Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Autorité de la concurrence €2.15bn 55 % · 24 cases
- Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €929.3m 24 % · 15 cases
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte €598.1m 15 % · 20 cases
- Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), Commission des sanctions €117.5m 3 % · 11 cases
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) €50.1m 1 % · 7 cases
- Parquet de Paris (Procureure de la République, JIRS); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €22.5m 1 % · 1 case
- Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch das Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €16.1m 0 % · 1 case
- Parquet de Paris (Procureure de la République); Validierung durch das Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €15.5m 0 % · 1 case
- Conseil d'État €15m 0 % · 1 case
- Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom) €3.7m 0 % · 2 cases
- 4 more€3.2m
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
- Competition law €2.15bn 55 % · 24 cases
- Data protection €663.2m 17 % · 29 cases
- Bribery and corruption €360.8m 9 % · 13 cases
- Money laundering and terrorist financing €355.1m 9 % · 4 cases
- Other €271.2m 7 % · 3 cases
- Capital markets and financial supervision €117.5m 3 % · 11 cases
- Environment and sustainability €3.2m 0 % · 3 cases
- Supply chain and human rights – 0 % · 1 case
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
- Retail and e-commerce €890.5m 23 % · 8 cases
- Financial services and insurance €713.9m 18 % · 12 cases
- Media and online platforms €630.1m 16 % · 10 cases
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering €521.8m 13 % · 6 cases
- Energy and utilities €446.2m 11 % · 8 cases
- Telecoms, IT and software €391.6m 10 % · 16 cases
- Construction and real estate €129m 3 % · 5 cases
- Healthcare €94.9m 2 % · 8 cases
- Food and agriculture €39.2m 1 % · 5 cases
- Transport, logistics and shipping €29.8m 1 % · 3 cases
- 3 more€29.4m
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | €493.9m |
| 2023 | 19 | €486m |
| 2024 | 18 | €1.5bn |
| 2025 | 27 | €1.06bn |
| 2026 | 17 | €377.1m |
88 cases
24 Jul 2026 Société d'exploitation d'un service d'information (SESI)Arcom: EUR 200,000 fine on CNews operator SESI over programme breaches €200,000
On 24 July 2026 Arcom imposed a fine of EUR 200,000 on Société d'exploitation d'un service d'information (SESI), the operator of the news channel CNews. In Arcom's view, two programmes broadcast in June and September 2025 contained statements about people of (presumed) immigrant background and Muslims, without sufficient context or challenge, that were capable of inciting hatred and discrimination; Arcom considered this a breach of Article 15 of Law No 86-1067 and of the channel's contractual obligations on non-discrimination and control of its programming. In setting the amount, Arcom took into account earlier sanctions against SESI for breaches of the same obligations in 2021 and 2024. Arcom did not sanction a third programme it examined. Whether the decision has been appealed is not known here.
Broadcasters of opinion formats must put polarising statements into editorial context; a lack of challenge in the studio reflects on the broadcaster.
Editorial framing of polarising statements
- Authority / court
- Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom)
- Area of law
- Other
- Legal basis
- Art. 15, 42-1 und 42-2 Loi n° 86-1067 du 30 septembre 1986 (liberté de communication); Art. 2-2-1 und 2-3-2 der Vereinbarungen vom 27. November 2019 und 10. Dezember 2024
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 29 Jul 2026
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Jul 2026 Hôpital Privé de la LoireHôpital Privé de la Loire: 500,000 EUR after data exfiltration affecting over 520,000 patients €500,000
In summer 2025, an attacker gained access to the private hospital's electronic patient record system and obtained data on 524,867 patients and 202,246 trusted persons. There was no VPN or multi-factor authentication for external users, no appropriate access control and no detection of suspicious activity; the trusted persons were not notified. France's data protection authority (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés, CNIL) imposed a fine of 500,000 EUR (SAN-2026-009).
External access to patient records belongs behind multi-factor authentication and continuous monitoring for unusual access.
Access security and attack detection in hospitals
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 32, Art. 34
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Published
- 3 Sep 2026
- Sanction : amende de 500 000 euros à l'encontre de l'Hôpital Privé de la Loire Press release of an authority
- Délibération SAN-2026-009 du 21 juillet 2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Jul 2026 EXTIACNIL: €300,000 fine for EXTIA over unprocessed erasure requests €300,000
The CNIL (French data protection authority) fined the IT and engineering consultancy EXTIA EUR 300,000 because, of 265 erasure requests received in 2024 – mostly from job applicants, occasionally from former employees – 12 were not processed at all and 166 applicants were not told of the outcome; 27 received their reply only after the one-month deadline. The CNIL regarded this as particularly negligent, especially as the company had already been reminded of its obligations by the CNIL twice in 2024 (Art. 12 and 17 GDPR).
Automatic deletion routines do not replace a timely reply to the person who requested erasure.
Handling erasure requests
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 12 und 17 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Employees
- 1,000 to 9,999
- Culpability
- negligent
- Repeat case
- yes
- Mitigating circumstances
- During the proceedings the company deleted the data concerned and informed the applicants retrospectively.
- Published
- 9 Sep 2026
- CNIL: Non-respect des droits des personnes : sanction de 300 000 euros à l'encontre de la société EXTIA (09.09.2026) Press release of an authority
- Délibération de la formation restreinte n° SAN-2026-010 du 21 juillet 2026 concernant la société EXTIA Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Jul 2026 Meta Platforms Inc.; Meta Platforms Ireland LimitedMeta: interim orders on remuneration for press content (neighbouring rights) Order
At the request of the press association Alliance de la Presse d’Information Générale (APIG), the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) imposed interim measures on Meta because its conduct in negotiations on remuneration for press publishers’ neighbouring rights could amount to an abuse of a dominant position. Meta must negotiate in good faith on remuneration for all Meta services from 1 February 2025, provide the information needed for the assessment within 15 days, must not degrade the display of press content during the negotiations and must report to the authority monthly. On the same day a similar decision (26-MC-02) was issued at the request of the collective management organisation DVP.
Dominant platforms must conduct remuneration negotiations transparently and give their negotiating partners the data that makes an objective assessment possible in the first place.
Abuse of market power in remuneration negotiations with content providers
- Authority / court
- Autorité de la concurrence
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Art. L. 464-1 Code de commerce (mesures conservatoires); vorläufige Würdigung nach Art. L. 420-2 Code de commerce und Art. 102 AEUV; Art. L. 218-4 Code de la propriété intellectuelle
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 8 Jul 2026
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 26-MC-01 du 8 juillet 2026 (Entscheidungsseite) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 26-MC-01 (Volltext, PDF) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Communiqué de presse zu 26-MC-01 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Jun 2026 TotalEnergiesParis Judicial Court: TotalEnergies must include Scope 3 emissions in vigilance plan Order
In an action brought by Notre Affaire à Tous, Sherpa, ZEA, France Nature Environnement and the City of Paris, the Paris Judicial Court (Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, 34th chamber) ruled that climate risks fall under the French duty of vigilance law and that Scope 3 emissions are part of the oil and gas group's activities. The vigilance plan without Scope 3 is incomplete, the court held; TotalEnergies must supplement it within six months, with provisional enforceability, and implementation will be reviewed by the court in January 2027.
Risk analyses under due diligence laws must also cover the climate impact of the products sold (Scope 3).
- Authority / court
- Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (34. Kammer)
- Area of law
- Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
- Legal basis
- Art. L.225-102-1 und L.225-102-2 Code de commerce (Loi n° 2017-399, devoir de vigilance); Art. 1252 Code civil
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 25 Jun 2026
- Communiqué de presse – Jugement du 25 juin 2026, 34ème chambre Court press release
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Jun 2026 Bourse Direct SAAMF: EUR 800,000 on online broker Bourse Direct over reporting and monitoring failures €800,000
According to the AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers, French financial markets authority) Enforcement Committee, the online broker Bourse Direct did not properly submit its transaction reports under Art. 26 MiFIR between January 2021 and November 2023 and did not maintain an adequate system to detect and report suspicious orders and transactions under Art. 16(2) MAR. The company received EUR 800,000. The amount covers only the sanction imposed on the company.
Investment firms should regularly test transaction reporting and market abuse surveillance for completeness and effectiveness.
Transaction reporting and market abuse surveillance at brokers
- Authority / court
- Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), Commission des sanctions
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 26 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 600/2014 (MiFIR); Art. 15 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/590; Art. 16 Abs. 2 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 596/2014 (MAR); Art. 2, 3 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2016/957
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Employees
- 50 to 249
- Published
- 25 Jun 2026
- AMF Commission des sanctions, Décision n° 4 du 23 juin 2026 (SAN-2026-05), Bourse Direct Decision of an authority
- AMF: SAN-2026-05, Entscheidungsseite Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
26 May 2026 IQVIA Operations FranceCNIL: €5m fine for IQVIA Operations France over health data warehouses €5m
The CNIL (French data protection authority) fined IQVIA Operations France EUR 5,000,000 because, for two health data warehouses authorised by the CNIL (fed with data from around 14,000 pharmacies and several thousand medical practices), the company did not comply with the conditions of the authorisations, including log analysis, multi-factor authentication, patient information and the right to object. In addition, pharmacy customers were not informed of the transfer of their data, in-house studies were carried out without the required authorisation and the pharmacy software transmitted data even after a refusal (Art. 25 GDPR). The CNIL classified the data as pseudonymised rather than anonymous and ordered remedial action within six months, subject to a penalty payment of EUR 10,000 per day.
Anyone working with authorised health data must implement the conditions of the authorisation technically as well and actively monitor how partners inform the individuals concerned.
Conditions for processing health data
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 66 Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 (Loi Informatique et Libertés); Art. 14 und 25 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- The security shortcomings were remedied after the inspections.
- Published
- 28 May 2026
- CNIL: Données de santé : sanction de 5 millions d'euros à l'encontre de la société IQVIA (28.05.2026) Press release of an authority
- Délibération de la formation restreinte n° SAN-2026-008 du 26 mai 2026 concernant la société IQVIA OPERATIONS FRANCE Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
13 May 2026 NaphtachimieMarseille: environmental CJIP with Naphtachimie for €1.2m after oil leaks at Lavéra €1.2m
Pyrolysis oil leaked twice at the Lavéra petrochemical site in Martigues: around 50 tonnes in July 2018 through a failed seal into the Anse d'Auguette, part of which reached the sea, and around one tonne in April 2022 through a corroded seawater pipe, of which some 500 kg reached the Anse d'Auguette. Naphtachimie therefore concluded an environmental CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Marseille public prosecutor; it pays a public interest fine of 1,200,000 EUR, compensates two environmental associations and will trial, at its own expense, a biological clean-up of the Anse d'Auguette; validated on 13 May 2026.
Seals and pipes at plants handling substances hazardous to water must be inspected proactively; leaks lead to fines and remediation duties.
Maintenance and leak prevention at industrial sites near water
- Authority / court
- Parquet de Marseille (Procureur de la République); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Art. 41-1-3 Code de procédure pénale (pollution des eaux)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 26 May 2026
- Communiqué de presse du parquet de Marseille, 26 mai 2026 (CJIP-E Naphtachimie) Press release of an authority
- Ministère de la Justice: Liste der Conventions judiciaires d'intérêt public Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Apr 2026 Synadis Bio, Greenweez (mit Carrefour SA), ITM Entreprises (mit Les Mousquetaires), Les Comptoirs de la BioFrance: 12.67 million EUR over allocation of distribution channels for organic food €12.7m
Through the association Synadis Bio, market participants ensured for more than seven years that organic brands were not sold simultaneously in specialist organic shops and in conventional supermarkets, in order to prevent price comparisons (decision 26-D-05). Fines: Synadis Bio 10 million EUR, Greenweez/Carrefour 1.85 million EUR, ITM 740,000 EUR, Les Comptoirs de la Bio 80,000 EUR.
Association decisions that tie members to particular distribution channels amount to market sharing – even if they are justified as a quality or positioning policy.
Association rules to foreclose distribution channels
- Authority / court
- Autorité de la concurrence
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. L.420-1 Code de commerce, Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; Bußgeldbemessung nach Art. L.464-2 Code de commerce
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Published
- 16 Apr 2026
- L'Autorité de la concurrence sanctionne à hauteur de 12,67 millions d'euros (Entscheidung 26-D-05) Press release of an authority
- Décision 26-D-05 (version publique) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
2 Apr 2026 Nexans France, Nexans SA; Sonepar-Gruppe (Sonepar France Distribution u. a.)Nexans and Sonepar: EUR 6.5 million for exclusive import rights in overseas territories €6.5m
From 13 May 2015 to 20 November 2023, Nexans granted companies of the Sonepar group exclusive rights to import Nexans cables into La Réunion, Mayotte, French Guiana, Martinique and Guadeloupe, which Art. L. 420-2-1 of the Code de commerce (French Commercial Code) prohibits for the overseas territories. In a settlement procedure the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) imposed EUR 3 million on Nexans France (jointly with Nexans SA) and EUR 3.5 million on the Sonepar companies involved, EUR 6.5 million in total. It is the authority’s first decision based on a report by a person with protected whistleblower status.
Exclusive import or distribution rights for the French overseas territories are prohibited in principle and should be reviewed before any contract is signed.
Exclusive distribution and import rights; whistleblowers as a source of detection
- Authority / court
- Autorité de la concurrence
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. L. 420-2-1 Code de commerce; Vergleichsverfahren nach Art. L. 464-2 III Code de commerce
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Mitigating circumstances
- Settlement procedure (transaction): the companies did not contest the objections.
- Published
- 2 Apr 2026
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 26-D-04 du 2 avril 2026 (Entscheidungsseite) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 26-D-04 (Volltext, PDF) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Communiqué de presse zu 26-D-04 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Mar 2026 Colas Rail Asia Sdn Bhd (Colas-Gruppe)Colas Rail Asia: CJIP of 29.7 million EUR over bribery in metro contracts in Malaysia €29.7m
The Malaysian subsidiary of Colas Rail paid large, undocumented sums via intermediaries in connection with public contracts for urban rail lines in Kuala Lumpur (Kelana Jaya extension, MRT2). Following an internal investigation, Colas Rail self-reported the matter in 2017; the CJIP (Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, a French deferred prosecution agreement) provides for a public interest fine of 29,745,974 EUR and a three-year compliance programme monitored by the French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) (costs of up to 1.9 million EUR).
Undocumented payments to intermediaries on foreign projects must be stopped early by the finance and compliance functions – self-reporting after an internal investigation is rewarded.
Intermediaries and consultants in public tenders
- Authority / court
- Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
- Legal basis
- Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Self-report (criminal complaint filed by Colas Rail on 31 May 2017) following an internal forensic investigation.
- Liability of senior managers
- The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
- Published
- 19 Mar 2026
- Communiqué de presse du procureur de la République financier – CJIP COLAS RAIL ASIA Press release of an authority
- Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public – COLAS RAIL ASIA (17.03.2026) Decision of an authority
- Ministère de la Justice: Conventions judiciaires d'intérêt public (Verzeichnis) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Mar 2026 Balt USA LLC (Balt-Gruppe)Balt USA: CJIP in France over payments to a hospital physician €1.77m
In parallel with the US declination, the PNF concluded a CJIP with the US subsidiary of the French medical technology manufacturer for 1,765,493 EUR (after crediting the US disgorgement) and a three-year AFA compliance programme. The case arose from Balt SAS's voluntary self-disclosure of 22 May 2023 concerning conduct at the acquired company Blockade Medical.
Acquisitions require anti-corruption due diligence on the target company – otherwise legacy misconduct by its management becomes a group risk.
Benefits to hospital physicians, integration of acquired companies
- Authority / court
- Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
- Legal basis
- Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); aktive und passive Bestechung von Amtsträgern
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Employees
- 250 to 999
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary self-disclosure to the PNF and the DOJ; coordinated resolution with crediting.
- Liability of senior managers
- The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
- Published
- 19 Mar 2026
- Communiqué de presse du procureur de la République financier – CJIP BALT USA Press release of an authority
- Ministère de la Justice – Conventions judiciaires d'intérêt public (Liste) Official register or notice
- CJIP Société BALT USA LLC (17.03.2026) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Mar 2026 Syndicat National des Moniteurs du Ski Français (SNMSF)Ski instructors’ union SNMSF: EUR 3.4 million for exclusivity duty of ESF instructors €3.4m
From 12 May 2006 to 4 February 2025, the model agreement of France’s largest ski instructors’ union prohibited instructors of the Écoles du Ski Français from teaching for competing ski schools or their own clients and threatened exclusion for breaches; the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) regarded this as a restriction of competition by object on the market for ski tuition. It imposed EUR 3.4 million, for the first time in an ordinary procedure calculated on the basis of the members’ turnover, and ordered the union to amend the rules, publish the decision and, if it cannot pay, call on its members for contributions.
Professional associations are also liable under competition law for statutes and model rules that forbid their members from working for competitors.
Anti-competitive rules in professional associations
- Authority / court
- Autorité de la concurrence
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; Art. L. 420-1 Code de commerce; Bemessung nach Art. L. 464-2 Code de commerce (Umsetzung der ECN+-Richtlinie)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 17 Mar 2026
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 26-D-03 du 17 mars 2026 (Entscheidungsseite) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 26-D-03 (Volltext, PDF) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Communiqué de presse zu 26-D-03 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Feb 2026 Périphériques et Matériels de Contrôle SAS (Groupe Carrus)Betting terminal manufacturer PMC: CJIP over payments to an official in Mali €499,150
From 2008 to 2011, the Paris-based supplier of betting and gaming terminals made unjustified payments of 78,972 EUR to an official of a majority state-owned company in Mali, with which it had a supply contract awarded without a tender. The case was triggered by a report from TRACFIN (the French financial intelligence unit). Public interest fine of 499,150 EUR (including 335,000 EUR already seized) and a three-year AFA compliance programme.
Managers of state-controlled companies are also public officials – even small private payments to them create a risk of criminal liability for medium-sized companies.
Payments to heads of state-owned companies abroad
- Authority / court
- Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
- Legal basis
- Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger und Geldwäsche
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Employees
- 50 to 249
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
- Published
- 18 Feb 2026
- Communiqué de presse du procureur de la République financier – CJIP PMC Press release of an authority
- Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public – Périphériques et Matériels de Contrôle SAS Decision of an authority
- Ministère de la Justice: Conventions judiciaires d'intérêt public (Verzeichnis) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Jan 2026 France TravailCNIL: 5 million EUR against France Travail after social engineering attack €5m
In early 2024, attackers used social engineering to take over accounts of Cap Emploi advisers and accessed data on jobseekers from the last 20 years, including social security numbers. The French data protection authority (CNIL) criticised weak authentication, insufficient logging and overly broad access rights, and imposed 5 million EUR together with an order carrying a penalty payment of 5,000 EUR per day of delay.
Accounts of external partners with extensive data access need strong authentication, narrow rights and anomaly detection – and their users need training against social engineering.
Social engineering and account takeover
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 32 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 29 Jan 2026
- Violation de données : sanction de 5 millions d'euros à l'encontre de FRANCE TRAVAIL Press release of an authority
- CNIL – Les sanctions prononcées par la CNIL (Eintrag 22/01/2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Jan 2026 HSBC Bank plcPNF: HSBC Bank plc pays €267.53m over dividend arbitrage (tax fraud) €267.5m
HSBC Bank plc concluded a CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Parquet national financier (PNF, French national financial prosecutor) concerning intra-group dividend arbitrage trading structures run through its Paris branch between 2014 and 2019, which avoided withholding tax on dividends and may be classified as aggravated tax fraud. The bank pays a public interest fine of 267,531,000 EUR; for 2019 it had already paid 34,464,424 EUR in taxes, interest and penalties. Validated on 8 January 2026.
Intra-group trades around dividend record dates must be reviewed for tax and criminal law risks before they are approved.
Tax-driven dividend trades as a criminal liability risk
- Authority / court
- Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
- Area of law
- Other
- Legal basis
- Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (fraude fiscale aggravée)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 8 Jan 2026
- Communiqué de presse du Procureur de la République financier, 8 janvier 2026 (CJIP HSBC Bank plc) Press release of an authority
- Ministère de la Justice: Liste der Conventions judiciaires d'intérêt public Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Jan 2026 Free Mobile SAS und Free SASCNIL: 42 million EUR against Free Mobile and Free after data leak affecting 24 million contracts €42m
Following an attack in October 2024 in which data relating to around 24 million customer contracts, including IBANs, was exfiltrated, the French data protection authority (CNIL) imposed 27 million EUR on Free Mobile and 15 million EUR on Free (42 million EUR in total). The authority objected to VPN access without adequate authentication, deficient detection of suspicious access, incomplete notification of data subjects and, at Free Mobile, excessively long retention of old contracts; orders with deadlines were also issued.
Put remote access such as VPN behind multi-factor authentication, and consistently delete legacy data from terminated contracts.
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e, Art. 32, Art. 34 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Mitigating circumstances
- During the proceedings, the companies introduced multi-factor authentication, a Security Operations Centre and improved logging.
- Published
- 14 Jan 2026
- Violation de données : sanction de 42 millions d'euros à l'encontre des sociétés FREE MOBILE et FREE Press release of an authority
- Délibération SAN-2026-001 du 8 janvier 2026 (FREE MOBILE) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Dec 2025 Einzelhandelskette mit Kundenprogramm (anonymisiert)CNIL: €3.5m fine for retail chain over sharing customer data with a social network €3.5m
The CNIL (French data protection authority) fined an unnamed retail chain EUR 3,500,000 (EUR 2,500,000 under Art. 6(1)(a), 13, 32 and 35 GDPR and EUR 1,000,000 under Art. 82 of the Loi Informatique et Libertés, the French Data Protection Act). Since 2018 the company had transferred e-mail addresses and telephone numbers of members of its loyalty programme to a social network without valid consent in order to show them targeted advertising there; more than 10.5 million people were affected. In addition, there was inadequate information, weak password rules with SHA-256 hashing, no data protection impact assessment, and cookies that were set before any choice and continued to be read after a refusal.
Anyone transferring customer data to platforms for audience targeting needs a separate, clearly worded consent and a prior data protection impact assessment.
Using customer data for advertising on social networks
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. a, 13, 32 und 35 DSGVO; Art. 82 Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 (Loi Informatique et Libertés)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 22 Jan 2026
- CNIL: Transmission de données à un réseau social à des fins publicitaires : la CNIL prononce une sanction de 3,5 millions d'euros (22.01.2026) Press release of an authority
- Délibération de la formation restreinte n° SAN-2025-017 du 30 décembre 2025 concernant la société X Decision of an authority
- CNIL: Les sanctions prononcées par la CNIL (Liste, Stand 14.04.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Dec 2025 Amazon France Logistique SASConseil d'État reduces CNIL fine against Amazon France Logistique to 15 million EUR €15m
In 2023, the French data protection authority (CNIL) had imposed 32 million EUR for the real-time monitoring of warehouse staff through scanner metrics. France's supreme administrative court (Conseil d'État) held that three metrics (‘Stow Machine Gun’, ‘Idle Time’, ‘Latency’) were covered by legitimate interest, but upheld the findings on the 31-day retention of all metrics, information deficiencies and security flaws in the video surveillance, and reduced the fine to 15 million EUR.
Store employee performance metrics only for as long and in as much detail as their specific purpose requires.
- Authority / court
- Conseil d'État
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c, Art. 12, 13, 32 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Conseil d'État, décision n° 492830 du 23 décembre 2025 Court decision
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Dec 2025 Nexpublica FranceCNIL: 1.7 million EUR against processor Nexpublica over security flaws €1.7m
As a processor, Nexpublica developed and operated the case management software ‘Public CRM’ for the disability authority MDPH Nord. Following two data breaches in 2022, audits revealed critical vulnerabilities that had existed since 2021, such as outdated SHA-1 hashing; the French data protection authority (CNIL) imposed 1.7 million EUR directly on the service provider.
Processors are themselves liable for the data security of their software; do not leave known vulnerabilities unaddressed until the next breach.
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data processors
- Legal basis
- Art. 32 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Délibération SAN-2025-015 du 22 décembre 2025 (NEXPUBLICA FRANCE) Decision of an authority
- Les sanctions prononcées par la CNIL Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link