Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EUPoland Clear all filters
36cases from 1 jurisdiction
€364mTotal of monetary amounts
€3.11mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK) €281.3m 77 % · 9 cases
  2. Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK) €34.2m 9 % · 4 cases
  3. Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF) €29.7m 8 % · 6 cases
  4. Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO) €10.8m 3 % · 15 cases
  5. Präsident des Amts für Wettbewerbs- und Verbraucherschutz (UOKiK) €6.66m 2 % · 1 case
  6. Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK), Delegatura w Poznaniu €1.44m 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €269.4m 74 % · 8 cases
  2. Consumer protection and online retail €54.1m 15 % · 7 cases
  3. Capital markets and financial supervision €29.7m 8 % · 6 cases
  4. Data protection €10.4m 3 % · 10 cases
  5. Information security and cyber €383,832 0 % · 5 cases

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Retail and e-commerce €126m 35 % · 10 cases
  2. Automotive €92.4m 25 % · 1 case
  3. Manufacturing and mechanical engineering €80.1m 22 % · 1 case
  4. Financial services and insurance €27.6m 8 % · 10 cases
  5. Telecoms, IT and software €13.4m 4 % · 2 cases
  6. Media and online platforms €8.07m 2 % · 3 cases
  7. Construction and real estate €7.9m 2 % · 2 cases
  8. Food and agriculture €4.06m 1 % · 2 cases
  9. Transport, logistics and shipping €2.95m 1 % · 2 cases
  10. Energy and utilities €1.44m 0 % · 1 case
  11. 2 more€7,607

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20222€45.4m
20233€27.7m
20248€102.2m
20258€131.5m
202615€57.3m

36 cases

5 Aug 2026 Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. (PKO BP)PKO BP: PLN 47.5m for failings in structured deposits PolandOrganisational requirements €11m

The KNF imposed five fines totalling PLN 47,500,000 on PKO BP in connection with structured deposits: PLN 26m for failing to inform clients of existing conflicts of interest, PLN 8m each for not analysing costs and charges and for an imprecise definition of the risk category and target market, PLN 4m for selling without checking target-market suitability and PLN 1.5m for misleading sales material on two products. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Firms selling structured products must disclose conflicts of interest, test costs against client benefit and define the target market precisely.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conflicts of interest and product governance for retail investment products

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 88c Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 88m Abs. 5 und 9 Prawo bankowe i. V. m. Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 21.01.2019 über Dienstleistungen der Banken bei strukturierten Einlagen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 47,500,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Jun 2026 Neonet S.A.Neonet: 3 million PLN over false delivery and availability information on Allegro PolandInformation duties in online retail €709,854

On its Allegro account, the electronics retailer promised dispatch within 24 hours even for goods not in stock and did not inform customers in good time of delays or unavailability. UOKiK imposed a fine of 3,043,000 PLN; the decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Link delivery and availability information to stock levels; in the event of delays, inform customers immediately.

Relevance to training and awareness

Availability and delivery information on marketplaces

Authority / court
Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Information duties in online retail
Legal basis
Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
26 Jun 2026

Original amount 3,043,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

29 May 2026 mBank S.A.mBank: PLN 14.9m for failings in treasury business and compliance PolandOrganisational requirements €3.52m

The KNF imposed four fines totalling PLN 14,900,000 on mBank: PLN 0.4m and 6m because staff negotiated client transactions with unauthorised third parties and passed client information to them, PLN 5m for not treating currency hedging transactions as financial instruments and PLN 3.5m for ineffective internal control and compliance functions. Following a request for reconsideration, the KNF upheld the decision on 28 August 2026; it is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Staff may negotiate client transactions only with persons whose authority has been verified, and the compliance function must monitor this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Verifying authority and confidentiality in client dealings

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
§ 8 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 26 Nr. 1 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 24.09.2012; Art. 83b Abs. 3 und 6, Art. 83c Abs. 1 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi; Art. 9c Abs. 1 Nr. 4 Prawo bankowe; Art. 21 und 22 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/565
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 14,900,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 May 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

4 May 2026 Decora S.A., Bel-Pol sp. z o.o.Decora and Bel-Pol: PLN 33.6m for price and territory agreements on flooring accessories PolandCartels and collusion €7.9m

The manufacturer Decora and the wholesaler Bel-Pol had coordinated prices for vinyl panels, underlays, skirting boards and floor profiles from Decora's range and divided the wholesale market for these products. UOKiK imposed fines of PLN 28,344,000 on Decora and PLN 5,290,000 on Bel-Pol, PLN 33,634,000 in total. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Vertical agreements on prices and territories in wholesale are hardcore restrictions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price and territory agreements between manufacturer and wholesaler

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 3 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 101 Abs. 1 lit. a und c AEUV; Art. 106 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2, Art. 113c und Art. 89a ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Construction and real estate
Mitigating circumstances
As a leniency applicant, Bel-Pol received a 50% reduction of its fine and a further 10% for voluntarily accepting the fine (settlement).
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.

Original amount 33,634,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Apr 2026 Compensa Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń S.A. Vienna Insurance GroupCompensa: PLN 8.5m for inadequate motor third-party liability premiums PolandOrganisational requirements €2m

The KNF fined the insurer Compensa PLN 8,500,000 because, in motor third-party liability insurance (class 10) in 2022 to 2024, it set premiums that were insufficient to cover all obligations under the contracts and the costs of its insurance business. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Insurers must price premiums so that they cover at least all contractual obligations and operating costs, and review this regularly.

Relevance to training and awareness

Adequate premium pricing in insurance

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 33 Abs. 2 ustawa z dnia 11 września 2015 r. o działalności ubezpieczeniowej i reasekuracyjnej
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 8,500,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

7 Apr 2026 Wspólnota Mieszkaniowa K. (Wohnungseigentümergemeinschaft, im Bescheid pseudonymisiert)Homeowners’ association: 4,852 PLN – misdirected statement not notified PolandIncident reporting obligations €1,135

Acting as processor, the property management company sent an owner’s statement of service charges to an unauthorised person. The association considered notification unnecessary because only ‘ordinary’ data of one member were affected, and maintained this position in the proceedings; the UODO (Poland’s data protection authority) imposed 4,852 PLN.

What organisations can take from it

Small controllers must also assess and notify data breaches by their service providers – ‘only one data subject’ is no ground for exemption.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising misdirected mail as a data breach – including at service providers

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Incident reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 33 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate

Original amount 4,852 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Apr 2026 LPP S.A.LPP: PLN 15m for flawed consolidated accounts after the outbreak of war in Ukraine PolandDisclosure and reporting obligations €3.5m

The KNF imposed a fine of PLN 15,000,000 on the listed issuer LPP for breaches of disclosure obligations in its consolidated financial statements for 2021/2022 and 2022/2023. LPP had wrongly recognised impairments of PLN 608m on fixed assets and inventories resulting from the Russian attack on Ukraine of 24 February 2022 as an adjusting event in the 2021/2022 statements and did not correct the comparative figures in the following year, although the authority had repeatedly recommended this and the auditor had issued qualifications. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Issuers should promptly act on supervisory recommendations and auditor qualifications on accounting treatment rather than carrying errors forward.

Relevance to training and awareness

Correct accounting for events after the reporting period

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 56 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 lit. a ustawa o ofercie publicznej i. V. m. § 3 Abs. 1 und 3 sowie § 71 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 lit. b Verordnung des Finanzministers über laufende und periodische Informationen; IAS 2, 8, 10 und 36
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce

Original amount 15,000,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Mar 2026 XTB S.A.XTB: PLN 20m for deficient appropriateness checks in CFD sales PolandOrganisational requirements €4.66m

The KNF fined the brokerage XTB PLN 20,000,000 because, between January 2022 and September 2023, it did not properly assess clients' knowledge and experience, did not adequately define the target market for complex instruments such as CFDs, failed to identify possible conflicts of interest arising from the „lista HOT“ distributed to clients and gave clients unreliable information on CFD risks. At XTB's request the KNF reconsidered the case and upheld the decision on 28 August 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Experience with simple products is not enough to classify complex leveraged products such as CFDs as appropriate for a client.

Relevance to training and awareness

Appropriateness assessment and product governance for leveraged products

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. a, Art. 48 und Art. 56 Abs. 1 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/565; § 37 Abs. 5 Nr. 6 i. V. m. § 31 Abs. 7 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 30.05.2018; Art. 83c Abs. 2 und Abs. 4 Nr. 2 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 20,000,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

4 Mar 2026 Santander Bank Polska S.A. (heute Erste Bank Polska S.A.)Santander Bank Polska: PLN 21.1m for failings in securities and treasury business PolandOrganisational requirements €4.95m

The KNF imposed eight fines totalling PLN 21,100,000, among other things for cooperating with unauthorised third parties in client transactions (PLN 2m and 4m), transactions with clients outside the target market (PLN 2.5m), missing cost information on currency hedging transactions (PLN 1m), a non-compliant remuneration system (PLN 0.5m), the execution of orders relating to „Oprocentowanie Nie Wyższe Niż“ (PLN 7m), ineffective internal control and compliance functions (PLN 4m) and failure to archive client correspondence (PLN 0.1m). Following a request for reconsideration, the KNF upheld the fines on 28 August 2026; an action before the administrative court is possible.

What organisations can take from it

Banks must verify the authority of persons acting for clients and equip their compliance function so that it actually detects such gaps.

Relevance to training and awareness

An effective compliance function and dealing with client representatives in treasury business

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 83b Abs. 3, Art. 83c Abs. 1 und 4, Art. 83e Abs. 1 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi; § 8 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 26 Nr. 1 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 24.09.2012; Art. 9c Abs. 1 Nr. 4 und Art. 88k Abs. 6a Prawo bankowe
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 21,100,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Feb 2026 Restaurant Partner Polska sp. z o.o. (Betreiberin der Plattform Glovo)Glovo Poland: 5.9 million PLN for copies of identity documents without legal basis PolandData subject rights and transparency €1.4m

Since 2019, the delivery platform had required scans or photos of its users’ identity cards and passports in cases of suspected fraud, relying on legitimate interests. The Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (President of Poland’s data protection authority, UODO) regarded this as processing without a legal basis and a breach of data minimisation, imposed 5,898,064 PLN and ordered the processing to stop and the data to be erased.

What organisations can take from it

Fraud prevention does not justify copies of identity documents – only those authorised by law may capture documents in full.

Relevance to training and awareness

Copying identity documents and data minimisation

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und c, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO (DKN.5112.33.2022)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
16 Mar 2026

Original amount 5,898,064 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

5 Feb 2026 DPD Polska sp. z o.o.DPD Polska: PLN 11.46m in fines, including for missing data processing agreements PolandData processors €2.72m

The UODO (Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych, Polish data protection authority) fined the parcel carrier DPD Polska sp. z o.o. a total of PLN 11,461,030. PLN 6,251,471 relates to the company using external hauliers for shipments between its depots without a data processing agreement under Art. 28(3) GDPR, although they had access to the address labels during loading and unloading; PLN 5,209,559 relates to staff not being given effective authorisations to process data and the company's own data protection policy not being implemented (Art. 24, 29, 32 GDPR). The authority classed both infringements as intentional and treated earlier reprimands against the company as aggravating. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Even pure transport providers can be processors if they have access to personal data such as address labels – an Art. 28 GDPR contract is then mandatory.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising data processing by logistics and transport providers

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 28 Abs. 3 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und Abs. 2 DSGVO; Art. 24 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 29, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 4 i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f und Abs. 2 DSGVO; Art. 83 Abs. 4 lit. a und Abs. 5 lit. a DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
It was treated as mitigating that, after the proceedings were opened, DPD amended its contracts with the hauliers to include data processing terms and changed its procedure for granting authorisations.
Liability of senior managers
No personal liability was established.
Published
23 Feb 2026

Original amount 11,461,030 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jan 2026 Orange Polska S.A.Orange Polska: PLN 24.75m for a prepaid fee introduced mid-contract PolandMisleading advertising and pricing €5.88m

With effect from 4 April 2022, Orange Polska unilaterally introduced a fee for keeping the phone number active in existing prepaid contracts, although neither the law nor the contract allowed this change, and it failed to disclose the fee on starter packs and on its website. UOKiK classed both as unfair practices and imposed fines of PLN 17,325,000 and PLN 7,425,000, totalling PLN 24,750,000. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

New charges in ongoing consumer contracts need a clear statutory or contractual basis and must be disclosed in the offer itself.

Relevance to training and awareness

Unilateral contract changes and price transparency in prepaid tariffs

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Art. 24 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 und Art. 27 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów i. V. m. Art. 4 und Art. 6 ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu nieuczciwym praktykom rynkowym
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Original amount 24,750,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

14 Jan 2026 Zalando SEZalando: around 31 million PLN for missing 30-day lowest prices on discounts PolandMisleading advertising and pricing €7.34m

Zalando did not display the lowest price of the previous 30 days for discounts, manipulated reference prices to make reductions appear larger and did not present the mandatory information consistently at all stages of the purchasing process. Poland's Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) imposed a fine of 30,945,000 PLN; the decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Discount information must be identical and correct on all pages of a shop – listing, product page, shopping basket.

Relevance to training and awareness

Presentation of discounts in online shops

Authority / court
Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Polnische Umsetzung der Omnibus-Richtlinie (Preisangaben bei Preisermäßigungen); Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
14 Jan 2026

Original amount 30,945,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

14 Jan 2026 Whaleco Technology Limited (Temu)Temu: almost 6 million PLN over changing reference prices and discount labelling PolandMisleading advertising and pricing €1.4m

The operator of the Temu interface omitted the 30-day lowest price or stated it incorrectly, labelled promotions inconsistently and changed reference prices from day to day without the actual price changing. UOKiK imposed a fine of 5,910,900 PLN; the decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Reference prices that shift daily without any real price change are a misleading staging of discounts.

Authority / court
Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Polnische Umsetzung der Omnibus-Richtlinie (Preisangaben bei Preisermäßigungen); Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
14 Jan 2026

Original amount 5,910,900 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jan 2026 Poczta Polska S.A.Poczta Polska: 978,128 PLN because the data protection officer was not independent PolandData protection €232,208

The function of data protection officer was performed by a manager who was at the same time responsible for security and protection of classified information and thus monitored their own activities; there was no conflict analysis. Poland’s data protection authority (UODO) imposed 978,128 PLN and referred to numerous previous reprimands and orders against the company.

What organisations can take from it

Data protection officers must not be responsible for the processes they monitor – check dual roles for conflicts of interest in advance.

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Data protection
Legal basis
Art. 38 Abs. 3 und 6 DSGVO (DKN.5131.4.2025)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
During the proceedings the function was made independent and placed directly under the management board.
Published
26 Jan 2026

Original amount 978,128 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 Dec 2025 CNH Industrial Polska sp. z o.o., Raitech sp. z o.o., PHU Perkoz sp. z o.o. u. a. (8 Unternehmen)CNH Industrial Polska and dealers: PLN 338.8m for agricultural machinery cartel PolandCartels and collusion €80.1m

UOKiK sanctioned CNH Industrial Polska and seven dealers of the New Holland, Case IH and Steyr brands for dividing the Polish market for agricultural machinery of these brands and coordinating prices. The fines on the undertakings total PLN 338,827,000 (CNH Industrial Polska 241,599,000, Raitech 24,391,000, Perkoz 23,778,000, Adler Agro 15,335,000, Rolserwis 13,356,000, a further dealer company (partnership) 8,249,000, Kisiel Agrotech 6,778,000, Kisiel 5,341,000 PLN). Fines on natural persons are not included in the amount. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Agreements on sales territories and prices within a dealer network are serious cartel infringements in agricultural machinery distribution too.

Relevance to training and awareness

Market sharing and price coordination between manufacturer and dealers

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 3 ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 101 Abs. 1 lit. a und c AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.

Original amount 338,827,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

4 Dec 2025 Jeronimo Martins Polska (Biedronka)Biedronka: almost 105 million PLN over undisclosed conditions for "100 % back" PolandMisleading advertising and pricing €24.7m

The supermarket chain advertised promotions such as "Special Wednesday" with "100 % money back as a voucher", but did not state restrictions concerning product categories, minimum spend and use of the vouchers in radio, app and in-store advertising, only on the receipt, the website or in-store notices. UOKiK imposed a fine of 104,722,016 PLN; the decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

State the essential restrictions of a promotion in the advertising itself, not just on the receipt.

Relevance to training and awareness

Complete promotion terms in advertising

Authority / court
Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (UOKiK)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Verletzung kollektiver Verbraucherinteressen (irreführende Werbung durch Unterlassen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
4 Dec 2025

Original amount 104,722,016 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Oct 2025 Komornik Sądowy przy Sądzie Rejonowym w S. (Gerichtsvollzieherkanzlei, im Bescheid pseudonymisiert)Bailiff: 20,900 PLN – documents with PESEL number misdirected, not notified PolandIncident reporting obligations €4,938

In October 2023, an uninvolved person received a debtor’s enforcement documents containing name, address, date of birth, PESEL number, amount of the claim and employer. The bailiff’s office neither notified the supervisory authority nor informed the data subject; the UODO (Poland’s data protection authority) imposed 7,700 PLN for the failure to notify and 13,200 PLN for the failure to inform the data subject, and ordered the data subject to be informed within three days.

What organisations can take from it

Where identification numbers such as the PESEL number are disclosed, a high risk can almost always be assumed – notification of the authority and of the data subject is then mandatory.

Relevance to training and awareness

Checking postal mailings; notifying data breaches involving identification numbers

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Incident reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 33 Abs. 1, Art. 34 Abs. 1 und 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector

Original amount 20,900 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Sep 2025 Specer sp. z o.o.Medical company Specer: CEO acting as data protection officer costs 11,365 PLN PolandData protection €2,669

For almost six years, the chair of the management board of the medical company was also its data protection officer; this came to light after a report that a patient had been handed documents relating to another person. Poland’s data protection authority (UODO) found a conflict of interest and imposed 11,365 PLN.

What organisations can take from it

This also applies in small practices and companies: management cannot be its own data protection officer.

Relevance to training and awareness

Role and independence of the data protection officer; release of patient records

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Data protection
Legal basis
Art. 38 Abs. 6 DSGVO (DKN.5131.7.2025)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Healthcare
Mitigating circumstances
An independent external data protection officer was appointed in July 2024.
Published
29 Sep 2025

Original amount 11,365 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2025 McDonald’s Polska sp. z o.o.; 24/7 Communication sp. z o.o. (Auftragsverarbeiter)McDonald’s Polska and service provider: PLN 17.1m after staff rotas were publicly accessible PolandEmployee data €4m

Data of employees of McDonald’s and its franchisees from the rota module (including names, PESEL or passport numbers, working hours, positions) sat in a publicly accessible directory. UODO found that McDonald’s Polska had carried out no risk analysis, implemented no appropriate safeguards and not effectively supervised its processor, and imposed fines of PLN 1,632,063, 13,600,528 and 1,700,066 (PLN 16,932,657 in total) and a reprimand; the processor 24/7 Communication received PLN 94,286, 42,429 and 47,143 (PLN 183,858), making PLN 17,116,515 overall. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Outsourcing HR processes does not shift responsibility: a risk analysis, access to the system configuration and audits actually carried out at the provider are mandatory.

Relevance to training and awareness

Protecting employee data in outsourced HR systems

Authority / court
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych (UODO)
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c und f, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 28 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 38 Abs. 1 DSGVO sowie Art. 34 Abs. 1 und 3 lit. c DSGVO (Verwarnung) (Verantwortlicher); Art. 28 Abs. 3 lit. c, Abs. 4 und 9, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 38 Abs. 1 DSGVO (Auftragsverarbeiter)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
21 Jul 2025

Original amount 17,116,515 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jun 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 16 more of 16

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial