XTB SA Press release of an authority
- KNF: Ostateczna decyzja ws. XTB SA Press release of an authority
- KNF: Wykaz kar nałożonych przez Komisję Nadzoru Finansowego w 2026 roku (Lp. 8) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 Mar 2026 Santander Bank Polska S.A. (heute Erste Bank Polska S.A.)Santander Bank Polska: PLN 21.1m for failings in securities and treasury business €4.95m
The KNF imposed eight fines totalling PLN 21,100,000, among other things for cooperating with unauthorised third parties in client transactions (PLN 2m and 4m), transactions with clients outside the target market (PLN 2.5m), missing cost information on currency hedging transactions (PLN 1m), a non-compliant remuneration system (PLN 0.5m), the execution of orders relating to „Oprocentowanie Nie Wyższe Niż“ (PLN 7m), ineffective internal control and compliance functions (PLN 4m) and failure to archive client correspondence (PLN 0.1m). Following a request for reconsideration, the KNF upheld the fines on 28 August 2026; an action before the administrative court is possible.
Banks must verify the authority of persons acting for clients and equip their compliance function so that it actually detects such gaps.
An effective compliance function and dealing with client representatives in treasury business
- Authority / court
- Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
- Legal basis
- Art. 83b Abs. 3, Art. 83c Abs. 1 und 4, Art. 83e Abs. 1 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi; § 8 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 26 Nr. 1 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 24.09.2012; Art. 9c Abs. 1 Nr. 4 und Art. 88k Abs. 6a Prawo bankowe
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
Original amount 21,100,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Mar 2026.
- KNF: Nałożenie kar pieniężnych na Santander Bank Polska SA Press release of an authority
- KNF: Ostateczna decyzja ws. Erste Bank Polska SA (dawniej: Santander Bank Polska SA) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Feb 2026 Restaurant Partner Polska sp. z o.o. (Betreiberin der Plattform Glovo)Glovo Poland: 5.9 million PLN for copies of identity documents without legal basis €1.4m
Since 2019, the delivery platform had required scans or photos of its users’ identity cards and passports in cases of suspected fraud, relying on legitimate interests. The Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (President of Poland’s data protection authority, UODO) regarded this as processing without a legal basis and a breach of data minimisation, imposed 5,898,064 PLN and ordered the processing to stop and the data to be erased.
Fraud prevention does not justify copies of identity documents – only those authorised by law may capture documents in full.
Copying identity documents and data minimisation
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und c, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO (DKN.5112.33.2022)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Published
- 16 Mar 2026
Original amount 5,898,064 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Feb 2026.
- Nie można kopiować dokumentów bez podstawy prawnej - kara dla Glovo Press release of an authority
- Decyzja DKN.5112.33.2022 z 19 lutego 2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Feb 2026 DPD Polska sp. z o.o.DPD Polska: PLN 11.46m in fines, including for missing data processing agreements €2.72m
The UODO (Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych, Polish data protection authority) fined the parcel carrier DPD Polska sp. z o.o. a total of PLN 11,461,030. PLN 6,251,471 relates to the company using external hauliers for shipments between its depots without a data processing agreement under Art. 28(3) GDPR, although they had access to the address labels during loading and unloading; PLN 5,209,559 relates to staff not being given effective authorisations to process data and the company's own data protection policy not being implemented (Art. 24, 29, 32 GDPR). The authority classed both infringements as intentional and treated earlier reprimands against the company as aggravating. The decision is not final.
Even pure transport providers can be processors if they have access to personal data such as address labels – an Art. 28 GDPR contract is then mandatory.
Recognising data processing by logistics and transport providers
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data processors
- Legal basis
- Art. 28 Abs. 3 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und Abs. 2 DSGVO; Art. 24 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 29, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 4 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f und Abs. 2 DSGVO; Art. 83 Abs. 4 lit. a und Abs. 5 lit. a DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Culpability
- intentional
- Repeat case
- yes
- Mitigating circumstances
- It was treated as mitigating that, after the proceedings were opened, DPD amended its contracts with the hauliers to include data processing terms and changed its procedure for granting authorisations.
- Liability of senior managers
- No personal liability was established.
- Published
- 23 Feb 2026
Original amount 11,461,030 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Feb 2026.
- UODO: Naruszenie przepisów RODO przez firmę kurierską (23.02.2026) Press release of an authority
- Decyzja Prezesa UODO DKN.5112.1.2023 vom 5. Februar 2026 (Portal Orzeczeń UODO) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Jan 2026 Orange Polska S.A.Orange Polska: PLN 24.75m for a prepaid fee introduced mid-contract €5.88m
With effect from 4 April 2022, Orange Polska unilaterally introduced a fee for keeping the phone number active in existing prepaid contracts, although neither the law nor the contract allowed this change, and it failed to disclose the fee on starter packs and on its website. UOKiK classed both as unfair practices and imposed fines of PLN 17,325,000 and PLN 7,425,000, totalling PLN 24,750,000. The decision is not final.
New charges in ongoing consumer contracts need a clear statutory or contractual basis and must be disclosed in the offer itself.
Unilateral contract changes and price transparency in prepaid tariffs
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
- Legal basis
- Art. 24 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 und Art. 27 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów i. V. m. Art. 4 und Art. 6 ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu nieuczciwym praktykom rynkowym
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
Original amount 24,750,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jan 2026.
- UOKiK-Entscheidungsdatenbank: Decyzja DOZIK-3/2026 (Orange Polska S.A.) Enforcement database of an authority
- Decyzja nr DOZIK 3/2026 vom 30.01.2026 (öffentliche Fassung) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Jan 2026 Zalando SEZalando: around 31 million PLN for missing 30-day lowest prices on discounts €7.34m
Zalando did not display the lowest price of the previous 30 days for discounts, manipulated reference prices to make reductions appear larger and did not present the mandatory information consistently at all stages of the purchasing process. Poland's Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) imposed a fine of 30,945,000 PLN; the decision is not final.
Discount information must be identical and correct on all pages of a shop – listing, product page, shopping basket.
Presentation of discounts in online shops
- Authority / court
- Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
- Legal basis
- Polnische Umsetzung der Omnibus-Richtlinie (Preisangaben bei Preisermäßigungen); Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 14 Jan 2026
Original amount 30,945,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jan 2026.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Jan 2026 Whaleco Technology Limited (Temu)Temu: almost 6 million PLN over changing reference prices and discount labelling €1.4m
The operator of the Temu interface omitted the 30-day lowest price or stated it incorrectly, labelled promotions inconsistently and changed reference prices from day to day without the actual price changing. UOKiK imposed a fine of 5,910,900 PLN; the decision is not final.
Reference prices that shift daily without any real price change are a misleading staging of discounts.
- Authority / court
- Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
- Legal basis
- Polnische Umsetzung der Omnibus-Richtlinie (Preisangaben bei Preisermäßigungen); Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Published
- 14 Jan 2026
Original amount 5,910,900 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jan 2026.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
2 Jan 2026 Poczta Polska S.A.Poczta Polska: 978,128 PLN because the data protection officer was not independent €232,208
The function of data protection officer was performed by a manager who was at the same time responsible for security and protection of classified information and thus monitored their own activities; there was no conflict analysis. Poland’s data protection authority (UODO) imposed 978,128 PLN and referred to numerous previous reprimands and orders against the company.
Data protection officers must not be responsible for the processes they monitor – check dual roles for conflicts of interest in advance.
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Data protection
- Legal basis
- Art. 38 Abs. 3 und 6 DSGVO (DKN.5131.4.2025)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Repeat case
- yes
- Mitigating circumstances
- During the proceedings the function was made independent and placed directly under the management board.
- Published
- 26 Jan 2026
Original amount 978,128 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jan 2026.
- Kara dla Poczty Polskiej za brak zapewnienia niezależności sprawowania funkcji IOD Press release of an authority
- Decyzja DKN.5131.4.2025 z 2 stycznia 2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
9 Dec 2025 CNH Industrial Polska sp. z o.o., Raitech sp. z o.o., PHU Perkoz sp. z o.o. u. a. (8 Unternehmen)CNH Industrial Polska and dealers: PLN 338.8m for agricultural machinery cartel €80.1m
UOKiK sanctioned CNH Industrial Polska and seven dealers of the New Holland, Case IH and Steyr brands for dividing the Polish market for agricultural machinery of these brands and coordinating prices. The fines on the undertakings total PLN 338,827,000 (CNH Industrial Polska 241,599,000, Raitech 24,391,000, Perkoz 23,778,000, Adler Agro 15,335,000, Rolserwis 13,356,000, a further dealer company (partnership) 8,249,000, Kisiel Agrotech 6,778,000, Kisiel 5,341,000 PLN). Fines on natural persons are not included in the amount. The decision is not final.
Agreements on sales territories and prices within a dealer network are serious cartel infringements in agricultural machinery distribution too.
Market sharing and price coordination between manufacturer and dealers
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 3 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 101 Abs. 1 lit. a und c AEUV
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Original amount 338,827,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Dec 2025.
- UOKiK-Entscheidungsdatenbank: Decyzja DOK-5/2025 (CNH Industrial Polska u. a.) Enforcement database of an authority
- Decyzja nr DOK-5/2025 vom 09.12.2025 (öffentliche Fassung) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 Dec 2025 Jeronimo Martins Polska (Biedronka)Biedronka: almost 105 million PLN over undisclosed conditions for "100 % back" €24.7m
The supermarket chain advertised promotions such as "Special Wednesday" with "100 % money back as a voucher", but did not state restrictions concerning product categories, minimum spend and use of the vouchers in radio, app and in-store advertising, only on the receipt, the website or in-store notices. UOKiK imposed a fine of 104,722,016 PLN; the decision is not final.
State the essential restrictions of a promotion in the advertising itself, not just on the receipt.
Complete promotion terms in advertising
- Authority / court
- Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
- Legal basis
- Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen (irreführende Werbung durch Unterlassen)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 4 Dec 2025
Original amount 104,722,016 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Dec 2025.
- When a promotion fails to mention what is important – nearly PLN 105 million in fines for Biedronka Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Oct 2025 Komornik Sądowy przy Sądzie Rejonowym w S. (Gerichtsvollzieherkanzlei, im Bescheid pseudonymisiert)Bailiff: 20,900 PLN – documents with PESEL number misdirected, not notified €4,938
In October 2023, an uninvolved person received a debtor’s enforcement documents containing name, address, date of birth, PESEL number, amount of the claim and employer. The bailiff’s office neither notified the supervisory authority nor informed the data subject; the UODO (Poland’s data protection authority) imposed 7,700 PLN for the failure to notify and 13,200 PLN for the failure to inform the data subject, and ordered the data subject to be informed within three days.
Where identification numbers such as the PESEL number are disclosed, a high risk can almost always be assumed – notification of the authority and of the data subject is then mandatory.
Checking postal mailings; notifying data breaches involving identification numbers
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Information security and cyber · Incident reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 33 Abs. 1, Art. 34 Abs. 1 und 2 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
Original amount 20,900 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Oct 2025.
- UODO, Decyzja DKN.5131.17.2024 vom 23.10.2025 (nicht rechtskräftig) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Sep 2025 Specer sp. z o.o.Medical company Specer: CEO acting as data protection officer costs 11,365 PLN €2,669
For almost six years, the chair of the management board of the medical company was also its data protection officer; this came to light after a report that a patient had been handed documents relating to another person. Poland’s data protection authority (UODO) found a conflict of interest and imposed 11,365 PLN.
This also applies in small practices and companies: management cannot be its own data protection officer.
Role and independence of the data protection officer; release of patient records
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Data protection
- Legal basis
- Art. 38 Abs. 6 DSGVO (DKN.5131.7.2025)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Mitigating circumstances
- An independent external data protection officer was appointed in July 2024.
- Published
- 29 Sep 2025
Original amount 11,365 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Sep 2025.
- Prezes firmy nie może być jednocześnie IOD. Kara dla spółki Specer Press release of an authority
- Decyzja DKN.5131.7.2025 z 12 września 2025 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Jun 2025 McDonald’s Polska sp. z o.o.; 24/7 Communication sp. z o.o. (Auftragsverarbeiter)McDonald’s Polska and service provider: PLN 17.1m after staff rotas were publicly accessible €4m
Data of employees of McDonald’s and its franchisees from the rota module (including names, PESEL or passport numbers, working hours, positions) sat in a publicly accessible directory. UODO found that McDonald’s Polska had carried out no risk analysis, implemented no appropriate safeguards and not effectively supervised its processor, and imposed fines of PLN 1,632,063, 13,600,528 and 1,700,066 (PLN 16,932,657 in total) and a reprimand; the processor 24/7 Communication received PLN 94,286, 42,429 and 47,143 (PLN 183,858), making PLN 17,116,515 overall. The decision is not final.
Outsourcing HR processes does not shift responsibility: a risk analysis, access to the system configuration and audits actually carried out at the provider are mandatory.
Protecting employee data in outsourced HR systems
- Authority / court
- Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c und f, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 28 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 38 Abs. 1 DSGVO sowie Art. 34 Abs. 1 und 3 lit. c DSGVO (Verwarnung) (Verantwortlicher); Art. 28 Abs. 3 lit. c, Abs. 4 und 9, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 38 Abs. 1 DSGVO (Auftragsverarbeiter)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Published
- 21 Jul 2025
Original amount 17,116,515 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jun 2025.
- Decyzja Prezesa UODO DKN.5130.4179.2020 vom 23.06.2025 (pseudonymisiert) Decision of an authority
- UODO: Za ochronę danych osobowych są odpowiedzialni zarówno administrator, jak i podmiot przetwarzający Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link