Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

EUFrance Clear all filters
88cases from 1 jurisdiction
€3.92bnTotal of monetary amounts (84 cases with an amount)
€6.41mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Autorité de la concurrence €2.15bn 55 % · 24 cases
  2. Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €929.3m 24 % · 15 cases
  3. Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte €598.1m 15 % · 20 cases
  4. Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), Commission des sanctions €117.5m 3 % · 11 cases
  5. Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) €50.1m 1 % · 7 cases
  6. Parquet de Paris (Procureure de la République, JIRS); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €22.5m 1 % · 1 case
  7. Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch das Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €16.1m 0 % · 1 case
  8. Parquet de Paris (Procureure de la République); Validierung durch das Tribunal judiciaire de Paris €15.5m 0 % · 1 case
  9. Conseil d'État €15m 0 % · 1 case
  10. Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom) €3.7m 0 % · 2 cases
  11. 4 more€3.2m

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €2.15bn 55 % · 24 cases
  2. Data protection €663.2m 17 % · 29 cases
  3. Bribery and corruption €360.8m 9 % · 13 cases
  4. Money laundering and terrorist financing €355.1m 9 % · 4 cases
  5. Other €271.2m 7 % · 3 cases
  6. Capital markets and financial supervision €117.5m 3 % · 11 cases
  7. Environment and sustainability €3.2m 0 % · 3 cases
  8. Supply chain and human rights – 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Retail and e-commerce €890.5m 23 % · 8 cases
  2. Financial services and insurance €713.9m 18 % · 12 cases
  3. Media and online platforms €630.1m 16 % · 10 cases
  4. Manufacturing and mechanical engineering €521.8m 13 % · 6 cases
  5. Energy and utilities €446.2m 11 % · 8 cases
  6. Telecoms, IT and software €391.6m 10 % · 16 cases
  7. Construction and real estate €129m 3 % · 5 cases
  8. Healthcare €94.9m 2 % · 8 cases
  9. Food and agriculture €39.2m 1 % · 5 cases
  10. Transport, logistics and shipping €29.8m 1 % · 3 cases
  11. 3 more€29.4m

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20227€493.9m
202319€486m
202418€1.5bn
202527€1.06bn
202617€377.1m

88 cases

24 Jul 2026 Société d'exploitation d'un service d'information (SESI)Arcom: EUR 200,000 fine on CNews operator SESI over programme breaches FranceOther €200,000

On 24 July 2026 Arcom imposed a fine of EUR 200,000 on Société d'exploitation d'un service d'information (SESI), the operator of the news channel CNews. In Arcom's view, two programmes broadcast in June and September 2025 contained statements about people of (presumed) immigrant background and Muslims, without sufficient context or challenge, that were capable of inciting hatred and discrimination; Arcom considered this a breach of Article 15 of Law No 86-1067 and of the channel's contractual obligations on non-discrimination and control of its programming. In setting the amount, Arcom took into account earlier sanctions against SESI for breaches of the same obligations in 2021 and 2024. Arcom did not sanction a third programme it examined. Whether the decision has been appealed is not known here.

What organisations can take from it

Broadcasters of opinion formats must put polarising statements into editorial context; a lack of challenge in the studio reflects on the broadcaster.

Relevance to training and awareness

Editorial framing of polarising statements

Authority / court
Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Art. 15, 42-1 und 42-2 Loi n° 86-1067 du 30 septembre 1986 (liberté de communication); Art. 2-2-1 und 2-3-2 der Vereinbarungen vom 27. November 2019 und 10. Dezember 2024
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Media and online platforms
Repeat case
yes
Published
29 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

21 Jul 2026 Hôpital Privé de la LoireHôpital Privé de la Loire: 500,000 EUR after data exfiltration affecting over 520,000 patients FranceData breaches and data security €500,000

In summer 2025, an attacker gained access to the private hospital's electronic patient record system and obtained data on 524,867 patients and 202,246 trusted persons. There was no VPN or multi-factor authentication for external users, no appropriate access control and no detection of suspicious activity; the trusted persons were not notified. France's data protection authority (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés, CNIL) imposed a fine of 500,000 EUR (SAN-2026-009).

What organisations can take from it

External access to patient records belongs behind multi-factor authentication and continuous monitoring for unusual access.

Relevance to training and awareness

Access security and attack detection in hospitals

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 32, Art. 34
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Healthcare
Published
3 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

21 Jul 2026 EXTIACNIL: €300,000 fine for EXTIA over unprocessed erasure requests FranceData subject rights and transparency €300,000

The CNIL (French data protection authority) fined the IT and engineering consultancy EXTIA EUR 300,000 because, of 265 erasure requests received in 2024 – mostly from job applicants, occasionally from former employees – 12 were not processed at all and 166 applicants were not told of the outcome; 27 received their reply only after the one-month deadline. The CNIL regarded this as particularly negligent, especially as the company had already been reminded of its obligations by the CNIL twice in 2024 (Art. 12 and 17 GDPR).

What organisations can take from it

Automatic deletion routines do not replace a timely reply to the person who requested erasure.

Relevance to training and awareness

Handling erasure requests

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 12 und 17 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
During the proceedings the company deleted the data concerned and informed the applicants retrospectively.
Published
9 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jul 2026 Meta Platforms Inc.; Meta Platforms Ireland LimitedMeta: interim orders on remuneration for press content (neighbouring rights) FranceAbuse of market power Order

At the request of the press association Alliance de la Presse d’Information Générale (APIG), the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) imposed interim measures on Meta because its conduct in negotiations on remuneration for press publishers’ neighbouring rights could amount to an abuse of a dominant position. Meta must negotiate in good faith on remuneration for all Meta services from 1 February 2025, provide the information needed for the assessment within 15 days, must not degrade the display of press content during the negotiations and must report to the authority monthly. On the same day a similar decision (26-MC-02) was issued at the request of the collective management organisation DVP.

What organisations can take from it

Dominant platforms must conduct remuneration negotiations transparently and give their negotiating partners the data that makes an objective assessment possible in the first place.

Relevance to training and awareness

Abuse of market power in remuneration negotiations with content providers

Authority / court
Autorité de la concurrence
Area of law
Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis
Art. L. 464-1 Code de commerce (mesures conservatoires); vorläufige Würdigung nach Art. L. 420-2 Code de commerce und Art. 102 AEUV; Art. L. 218-4 Code de la propriété intellectuelle
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
8 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Jun 2026 TotalEnergiesParis Judicial Court: TotalEnergies must include Scope 3 emissions in vigilance plan FranceSupply chain due diligence Order

In an action brought by Notre Affaire à Tous, Sherpa, ZEA, France Nature Environnement and the City of Paris, the Paris Judicial Court (Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, 34th chamber) ruled that climate risks fall under the French duty of vigilance law and that Scope 3 emissions are part of the oil and gas group's activities. The vigilance plan without Scope 3 is incomplete, the court held; TotalEnergies must supplement it within six months, with provisional enforceability, and implementation will be reviewed by the court in January 2027.

What organisations can take from it

Risk analyses under due diligence laws must also cover the climate impact of the products sold (Scope 3).

Authority / court
Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (34. Kammer)
Area of law
Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
Legal basis
Art. L.225-102-1 und L.225-102-2 Code de commerce (Loi n° 2017-399, devoir de vigilance); Art. 1252 Code civil
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
25 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2026 Bourse Direct SAAMF: EUR 800,000 on online broker Bourse Direct over reporting and monitoring failures FranceDisclosure and reporting obligations €800,000

According to the AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers, French financial markets authority) Enforcement Committee, the online broker Bourse Direct did not properly submit its transaction reports under Art. 26 MiFIR between January 2021 and November 2023 and did not maintain an adequate system to detect and report suspicious orders and transactions under Art. 16(2) MAR. The company received EUR 800,000. The amount covers only the sanction imposed on the company.

What organisations can take from it

Investment firms should regularly test transaction reporting and market abuse surveillance for completeness and effectiveness.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transaction reporting and market abuse surveillance at brokers

Authority / court
Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), Commission des sanctions
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 26 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 600/2014 (MiFIR); Art. 15 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/590; Art. 16 Abs. 2 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 596/2014 (MAR); Art. 2, 3 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2016/957
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
50 to 249
Published
25 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 May 2026 IQVIA Operations FranceCNIL: €5m fine for IQVIA Operations France over health data warehouses FranceData subject rights and transparency €5m

The CNIL (French data protection authority) fined IQVIA Operations France EUR 5,000,000 because, for two health data warehouses authorised by the CNIL (fed with data from around 14,000 pharmacies and several thousand medical practices), the company did not comply with the conditions of the authorisations, including log analysis, multi-factor authentication, patient information and the right to object. In addition, pharmacy customers were not informed of the transfer of their data, in-house studies were carried out without the required authorisation and the pharmacy software transmitted data even after a refusal (Art. 25 GDPR). The CNIL classified the data as pseudonymised rather than anonymous and ordered remedial action within six months, subject to a penalty payment of EUR 10,000 per day.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone working with authorised health data must implement the conditions of the authorisation technically as well and actively monitor how partners inform the individuals concerned.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conditions for processing health data

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 66 Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 (Loi Informatique et Libertés); Art. 14 und 25 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
The security shortcomings were remedied after the inspections.
Published
28 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 May 2026 NaphtachimieMarseille: environmental CJIP with Naphtachimie for €1.2m after oil leaks at Lavéra FranceEmissions and permits €1.2m

Pyrolysis oil leaked twice at the Lavéra petrochemical site in Martigues: around 50 tonnes in July 2018 through a failed seal into the Anse d'Auguette, part of which reached the sea, and around one tonne in April 2022 through a corroded seawater pipe, of which some 500 kg reached the Anse d'Auguette. Naphtachimie therefore concluded an environmental CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Marseille public prosecutor; it pays a public interest fine of 1,200,000 EUR, compensates two environmental associations and will trial, at its own expense, a biological clean-up of the Anse d'Auguette; validated on 13 May 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Seals and pipes at plants handling substances hazardous to water must be inspected proactively; leaks lead to fines and remediation duties.

Relevance to training and awareness

Maintenance and leak prevention at industrial sites near water

Authority / court
Parquet de Marseille (Procureur de la République); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-3 Code de procédure pénale (pollution des eaux)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Published
26 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Apr 2026 Synadis Bio, Greenweez (mit Carrefour SA), ITM Entreprises (mit Les Mousquetaires), Les Comptoirs de la BioFrance: 12.67 million EUR over allocation of distribution channels for organic food FranceCartels and collusion €12.7m

Through the association Synadis Bio, market participants ensured for more than seven years that organic brands were not sold simultaneously in specialist organic shops and in conventional supermarkets, in order to prevent price comparisons (decision 26-D-05). Fines: Synadis Bio 10 million EUR, Greenweez/Carrefour 1.85 million EUR, ITM 740,000 EUR, Les Comptoirs de la Bio 80,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Association decisions that tie members to particular distribution channels amount to market sharing – even if they are justified as a quality or positioning policy.

Relevance to training and awareness

Association rules to foreclose distribution channels

Authority / court
Autorité de la concurrence
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. L.420-1 Code de commerce, Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; Bußgeldbemessung nach Art. L.464-2 Code de commerce
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
16 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Apr 2026 Nexans France, Nexans SA; Sonepar-Gruppe (Sonepar France Distribution u. a.)Nexans and Sonepar: EUR 6.5 million for exclusive import rights in overseas territories FranceCartels and collusion €6.5m

From 13 May 2015 to 20 November 2023, Nexans granted companies of the Sonepar group exclusive rights to import Nexans cables into La Réunion, Mayotte, French Guiana, Martinique and Guadeloupe, which Art. L. 420-2-1 of the Code de commerce (French Commercial Code) prohibits for the overseas territories. In a settlement procedure the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) imposed EUR 3 million on Nexans France (jointly with Nexans SA) and EUR 3.5 million on the Sonepar companies involved, EUR 6.5 million in total. It is the authority’s first decision based on a report by a person with protected whistleblower status.

What organisations can take from it

Exclusive import or distribution rights for the French overseas territories are prohibited in principle and should be reviewed before any contract is signed.

Relevance to training and awareness

Exclusive distribution and import rights; whistleblowers as a source of detection

Authority / court
Autorité de la concurrence
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. L. 420-2-1 Code de commerce; Vergleichsverfahren nach Art. L. 464-2 III Code de commerce
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement procedure (transaction): the companies did not contest the objections.
Published
2 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2026 Colas Rail Asia Sdn Bhd (Colas-Gruppe)Colas Rail Asia: CJIP of 29.7 million EUR over bribery in metro contracts in Malaysia FranceBribery of public officials €29.7m

The Malaysian subsidiary of Colas Rail paid large, undocumented sums via intermediaries in connection with public contracts for urban rail lines in Kuala Lumpur (Kelana Jaya extension, MRT2). Following an internal investigation, Colas Rail self-reported the matter in 2017; the CJIP (Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, a French deferred prosecution agreement) provides for a public interest fine of 29,745,974 EUR and a three-year compliance programme monitored by the French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) (costs of up to 1.9 million EUR).

What organisations can take from it

Undocumented payments to intermediaries on foreign projects must be stopped early by the finance and compliance functions – self-reporting after an internal investigation is rewarded.

Relevance to training and awareness

Intermediaries and consultants in public tenders

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Construction and real estate
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report (criminal complaint filed by Colas Rail on 31 May 2017) following an internal forensic investigation.
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
19 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2026 Balt USA LLC (Balt-Gruppe)Balt USA: CJIP in France over payments to a hospital physician FranceBribery of public officials €1.77m

In parallel with the US declination, the PNF concluded a CJIP with the US subsidiary of the French medical technology manufacturer for 1,765,493 EUR (after crediting the US disgorgement) and a three-year AFA compliance programme. The case arose from Balt SAS's voluntary self-disclosure of 22 May 2023 concerning conduct at the acquired company Blockade Medical.

What organisations can take from it

Acquisitions require anti-corruption due diligence on the target company – otherwise legacy misconduct by its management becomes a group risk.

Relevance to training and awareness

Benefits to hospital physicians, integration of acquired companies

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); aktive und passive Bestechung von Amtsträgern
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Healthcare
Employees
250 to 999
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure to the PNF and the DOJ; coordinated resolution with crediting.
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
19 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Mar 2026 Syndicat National des Moniteurs du Ski Français (SNMSF)Ski instructors’ union SNMSF: EUR 3.4 million for exclusivity duty of ESF instructors FranceCartels and collusion €3.4m

From 12 May 2006 to 4 February 2025, the model agreement of France’s largest ski instructors’ union prohibited instructors of the Écoles du Ski Français from teaching for competing ski schools or their own clients and threatened exclusion for breaches; the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) regarded this as a restriction of competition by object on the market for ski tuition. It imposed EUR 3.4 million, for the first time in an ordinary procedure calculated on the basis of the members’ turnover, and ordered the union to amend the rules, publish the decision and, if it cannot pay, call on its members for contributions.

What organisations can take from it

Professional associations are also liable under competition law for statutes and model rules that forbid their members from working for competitors.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-competitive rules in professional associations

Authority / court
Autorité de la concurrence
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; Art. L. 420-1 Code de commerce; Bemessung nach Art. L. 464-2 Code de commerce (Umsetzung der ECN+-Richtlinie)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Other
Published
17 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Feb 2026 Périphériques et Matériels de Contrôle SAS (Groupe Carrus)Betting terminal manufacturer PMC: CJIP over payments to an official in Mali FranceBribery of public officials €499,150

From 2008 to 2011, the Paris-based supplier of betting and gaming terminals made unjustified payments of 78,972 EUR to an official of a majority state-owned company in Mali, with which it had a supply contract awarded without a tender. The case was triggered by a report from TRACFIN (the French financial intelligence unit). Public interest fine of 499,150 EUR (including 335,000 EUR already seized) and a three-year AFA compliance programme.

What organisations can take from it

Managers of state-controlled companies are also public officials – even small private payments to them create a risk of criminal liability for medium-sized companies.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments to heads of state-owned companies abroad

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (CJIP); Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger und Geldwäsche
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
50 to 249
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
The CJIP does not address the criminal liability of natural persons.
Published
18 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Jan 2026 France TravailCNIL: 5 million EUR against France Travail after social engineering attack FranceData breaches and data security €5m

In early 2024, attackers used social engineering to take over accounts of Cap Emploi advisers and accessed data on jobseekers from the last 20 years, including social security numbers. The French data protection authority (CNIL) criticised weak authentication, insufficient logging and overly broad access rights, and imposed 5 million EUR together with an order carrying a penalty payment of 5,000 EUR per day of delay.

What organisations can take from it

Accounts of external partners with extensive data access need strong authentication, narrow rights and anomaly detection – and their users need training against social engineering.

Relevance to training and awareness

Social engineering and account takeover

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 32 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
29 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jan 2026 HSBC Bank plcPNF: HSBC Bank plc pays €267.53m over dividend arbitrage (tax fraud) FranceOther €267.5m

HSBC Bank plc concluded a CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Parquet national financier (PNF, French national financial prosecutor) concerning intra-group dividend arbitrage trading structures run through its Paris branch between 2014 and 2019, which avoided withholding tax on dividends and may be classified as aggravated tax fraud. The bank pays a public interest fine of 267,531,000 EUR; for 2019 it had already paid 34,464,424 EUR in taxes, interest and penalties. Validated on 8 January 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Intra-group trades around dividend record dates must be reviewed for tax and criminal law risks before they are approved.

Relevance to training and awareness

Tax-driven dividend trades as a criminal liability risk

Authority / court
Parquet national financier (PNF); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-2 Code de procédure pénale (fraude fiscale aggravée)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
8 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jan 2026 Free Mobile SAS und Free SASCNIL: 42 million EUR against Free Mobile and Free after data leak affecting 24 million contracts FranceData breaches and data security €42m

Following an attack in October 2024 in which data relating to around 24 million customer contracts, including IBANs, was exfiltrated, the French data protection authority (CNIL) imposed 27 million EUR on Free Mobile and 15 million EUR on Free (42 million EUR in total). The authority objected to VPN access without adequate authentication, deficient detection of suspicious access, incomplete notification of data subjects and, at Free Mobile, excessively long retention of old contracts; orders with deadlines were also issued.

What organisations can take from it

Put remote access such as VPN behind multi-factor authentication, and consistently delete legacy data from terminated contracts.

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e, Art. 32, Art. 34 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Mitigating circumstances
During the proceedings, the companies introduced multi-factor authentication, a Security Operations Centre and improved logging.
Published
14 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Dec 2025 Einzelhandelskette mit Kundenprogramm (anonymisiert)CNIL: €3.5m fine for retail chain over sharing customer data with a social network FranceMarketing and consent €3.5m

The CNIL (French data protection authority) fined an unnamed retail chain EUR 3,500,000 (EUR 2,500,000 under Art. 6(1)(a), 13, 32 and 35 GDPR and EUR 1,000,000 under Art. 82 of the Loi Informatique et Libertés, the French Data Protection Act). Since 2018 the company had transferred e-mail addresses and telephone numbers of members of its loyalty programme to a social network without valid consent in order to show them targeted advertising there; more than 10.5 million people were affected. In addition, there was inadequate information, weak password rules with SHA-256 hashing, no data protection impact assessment, and cookies that were set before any choice and continued to be read after a refusal.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone transferring customer data to platforms for audience targeting needs a separate, clearly worded consent and a prior data protection impact assessment.

Relevance to training and awareness

Using customer data for advertising on social networks

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), formation restreinte
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. a, 13, 32 und 35 DSGVO; Art. 82 Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 (Loi Informatique et Libertés)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
negligent
Published
22 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Dec 2025 Amazon France Logistique SASConseil d'État reduces CNIL fine against Amazon France Logistique to 15 million EUR FranceEmployee data €15m

In 2023, the French data protection authority (CNIL) had imposed 32 million EUR for the real-time monitoring of warehouse staff through scanner metrics. France's supreme administrative court (Conseil d'État) held that three metrics (‘Stow Machine Gun’, ‘Idle Time’, ‘Latency’) were covered by legitimate interest, but upheld the findings on the 31-day retention of all metrics, information deficiencies and security flaws in the video surveillance, and reduced the fine to 15 million EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Store employee performance metrics only for as long and in as much detail as their specific purpose requires.

Authority / court
Conseil d'État
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c, Art. 12, 13, 32 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Dec 2025 Nexpublica FranceCNIL: 1.7 million EUR against processor Nexpublica over security flaws FranceData processors €1.7m

As a processor, Nexpublica developed and operated the case management software ‘Public CRM’ for the disability authority MDPH Nord. Following two data breaches in 2022, audits revealed critical vulnerabilities that had existed since 2021, such as outdated SHA-1 hashing; the French data protection authority (CNIL) imposed 1.7 million EUR directly on the service provider.

What organisations can take from it

Processors are themselves liable for the data security of their software; do not leave known vulnerabilities unaddressed until the next breach.

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 32 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 20 more of 68

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial